Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Monahan (0)  

Feedback:   All (1736)  |   Reviews (27)  |   Comments (117)  |   Replies (1592)

Other:   Replies Received (734)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 526-550 of 734 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
526
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Winston: (Monahan's Reply)

Yes they have a pretty decent search system.. hair color, breast size, location,ethnicity ect.and my favorite photographer. I'm a big fan of Met Art, if you like glamour that's what they sell. Not that i don't like the colorful stuff too

01-08-10  06:18pm

Reply
527
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from lk2fireone: (Monahan's Reply)

It continuously surprises me how much personal tastes can differ.
I was thinking the models of the last year were not up the the previous standards of attractiveness. There were a good percentage of lovely young girls in the past, and I've found very few that I really liked this past year.

We agree on the videos, though, but I don't know what they can do, since Met-art is strictly softcore. I find that Femjoy videos are more watchable than Met-art videos, but not by much.

If the videos went very high-definition, that might help a little. Better music background would help a little. But the main problem is the girls don't do much of anything: they walk, they sit, they lay down, stand up. If there was some story to the video, that would help, but these girls are not actresses. And the photo people are not writers that would be able to write a short plot that makes sense and holds interest.


07-09-09  01:52am

Reply
528
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from GCode: (Monahan's Reply)

Man, it's been awhile since I was a member but I know there was a search engine that was quite comprehensive as far as tags goes. Meaning, I do believe you can do searches including breast size, hair color, location, and so on. Hopefully a current member can give you more insight.

06-22-09  11:16pm

Reply
529
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from zzzins: (Monahan's Reply)

Totally agree Monahan. I'm a video guy too but joined MetArt because the photos are just so damn good. I see the video content on MetArt as a bit of a bonus really - not why I joined but occasionally nice to have a vid of a girl you've been admiring the photos of. Uma B was a good example for me - major hot babe with about 5 photo sets and all of a suddden 2 or 3 vids appeared - a nice addition.

I agree with you regarding the model names but at least the names are unique. I'm currently writing a database/website to act as a central model "lookup" for as many popular websites as possible and will let the PU community know as soon as I have a beta sit ready to test.


05-11-09  02:05am

Reply
530
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from PinkPanther: (Monahan's Reply)

Yep - all true. If you enjoy softer nude stuff well-presented with gorgeous babes - updated daily, this sites's pretty awesome.

If you're looking for boy/girl stuff or harder solo stuff, this site will frustrate the hell out of you.

I would highly recommend Nubiles.net for people that are frustrated by Met Art but like the type of girls that they post. Nubiles.net also has multiple updates a day, lots of great HQ masturbations vids, some boy/girl vids - and you can be delighted to find girls that went on to be notable porn babes who did great stuff here early in their careers.


05-10-09  06:04pm

Reply
531
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment from hondaman:

I dont think that seeing a woman's labia or vagina as can be seen in some met art sets would ever pass a 60's censor seeing as they airbrushed out labia back then.

11-13-08  01:53pm

Reply
532
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from PinkPanther: (Monahan's Reply)

I have yet to see a good vid at Met Art - the vast majority are unbearable, they did manage to do a few that are OK, but this is not a vid site at all. It's a great pics site. They have a great variety of models and enough variety of photogs and styles to keep it as a site that I look forward to checking out every day - and the multiple updates a day can't be beat.

11-03-08  07:02pm

Reply
533
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from asmith12: (Monahan's Reply)

> There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics.
Exactly; thanks for expressing my feelings it this concise and exact way; IMHO it's a perfect way to describe it in one sentence instead of my long and maybe not so clear description.


09-29-08  09:08am

Reply
534
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Denner: (Monahan's Reply)

Been a member three times - have not seen that offer. But ok, it may have slipped among all that spammail, I still get.

06-15-08  12:51pm

Reply
535
Visit MetArtX

MetArtX
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from LadyLover: (Monahan's Reply)

that's definitely true. I think for some models this is the "next step" before trying a twosome. And some never move beyond the solo sets.

09-20-17  03:34pm

Reply
536
Visit MetArtX

MetArtX
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from lk2fireone: (Monahan's Reply)

METART IS BASICALLY SOFTCORE.
EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, YOU FIND A METART MODEL IN ONE OF THE METART SISTER SITES IN A HOT PHOTOSET OR VIDEO THAT GIVES YOU A NEW APPRECIATION OF THE MODEL.
OR, EVEN RARER, YOU COME ACROSS THE MODEL IN A COMPETING SITE, THAT IS HARDCORE, AND YOU DEFINITELY SEE THE MODEL IN A NEW LIGHT.
MAYBE I'M SLOW, BUT WHEN I VIEW THE METART PHOTOSETS, I THINK OF THE MODELS AS BASICALLY INNOCENT GLAMOUR MODELS.
WATCHING THE SAME MODEL PERFORMING HARDCORE PORN MAKES A DIFFERENCE. SOMETIMES THE DIFFERENCE IS JUST HOW HOT THE MODEL CAN LOOK. OTHER TIMES, I THINK THE MODEL IS WASTING HER OPPORTUNITIES APPEARING IN SUCH LOW-GRADE PORN.
BUT THAT'S JUST ME.


