| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Real Spankings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tree Rodent:
(Jay G's Reply)
Ah yes, a lot of spankers do like the clothed spankings. At least with RealSpankings there's enough material to satisfy everyone's taste. The one thing I have noticed about the site which may be a bit picky, is if you go to the model directory, and look up a model, the list does not necessarily contain all the clips for that model. But then their system has always been a little haphazard.
|
03-10-09 08:06pm
|
Reply
277
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tree Rodent:
(Jay G's Reply)
Yeah, but as we know, real spanking is a specialist thing. On the other hand they do have some good Black Mirror stuff. I think they have a better selection of fetish per video than any of the bigger dvd download sites.
|
03-09-09 10:44am
|
Reply
278
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
There are a few of us here who really love this site, not least because of its great customer service. The difference between American Vice, and the big sites who really couldn't care less about customer service, as they probably consider themselves far too big to worry about customers, is enormous. The great customer service, along with the variety and quality of videos, makes it one of my favourites.
|
03-09-09 10:28am
|
Reply
279
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from messmer:
I started with the five free tokens myself but after having a good look at what the site had to offer I said, what the heck, and subscribed to get my unlimited download. The video aficionado will find all kinds of DVDs here that the other sites don't offer. Great site to complement your collection. Great site for those who are tired of cookie cutter porn.
|
03-09-09 09:32am
|
Reply
280
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Jay G's Reply)
It's about $39 US, approximately. That's at 1.27 euros to the dollar. I tried to find out exactly what I'd been charged at my credit card website, but I've run into snags.
And that's a long story. I'll cut to the lesson: Don't use McAfee (or "McFuckafee," as I now call it.) for your anti-virus. I've been regretting that all this month.
|
02-28-09 02:23pm
|
Reply
281
|
Ass Teen Mouth
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from Tree Rodent:
I think lousy customer service and lousy content are of equal importance, as far as I'm concerned, in establishing which sites to avoid. Some people would go for the content as the most important thing, but if you get lousy service or feel you've been ripped off in any way, what should be a fun way to spend money, turns out to be a bloody nuisance and waste of time. I avoid any site or organisation that has terrible customer service. This organisation is now one of them.
|
02-18-09 06:19am
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from TrashMan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Yeah, ive done the whole "download everything" task. Its way too much porn.
I was on a site a while ago (2006?) and decided to download everything. It was over 12GB of content...not much when compared to VideoBox, but if you start doing that for every site you join you will be out of space faster than you know it.
|
02-16-09 08:59am
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from ramscrota:
(Jay G's Reply)
I totally agree, Jay G.
Once when I updated IE, I found that this annoying bar remained at the top, like a bad smell, when I pressed F11. It cuts into the top of the pic download, and annoys the fuck out of me. And then I found I couldn't revert to the old one. Wne I complained to IE, they fobbed me off with some bullshit.
|
02-14-09 10:45pm
|
Reply
284
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Khan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Jay, sites change their prices all the time without telling us ... especially trial prices so it never hurts to check. And I certainly don't mind telling users about dumping their cookies as many times as it's a help. It's just that there's not that many ways to say it and I never want Users to think they're not getting the personal attention we think they deserve.
Anyway, I'll gather your's is straightened out and you're now seeing the special price.
|
02-05-09 05:25am
|
Reply
285
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Khan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Jay, I can only repeat what I've already said. When a user in the US doesn't see the same price we're seeing, it's almost certainly a cookie issue. If you'll dump your temporary Internet files and/or any cookies associated with that site ... and then visit the site directly from a link here at PU/TBP ... you should see the special price. I just visited yet again to confirm that the price is still offered. It's under the "Basic Plan" for $9.95 per month until cancelled.
|
02-04-09 06:26pm
|
Reply
286
|
Orgy World Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
These videos look GREAT. Just my sort of thing. I hate it when they describe two couples having sex with 6 people looking on as "an orgy." I hope they get some more content so it's worth joining. Personally I think the best orgy site I have seen is "Orgy Sex Parties," but you have to put up with all the Pink Visual negatives when you subscribe to that one.
|
01-30-09 08:34am
|
Reply
287
|
Tushy School
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from littlejoe:
(Jay G's Reply)
the newer vids are higher resolution, have better looking models, better scenarios & much longer penetration. i believe the update setup is still the same, but at least now you can download them as a whole movie as well
you can get the membership for $20 if you click all the way to the ccbill signup page and then click back. if you have pop-ups off you usually get a window says a $20 special offer
|
01-26-09 05:40pm
|
Reply
288
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(Jay G's Reply)
Agree with Jay G: "The fun is the hunt"
And this user too sometimes (or mostly) gets bored after a few weeks of membership of most sites (because after that period you've been through most - maybe except sites like Videobox)....and oh, yes: quite a few of us are spoiled - and then again: they (paysites)want our money and in order to deliver, the sites got to do the same...
