| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
Teens 3some
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I converted all the videos to avi because they are all in wmv and I like to burn them to dvd's. The resolution is 640 x 480 for most of not them. I did notice one that is 860 x 484. They are nowhere near HD, but that isn't a big deal with me. I think they look nice on my 19" computer screen or my 27" TV.
|
11-05-08 07:49pm
|
Reply
377
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jeffrey99:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I'd think the tease is the first 75-80% of the photos. Just to me there are too many sets that never get past the tease part.
But no there isn't any false advertising or anything going on. As they never do promise or say how nude the ladies get. To me OT is a jack of all trades and a master of none. It seems they can't make up their mind if they want to do full nudity, just topless or non-nude.
Guess I'm just not used to paying $25 for a non-nude site.
|
11-05-08 12:22pm
|
Reply
378
|
Real Black Lesbians
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mbaya:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I gave you a positive rating on August 27th. You have some very high quality reviews. I hope you also like this site.
|
11-05-08 12:12pm
|
Reply
379
|
Real Black Lesbians
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thank you for your nice words. I don't see your rating yet.
|
11-05-08 12:04pm
|
Reply
380
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tobi:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks a lot. I really try to be objective.
|
11-01-08 12:10pm
|
Reply
381
|
Phil-Flash Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
As I read the PU info on the network, it listed 4 sites - PF.com, Seanna Teen, Princess Blueyez and Next Door Nikki - all of which are included with PF.com membership, as well as Nikki, Seanna & Princess Blueyez' zip set, The Taylor Twins site, Kendall Blaze's site - all available via separate log-in - and a number of other sites that were folded into the PF.com site and are available by clicking on the Bonus Sites area.
|
10-31-08 12:46pm
|
Reply
382
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
He said it only updated 3 or 4 times a week, which wasn't often enough for his tastes. The every day updates might not be often enough for his tastes either - some sites give multiple updates a day, but I was responding to the incorrect info in the review - I should note that the review has now been edited - so if anybody else comes along and says, "Where does he say it only updates 3 or 4 times a week?", well it no longer does.
|
10-31-08 12:43pm
|
Reply
383
|
Suze Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from xbigvmanx:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks man. I appreciate it. Its one of those websites that hasn't lossed too much of its luster over the years. I probably will subscribe again once it moves all of their photo galleries to zip and improves their video content and quality.
|
10-31-08 12:04pm
|
Reply
384
|
Phil-Flash Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Actually, as a member of this site/network, I can say for a fact that all of the sites listed in PU's info are included with membership as well as others. Some are listed in the main site as "Bonus Sites". Others have a link in the top left of the main page and need to be entered separately with the same username/password as you use for the main site. But they are all included.
|
10-31-08 11:14am
|
Reply
385
|
Adult Doorway
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Much appreciated. Can you give me a trust rating?
|
10-31-08 03:46am
|
Reply
386
|
Lezbo Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
When I joined Lez Cuties, I was unaware that I'd get access to all of the other sites. Let me say that I was quite pleased by that surprise. I'm not sure which site you might get if you join Lesbo Honeys. It might be all of the ones I got, but you might get some different ones. If I'm correct there are a total of 40+ sites that are available. I'm probably going to join DP Fanatics in November because I want Doris/ Aleta Ocean, Aliens first DP scene. I'll let you know which site if any I actually get with that one.
|
10-30-08 06:48pm
|
Reply
387
|
Phil Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Wittyguy:
Hey, I dig you're marketing approach to getting trust votes here. Never thought of the direct sell method in reviews. Just curious, what size do the photos come in?
|
10-27-08 02:18pm
|
Reply
388
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pr0n addict:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
highest resolution is 1920x1080
i woulden't even bother downloading any other size cause you dont get any detail in it, if you know what i mean?
i didn't include any of the resolutions in my review because the person below and before me who reviewed it also wrote it down on there review. i was just adding to their review or reinterating the good and bad points aswell. :)
|
10-26-08 11:50am
|
Reply
389
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Have to say I agree, too. Thing is, I usually watch with sound off anyway so I don't notice. But the cameraman or interviewer or stud, whoever it is, doing a bunch of yakking during sex or idiotic (really pathetic) verbal posturing during interviews is a total turn off.
