Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Cybertoad (0)  

Feedback:   All (1192)  |   Reviews (64)  |   Comments (55)  |   Replies (1073)

Other:   Replies Received (495)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 476-495 of 495 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
476
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review from messmer:

How would you describe the majority of the picture sets, Cybertoad? Artistic nudes or strip sequences? As you might have guessed by now the lingerie the ladies are wearing is very important to me.

09-21-11  09:49am

Reply
477
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review from Nick Spillum:

Great review, thanks for that Cybertoad! Just one little point, we have over 150,000 images not 15,000 :)) I'm sure you meant to say that though.

09-21-11  06:56am

Reply
478
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review from Denner:

Hope you can clear this up....
There GOT to be a difference between the main Viv Thomas-site - and the one you gain access to via various sites, Teendreams as one.

The vids - via Teendreams - are almost horrible/blurred in quality and 3:4. But seen some trailers from Viv Thomas in 1280x720 (I think it was) - and in great quality...

Guess that's the "Very High Quality"?
And if so....great! And is that only for newer vids?


09-21-11  06:10am

Reply
479
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review from otoh:

I find Viv Thomas's photos sometimes a bit too glam-slick - but that's no bad thing once in a while and agree he has a knack for girl-girl. There's quite a few sets of his at Nena Blue, which I enjoyed - although some folk may find most of the other stuff there a bit arty.

Anyway, a great review, CT - very helpful given that the site tour is a bit sparse - shame there's no model index. Photos are still just 1280px as per Drooler's comment a while ago?


09-20-11  11:34pm

Reply
480
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review from BradlyH:

That's a great deal. 24.95 Alone for just 15000 pics would be a good deal not to mention the Videos. Do you have the resolution specs of the pictures, I take it they are large since you said "fullscreen pictures"

09-20-11  10:13pm

Reply
481
Visit Wank Pass

Wank Pass
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (Cybertoad's Reply)

Thanks for the comments Cybertoad. The time-out is actually one minute, but your point is well taken: this is a very unusual way to restrict downloads. Like you, I've never seen it before and it is VERY annoying! I might (and I stress 'might') have been able to live with it if there weren't the other issues, particularly that a lot of the scenes are really short so you have to wait a full minute between downloads that take 30 seconds. And the video quality itself isn't great. I'm no "HD snob" but this is lower quality than I'll accept.

This is a pretty crappy site and PU members will do well to avoid it.


10-20-12  05:31am

Reply
482
Visit Watch You Jerk

Watch You Jerk
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from elonlybuster: (Cybertoad's Reply)

I faintly remember that episode somewhat.
Anyways, I guess the reason a few sites like this still exist is because there has to be someone that likes it. I'm assuming these are the same people who have a phobia of cocks, or maybe some chicks who are trying to learn to talk dirty to their guy.
Regardless thanks for the feedback.


10-01-08  10:06am

Reply
483
Visit Wicked Pictures

Wicked Pictures
(0)
REPLY TO #12 from pat362: (Cybertoad's Reply)

Definetly well worth the price.

10-02-12  01:07pm

Reply
484
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from lk2fireone: (Cybertoad's Reply)

Thanks for the fast reply.

I was a member 1 or 2 years ago (my memory is getting terrible as I get older), and they had a banner on the site that counted off the days before I would have access to all three sites.

So I guess they dropped that.


04-15-16  12:48pm

Reply
485
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from elephant: (Cybertoad's Reply)

Yeah don't get me wrong its a really good quality site, just my tastes are more for groups of girls than solo or g/b stuff, it never did too much group stuff but I'd find gems I loved, my fav to date is still the girls at the party when theres about 7 of them all getting naked, amazing movie.

04-15-16  09:38am

Reply
486
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review from elephant:

Nice review, I used to love the site but for me my joining the site was to see the groups of girls together scenes, when they had 3 or more in a scene, often I really liked even when they just were dancing or swimming. sadly they seem to of knocked those scenes on the head as they haven't done any new ones since I was last there.

The prices too put me off, its sister site especially 18onlygirls is really expensive if you live in the UK.


04-15-16  05:05am

Reply
487
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review from lk2fireone:

It used to be that if you stayed a member of 18OnlyGirls, WowGirls, or WowPorn for a certain amount of time, you automatically became a member of all three sites.

Is that still the way it works?
And how long do you have to stay a member at one of the sites, to automatically gain access to all three sites?

There was a separate method of gaining access to all three sites, if you paid a higher membership fee.
Or if you paid an upgrade fee after you joined one of their sites, to get access to all three sites.

I assume, since your membership is over 3 months, that you now have access to all 3 sites.
Correct?

The girls at the 3 sites are extremely attractive. And the videos, as you wrote, are top quality, as well.


04-15-16  02:03am

Reply
488
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from KET924aab: (Cybertoad's Reply)

Glad it worked out Cybertoad! Their site does look amazing, and I'm going to join soon. I wish they had a better preview, with a full model list.

I figured out the problems I was having with ATK Galleria--it was my Kaspersky Antivirus being a total system resource hog, and it's new cloud technology, which means it gives itself priority download access to its cloud files whenever anything is being downloaded from the net. Granted my 2 computers are getting a little long in the tooth, but I've had no issues since I uninstalled it. I was going to slam Galleria for it in my upcoming review, but the problem was definitely my equipment and software.


04-28-14  10:27pm

Reply
489
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review from KET924aab:

Cybertoad, do you think it might be your browser, and have tried different ones?

I am having similar problems at ATK Galleria, although in my case it's mainly inconsistent and extremely long download times. Happens with either IE or Chrome for me. And I know it's not my PC because a speed test on my ISP's homepage shows normal download speeds.

I really hope this isn't a real issue with Wow Girls, as they are on my list to join, and from their tour pages, the material looks awesome.

Can any other members chime in?


04-13-14  03:21pm

Reply
490
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from slutty: (Cybertoad's Reply)

No problem, hope it works for you.

09-17-11  10:39pm

Reply
491
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review from slutty:

When I was last a member here if you went to cancel they'd offer a $10/month price, so you might want to try that if you are planning on hanging around for a few months.

09-15-11  11:51pm

Reply
492
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review from lk2fireone:

Welcome back, stranger. Good to see your smiling face and the lovely face and body of your wife. Love your avatar.

09-15-11  03:53am

Reply
493
Visit XX Cel

XX Cel
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from GUY22: (Cybertoad's Reply)

The guy uses WMV codec instead of H.264/MP4 codec
It's not as crisp and sharp as most HD videos that I've seen.
More HDV than HD. I guess I might be nitpicking a bit here.
Most of the newer videos are in 1280x720 resolution though.
The older ones are DVD quality.

The site claims 374 video and 42483 pictures.
And that sounds about right.

Hope that helps.


03-21-13  07:30pm

Reply
494
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from RagingBuddhist: (Cybertoad's Reply)

Thanks, CT. I try! :cheesy grin:

04-01-13  09:52am

Reply
495
Visit Zenra.net

Zenra.net
(0)
REPLY TO #7 from asmith12: (Cybertoad's Reply)

Sure, it wasn't my point to have everybody join :-). I'm just sharing my own very subjective feelings about the site, and it is always up to reader to decide if to join or not. Unfortunately, there is no "holy grail" of porn out there, especially if looking for something original :-(.

09-17-08  05:58am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 476-495 of 495 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.54 seconds.