| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(atrapat's Reply)
Damn - stupid thing to do with a network that needs more sites and scenes rather than less - at this rate, Mofos is going to take a year or more to be worthwhile
|
04-12-09 05:54pm
|
Reply
127
|
Molly's Life
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(atrapat's Reply)
I don't mind as much when a network site like RK does that because the vast majority of people that join those sites don't do it for just one performer so the fact that someone is no longer on the site doesn't mean that the site will not replace the performer.
Case in point is captain stabbin. All the guys that were associated with that site stopped doing porn a long time ago and that's why you stopped seeing new scenes. The ones that have been added in the last couple of years are with new performers and I think the style is a little different as well.
|
10-02-12 06:34pm
|
Reply
128
|
Molly's Life
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
from pat362:
I get slightly tick off when a retired performer is telling people to keep on subscribing to her essentially dead site. I'm fine if she makes it clear on her join page that the content is older and you're not getting new content because prospective customers know that they are still getting some decent stuff. Otherwise you are basically paying for older and older content and if you don't know that she isn't updating with new stuff then you may feel cheated.
|
10-02-12 01:16pm
|
Reply
129
|
Monique Alexander.net
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
from ace of aces:
thanks for the warning.
|
06-06-08 08:07am
|
Reply
130
|
Monique Alexander.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(atrapat's Reply)
Well, that Monique stuff came out before she signed to Vivid, so it's probably true that her exclusivity to them only occured once her pen made its way across the dotted line.
There's still material of her at ALS Scan, Matrix Nudes, Twistys, Digital Desire, etc.
The Nikki Nova site you reviewed was one I've been a member of myself, but it's now been over three years (March 2005). It seemed to be drying up.
There is some new stuff of her at Danni and at Marquis Models (with that eloborate tatoo on her back). If you haven't been to Marquis Models, you might want to check that one out. A month ago, I got a 3-day subscription for 3.95. They have zips and some nice stuff there.
|
05-25-08 03:01pm
|
Reply
131
|
Monique Alexander.net
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
from Drooler:
The message board reminds of a cartoon of a suggestion box that's open on the bottom and has a trash can under it.
I suspected that it was just a "fake" site offering only older content as seen at Matrix. Thanks for sticking your neck (and credit card) out for the rest of us to confirm this.
It really bums me out that Monique signed an exclusive contract with Vivid. There are sites these days that I wish she could be on, including Matrix, which has better quality than it used to.
|
05-25-08 02:01pm
|
Reply
132
|
Muffia
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from mbaya:
I really liked nakedmovie and am disappointed that they have not added another video since February. When you say their final one, do you mean to say that they will never add another and the site is now a zombie?
|
12-02-09 07:40pm
|
Reply
133
|
Muffia
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from clickonme:
Is the trial at 2.95 give you full access to full scene and full download cause on thebestporn.com they said limited trial... Just want to know!
|
02-25-09 10:08pm
|
Reply
134
|
Muffia
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from wiild1:
(atrapat's Reply)
Exactly what I was planning to do: spend a day or so during a weekend as a trial member and then download all that I like, then cancel.
I tend to join more and more trials as I usually get bored after a week or so with the same content. The good thing with trials and only joining for short periods is that you seem to often get good offers on staying as a member, offers you often wouldn't get otherwise! :-)
I think pornusers.com is a good forum for sharing info about such offers. and in these tough financial times we need to stick together to save a buck here and there! :-)
|
02-19-09 12:14pm
|
Reply
135
|
Muffia
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from wiild1:
Hey Atrapat, thanks for first review! How long was the trial you got via RealityKings? I am thinking about giving the trial a go..now it LOOKS like it's possible to join Muffia without being a member of RK.
2 Day Trial - $2.95
|
02-19-09 11:44am
|
Reply
136
|
Muffia
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from TrashMan:
So, if someone was looking to blow $30 a month or so, which network would you say to join, RK or Muffia?
|
01-13-09 03:12pm
|
Reply
137
|
My Fetish
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(atrapat's Reply)
I did not realize that this site was a part of a network - too sloppy of me. But this info and other update you put here is a fine help. Thanks, atrapat...
|
04-09-10 05:57am
|
Reply
138
|
My Heather VanDeven
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from mbaya:
Informative and helpful. I will check out this site.
|
10-27-08 03:46am
|
Reply
139
|
My Heather VanDeven
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from Drooler:
Heather knocks me out, but this site wouldn't. Thanks for the detailed review. Saves me money and letdown.
|
10-26-08 01:59pm
|
Reply
140
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
from Jay G:
Excellent points. MFC has lots of excellent features, including excellent record keeping and the archives where I can see the old chats I had with a model and recover information about her I may have forgotten.
