Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#27
from Capn:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I'll email them to you when I get back from work tonight.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-04-12 11:11pm
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from otoh:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
CT, how are you enjoying using Linux? I use various kinds for work as servers (and actually Mac OS is not too dissimilar, being Unix) and use Ubuntu on my netbook for casual use, but haven't used it yet as a day-to-day OS.
I'm a huge fan of the Linux, given that it is free as in both beer and speech. I like to think it's a very viable OS for many folk and am hugely peeved that it is essentially impossible to buy a computer without paying MS for Windows, even if you have no intention of using it.
|
04-03-12 01:42am
|
Reply
203
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from RagingBuddhist:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
XP is pretty good but, at least for me, it definitely boots slower and is heavier on system resources than 2000.
Microshaft knows how good it is - But continuing support for 2000 didn't bring in any money. It was time to put out something "new and improved" a.k.a. "We need more millions".
|
04-02-12 02:53pm
|
Reply
204
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from BadMrFrosty:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
That's much better. So yes, I am on the site hangout with other connoisseurs :)
|
03-21-12 08:40am
|
Reply
205
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Gazette Risque:
Spot on review, CT!
Especially the fact it's repetitive.
Great site but it does get boring sometimes.
|
03-17-12 12:04pm
|
Reply
206
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from messmer:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I'm going to keep this short, CT, before someone starts hollering "take it to the forum!" I'm going to check both my players for a cache and I have no idea about the graphics. I know it's an Intel chip! :-)
|
03-16-12 09:40am
|
Reply
207
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hi Cybertoad. Take a look at the review because you'll notice that it has completely changed since I screwed up my review. I used the info for backroom casting couch for exploited college girl. I have corrected my error and made a review for the other site. You will see that exploited gets a better score and review than it's sister site.
|
03-16-12 06:14am
|
Reply
208
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from messmer:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks, CT, for that very thorough reply. I was actually talking about what happens after I have closed down Firefox after a prolonged period of browsing and start watching downloaded videos on my hard drives with VLC or my other viewer (forgot the name at the moment) but not with WMP..
On many days I do just great but on other days the videos will stutter or the sound will become distorted but when I restart the computer everything is fine. Any idea what might cause that? It is almost as if I had used up too much memory and a restart gives it back to me.
|
03-15-12 06:33pm
|
Reply
209
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Good review Toad. I agree about the quality. For me 21 Sextury are the best network. I also agree with you about the one thing that needs improvement is the layout and navigation.
|
03-14-12 05:41pm
|
Reply
210
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
No. It isn't closing.... :0/
Where did you get that idea?
No, unfortunately it has been bought out by a mainstream photographer.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-11-12 12:18pm
|
Reply
211
|
Audrey Bitoni
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from tangub:
Thanks for this review CT, I've also been tempted by this Premium Pass network but i'm put off by not being offered an independant biller like CCBill or Epoch as well as the pre checked cross sells. Did you have any problems with download limits here as TBP site facts states there's a 1GB limit?
|
03-11-12 06:31am
|
Reply
212
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from rearadmiral:
Excellent review. One of these days I'm going to have to rely on all of the PU members here who reviewed this site favourably and join it. I was complaining on a recent forum thread that not enough photographers give any attention to a woman's ass, and particularly here anus. This site looks like it doesn't suffer from that issue.
Thanks for the great review.
|
03-10-12 12:12pm
|
Reply
213
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from exotics4me:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Don't worry about that at all Cybertoad. I think the more reviews and different or similar perspectives are important.
|
03-09-12 05:32pm
|
Reply
214
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Capn:
Can I take it that this is really a video site?
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-09-12 01:15pm
|
Reply
215
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from lk2fireone:
The site preview seems kind of short. I see that there are some sample photos and videos, but I usually like to see a list of all the models at the site, with thumbnails of those models.
|
03-09-12 01:03pm
|
Reply
216
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Denner:
I understand the 93 from CT - in score.
And respect that.
Still: This user got some primary negative inputs about a site which in many ways do it so well - many ways:
1)Top,top,top quality vids/pixsets.
2)Fine selection of models.
3)Generally fine editing.