BTW: Good pol, Monahan.
|
01-24-09 07:35am
|
Reply
289
|
Ed Powers
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from jd1961:
I don't see it either.
But WOW! $34.95 and this guy offers only puny streaming video?
Doesn't sound like it's even worth $9.95!
|
01-18-09 06:14am
|
Reply
290
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mbaya:
(Jay G's Reply)
The message came from the webmaster, Brainpat. I have kept the email. If he has a response, he can do so easily. He has been fairly active on PU, so I guess that he knows about my post. He certainly has a means to improve the image of the site. I see nice reviews, so it may be worth joining.
|
01-15-09 04:13am
|
Reply
291
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Jay G's Reply)
What surprised me most is that I emailed him from the link on PU. He obviously knew that it was entirely possible that I could post the information and make it known to anyone what I thought of our conversation. I waited for several months before I decided that I should post what I did. I also notice that I have not received a response from the webmaster about my post.
|
01-14-09 07:57am
|
Reply
292
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from mbaya:
(Jay G's Reply)
I definitely agree that a red flag is a great idea. Deceptive or even dishonest practices are a major turn off. I liked so much about the site and it has many really good reviews. However, if I had to join over again, I would not. TBP warns us about limited access trials,as well as cross sells with prechecked boxes. Other topoics not covered are reports of a lack of customer service, reports from PU'ers about unresolved problems, or links to other problems within the site. By the way, I left out of my review that the site has prechecked cross sells on the joinup page and has an uncertain update schedule.
|
12-21-08 09:53am
|
Reply
293
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Monahan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Correct. Long threads that become longer are difficult to read and, because the tangents are hard to change, usually don't attract a lot of interest.
If a thread is truly redundant it's no big deal for someone to post a link to the old one...or post a comment in the old one that pushes the old one back up to the top,
|
12-17-08 08:51am
|
Reply
294
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply from Jay G:
"Different strokes for different folks" (pun intended)
|
12-08-08 05:24am
|
Reply
295
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Tree Rodent:
(Jay G's Reply)
Yeah it sounds like a good idea. I think you tend to like the sites I quite like. I'm not sure how much interest there would be here in such a thread. What makes me worried is that RealSpankings has its own forum. One guy that loves spanking argued that the people at Mood must be "scumbag sadists" or something similar, based on the harshness of the spankings. Myself and one other guy were basically saying - look if you love spanking the rest of the world thinks you are a sicko degenerate. If you, who are into this sort of thing, starts calling people who spank that hard, as scumbag sadists and degenerates, based purely on the strength of the spanking, what hope is there for us. I said I thought he was on very thin ice there anyway, making that sort of judgement. Basically it just shows how inflamed and moralistic supposedly open minded people can get, when they start to talk about those niche sites. But it may be worth starting a thread anyway!
|
12-07-08 04:12pm
|
Reply
296
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from jd1961:
The good news is: it looks like an interesting site.
The bad news is: 90's porn prop Mark Davis is in way too many scenes!
|
12-06-08 05:54pm
|
Reply
297
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Another good review Jay. There aren't too many of us on here interested in this sort of thing, so it's good to hear an informed opinion. Be interesting to see what the few of us consider to be the best "niche" sites. Probably we'd all go for entirely different ones. Maybe have to start a thread on that.
|
12-06-08 07:28am
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#29
from Pinche Kankun:
(Jay G's Reply)
YEAH!! That's something that porn is trying to make obsolete cause porn is too busy concentrating on the guy's dick!! >:( >:(
|
12-06-08 01:14am
|
Reply
299
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Cybertoad:
(Jay G's Reply)
Jay I couldnt have said it better.
|
12-05-08 08:02am
|
Reply
300
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from elonlybuster:
(Jay G's Reply)
thanks for the info, but because I live in a dry county there's not much to really do unless you want to drive 20 minutes to the next county to get hard liquor. Really annoying
|
12-04-08 03:51am
|
