| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
Virtual Nymphos
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from mbaya:
Very interesting and complete review. I have always wondered about sites like these and now I know that they are not ready yet.
|
10-16-08 03:49am
|
Reply
402
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Both are good sites. InFocus Girls is a fairly easy site to download, but they time stamp the links, so they expire after maybe an hour or so. I would say to join InFocus Girls then Hungarian Honeys next month perhaps, or just join whcih ever site you have not seen before in the event you have been to one of them already.
|
10-15-08 11:34am
|
Reply
403
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hum....I would say that $25 is still not bad. A lot of sites are costing $30 or more any more. There is a good amount of content and the models are pretty good looking. Plus, they update daily. Worst case join for a month and cancel. They might offer you the $10 per month then, or email an offer down the road somewhere. I do not remember getting the offer before two months ago, so it may have only been a one time promotion.
Anyway, don't let the fact that I am paying less deter you from a site you wanted to join before you knew that. There is easily $25 worth of good stuff here.
Sorry they were not receptive to offering you a discount. Perhaps the guys at TBP can work something out with them sometime.
|
10-15-08 10:01am
|
Reply
404
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from atrapat:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Glad you liked the review. To each his own, though. Funny thing is I'm not a big fan of extremely huge boobs either and the usual body type of SCORE models has never done it for me but there was something with Christy Marks that prompted me to join and no complaints. The BGG scene with "major boobage" Janet Jade alone was well worth the price of admission.
|
10-13-08 03:11pm
|
Reply
405
|
Virtual Nymphos
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Denner:
Excellent review (and warning).
Well, Cybertoad got around to it and the same goes for asmith: Those 3D/animated-sites.
I've been somewhat fascinated by that kind of "porn", but along the way it seems like the deal is not so attractive, after all - thanks to reviews from asmith and Cybertoad.
Maybe thing are a bit premature - and maybe it takes MORE time to develop stuff like this. Wish it did not, though...
|
10-13-08 09:20am
|
Reply
406
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I got an offer through my email. I was member there before. I posted here on PU, but I believe it had to be deleted because it seemed it would not work of anyone else. You might try emailing their customer service and asking if they would give you that deal. Worst they could do is say no.
|
10-12-08 05:34pm
|
Reply
407
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
The videos look they would be no easier to get with a download manager.. But I usually would queue that up manually. It would only take 15 minutes to grab a good number of them.
If you join I could go over the method I used previously to grab the zips I did get. I got about 20% of them automatically, but it did take some work to get to that point, but much less than actually clicking around.
I do not usually use site grabber, I find them to be very unreliable. They skip stuff and double on others.
The videos can be downloaded in one piece now. I believe that is what you were asking, they are not in chunks, so that part is easier. Really by the time you got a manager set up to search for the videos you could just click them by hand, they are easy to get to.
The only problem is that the videos are not named consistantly. Some are named with the models name while others are labeled "HDV 2" for example.
The zips are named fairly nicely, although, I wish they had used spaces or something between the words. Amy Ried Red Dress reads "amyriedreddress" which is descriptive but a little hard to read when there are 4000 of them all together!
|
10-12-08 05:32pm
|
Reply
408
|
Old Man Tales
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Completely right.
This typically end up being deleted once the staff guys check the site after an hour or so.
Besides, he is likely just venting off some frustrations about something, although I would like to know what. A lot of times these guys never review anything else, so this review never counts into the scoring, which is the first thing you see when looking for anew site anyway.
Hopefully he will come back and tell us a little something before it gets deleted.
|
10-12-08 04:29pm
|
Reply
409
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Cybertoad.
There is a lot of content, but I have just been having a little trouble downloading it. They have been posting 4 videos per week and they are pretty good quality.
They have been posting photos daily. They quality has gotten fairly good. The lasted set has a resolution of 1334 × 2000.
They definitely have a good amount of girls here, and you will not find too many ugly ones.
I am having issues with downloading the zips from the site. I found a way to automate it and it work nicely, once. Now I cant seem to get it to work right again and have put it aside for now as I have been extremely busy and trying to rush another site that cost $35 per month rather than the $10 I am paying for this one.
To download the sips you have to go to load the gallery then go at another page. From there it says it is putting the zip file together, then a few seconds later the link shows up. This plays tricks on some download managers and make it a pain to queue stuff up. One good thing is that the links do not expire, so you can queue up 3 days of zips if you want and do not have to worry about them expiring on you.
I will write a full review for this one, I just have not been focusing on this site lately.