Like, are WE supposed to be impressed by this? Au contraire!
Regarding interviews, I've never seen any of a guy interviewing the girl that didn't just reek of "loser" on the guy end. The questions are so dumb, the comeons so flat, the girl so smart compared to the knucklehead. At least the girl, bored though she must be, comes out of it looking no worse for the wear.
|
10-24-08 03:17pm
|
Reply
390
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from williamj:
Final Whistle has really slipped. I now recommend avoiding their sites if you where a member when they where good. Too many negative things from trust reviewers. Its a shame they had it going when they where good.
|
10-24-08 08:26am
|
Reply
391
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from oldfart:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Yes, these are the main cons. Personally, I had to sift through quite a number of videos to find downloads that appealed to me. I found about 30 clips from 18 of 200 videos that I thought were interesting between Oct 20 and Sept 11, 2008. You may find more to your liking – I am only expressing my opinion. There is a lot of content on this site, despite its quality of content flaws, so in the end it is worth a trial for those who are satisfied with ordinary porn.
|
10-21-08 12:46pm
|
Reply
392
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from asmith12:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
> But selfish me that rubber ruins the fantasy.
Ditto. An ideal for me would be something safe but invisible.
|
10-20-08 11:18am
|
Reply
393
|
Restrained Elegance
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Dorsai6:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I can understand your concern. I am a new member and I don't know how the rating scheme works in practice. However, the system notes indicated that the 90-99 range was for an excellent site. I've visited a number of sites whose rating here was in the mid-90's and I feel that this site is better. It's my opinion and you certainly don't have to trust it. I did post what I think are the most relevant data both plus and minus. That was the most information I was willing to take the time to assemble. If the review was inadequate, I hope the owners of this site will pull it. On the other hand, I think it does describe the site fairly well.
|
10-17-08 04:36pm
|
Reply
394
|
The Hand Job Site
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from mbaya:
Unfortunately no trial.
|
10-17-08 12:17pm
|
Reply
395
|
Her First Fat Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from OMF456:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks for the trust rating. Haven't been here long enough to even know what that does for me but thanks nonetheless. :-)
They offer both high res and low res full videos and then they break each video down into smaller segments too.
I'll try to do better with my reviews in the future. I guess I'm easy to please. I dont' care what format the videos are in. I can watch any format. I don't care about stills cuz, in my mind, why bother with stills if you've got video. Any site under $30 that tweaks my fancy, I'll join. I actually think that's a tremendous bargain versus schlepping off to the adult book store or buying a PPV movie so price isn't that concerning to me either. If I like it I'll stick around for awhile. If I don't, I'll cancel immediately and just use up my 30 days. But, I see that others do care about this stuff so in the future I will do my best to include details about it.
One thing that I will ALWAYS mention are the damn sites that freaking try and bill you $100 or some ridiculous amount when you're just trying to join one site for $25 or whatever it is. If I see that, I'll typically not join at all even though I could probably have clicked all the right buttons to get out of the bullshit.
Fuck, I can really go on and on when I want to. Anyway, sorry for the long comment.
Cya
|
10-17-08 11:17am
|
Reply
396
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from OMF456:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
If you like cum-swallowing, there is no better site on the internet than AmateurAllure, in my opinion. (No, I don't work for them, :-)) However, the domain name is AMATEUR Allure. Not, cumswallowing allure. So, the name infers that the girls are amateurs when in fact, most of them are not.
My personal "thing" is amateurs. I guess I need to clarify that. I guess my "thing" is amateur girls giving blowjobs and fucking. Don't really care who the guy is. Though I do not like the "stolen sex tapes" sites or the "watch a guy nag his girlfriend" sites.
