| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Boobs4ever:
(Monahan's Reply)
And you cant only Join one of the network sites of Brazzers (what I know of) Its not a bad site I just hope they dont continue the Like it Big Theme. When Im not a member of Brazzers network bc of the all the big dick the models only gets. Wouldnt matter me if was normal sized dicks. I just getin tired of the Big Dick theme that been on Brazzers latley.
|
04-08-08 12:01pm
|
Reply
652
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
My Pleasure. One of the biggest reasons why I am a huge fan of the site is because they have so many amazing movies from the good old days. Especially many from the French studio Marc Dorcel.
|
03-30-17 05:39pm
|
Reply
653
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
I live in California.
Micky D charges about $1 for their coffee or iced tea. With free refills.
So if you add a lot of sugar, it's OK to drink.
Except I've been reading lately that sugar is bad for your health. Bad for blood pressure and other problems.
The older I get, the fewer things I find that are good for you. Except porn?
Stay well, buddy. :)
|
04-20-16 03:17pm
|
Reply
654
|
The Real Me
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
from atrapat:
Your review prompted me to join and I really liked what I saw. I haven't had time to watch all the content but so far, so good. For a trial membership, it's a real bargain if you like this type of content.
I was prompted to research around the site and the sad thing is that the site is for sale. I came across a webmaster message board where the owner of the site said he was listening to offers. I doubt that there will be any updates in the meantime. If the site is sold, it's unclear whether the new owners will be able to keep up with the quality of the first 14 updates.
|
08-22-08 03:16pm
|
Reply
655
|
The Real Me
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
from Drooler:
Sign 'n Drain -- that's the way! For three bucks, not bad! I'm also into a good "raid" (my term) every now and then.
Thanks for the update on Shay Laren. Wasn't sure if I should bother with the "do it all over again" login they've got there -- something I'd not mentioned before. Too bad they can't do the seamless, "go back and you're in" type they've got at sites like GlamDeluxe and Rigin-studio (which has just relaunched).
For the full price, TheRealMe ought to have pics at 2000px. That would be keepin' it real.
Anymore, I never join a site with pics under 1600 unless it's got really good vids. The recent Suze.net offer of $14.97 got me since they'd added some hot ones.
|
07-02-08 11:38pm
|
Reply
656
|
Tight Clothes
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from TheRizzo:
Thanks for the heads up Monahan!
|
03-01-09 10:42pm
|
Reply
657
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from brotherlove:
(Monahan's Reply)
They now have some nameless person running Twistys, who does not interact with customers. This is as of the beginning of September. The only person who reads content comments is the censor and they are very into censorship. Bottom line they no longer give a crap about customer feedback. I can't see it doing anything but getting worse with that attitude.
|
09-11-14 08:59pm
|
Reply
658
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Hooliganzo:
(Monahan's Reply)
The lack of search criteria for solo hardcore/sofcore etc is true but I usually go for Soft-core anyway so it was an issue I overlook.
I think the inaccuracies in cup sizes have to do with returning models who previously did not have implants returning to do more photo sets with them.
I would have liked to see a search criteria for implants and I did mention that some models have implants but overall it is a minor complaint for me.
|
10-16-12 08:17am
|
Reply
659
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Hooliganzo:
(Monahan's Reply)
Most of what I liked is already listed in the pros. The negatives were just nitpicking.
You can find big discounts for the site like the $65 annual offered here or $9.95 monthly which are a steal. I took the annual discount almost a year ago. Just from a price to content ratio, the site is worth it at the full price. The fact that you can subscribe at a 66% discount makes it a must especially with the high production value and content updates.
Aside from content site is well organized and the search is great. The amount of different models on this site is huge. Most I've seen in any site I've been to.
Like mentioned before the production value is high. The models have their hair and makeup done in a glamour fashion which I don't see in many other sites. The pictures are well shot, high resolution, crisp and full of color. There are no Jpeg compression artifacts like in some other sites.
