| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
TNV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from WeeWillyWinky:
(Jay G's Reply)
Hi Jay,
Thanks for the reply, but I think maybe my review is giving the wrong impression.
While the site is no doubt softcore, it's most definitely not non-nude. There is plenty of nudity; in fact, there's even a section for nude galleries and videos, though that isn't the only place nudity happens. The action between the girls is often very erotic and it seems very genuine most of the time.
About the DRM protected vids: I believe there is only one small section containing these. I would estimate at least 85-90 percent of the video here is not DRM protected. I do agree with you, though, and I avoid DRM sites as well.
|
01-07-08 09:03pm
|
Reply
352
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Monahan:
(Jay G's Reply)
I think Jay G has nailed it. Three ratings makes the most sense.
Quantity:
I have gone to a great looking site at a good price to find that I can download everything on it in a week or so. Relatedly, I've gone to high rated sites that have infrequent updating, or none at all. A quantity rating makes great sense.
Quality:
A rating of quality that is not influenced at all by price or quantity adds considerably to the value of the rating.
Price:
Stating the price is good, but the TBP folks have seen everything so they can add a price/value subjective rating to the mix. If it's independent from the content rating, than it's a big addition to the review.
|
12-30-07 08:38am
|
Reply
353
|
Chanta's Bitches
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from cerebral:
(Jay G's Reply)
Howdy, Jay G:
Like your comments. Not to worry about minor disagreements. We all have different tastes.
What worries me most about this site is the lighting. Know that darkness evokes mystery and danger. But a little better lighting would improve viewer entertainment. Chanta is fine. Guess I like some of the female doms like Venus and Kym Wild.
Hope you enjoy the holidays.
Cerebral
|
12-25-07 12:15pm
|
Reply
354
|
VIP XXX Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from pat362:
Hi Jay G. I made the mistake of joining "porn pass for all" which offers the same sites, but for 38.95 as oppose to the 24.95 which is offered by this site. You do not get immediate acces to all of the sites advertised, but if you remain a member for about 6 months you will then have acces to all of them without increasing the cost. They add an extra 2 or 3 site every month. I wasn't disapointed with the content first offered, but I dislike being lied to. I'm not sure if they randomly choose which sites you get access to because I haven't rejoined.
|
11-27-07 06:42pm
|
Reply
355
|
Exploited Moms
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from delta69:
(Jay G's Reply)
This site does not accept reviews below a certain score. I had to bump up the score in order for my review to even be accepted for posting.
|
10-28-07 09:49pm
|
Reply
356
|
Meat Members
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from SnowDude:
(Jay G's Reply)
That's not a particular fetish of mine, but perhaps I'll do a review of it for those that do. Thanks for the comment!
|
10-10-07 07:37pm
|
Reply
357
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jd1961:
(Jay G's Reply)
I think not everyone is online----yet. So they still sell $45 videos in porn shops. But they better get in line with the reality of internet porn, which has a lot more customer potential than the sleazy sex shop ever did.
|
10-10-07 02:14pm
|
Reply
358
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jeffdanson:
(Jay G's Reply)
Well its not like the other websites where you have only one person. They have to give some camera time to all of the small actions. But I think overall they do a good job of capturing the action.
You might considering the parent website eromaxx.com
|
10-07-07 02:14pm
|
Reply
359
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pornseeker:
(Jay G's Reply)
wow...you guys are harsh. I've joined so many sites with crappy vids I was thrilled to find one with hot girl in hardcore action. Of course they need more models but they give you free access to a few other teen sites and lots of teen dvds. Keeps me happy!
|
10-03-07 07:55am
|
Reply
360
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Jay G's Reply)
Thanks Jay G
... and yeah - most of the times I try to experiment out there with "unknown" sites I get disappointed. And high price after the "you get what you pay for" never garantee quality. Mostly the opposite.
|
09-27-07 12:53am
|
Reply
361
|
Sensual Harmony
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jake07621:
(Jay G's Reply)
I cracked up laughing the other night. A couple of the sites I belong to have the 'house cams' and she's on there. I've never seen her naked on there....but, yikes. She's usually chain smoking, mean expression, and looks like she just rolled out of bed. Hair's a mess, etc. Ugh.
|
09-20-07 02:33pm
|
Reply
362
|
Hardcore Partying
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(Jay G's Reply)
Thanks very much Jay
Yeah I hope webmasters do come here as its a great place to see what your paying subscribers or potential subscribers want from a site, thats always going to be important for any business no matter what it is.