Anyway, I went off on a tangent there. I was just saying that he represents the girls as amateurs when they're not. Since amateurs is my thing, that's a big con for me. But, overall, the site is one of the best out there.
|
10-17-08 11:07am
|
Reply
397
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from williamj:
They have three different sites in one. Solo, Intimate Moments, and the third is a xxx hard core girl/girl. You can subscribe to either one for a monthly fee, but they always have an offer to get all three for an extra $4.95. Tons of material, getting a bit more xxx lately.
|
10-17-08 10:42am
|
Reply
398
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Khan:
HEADS UP TO ALL
User account Morphious has been suspended. We have substantial evidence that this user is related to the site Francine Dee.
His Reviews and Comments have been removed, however we'll leave his replies here for the sake of continuity of the thread.
We'd suggest users judge his remarks accordingly.
|
10-17-08 09:55am
|
Reply
399
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Morphious:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hello, back from Vacation, in the live chat on Francies's Site now site now. Seems kind of funny that showing a pre recorded chat while dran is not live, is one of the Con's from this reviewer. I guss he is only used to seeing a blank screen where the model is not live.
Asked the chatters if they had a problem with support emails.. No one said they have a problem..
Kind of think you are making this up.. I have even sent an email to the contact email ( form the members area ) and received email direct back from Francine. So I am really not believing that you have tried at all.
If you look at the site. http://francinedee.com/blast_past.php shows 10 years of sites. Photos show 10 years of sites. I am SURE that a lot of the other parts of the site, as they have been added over time, do not go back 10 years. Plus they just had their 10 years party in LA on 8-8-08 ( it is on the site )
There seems to be movies on the site that where shot in HD and
scaled down for web use. Comcast compresses their Video hugely, so does Dish network, etc. How is this any different? Just because of the physical size of the video? If this was 1920 / 1080 , but supper compressed, would it not be HD? What about the Industry calling 720 DPI video monitors HD? Where they wrong, because it was not 1920 / 1080?
OK, about the misleading parts of the site. I looked over it all again when I got back. Since you seem to be focusing your whole review and negativity toward this site regarding video, go here.
http://francinedee.com/videos.php
at the top it says : Regularly updated HD flash video with PSP and IPOD Downloads!
Then you can look down and see sample thumbs and dates of every video in the site.
Man, it does not get any clearer then this!!!. If you did not take the time and read over the preview pages and look at the dates and samples on the site, it is your own fault. The site shows samples time and dates for every update they have done. I don't think it gets an more honest then this. 90% of sites out there do not show you samples, and dates for all the content they have on their site. So is it better to see a "splash page" on a site with 20 pic samples, not dated, and you go in the site to find out that it has not been updated in a year? This had happened to me MANY times in the past.
I 100% support the advertising methods of this site, as it is one of the FEW model sites where you really get to see everything that you are getting BEFORE you chose to buy.
P.S. kind of funny how a bunch of the rebuttals to your posts have been deleted....
|
10-16-08 10:13pm
|
Reply
400
|
Pornotopia
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pornotopia:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hello and Thank you for writing in your question. It has, indeed, been 2 1/2 years since our last full feature DVD release, PornoMation2 and we still have several months yet to finish PornoMation3.
In fact, it will take a full studio house up to a year to execute 30 minutes of finished 3d animation. Pornotopia.com is Sagemonn and myself pulling off a whole 90 minute production on our own. I'd be glad to explain all the complexities involved if anyone cares to know.
I have to admit to not having known the best way to communicate about this. We took on an ambitious project and severely miscalculated our ETA. It has been embarrassing to extend promises we are not sure of. We are to date about 70 - 75% finished. We will post the good news at Pornotopia.com as soon as it is available.
Thanks to all who have supported us and have so VERY patiently hung in there for us!
Sincerely,
Karynna
|
10-16-08 07:16am
|