Of course, if there is anything else you would like to know...
|
10-12-08 04:20pm
|
Reply
410
|
Mia McKinley
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Another site powered by the same people, Naughty Natalie XOXO, also got a rave review with little info. I wrote a review for another site by them, Miss Laura Lee, whose picture content info shouldn't be much different from the one here.
The free section from these people usually shows the amount of content available in the members area. Be advised, though, that pictures are probably quite small and cannot be downloaded. Video sizes are probably big but there's no info on resolution or duration. Only a handful of videos. There's a free video sample which is 1280x720 (6000kbps); IMHO, very bad camera work, though.
|
10-12-08 05:35am
|
Reply
411
|
Sammy4U
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Bryce1:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I added some more I hope it helps ..if you need more ..you might have to be more specific thanks for the input though
Bryce1
|
10-09-08 04:51am
|
Reply
412
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks Cybertoad. My thoughts are that this site works for all of us so if I don't give enough detail or assumed to much then it works well for all of us when that's pointed out so I can correct it.
Thanks for the trust rating.
|
10-08-08 02:42pm
|
Reply
413
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
If I had to make a rough guess I would say the site contains approx. 350 videos (split up into four categories: hard core, hard core solo (toys), interviews and soft core solos) with most models having at least two - three videos. Tell the truth I gave up after the first few videos because, to me, they are substandard to what's offered on other sites. I download the "Interview" videos at times if I'm interested in a model's background but delete it after because many of the videos are ill-lit, and too blurry for my taste.
The site is fairly large and growing every day with steady updates so taking out a month's subscription would not be a bad deal. My tastes are a bit limited, so for me it's difficult to find the right material (women in their fifties, lingerie) and I deplete a site of the material I'm interested in very quickly but folks with more eclectic tastes will have a ball on this site. It really is quality!
|
10-08-08 10:00am
|
Reply
414
|
Pee Lover
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
That's what we are here for. Of the sites on the network this one is the most dedicated to ONLY peeing. Many of the others feature fisting and other things. Here it is pee and all the crazy things they could think of to do with it.
|
10-08-08 09:11am
|
Reply
415
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from badandy400:
Hey, sometimes you just have to go with your gut even if it is not the answer you want. We want you to call it how you see it, not how you would like to see it. So keep it honest and chalk this one up as a piece of junk and put it on your blacklist.
|
10-08-08 09:09am
|
Reply
416
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ace of aces:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
knowing that there are less video makes the price high. and trials...
sadly most of the trial are limited, although they are displayed as unlimited. just trapped with Huge Boobs Galore. wether the special price was available nor the trial was a real one.
|
10-08-08 08:44am
|
Reply
417
|
Sammy4U
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Bryce1:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I will do that cybertoad.. let me just check it out in depth to make sure I get the right info for you .. and thanks for the reply
Bryce1
|
10-08-08 08:30am
|
Reply
418
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
maybe i risk it :)
|
10-08-08 08:24am
|
Reply
419
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Sorry for the lack of detail Cybertoad. I guess I assumed that a lot of people would be familiar with Kink stuff, and that probably just isn't the case. To answer your questions:
Content details: The Eastern European scenes start with a scantily clothed woman in some sort of bondage and often with a ball gag. She is paraded around in public and made to do humiliating things like drink from a dog bowl or let people touch her. The scenes then shift to sex in some outdoor and public location. The U.S. scenes are more like a gangbang scene with bondage and Kink props used. There are several scenes in each shoot using a different bondage or prop setup. In the U.S. scenes the 'public' element is a little strained in that it is shot inside for obvious reasons, but the trade off is that the models are more widely known.
The humiliation level in both the European and U.S scenes is fairly high.
Video quality: decent. I'm not a techie so I don't know what is objectively good. The bitrate is 2140kbps and the dimensions are 960x540.
Other stuff: There are no dowmload limits that I'm aware of on any Kink site. If there was one, I'd have surely run into it on their other sites. There is no DRM either.
As for the thread where people are complaining about it being too tame, I can understand that but I don't really agree. It's a subjective thing. I read the thread and many people seem to want to see specific things, especially more humiliation. I like the balance they have now, though if they added more humiliation I wouldn't complain.
Another complaint that I do agree with is that the shoots in the U.S are a lot like other Kink stuff, but just with a gangbang thrown in. It looks a lot like Training of O or Sex and Submission.
If there is a valid complaint in the thread it might be that the site seems to advertise more humiliation and less sex, when what you get is less humiliation and more sex. I don't necessarily agree with that since I think having a woman tied up and fucked outside while people watch is pretty humiliating. But I won't complain if they ramp it up.
