I don't know what we are agreeing to disagree about. I glanced at your reviews, you gave Rachel Aziani's solo site a 91, it doesn't have half the content of Eve's site that I reviewed. And it only updates once per week, so it isn't going to get near Eve's amount of content anytime soon. So, I don't know why you would mention content vs. cost.
You think getting a negative review for giving a high score is bad? I took 20 points off a site's score because they had a 10 GB monthly download limit. I put in the review clearly that if the limit wasn't there, I would have gave the site a 90, instead of a 70. The site actually went back and removed their download limit and made it unlimited and I went back and added the 20 points back to the score, the negative review is still there though.
You said, "I tend to be picky and honest" the review is 100% honest, I tell that there is no new Eve content coming out, the amount of content, the quality of that content and so on, nothing dishonest there.
You don't seem to follow my concept of Eve not being involved anymore when you say the model should be involved in updates and should do a name change. There are 200+ videos of EVE, 200+ picture sets of EVE that are still there for download, why would they change the name? Also, about the name change, that isn't something for me to say. I think they should make it clear that they don't have any new Eve content, but why change the name of a site when more than half of the content there is of Eve Angel? That wouldn't make much sense.
Last, I do put the cons I can find, but I don't see why a con would stop a site from getting a 90+ score. If you look at the TBP reviews, the sites with 90+ have cons in the reviews. Also, if you look at solo models in the TBP reviews, you will see that Eve's site is listed as the #3 solo site by the TBP reviewers by score. At one time, it was #1. I do think that you agree that these are individual views, but then again, you are telling me how YOU would do a review or what you think should happen with the site name. If you ever need a site to join, try Eve's out, it is cheap at $15 and download all of her content off there. Like I said earlier, if we put these on DVDs there would be 30 four hour DVDs or 60 two hour DVDs worth of content with Eve in all of the scenes. Surely not having a daily update would be offset by getting what is equal to 25 cent two hour DVDs?
Few things on your comment. First, there is way too much emphasis put on current updates on all sites. Let me give you an example.
Lets say site A opened last month and has daily updates of Eve Angel content. By the time your month was up, you would have access to maybe 10 GB of content. This site has over 80 GB of Eve movies and around 30 GB of her pictures.
Each month, content of her on this site ranged between 3-8 new GB of content, when you look at the total number which is one of the largest sites of a solo model, it still has more content than the next 10 sites combined, that feature Eve. Going by that, the daily update isn't a big deal to me.
If you also notice, I reviewed it as a one month join site. It would take a month to download all of the content on the site, unless you downloaded it for 24 hours a day.
What I'm saying, which is worth more 3-8 new GBs of content per month or around 120 GB?
As for the updates, it still updates, the friends content is new to the site, the Eve content is old content they are recycling. And my main point is still, this is an Eve Angel site, for fans of her, 120 GB of just Eve for $15 is the best deal on the internet. That would be like getting 30 full length DVDs of her for $15.
The only way that the no new updates is a con is if you have all the content already on the site. If you have none of it, there are over 200 movies and 200 picture sets of Eve, you could just download one video and one photo set per day and say those were daily updates. See what I mean?
Last, I didn't take it as sarcastic, and can understand why you would question a score, but keep in mind that all of us are different in our tastes, in our understanding or in the concept of numbers, so the number I give the site shouldn't be the first thing you look at. Instead, look at the facts in the review, 400 video/pic sets of Eve Angel, that to me is near perfect.
I can see, CT, that you put a hardy amount of effort and time on this review. Good job!
The content quality and stupendous volume of this work truly stretches the mind. .
Subsequently, the end results of My would-be choices derived from your impressive coverage are now sufficiently drawn.
I couldn't agree more CT, I love Eve Angel but also found this site disappointing. Her old site run by another company was much better in terms of photo content back in the days when it was still active.
Hi Cybertoad. Take a look at the review because you'll notice that it has completely changed since I screwed up my review. I used the info for backroom casting couch for exploited college girl. I have corrected my error and made a review for the other site. You will see that exploited gets a better score and review than it's sister site.
Thanks again. Few new updates but that's a respectable amount of probably exclusive scenes. As I said elsewhere, I'll probably visit the network soon and the scenes alone are just one more reason to do it. Even though other sites in the network will be much more interesting for sure.
Thanks for the info. She is not only a beauty (if you manage to ignore the tattoos) but I believe she has quite a character. Pity the site fails to show that side of her. I'll have to make do with the behind the scenes videos when I join. Thanks again.