Twistys live, while new and only updates once a month, is a nice addition on top of everything else. I always wanted to see something like this smiler to playboy night calls, Basically naked woman talking with some action at the end. Before that they had and still have model interviews which I also liked.
It is definitely a more generalist site with softcore and straight forward hardcore and no niches. Overall you usually don't get both quantity and quality and this site has both on top of a lot of diversity in its models.
|
10-15-12 07:24pm
|
Reply
660
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(Monahan's Reply)
Thank you, I'm getting the feeling this is becoming a normal trend for the more established sites to rest on the laurels, so to speak, had a membership at Sapphic Erotica and while it's still a good site, I can't tell much difference in the content shot in 2008 and 2012.
|
05-28-12 06:38am
|
Reply
661
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(Monahan's Reply)
A very comprehensive reply!
No overt sexuality, no.....
...but scope for plenty of eroticism.
Thanks for the support. It is appreciated! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-01-10 09:27am
|
Reply
662
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nymano:
(Monahan's Reply)
Sorry, I meant "little action", I will change it.
|
07-31-10 11:48am
|
Reply
663
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(Monahan's Reply)
How about the zip files them selves. I remember them having some pretty strange names in the past. When I unzip the zp files I usually have the file name be used for the folder name, so the name is fairly important, otherwise I have to rename everything all the time....very time consuming!
|
07-25-08 07:12pm
|
Reply
664
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Monahan's Reply)
Just want to make a particular, perhaps persnickity note about Blue Fantasies. Most of it's exclusive, but there are a few exceptions. All of the Cassia Riley photosets at Blue Fantasies are ALSO at Babelicious, which has them in much larger pics (3000px!). Hoooahh!
Both sites also have in common sets of Kirsten Andrews, though Babelicious has more.
For those interested: Blue Fantasies is a something of an oddessy. I was first aware of it in 2002. Back then, it was an independent site and had a "lifestyle" side to it, offering recipes and other tips for the would-be Romeo to serve up to his modern Juliet. It built up a lot of content that's no longer there, of models like Aimee Sweet, Linda O'Neil, Sanja Matice, Meriah Nelson, Nissa, and Roxanne Galla.
The site reformed itself more than once. The membership price kept changing, too. $19.95 then $29.95, then four-day trials for 4.95, then 2 days for 3.95. At one point, it was actually pitching for a buyer to take it over. Eventually, Twistys became its latest buyer. And now it's part of Twistys. End of story.
Anyway, grandpa's tired of sitting in his rocking chair. He's going to pop a Viagra and go to bed now. LOL.
|
07-20-08 04:07pm
|
Reply
665
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Drooler:
FYI as I was cancelling at Epoch, they offered 9.99 per month continuing rate, so I took it.
I'm not exactly crazy about some of the photosets. Have had discussions with others here that they're too "cookie cutter" in the approach. And the quality is definitely lacking in some of the sets which look like licensed-out older stuff from Digital Desire. There are some very recent postings. Alyssa Lovelace in "Laundry with a Twist" (yesterday) for one.
I do wish they'd get the pic sizes up to 1600 as the standard size instead of just reserving that for the girl of the month. They'd actually had Andi Valentino as girl of the month but then went back to 1280 for her latest set, a very nice exclusive set of poses in a bathtub.
Reminds me of that song by Peter Gabriel: "Hey, I'm feelin' so dirty/You're lookin' so clean." ;)
The Eurofoxes and BustyOnes are all the same content as at Twistys, but the other three sites there are mutually exclusive in content to Twistys.
Anyway, $10 per month is a pretty decent deal for all they offer.
|
07-16-08 02:27pm
|
Reply
666
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
I personally thought the review was a bit short of facts, but thanks, Monahan. And I hope I did the site justice despite my disappointment with the pictures.
|
04-14-08 05:52pm
|
Reply
667
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
from Shap:
Hi Monahan. Thank you very much for the review. As you can probably tell we care very much about what our members want and work day and night to deliver it. We know if our members aren't happy there is no Twistys. So we build everything to please our members.