I also note on the forum link that you posted that there is only one thread that has anything negative, so for the most part people seem satisfied.
I hope I've answered your questions. If you need more info or more detail post a reply to this and I'll be happy to answer.
|
10-07-08 02:51pm
|
Reply
420
|
Deluxe Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from OttifantSir:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks for the encouraging words, they sure help a newb like myself. I have now updated my review some, but on the part of numbers for download quality, I can't remember exactly, therefore I added a general description of the movies' quality.
I also listed some genres I remember from this site.
Thanks for your input, and I will try my best to remember this when I review another site.
|
10-04-08 10:10am
|
Reply
421
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I'm willing to allow that the economy isn't helping, but frankly I can count on my hands the number of good mainstream movies were
released this year, and I can safely say that I only need one for amazing movies. It's pretty much the samething for porn, but just multiply the number of movies by 5. People simply do not know how to make movies anymore. It's cookie cutter with all show and no substance.
|
10-01-08 05:26pm
|
Reply
422
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from atrapat:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Cybertoad, maybe I didn't see it clear enough the other day but I just want to say that your review is well worth it and I'm sure that a surfer looking for HD video will find the recounting of your experience valuable and avoid this site at all costs once they see the advertised HD video is nowhere to be seen.
I see your review and rating are honest for someone looking for a regular solo model site but Morphious seems to be so much into this site and model that I'd very much like him to arrange his thoughts and explain what makes this site so absolutely special for him.
The thing is I believe the site perhaps only SEEMS to advertise itself falsely for several reasons:
a) we usually expect solo model sites (or sites in general) to deliver mainly photos and video on a regular basis: journals, chats, live cams are a rare extra and not the main course;
b) at one point in its 8+ years of existence, the site was a usual solo model site and its design mostly stuck with it;
c) the site design fails at conveying to the visitors what it's really about;
When someone arrives at the site, he sees the model and some white text on a sky blue background on the right that he just ignores: hard to read and his eyes are probably fixed on the girl (at least, that's what I did). He scrolls down the page and sees the icons you mentioned: HD Videos, photos and all. OK, he thinks, we just found a usual solo model site, girl's hot, I like HD video, let's type in the credit card number and get the party started. Reality check: 3 streaming-only video updates in a year and lots of photos which aren't his favorite dish.
That text he ignored (rightfully, as it looks like they wanted people not to read it) says "Welcome to the internet's newest and most extensive reality show yet! Live cams are running 24 hours a day seven days a week to fulfill your voyeuristic pleasures. Go behind the scenes of a woman's world and enjoy". For once, I believe it's not lies in its entirety and this site is, in fact, delivering live voyeur video on a regular basis. OK, I guess those spy cams show recorded video during some hours of the day but Morphious seems to hint that he once caught Francine Dee having sex live on one of the "spy cams"! My crush on Francine Dee died a long time away (never was a member of the site, and never will) but, if that thing can happen in this site, I think it's pretty remarkable.
When you are so much into a model as Morphious seems to be, getting a weekly live chat plus video blogs plus contests plus spy cams plus getting her to call you on the phone during a chat plus being able to bid on her lingerie must make you live with a constant hard-on. HD what? Pictures? You get her LIVE daily! This site fails miserably to deliver HD video by all accounts but 3 different people came here to praise the site (2 reviews, 2 comments). Morphious seems to be the only one who didn't hit and run so I'd very much like him to make some sense of his initial review.
|
10-01-08 12:23pm
|
Reply
423
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from TheRizzo:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Yeah with the economy taking a hit and the crazy ammount of pirate tube sites out there, I wouldn't be surprised to see a lot of recycled content as updates. I wonder if the major sites are seeing any real drop in sales or not?
But as for 1 By Day, one of my favorites online by far. Deny's is a great photographer.
|
10-01-08 11:32am
|
Reply
424
|
Watch You Jerk
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elonlybuster:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I faintly remember that episode somewhat.
Anyways, I guess the reason a few sites like this still exist is because there has to be someone that likes it. I'm assuming these are the same people who have a phobia of cocks, or maybe some chicks who are trying to learn to talk dirty to their guy.
Regardless thanks for the feedback.
|
10-01-08 10:06am
|
Reply
425
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
As long as it's new to you then it's all good. I did take a quick look and some scenes do appear new. I'm just not going to spend 30$ for just a few scenes. I'm affraid that this studio is going under because I don't think Hands on Hardcore has had a new scene in months
|
09-30-08 06:31pm
|