Thanks. Try Joymii if you are looking for something a little edgier. Many of the models are the same, the photography is good and the sex is pretty real.
Must admit I didn't read your review as it had expired, but I think mine will probably end up being fairly similar. She's a stunner, it's a shame the site is such a disappointment.
Hello, back from Vacation, in the live chat on Francies's Site now site now. Seems kind of funny that showing a pre recorded chat while dran is not live, is one of the Con's from this reviewer. I guss he is only used to seeing a blank screen where the model is not live.
Asked the chatters if they had a problem with support emails.. No one said they have a problem..
Kind of think you are making this up.. I have even sent an email to the contact email ( form the members area ) and received email direct back from Francine. So I am really not believing that you have tried at all.
If you look at the site. http://francinedee.com/blast_past.php shows 10 years of sites. Photos show 10 years of sites. I am SURE that a lot of the other parts of the site, as they have been added over time, do not go back 10 years. Plus they just had their 10 years party in LA on 8-8-08 ( it is on the site )
There seems to be movies on the site that where shot in HD and
scaled down for web use. Comcast compresses their Video hugely, so does Dish network, etc. How is this any different? Just because of the physical size of the video? If this was 1920 / 1080 , but supper compressed, would it not be HD? What about the Industry calling 720 DPI video monitors HD? Where they wrong, because it was not 1920 / 1080?
OK, about the misleading parts of the site. I looked over it all again when I got back. Since you seem to be focusing your whole review and negativity toward this site regarding video, go here.
at the top it says : Regularly updated HD flash video with PSP and IPOD Downloads!
Then you can look down and see sample thumbs and dates of every video in the site.
Man, it does not get any clearer then this!!!. If you did not take the time and read over the preview pages and look at the dates and samples on the site, it is your own fault. The site shows samples time and dates for every update they have done. I don't think it gets an more honest then this. 90% of sites out there do not show you samples, and dates for all the content they have on their site. So is it better to see a "splash page" on a site with 20 pic samples, not dated, and you go in the site to find out that it has not been updated in a year? This had happened to me MANY times in the past.
I 100% support the advertising methods of this site, as it is one of the FEW model sites where you really get to see everything that you are getting BEFORE you chose to buy.
P.S. kind of funny how a bunch of the rebuttals to your posts have been deleted....
Hey, sometimes you just have to go with your gut even if it is not the answer you want. We want you to call it how you see it, not how you would like to see it. So keep it honest and chalk this one up as a piece of junk and put it on your blacklist.
Cybertoad, maybe I didn't see it clear enough the other day but I just want to say that your review is well worth it and I'm sure that a surfer looking for HD video will find the recounting of your experience valuable and avoid this site at all costs once they see the advertised HD video is nowhere to be seen.
I see your review and rating are honest for someone looking for a regular solo model site but Morphious seems to be so much into this site and model that I'd very much like him to arrange his thoughts and explain what makes this site so absolutely special for him.
The thing is I believe the site perhaps only SEEMS to advertise itself falsely for several reasons:
a) we usually expect solo model sites (or sites in general) to deliver mainly photos and video on a regular basis: journals, chats, live cams are a rare extra and not the main course;
b) at one point in its 8+ years of existence, the site was a usual solo model site and its design mostly stuck with it;
c) the site design fails at conveying to the visitors what it's really about;
When someone arrives at the site, he sees the model and some white text on a sky blue background on the right that he just ignores: hard to read and his eyes are probably fixed on the girl (at least, that's what I did). He scrolls down the page and sees the icons you mentioned: HD Videos, photos and all. OK, he thinks, we just found a usual solo model site, girl's hot, I like HD video, let's type in the credit card number and get the party started. Reality check: 3 streaming-only video updates in a year and lots of photos which aren't his favorite dish.
That text he ignored (rightfully, as it looks like they wanted people not to read it) says "Welcome to the internet's newest and most extensive reality show yet! Live cams are running 24 hours a day seven days a week to fulfill your voyeuristic pleasures. Go behind the scenes of a woman's world and enjoy". For once, I believe it's not lies in its entirety and this site is, in fact, delivering live voyeur video on a regular basis. OK, I guess those spy cams show recorded video during some hours of the day but Morphious seems to hint that he once caught Francine Dee having sex live on one of the "spy cams"! My crush on Francine Dee died a long time away (never was a member of the site, and never will) but, if that thing can happen in this site, I think it's pretty remarkable.