Still this user got some serious downers on this site after being here several times as a member:
I like, like it a lot: Full body views in vids.
But ITC pays less attention compared to earlier times. The full body scenes are now being downgraded compared to the meaning of the site: In The Crack - ok, but it's not a good development - compared to the past not good: Just look at the older vids of Lola/Dido Angel - her vids at the pool is just great - and the some years older Lexa vids walking around that swell and sunny place in the nude...
So please, give me back that ol' In The Crack deals...
Apart from the above: They still got that damn regional pricing!!!!
|
03-09-12 07:57am
|
Reply
217
|
Audrey Bitoni
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Gazette Risque:
Again, Cybertoad, great review!
Though I was left to wonder if the videos offered are exclusive or not.
Too bad they don't allow download managers, really.
|
03-09-12 04:31am
|
Reply
218
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Gazette Risque:
The fact that someone else recently did a review on the same site shouldn't keep you from doing your own review, so kudos! :)
If the same problems are addressed is multiple reviews, maybe the site owners will start to notice and perhaps think about changing.
But what is even better is when someone reads multiple reviews and reads that more people noticed something good or bad or had a good or bad experience.
Anyway, I certainly agree with you on the issue of lack of different backgrounds and too many close ups.
Great review!
|
03-09-12 04:27am
|
Reply
219
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Gazette Risque:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
It sure is ;)
And thank you for the nice comment and trust!
|
03-09-12 04:21am
|
Reply
220
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I can't really say because all I did was skim through a couple of scenes. The scenes I saw looked just like two images side by side and had no colour differentiation that you'd normally see with 3D. There may be better ones there, but since I selected two randomly and recently posted I suspect that they're a true representation of 3D. I confess that I didn't look at them through 3D glasses, which is obviously required. The problem is that I have no idea if we have 3D glasses in the house and if I ask my wife she'll want to know why. I doubt 'so I can look at 3D porn" will be an acceptable answer. If I am able to source some 3D glasses I'll make sure to update the information here. PH does also say that the scenes work on 3D monitors for those who have them. For now though, I'm treating 3D as a gimmick with little real value to a porn collector.
|
03-07-12 01:46pm
|
Reply
221
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from RagingBuddhist:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
That's funny - when I saw that Messmer had replied to my message, I was going to say pretty much the same thing. I know it's supposed to be consensual, but I somehow get the feeling that the girls don't know exactly what they're in for when they sign the consent form. So, as some have said, maybe it's the girls' fault for not being sharp enough to know what all is what beforehand. But, in any event, the way he treats them is too over the top to me. You put it very well - they *do* look like they're disposable.
|
03-07-12 11:37am
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from jberryl69:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
yes, I meant no disrespect to Denn with the poll, it's just a big pain even though you can find the alias' in their listings how many Jane names can you have.
|
02-28-12 03:19pm
|
Reply
223
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Jay G:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
You have very good points to make and I have to agree with you. The Romans did enjoy watching death in the arena, getting more and more creative over time. Human beings do have a sadistic streak.
If I began listing all the sadistic things societies have done since at least the old testament of the Bible which demands the burning of women who sin, I could go on and on.......
|
02-28-12 01:20pm
|
Reply
224
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Jay G:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Have to disagree about worse. Because some disapprove of SOME content now available in porn, you say it's getting worse.
If people really want to disapprove of abuse of women they need to start with mainstream movies like "Saw" and its many imitators that do a lot more than slapping women around.
Worse, in America showing tits is still considered more obscene in mainstream movies than killing and dismembering victims. Porn is nowhere near as bad as American horror movies.
|
02-27-12 09:12am
|
Reply
225
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from messmer:
The fact that someone can't download properly would certainly cause a wide gap in the ratings. It has never happened to me with VB. As I wrote in a comment on the latest review I usually download at my top speed which is at present set at 2.3MB/s. I have never had an abort after 99% of a movie was downloaded so I can't identify with our fellow Europeans except to express my sympathy. My personal beef with VB is that they are catering too much to the common taste (good business sense, though) and not enough to the niches. That's why I prefer Videosz. They are mostly main stream as well but do a bit more to appease my strange tastes.
|
02-23-12 12:46pm
|