| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
Leg Sex
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from TrashMan:
(Monahan's Reply)
I just updated the first bullet in my review. I forgot a couple words...namely "ZIP". I meant to say "ZIP DOWNLOADS". So if that makes any changes in your decision, my bad.
|
03-05-09 03:17pm
|
Reply
502
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
I hope that's not the case because that is a really dumb decision. This almost guarantees the site will disatisfy any new member.
I wonder how many like me have kept an eye on the site and were about to make the plunge and may now not bother. That is sad because there does look like really good stuff. At least I can cross this one from my list.
|
10-11-09 07:05pm
|
Reply
503
|
Little Summer
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mr smut:
(Monahan's Reply)
Let me be third in the row :-) thanks for this excellent review.
|
11-03-09 10:18pm
|
Reply
504
|
Lovely Vanessa
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Shap:
Hi. It hasn't been updated in a while. HOWEVER if you are looking for more Vanessa content we've been constantly adding content of her to Twistys. I have to get that content added to her site.
|
01-19-11 08:12am
|
Reply
505
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from otoh:
(Monahan's Reply)
I like your definition of softcore and midcore! I think that should be officially adopted to readily tell the difference :)
|
08-05-11 11:04pm
|
Reply
506
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Drooler:
Whenever I get one of those notices from them about their "VIP upgrades," I just upgrade my mailbox by throwing it into the trash ... and letting it delete on quit.
|
01-02-10 12:37pm
|
Reply
507
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Denner:
Monahan has a very good point here - no matter how M&B try to market their sites/deals - 'their credibility sucks' - it seems. The same with their updates - and content in general!
I think, that TBP has downgraded the site lately (not sure) - but 85 is still pretty high - to say it nicely - for this site..
Thanks for this relevant update/info here from Monahan.
|
01-02-10 08:18am
|
Reply
508
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from badandy400:
(Monahan's Reply)
People's business models change as time goes on. I really do not know if they were trying to cover a cost somewhere, or just using a bait and switch move. You are right though about Porn Users. That is why I am here, let others know what I know and learn what others already know.
|
07-17-08 03:09pm
|
Reply
509
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yeah but you're an old pro at it. My comment were for the newbies who still make those fatal errors. I really wish TBP and PU had existed when I first started surfing the net. I would have saved so much money that it's not even funny.
|
04-20-13 10:49am
|
Reply
510
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from 2 Free K:
(Monahan's Reply)
Hey man, sorry it took so long to reply.
To answer those very good questions:
1.) the vids are about 20 minutes each
2.) The trailers are truly appetizers for the videos. The vids are good, using excellent angles to please viewers of different tastes. The focus is on the girl the whole time. A+ on vid quality (shooting, image quality, performance, concept)
3.) The girls do a decent amount of teasing. Not too much (none of the hour of bullshit found in Bang Bus videos), and not too little. And, they change it up from video to video, per the requirements of the scenario. But they all have a good tease intro.
4.) The trailer set is actually a true representation of the membership archive, and you can see EVERY trailer! Talk about testing the product. In fact, I keep tabs on what's new through the trailer page, and they update about once to twice a week.
5.) I experienced no limits on my downloads, and believe me, I got my $$$ worth! No DRM, and fast downloads. The vids were high quality, while still being decently sized (I don't like those 1 GB HD files, it's just a porno vid)
My bad again for being offline for so long, I had forgotten the password to this account. You might've already joined. If not, I highly suggest it, I still check up on their updates weekly.
And the Victoria Vonn videos are HOT! God, her tits are a delight.
|
11-17-08 01:22am
|
Reply
511
|
Meggan Powers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yeah - she signed an exclusive 1-year contract and then was pretty much done with the adult industry after that year.
|
06-19-11 11:13pm
|
Reply
512
|
Meggan Powers
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I'm not a member of her site, but the scoop I found on the lovely Meggan is:
"On October 1, 2009 Meggan Mallone would hook up with the man that would go on to change her life, Vivid gonzo director B. Skow. Some thought it would never last beyond he first week but they seem to have defied all odds and are still blissfully happy two years later. Meggan Mallone has now retired from the adult business, is engaged to him I think around January 2011 and they have recently had their first child together."
|
06-19-11 10:46pm
|
Reply
513
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
I sent you an email.
Copy one link, and paste it into your browser address bar. That should bring up the offer.
Do the same for the other link (copy and paste).