Too bad this feature isn't available in real life.... when I meet a girl at a party and can't remember was she the one who works at a bank or a restaurant....and what had she told me about herself before?
I wish other cam sites had MFC's features.
|
10-19-12 04:56am
|
Reply
141
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Jay G:
(atrapat's Reply)
Still addicted, because I find there are so many interesting things about this site. Hate to admit how much money I'm spending with this "browsing through the harem fantasy."
Saw Angelina Crow for a few minutes with only 2 people in her room, very sad.
Find myself spending a lot of time in rooms where th girls remain fully clothed and the atmosphere is more like a friendly neighborhood bar with a pretty girl to look at. The girls in these rooms can chat it up and the guys often interact with each other. Girls here seem to be doing just as well or better in tips than many girls putting on an intense sex show.......interesting.......
|
06-27-12 03:47am
|
Reply
142
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(atrapat's Reply)
I spend way to much time on this site but I've discovered some interesting facts:
Models who verbally chat with the customers and look right at the camera get HUNDREDS of viewers at a time and great tips, even when their looks are only average at best.
Eve Angel doesn't talk, she types, and looks more at her keyboard than at the camera. She gets many viewers because of her fame and looks, but would do so much better if she were able to interact more. That seems to be what the cam game is mostly about. Interestingly, it seems many porn stars are great at following director's instructions but terribly shy on their own.
Another thing. There are always 30-40 models who do NOTHING but type and have no one in their room most of the time. I think they are only interested in "PRIVATE" expensive sessions not tips and don't put on any seductive, tempting or fun show to get us carnival gawkers into their tent.
|
06-23-12 06:02am
|
Reply
143
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(atrapat's Reply)
Camscores seem to be a complicated system which has more to do with tips and time models spend on camera than popularity. The top cam-score is a model who seems to work 80-90 hours per week and is very entertaining.
|
06-20-12 04:24am
|
Reply
144
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(atrapat's Reply)
I spend way too much time on this site, Pat. If you look at the camviews you can almost always find several models & groups of models showing everything and doing just about everything in the free chat area.
But the truth is that's not what's interesting. To see nudity and porn is cheap everywhere except cam sites. Cam sites are special only in the active interaction with the models. Problem is, I enjoy the interaction, especially talking to beautiful women from Russia & Romania & the Philippines very addictive. Those who merely perform sex are boring. That's just me and why I'm soon to be very poor. ;)
|
06-20-12 04:22am
|
Reply
145
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from PinkPanther:
This is an interesting cam site - gives the girls more options, and gives more opportunities for guys to have fun. I've seen popular cam girls get HUGE tips in the public area, so that's where they tend to stay. Other girls aren't as good at pulling those kind of tips in the public, so they tend to want to go private.
The interface is ugly as a crack ho on a bender and crashes every once in a while. But that might be a result of the huge amount of traffic on this site, which probably makes it difficult to keep up with the servers at time.
|
06-26-11 09:43am
|
Reply
146
|
Naked Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from mbaya:
This is a site I would have liked to check out, but after reading your review, I won't. Excellent review of a weak site.
|
05-19-09 03:38am
|
Reply
147
|
Naked.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from ace of aces:
(atrapat's Reply)
that`s not the same. i joined that what you did also and chosed active the videos, therfore i knew what i was paying. at this site you get sold a package which say spend more money and you get an extra discount and you won`t be billed, but what you get is a rebilling without getting credits...imo close to fraud
|
05-19-09 04:42am
|
Reply
148
|
Naked.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from conflicted:
(atrapat's Reply)
Those aren't the ones as far as I can tell, but thanks very much for the pointer, I'll keep looking.
Dead on review btw.
|
03-28-09 05:07am
|
Reply
149
|
Naked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from conflicted:
Anyone know what the other sites they tie into are? You can see some of the models interacting with SOMEONE at the keyboard, but it's not you (usually only in public chat). It'd be fun to have the same girl in two windows - I saw one guy do it & it slowly dawned on the model, she asked him if was on elsewhere & replied with her name from the other site which got her laughing.
|
03-21-09 09:50am
|
Reply
150
|
Naked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
Okay... cost isn't supposed to be a factor on here but... is 4 or 5 USD per minute really something positive here? For $240 an hour, I could go to a really nice escort service and do very well for myself.
|
02-08-09 06:03pm
|