Regarding Videos. I agree 100% and we've been actively rectifying the situation. As you have probably noticed all new videos (for the past 6 months) are at 640x480 and encoded at a very high quality. Moving forward our goal is to not only improve our video but to have the highest quality and sexiest video online.
Regarding Exclusive - Non Exclusive. We started Twistys 5 years ago on a low budget. A lot of the content was Non Exclusive. As we began to grow in size we reinvested heavily into Exclusive content. Right now I believe 85% of all content added is exclusive. I expect that number to continue to grow over the coming years.
Thanks again for the review and for being a Twistys member. We know how hard our members work for their money and we work as hard as we can to make sure they get their money's worth at Twistys. If ever you have any requests, suggestions or complaints please don't be shy hit me up I'll be more than happy to hear from you.
|
01-25-07 04:41pm
|
Reply
668
|
Twistys Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Thanks for the update.
Always nice to get more clear details on a major site.
|
08-06-16 08:52am
|
Reply
669
|
Veggie Bang
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(Monahan's Reply)
All Porn Site Pass
I joined through that, well one of the sites in that network and it granted access to the veggie site. I am not sure what the deal was there but that is how I ended up with access.
|
07-15-08 03:26pm
|
Reply
670
|
Victoria Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment from Monahan:
The site has a 7 day trial available for $1.00. Unlimited access. But you must access VictoriaPink.com directly and not through PU to get that price.
They redesigned the home page so I hoped that, perhaps, they might have added more material on Victoria Pink.
Nope. Same old crap with no updates in at least 3 years.
However the site has added several additional sites as bonus sites (all titled [something] Next Door - such as Virgins Next Door, Handjob Next Door, etc.) that show dates that suggest they are updated relatively currently. The bad news is that they download at the rate of about 140 Kb and are the usual unimaginative crap.
I downloaded what little I found any good (a decent, but not spectacular Bree Olson video, for example) and cancelled my trial about 2 hours after signing up.
Warning. Cross sells. Warning. $40.00 if you don't cancel before time runs out. Good news, billing by ccbill.
I gave the site a 64 a few years back but now it gets a 50.
|
09-30-09 11:10pm
|
Reply
671
|
Victoria Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from mbaya:
I have added a review. This site has not changed in over a year. What a shame.
|
08-21-08 12:23pm
|
Reply
672
|
Video Angels.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Monahan's Reply)
Monahan - yes, bro - first of all I guess it's a one month site ONLY - the updates seems really slow, so..
The quality of videos are VERY different throughout the site - I've not been through all yet - first I go for my favorites. But compared to some "top-sites" you got to be prepared for some videos in average/low quality, alas.
Still I rate it the 80 because of a handfull of more fine videos with those "old timers" - but again: compared to "better sites" the quality is very much unstable - I'd say half is fine/ok...
But finally from one Fiona Cooper-fan to another: You get the girls/models from that time - and man, some of those videos of the models mentioned in my review is a revival - not crisp in viewing quality, but you can live with it...for most of them.
And oh, btw - the photo-deal is very slim (14 sets) and not worth much...
|
02-22-09 12:11pm
|
Reply
673
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Dirt D:
I really, really, really, really wish I came to this site and read this comment before adding a new membership in March 2015, because now this site is just not worth it for me. Well, you live and you learn.
|
03-20-15 07:18pm
|
Reply
674
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Marcus:
I think that's fair enough, particularly with formats like MP4 which seem to be universally compatible, video players like VLC that play anything etc. It's also good that they give advance warning to members.
|
12-07-14 09:18am
|
Reply
675
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
I suspect that they are a victim of their popularity so satisfying such a large group of members is an impossibility. I'm glad that people like you still enjoy the site and I'm also glad that their join price is ridiculusly low so no one can complain that porn is too expensive beause this site proves them wrong.
It's too bad that the few studios that I love don't have a lot of content and aren't updating anymore and those that are tend to have the annoying added loud sountrack.
|
09-05-12 06:28pm
|