Good luck.
|
08-15-14 10:25pm
|
Reply
514
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
I agree that it sounds like some of them don't know what they are doing.
I just got a new email today (August 15) from Metart, offering me a discount to join VivThomas for $14.99, a 50% discount.
I can't post the link at PU, because that is against their rules.
And maybe you don't want to join VivThomas, anyway.
But send me an email through the PU internal email system, and I can show you a link to join The Life Erotic for $14.99/month, rebilling at $14.99/month.
I believe The Life Erotic Link discount is still good.
To use the PU internal email system, go to my PU user profile page, and click on the "email link" to send me a private email.
https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5722
|
08-15-14 08:11pm
|
Reply
515
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
Have you signed up for the Metart newsletter?
It's free. A one-page email, usually showing some covers of photo sets or videos from the network.
The email sometimes has some nice discounts for different site memberships.
The best discount was for $1/month membership to Erotic Beauty, that would never be raised in price.
PU rules didn't allow the link to access that offer to be posted on PU.
I joined Erotic Beauty, and it's cost me $12 for the 12 months I've been a member.
But no other offers came close to that one.
But sometimes you do get a nice discount to one or more sites in the Metart network in the Metart newsletter.
|
08-14-14 08:49pm
|
Reply
516
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from dracken:
I see Drooler's point, but to be honest I love it when a site at least tries to name their sets something that makes sense. As a guy that has a huge Misc-random-crap folder this is a nice improvement. I hope other sites follow the example :)
|
09-08-11 07:56pm
|
Reply
517
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Drooler:
BTW, don't you think that Barbara D bears a striking resemblance to Cybil Shepard? Just have a look at MetArt_GAZING_BARBARA-D_by_ALEX-SIRONI_medium_0012.jpg!
|
09-08-11 05:09am
|
Reply
518
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Drooler:
The newer folders and individual files now do have more descriptive names.
I guess it works for some people, but it's not going to be that way for everyone.
One problem is that the longer names mean longer path names. My system chokes on the longer names often enough that I actually shorten them before opening a zip. Otherwise, folders just don't open or thumbs don't render.
Also with individual photo files, which I always keep in clearly named folders, the only file name info I care about is the file number. Now I have to stretch the folder windows open wider than a Gapeland babe just to see past all of that irrelevant info to the 3- to 4-digit number at the end. Not a pain that bears repeating.
And inserted numbers like "_625d3_" don't seem particularly salient, except perhaps to the folks at Met-Art.
Besides, I have my own conventions about naming, and I'm sure lots of people have theirs, so while I think the Met-Art staff meant well, they overdid it in redoing theirs.
|
09-07-11 11:15am
|
Reply
519
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Khan:
(Monahan's Reply)
I'll have to defer your question about the videos to your fellow users.
With regards to the yearly pricing ...
Yes, we were made aware (last night) of some recent price changes. I've notified the TBP Editors and I suspect they'll get the listing updated when they return from the weekend/holiday.
|
01-02-11 06:39pm
|
Reply
520
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(Monahan's Reply)
With regards to your #2, I can only suggest you read some of the reviews that have been submitted for the site. I think both graymane and Denner addressed this question.
|
01-02-11 01:00pm
|
Reply
521
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from tangub:
That's disappointing :-(
|
01-02-11 07:38am
|
Reply
522
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Khan:
Just a quick followup ... we have been contacted by Met Art who says the price will be $29.99 from now on so I guess that answers this one.
Sorry. :(
|
01-02-11 07:06am
|
Reply
523
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Khan:
I don't see it working at the moment.
I've flagged this one for one of our people to contact the site owner to see if we can get the special price reinstated.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
01-01-11 08:33pm
|
Reply
524
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Capn:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yes, there needs to be at least some variation, to maintain interest.
I soon tire of the artsy fartsy stuff! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-06-10 08:55am
|
Reply
525
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yes, it is not so much the huge volume, which is not a problem in itself, it is more the artsy thumbnails are so similar it is difficult to pick out galleries that are likely to appeal.
For instance, last time I was a member, I found no more than 2 dozen galleries that appealed enough to download. Seemingly no more than one or two per model. For such a huge site that is very few. Typically I have half a dozen sets of each model that appeals at the end of a months subscription.
I just found it too tiresome:
Click....'No, that doesn't appeal.' x100
1 'Ah that is a good one.'
Too frustrating!
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-05-10 02:45am
|
