| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from Denner:
Maybe it's a question of the entire setup at this site - it may seem attractive to some - and it may be attractive when you join and get overwhelmed - by the amount. And then to some: A disapointment of quality in general.
Still it should come as no surprise with the very different scores - this site in particular has been debated over and over again - with all it's "plus and minus"
Will not go into details - the details have been around about Videobox as long as TBP/PU - but guess it still comes down to the gap between "the amount" and "the quality" - it does to this user, anyway.....
|
02-23-12 06:52am
|
Reply
227
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from Murkk:
Well, I gave the negative review, and it's because it is negative.
A place like Videobox is basically a giant download site. None of the content is exclusive, and it's reputation should live or die on the ability to download movies.
Right now the site is garbage. A complete waste. They even have malicious scripts on their server that will abort your downloads at 99.1%-99.9%.
There are plenty of other choices out there. I've been using them off and on... the last two were videoz and porn.com. I thought I'd stop in and see how this site was doing since it didn't used to be anywhere close to this bad.
|
02-22-12 04:43pm
|
Reply
228
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from Capn:
Two people can easily look at the same thing at the same time.
One might love it the other hate it.
Don't waste time agonising.
Choose your own view, Grasshopper. ;0)
Cap'n :0)
|
02-22-12 04:40pm
|
Reply
229
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
It may be the ability to download material rather than the content that decides the review. I hated Video Box and never went back because they had the slowest download speeds I have ever experienced. Their customer service was non existent. Streaming was impossible except some time after midnight here in the UK. Good material and value but it all depends on the ability to watch it.
For those who can access the content I fully understand why it should get high marks, but it's a lottery on download speeds. From what I have heard US appears not to be so bad, but European members often report of slow speeds and download problems.
|
02-22-12 09:02am
|
Reply
230
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from BubbaGump:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hello. Thanks. I tried to be fair and objective about it. never reviewed a porn site before.
|
01-12-12 03:43pm
|
Reply
231
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Khan:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Cybertoad, with regard to VLC's features ...
I use an older version so there may be some changes to the controls but if you look along the top menu and select "video" you should see options to "scale" and another to "zoom". I think they'll address at least some of your problems with that player.
Hope that helps some.
|
12-21-11 08:18am
|
Reply
232
|
Dana Lightspeed
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I was a member of some other Lightspeed sites for a few days recently - their $6.95 trial. One thing you should be aware of going in is that there hasn't been any new Lightspeed material at all, so far as I know, for several years. They just recycle their old material over and over and over. Of course, if you want to get some of that material, then it's worth joining. Their links aren't decayed and their vids all play and all that. It's just not new material.
|
12-15-11 06:49am
|
Reply
233
|
I Am Peeing
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BrockLion:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I said "some of the material is posted elsewhere."
|
12-14-11 09:20am
|
Reply
234
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from RLane:
Very nice review, but the picture quality is better than okay. Sometimes for new updates they have either 7000px or 5000px sets.
|
12-11-11 02:02pm
|
Reply
235
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I thought the 90 score was 20 points more than the site deserved and I already stated my reasons. I agree that she is really hot but can her site even be considered softcore porn? You never see her nude so unless she gets it on with a girl then it's nothing more than a kind of fan site dedicated to one girl.
|
12-10-11 07:38am
|
Reply
236
|
Nicole Graves
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Yes, I'm a member - No live camshows on this site for ever, but Nicole was part of 2 different Twisty's live shows recently and members of Twisty's have access to this site and vice versa.
She added 2 new photo sets to this site on 12/05. On 11/17, she added her most recent Twisty's photo set and she also added 2 other photo sets to this site on 11/03.
Videos? None since 2/11.
|
12-08-11 09:18pm
|
Reply
237
|
Rebecca's Office
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lazarus:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
First,
Thank you for your feedback.
I'm sorry I was not clear on why I found her website lacking.
First, her photo sets have all of the same poses, just different outfits and locations.
Second, her videos are of fair to poor quality.
Why ? because they were filmed in poorly lit rooms of which I asked her why.
Her reply was that the men she has sex with don't want to be recognized yet for more money you can purchase dvd's from her where the lighting is much better.
Sounds like a way to get more money out of her fans.
If you like MILF who is a true amateur that is attractive like Rebecca you might be able to look past the shortcommings I listed.
|
12-08-11 11:04am
|
Reply
238
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from messmer:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Cybertoad wrote:
"Just kidding, I share some of this stuff with you guys. I am not a huge Lisa Ann fan, but in a more recent shoot she did a full undress slowly with some nice under-garments and it was done very tasteful.