09-16-17  05:46pm

Reply
537
Visit MetArtX

MetArtX
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from lk2fireone: (Monahan's Reply)

MOST METART SITES USE MANY OF THE SAME MODELS.
WHICH CAN BE GOOD OR BAD: DEPENDING ON WHETHER YOU LIKE THE MODELS.


09-16-17  06:14am

Reply
538
Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from rearadmiral: (Monahan's Reply)

I hope you're right that Mofos will see the error of their ways and allow downloads again but my worry is that this is the future and guys like us are just dinosaurs. Maybe the average under-40 porn buyer is perfectly happy with streaming only. I know I'm not. But with internet access becoming so widespread maybe streaming is the future.

I read a comment on another forum where a commenter wondered if this was a trial balloon floated by the parent company to see what the reaction would be and if Mofos survived then maybe the other sites would go streaming only too.

The only consolation I have is that I own enough porn that I could plan to watch it all starting now and probably sluff off this mortal coil before reaching the end. But for me, as a collector, it is more about getting the porn than having the porn.


04-04-16  02:54pm

Reply
539
Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment from Monahan:

UPDATE - 4 eamils to support so far, and only autoreplies promising a reply in 1 to 3 days. It's now 6 days with no replies from the support desk.

There's still time left in my month so let's see if there really is a support function for MOFO's.


04-18-09  09:21am

Reply
540
Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment from atrapat:

JFYI, they've added the Avy Scott scene this week. It's a scene with Lexington Steele at Milfs Like It Black. Looks like they create the pornstar profile too early before the scene gets released.

04-18-09  04:26am

Reply
541
Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment from atrapat:

Regarding the Carmella Bing scene, it's at Day With A Pornstar, a site that has recently been moved to Brazzer's Pass. Scenes are still listed at Mofos Network but all links are dead.

04-12-09  02:14pm

Reply
542
Visit Mommy Got Boobs

Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from Cybertoad: (Monahan's Reply)

No Actually, I went to check it out for another review and saw the offer. If you look at other responses under that network you will see the offer was given before. So I am assuming they will do it again. And thats 10.00 recurring which means I pay 10.00 a month UNTIL I quit. Thats two gallons of gas for a H-O, LOL

06-24-08  09:05am

Reply
543
Visit Mommy Got Boobs

Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Cybertoad: (Monahan's Reply)

Me Too, but I got that 10.00 Brazzer so will stay a few until it expires.

06-23-08  09:14am

Reply
544
Visit Mommy Got Boobs

Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Cybertoad: (Monahan's Reply)

Ya i'm a natural kinda guy too.
I am not sure why the turn again to fake boobs.
Seemed in the 80's and mid 90's everyone got a boob job. then 2000 we started getting tart perky real ladies, what happed slim picking so lets pump up with silicone?
I agree Monahan, but I see this on other sites too like Bang Bro's etc. Maybe its where they are located???
Hope the fakes arent where its all headed.


06-23-08  09:12am

Reply
545
Visit Mommy Got Boobs

Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from badandy400: (Monahan's Reply)

The only thing I can say about that is that they never do say the breasts are all natural. Brazzers is about big tits and they couldn't care less how they go there! I like fake breasts, to a point though. But somehow natural does seem to be better. Perhaps you should give Big Naturals a try, there are some pretty damn good looking natural ones there! :)

06-18-08  02:46pm

Reply
546
Visit More Gonzo

More Gonzo
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment from exotics4me:

Hey Monahan,

Last I checked Give Me Pink also had stopped releasing new updates, believe that was in February as well. Hard to say if it is a permanent move, I wouldn't expect it to be permanent though. I have noticed over the last few years that some of the very exclusive sites are doing their shooting in the spring months, so that could be it, but maybe they have decided to pull back for awhile. I would imagine that considering the quality of their content 1920 high end video, completely exclusive content, that with most of the world experiencing financial problems that they could just disappear for awhile.

One bit of good news, when I was last a member at Give Me Pink, they were allowing a member to switch the remainder of their membership to one of their other sites at any time.

For example, when I canceled my Give Me Pink membership, there was a few weeks left on the subscription. It gave me the option at anytime during those remaining weeks, to switch the remaining time left to any of their sites and as far as I know, you could then do it again and again to each of their sites until your month was up. I thought that was one of the best ideas I had seen.


04-27-09  08:48pm

Reply
547
Visit Mr. Skin

Mr. Skin
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from alexmedia: (Monahan's Reply)

I've just checked and can see $4.95 limited trial option.

09-15-09  08:07am

Reply
548
Visit My XXX Pass

My XXX Pass
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment from Vegas Ken:

Monahan,

Thanks for the heads up on the broken discount. I talked with the site's rep and he gave us a new link to use. You should be able to see the special discount pricing now.

As always, Thanks for using our site!

Vegas Ken


09-09-13  10:51am

Reply
549
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Jade1: (Monahan's Reply)

It's not really been long or slow. It all went into effect April 2nd. And it's not specific to VR. The whole site is that way.

I've been subbed with them since sometime last year and have definitely got my money's worth. But I'm very concerned about their future for sure.


04-21-18  12:06pm

Reply
550
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment from Amanda:

Hi Monahan! Thanks for the head's up. We will get that link fixed up.

09-21-16  06:13am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 526-550 of 734 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.8 seconds.