When you are so much into a model as Morphious seems to be, getting a weekly live chat plus video blogs plus contests plus spy cams plus getting her to call you on the phone during a chat plus being able to bid on her lingerie must make you live with a constant hard-on. HD what? Pictures? You get her LIVE daily! This site fails miserably to deliver HD video by all accounts but 3 different people came here to praise the site (2 reviews, 2 comments). Morphious seems to be the only one who didn't hit and run so I'd very much like him to make some sense of his initial review.
I have sent this link to the webmaster @ FrancineDee.com and it looks like they changed the wording on the site.
" View all of our Videos in up to Full Screen Streaming HD Flash Video at 1000K ( 1Mbs! ) or view in 3D interactive mode.
Download and Play on your Ipod and PSP. "
Notice the word Streaming has been inserted.
I kind of agree with the webmaster on the large video Download Files.
I am a business person. I would not want my products stolen and give out for free. It only hurts the model and the site. If everything is for free, what is the point of buying anything? Where does the money come from to operate the site, Pay for shoots, location, site updates, etc.
Yes I believe in DRM, People have a right to protect their Copyrights. if you look at the site, you ca see the Free Membership section, seems like they are trying to address the issue of people taking their Copyrighted content.
About updates, just to show you how wrong a review can be:
In the last week.
Journal updated today
News updated 3 times
1 Live chat
2 Photo Set updates
2 Video Blog updates.
I guess this is an inactive site. I have been in sites where this is 1 - 2 months worth of updates.
FrancineDee.com has been around for 10 years, I Really think they know what they are doing at this point, This site is always ahead of the curve as far as latest trends are concerned.
Sorry but I still feel you based your review too much on the video content (or the lack of it). The site seems to have many other things apart from videos. I'm not so sure the site is misleading, either. The home page is misleading but free video section states the right facts. TBP facts also state what you have encountered in video terms. If the site was a video-only site and it offered only what it offers, it would certainly need work but (I may be wrong but) I believe there's much more than videos to this site.
On the other hand, you certainly deserve much more trust than the other two revieweres. Your reviews of Catalina Cruz's network are top notch and I will definitely join those sites in the near future. I decided not to ask the other reviewers for the reasons behind their extremely high rating because, with all due respect, one site fanatics aren't so much different than one book fanatics.
But, just as I am sure the site isn't paradise on earth, it looks like it has some interesting features which the other reviewers only hint at (even though those features are probably the reason why they like the site so much) and you almost completeley left those features aside. I'm not discussing the rating per se but basing the review in only one feature of the side.
Sounds like you just got screwed by a bunch of cell phone geeks! :)
Sorry to hear it. Sounds like the site name should say MOBILE in it. I would be a ton of pissed off too.
I guess you got screwed over by Newbie reviews. Notice how all of them have 1 point at most? And to think some people say some of us review TOO much. At least your review should set things straight.
HAHAHA, and you talked about my review being way off. The site Preview states and shows samples of the quality of everything on the site, as well as the history of updates etc. It even states about HD at 1000K speeds.
I can you could care less about reading the preview ( and all the reviews ) before you posted on here. Guess the review gave you a good change to plug your favorite model site and bash this one.
This review is just wrong... Hopefully the admins will see it and pull this one..
With all due respect, is the site such a disaster to deserve a 51 rating? I simpathise with you feeling ripped off because the other reviewers also made me think this site was some sort of paradise but, anyway, a 51 is sending it next to dead sites with 0 content while this one is clearly alive and has a decent amount of picture content.
I've only seen the free tour but it has some things I always appreciate like stating all the updates with dates. I agree the site claims to have "Hi Def video" on the home page but the video section in the free tour only claims to have "HD Flash Video at 1000K" plus ipod and psp versions. Maybe the streaming is at higher resolution than the downloadable ones?
I counted 60 solo picture gallery updates in the first 9 months of this year alone, which is quite a lot for a solo site. What resolution are they in? There was a scheduled chat last week which not so many solo sites really offer although every one claims to do. Did it take place? The contests also seem interesting and are absolutely rare. There seem to be way too many sections which are probably hot air but, anyway, a 51?
All in all, I believe this is a site Francine Dee fans certainly enjoy or she wouldn't be still in the business 8 years after it was launched. I am just guessing, but maybe the other two reviewers let their fan factor influence their first review ever and sent the rating way too high without clearly explaining their reasons.
This site has been on my radar for some time. I probably will never join at this price but I'm sorry to say your review in its current form is just as unhelpful as the other two.
09-29-0802:08pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