I wish there was more lace and such, seems I do not see it unless some guys is ripping it off a gal."
I just made you an honorary old-timer, CT! LOL!
|
12-07-11 12:12pm
|
Reply
239
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from careylowell:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I'm 50! I recall Playboy not showing crotches (sp?). I prefer hanky-panky between similar age groups. I guess I'm pestering you with a reply only because of my shameless quest for a talk back badge.
|
12-06-11 09:22pm
|
Reply
240
|
September Carrino
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from TomR:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks for the compliment. I could and will post a few more reviews soon. There are MANY I could post on. Unfortunately, Septembers site was the one of the ONLY ones I could rate as a NO GO so far. Most of my upcoming reviews will most likely be more positive. I just dont want people wasting their time and money with that one. I will post more soon. And once again thanks.
Tom
|
12-05-11 08:40am
|
Reply
241
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from gaypornolover:
Excellent review as ever - don't suppose there are gay male options? Mind you it sounds like it would never run on my laptop if you have a quad-core machine and it's still running slowly! Sounds like one for hardcore gamers as well as hardcore porn users!
|
12-04-11 05:44pm
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from messmer:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Conundrum is a good word, CT! Good thing we'll probably never be put to the test. I mean here I am secure in my heterosexual identity for all these years and then along comes this gorgeous Thai shemale and has the nerve to disturb my certainties. It's not right! :-)
|
12-01-11 12:49pm
|
Reply
243
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from RustyJ:
Is this one still working on the basis that you choose the positions from the predetermied set via menu system or is it free movement and positioning?
|
11-30-11 10:44pm
|
Reply
244
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Well, this site is sure taking a hit at the moment, CT. I remember being a member of Lusty Grandmas (one of the groups offered here) a long time before HD was even mentioned, and the quality was very good even at 640x480px. It could easily be watched full screen with amazing clarity. Lusty Grandmas is still around and updates once a week in Super HD and their quality is still very good.
However, I am very upset about many of the other updates that, according to their specifications, should also be very good (even though they are not HD) ... but aren't. The picture is blurred and crappy, the colors are washed out, lighting is off on far too many of them which only leaves a small handful of good quality HD updates a week.
Take away the niches that aren't of great interest to you and you will find yourself with two, possibly three updates, a week that appeal to you. Not much for the money, not even at a reduced rate unless you subscribe for the first time. :-(
|
11-30-11 07:46pm
|
Reply
245
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from slategrey:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Goverment wants to stop all the good stuff. And Dont count on a bail out. Might be possible if Herman Cain aka Big Daddy Cain gets in office, he seems raunchy. But Yeah i have to agree i have seen a dip in several sites.
|
11-30-11 07:20pm
|
Reply
246
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
In all honesty, that is why I have pretty much stopped using their content.
Whilst it is in some ways more polished than most, they do not provide what the customers are asking for in their sparse update schedule.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-30-11 01:24pm
|
Reply
247
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Capn:
I didn't go for the subscription.
I bought the content that appealed to me.
( Through purchase of the so called Sex Coins )
It is very pricey on the subscription & you cannot use it once the subscription expires.
That is why I went the purchase route.
The upside of the subscription is that you can play with all the toys, bells & whistles & check out what is worthwhile.
My main gripe with this site is the lack of communication between the developers & the users.
Users ask a question and are often ignored.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-30-11 01:14pm
|
Reply
248
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Anonymous64:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
There is a fair amount. This is actually my first porn subscription I ever paid for so I don't have a lot to compare to. What I did was load up a streaming video of something, and skip to juicy parts to see if I wanted to download it.. if I liked a certain scene I'd download it.
It IS plenty better I think than free video sites, which are mostly clips.. and poorer quality. The sites I know of that offer free lengthy videos, typically have bandwidth/buffer issues which makes it a pain to try and enjoy.
GGG in particular is a longtime producer of porn so, I'm sure they arn't out to scam you. From what I've read in the past, they have appeared to change their billing ways.
|
11-27-11 05:21pm
|
Reply
249
|
Milk Enema
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks Cybertoad. I find reviews so much easier to write now that the staff increased the allowable length. I guess I suffer from a bit of run-on...
|
11-25-11 02:11pm
|
Reply
250
|
Schoool Mistress Fantasy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Jason123:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
It's mostly a photo site. There's probably about a dozen vids on there (maybe less). As for photo sets, I don't know for sure but there's definitely several hundred at least
|
11-25-11 09:50am
|
