| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Pimp Element
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from uscue:
Yeah looks to me like the only difference is Sugarpie Honeys is devoted to black creampies, but other than that not much difference. They could have combined the two sites no problem instead of pumping up the "network" with an additional site.
|
10-05-09 12:54pm
|
Reply
252
|
Ass Teen Mouth
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from dracken:
I think this network of sites is one of the most attacked by hackers and crackers and what not and as a result they had to change security quite often. I remember a while back they had a much easier log-in procedure but they had to change it. Part of the log-in issues, I think, come from these attacks and the need to make the sites stronger.
Now, in my experience the passwords work for all sites and it's fairly easy to log-in except for the word type protection...however, that said, the lack of user features such as top models a good search and the like is felt and it hurts the overall score of the site. The high price is also to be considerate. Nonetheless, it's one of the few sites out there with hardcore, hot teens of such high quality...
|
08-02-09 05:15am
|
Reply
253
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Jay G's Reply)
There are a quite a few girls that are so hot it hurts but because this is their first scene or that's the style the producers want. They just don't shine like they should.
|
08-01-09 08:25am
|
Reply
254
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from mbaya:
I agree completely. This is an example of a site that delivers what it promises and gives you more than you would hope for.
|
07-22-09 11:53am
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(Jay G's Reply)
I can't say I like coffee, but sex on the other hand...
Of course, porn and coffee (such as Starbucks) always seem to be doing good business, so I think people get over any initial bad tastes rather quickly.
By the way, where's the choice for tried it and enjoyed it, but am now single, so not currently doing it?
|
06-23-09 09:00am
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from asmith12:
(Jay G's Reply)
> Cock....oh, I guess that's poultry, Huh?
:-))
|
06-01-09 05:38am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from asmith12:
(Jay G's Reply)
Oh, I see. Well, maybe it's a right time to start fearing ;-).
|
05-30-09 05:22am
|
Reply
258
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from mbaya:
A really nice review with a lot of useful information. I was waiting for the site to get bigger, as I am a fan of the other kink sites. I think I will pass on this one though. The focus seems to be a lot less on sex than on the other kink sites.
|
05-28-09 07:40pm
|
Reply
259
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from lk2fireone:
I loved your comment, "Slow, slow, slow, slow.....you get hours of 'training,' but only a small percentage is actual sex or spanking. Without fast forward I would fall asleep."
That's one of the major reasons I belong to PU. You gave me the best laugh of the entire day.
A great review.
|
05-27-09 08:02pm
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Monahan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Jay G said, "Storage is incredibly cheap and the numbers, I agree, don't always mean quality, but I am sure getting pickier and pickier about a "quality look" to videos. Old stuff is seldom good enough for a spoiled kid like me."
That's me. Exactly. Three or four years ago I was ok with almost anything just so long as it displayed what I wanted...plenty of PTA*.
Now, however, where the quality is so good even a gynecologist would be happy, and with a brand new Seagate 1.5 Tb hard drive ($129.99 + tax) joining my 640Gb, and two 500Gb hard drives, I'm like Jay, am totally spoiled. When I watch some of the older stuff that I used to watch over and over, I only wish it could be upgraded in quality.
The real question is, what's next? I can't imagine better quality than is now available. Maybe smell-o-vision or a form of 3-D?
*PTA - Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
05-24-09 10:12am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Monahan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Ditto everything that Jay said. I agree with him completely.
|
05-04-09 09:25pm
|
Reply
262
|
Dallas Spanks Hard
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from cucuta:
This sight definatly needs to be among the top ranked spanking sights. The lack of spanking reviews is a weakness of PU. DSH should be reviewed as should some of the other leading spanking sights such as RealSpanking, Spanking online, and Far east.
|
05-03-09 04:50pm
|
Reply
263
|
Tera Patrick
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from TheRizzo:
Hmmm that is a tempting price point for such a beautiful girl.
How slow were the downloads? What was the max speed you were getting?
|
05-03-09 12:54pm
|
Reply
264
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Jay G's Reply)
No kidding! Do the photographers actually say things like "look to the left, a little higher, look at the tree over there ..."?
Nude photosets should be virtual encounters with the girls, not exercises in "living statuary."
|
05-02-09 12:03pm
|
Reply
265
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from lk2fireone:
(Jay G's Reply)
I read an opinion piece recently. The writer said that our Republican representatives in Congress and the Senate who were secretly gay but strongly anti-gay rights were not hypocrites. They recognized that homosexuality was wrong, and they were fighting that evil not just in society but also in themselves. The fact that some of them have been exposed for their homosexual activity means they are only human.
What I got from the piece was that any position could be defended. That's what lawyers are for.
|
04-27-09 08:39am
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from james4096:
(Jay G's Reply)
I guess you have a point there.
|
04-26-09 10:38am
|
Reply
267
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Wittyguy:
(Jay G's Reply)
Hunting in the jungle is fine ... so long as you don't have to listen to Axel Rose sing about it the same time you're doing it ;)
|
04-23-09 05:32pm
|
Reply
268
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from asmith12:
(Jay G's Reply)
> If you've watched a lot of porn, a little unpredictability is a good thing.
Exactly, that's probably why I like it too.
|
04-20-09 10:32pm
|
Reply
269
|
Russian Discipline.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from picky:
Hi Jay G
How good quality are these videos - do you know the bitrate?
|
04-13-09 10:58am
|
Reply
270
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from Tree Rodent:
I had been thinking about maybe joining, but from reading your review, there doesn't appear to be too much quality here, even though there seems to be quantity. I'm not crazy about the quality of vids from RealSpankings either. In fact fetish material in general seems to be a little behind the rest in picture quality.
|
03-24-09 09:03pm
|
Reply
271
|
Spanked Cutie
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment from Jay G:
Hey I got a reply:
Hello Jay,
These information seem to be very outdated. What they are referring to is our VIP package deal, which has grown a lot since then, but has also increased in price. Please see vipspanking.com for details.
Best Refards!
Support.
|
03-20-09 05:42am
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Denner:
(Jay G's Reply)
I like Jay G's thing with:
"Brazil is wild and crazy, but the quality is still not up to par with USA."
Guess thats it - also. Just took a new look at Pacinos Adventures - and wauw, some latin dolls there and some fine previews for the site.
BUT: damn, the quality of those videos are STILL "milky-white" and somewhat blurred - too bad!
If a site like Pacinos could do really crisp videos. this user would not hesitate to join - again!
But alas!
|
03-19-09 08:25am
|
Reply
273
|
Spanked Cutie
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
It reminds me of Reginald Perrin - "amazing sale, 25% ON." Yes, it's regional discrimination again. You could do what Denner suggests. Email them and hassle them about the price. Even if they don't relent and give you the correct price, it costs them time and money to deal with you, and also lets them know they've lost a customer.
|
03-15-09 07:51am
|
Reply
274
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(Jay G's Reply)
And it's the pause that refreshes ...
|
03-13-09 12:10pm
|
Reply
275
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from turboshaft:
(Jay G's Reply)
One of the recent "reviews" for this site -- now deleted -- had some its pros listed in the cons section.
There is certainly nothing wrong with liking different things, but if you truly do then the review should reflect that in the details.
|
03-12-09 01:45pm
|