Hoping the webmaster for Reality Kings comes to PornUsers and reads some posts about his/her site network and does away with the Download Limit
Cheers
Elephant
|
09-18-07 04:08pm
|
Reply
363
|
Barbi's Slutty Adventures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Jay G's Reply)
Right, Jay G
Have the same thing with good bargains - and this is certainly not one of them...
|
09-10-07 03:09am
|
Reply
364
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Khan:
(Jay G's Reply)
For future reference ...
Should you ever find you've submitted a Comment / Review for the wrong site, drop us a line via email and we can usually help sort it out. Of course, once there's been a sting of discussion we're reluctant to delete a post.
You can email us via the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of every page or you can mail me directly at khan [at] PornUsers [dot] com
|
08-31-07 06:37am
|
Reply
365
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Fowrzo:
(Jay G's Reply)
Ahah! I see... no problem man! I just found it weird you know when I read your reply... I was like "Was I wrong when I wrote in my review that this site has no DRM protection?". I thought that maybe I didn't notice some DRM protection when there was one but at the same, I was pretty sure that there weren't any DRM protection so that's why I replied to you, just to make sure that I wasn't wrong about it! See you man!
|
08-30-07 07:50pm
|
Reply
366
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Fowrzo:
(Jay G's Reply)
There are no DRM at www.videobox.com!
|
08-29-07 10:04pm
|
Reply
367
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from videobox:
(Jay G's Reply)
No sweat. ;)
|
08-27-07 01:55pm
|
Reply
368
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from videobox:
(Jay G's Reply)
I suppose whether $9.95 per month is a high price can be debated, but it is incorrect to say that VideoBox uses DRM. We do not use DRM of any kind on our videos. Ever.
|
08-27-07 08:58am
|
Reply
369
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Jay G's Reply)
I think it hurts the site in terms of competitiveness, but the rejoinder to that is possibly that the site provides a unique product of exceptional quality, or something along those lines. And it's "fair" as you're paying by the "unit," as it were. How many sites take such care to do that?
That could be the schpiel (sp?), but considering that the site has never been reviewed at PornUsers until now, meaning it gets nowhere near the attention that many other sites have gotten would show the weakness of such counterpoints.
People go for porn because it's fun, and they don't want the experience to get complicated. Tokens are for riding subways.
|
08-26-07 07:20am
|
Reply
370
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(Jay G's Reply)
To be honest there are a few more than "three ugly ones" but I used that phrase as a take-off (so to speak) of the old Deja Vu Gentlemens' Club ads.
In an effort to fill the ranks of the Big Tits Round Ass site, they chose a few ladies whose avoirdupois is likely tipping the scale past the 200 pound mark and there are a few that couldn't do any damage over the 100 pound mark even when soaking wet.
To their credit, however, almost all of their stuff is definite woody generating material.
|
08-25-07 04:32pm
|
Reply
371
|
Chanta's Bitches
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from apoctom:
(Jay G's Reply)
Thanks for the information. I wish that I had known about it before. At $15/month (for the 2 month plan), it is a much better deal.
|
08-23-07 01:43pm
|
Reply
372
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from roseman:
(Jay G's Reply)
Thats true.
|
08-20-07 11:20pm
|
Reply
373
|
Strapon Lesbians
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from apoctom:
(Jay G's Reply)
I found it mentioned in pat's review and he explains the process in the replies. Just look in the rest of the reviews for Strapon Lesbians and you'll see his review.
|
08-19-07 09:10am
|
Reply
374
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Pinche Kankun:
(Jay G's Reply)
Oh, so that's is how you spell phenomenon!! Aight, cool!! Except for the ass-finger fuckin', I gotz ta go wit everything you mentioned man!!
Man, when I am on the street, and I see asscheeks rotating in tight jeans or tight shorts, I make one of those expressions that resemble a really uuuuuuugly face cuz I be like "DAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMNN!!!!!"
About the lovin' sexy women and are not uptight about it...
YOU SAID A MUTHAPHUCKIN' MOUTH FULL!!!
|
08-14-07 12:57pm
|
Reply
375
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Pinche Kankun:
(Jay G's Reply)
Hey, just out of vague curiosity, wut iz ur eyedea uv cutting edge stuff?!!
And another ?, have you ever blew your lid over a nice pair of asscheeks?!!
It's good shit, man!!
If you ask me, I love ass, man!! Big plump juice jello makes me wanna grap it, man, mainly spanish and white chicks!! I already know my hot black chicks got it, so I go for the NEW PHEONONINON (SHIT, I DON'T KNOW HOW TO SPELL DAT WORD, LEAVE ME ALONE!!)!
:)
|
08-12-07 05:33pm
|
