| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Dyked
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from LKLK:
I haven't been a member of the Team Skeet sites for over 1 year.
But when I was a member, a little over 1 year ago, Dyked was part of the basic Team Skeet network, and not one of the premium sites.
Membership in a premium site, at that time, and probably still, only allows you access to the premium site, and not to the basic Team Skeet network.
I'm guessing Dyked is still part of the basic Team Skeet network.
And that you were misled when you thought it was a premium site in the Team Skeet offerings.
My apologies if you think I'm being overly picky.
Actually, in the review I wrote on the Dyked site, dated 06-06-18, I wrote the following:
'Note: when you go to the Dyked site, there is a banner stating that Dyked is a Team Skeet premium site. This is misleading. Dyked is included in the basic Team Skeet network.
They used to call the premium sites in the network "Unlock" sites. Now they call the premium sites "Upgrade Now" sites.'
Your review was excellent, by the way. As usual.
|
01-14-20 12:00am
|
Reply
27
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from Loki:
Personally, I find the content of Love Hairy to be less explicit than that of We Are Hairy. But it's a personal opinion.
I liked your review. Thanks.
|
12-09-19 08:11pm
|
Reply
28
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from tangub:
(KayTBuffs's Reply)
Personally I don't have a problem with 19 year old photo content and if I'm joining a site that has been around that long I like to know their entire collection is available to view online. I just think there's a big difference between a site that's been online 19 years producing their own exclusive content and a site that's just been around a couple of years and posting 19 year old non exclusive content from other sites.
A person considering this site the most important thing they need to know is that if they've joined other sites in the Metart Network previously then they're unlikely to find anything new or exclusive here.
Sorry you didn't approve of my original comment, maybe I could have worded it better.
|
12-09-19 09:58am
|
Reply
29
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tangub:
(KayTBuffs's Reply)
LOL....not trying to be a snob or elitist, just pointing out that it's a compilation site created by the guys at Metart 2 or 3 years ago where they took many of their hairy models photo sets and videos and created a new site for those people who are interested in just hairy models to find them all in one place.
I agree though that when you see 2001 dates on some of the photo sets it could give the impression of the site being 19 years old but that is most likely the original posting date on Metart.
There was me thinking I was being helpful offering some feedback on an error, I'll just shut up in future.
|
12-09-19 05:50am
|
Reply
30
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from tangub:
The site has not been around for 19 years, I believe it's only been around 2 or 3 years. It's a collection of non exclusive content pulled from the sites within the Metart Network (ie Metart, Viv Thomas. Erotic Beauty etc).
Where you see the old dates on the content that will most likely be the dates they were originally posted on sites like Metart or Viv Thomas.
|
12-09-19 02:27am
|
Reply
31
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from Wraith0711:
Last Time I joined the all fine girls site was a separate purchase. Agreed the girls are super gorgeous, my all time favorites are Klara and Eleanor
|
12-08-19 07:22am
|
Reply
32
|
Teenrs
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from mbaya:
This site comes with the extras that other International Media sites have. This is what I wrote about them in my review of Club Seventeen:
Some of the extras are truly fantastic quality and quantity both. For example you get a Secret Spinners game, a cam girls site called Club Seventeen Live with 8000 models, a portal site https://www.secretfriends.com/portal/videos with over 14,000 streaming only samples of videos from other sites.
The other nice plus is a very hands on webmaster who cares about his customers and his site.
|
12-04-19 01:44am
|
Reply
33
|
Teenrs
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from clubseventeen:
Hi KayTBuffs,
Thank you for the review. We always appreciate input.
Something to take note of:
>> It wants to upgrade me to a very large, confusing network with 14,000+ videos, but doesn't tell the price.
The Network is completely free and you can stream all the videos you see there. It comes for free with your Teenrs membership.
Thanks again!
Gr
|
12-03-19 10:21pm
|
Reply
34
|
Sapphix
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from careylowell:
That one white leather conch used at Sapphix must smell like the toilet seat of a all-female crew's tuna boat.
|
11-12-19 08:56pm
|
Reply
35
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(KayTBuffs's Reply)
Thanks. I may be able to ID those in my collection and that will give me an idea if anything is new. The Red Riding Hood scene should be easy to identify.
|
10-29-19 05:47pm
|
Reply
36
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from rearadmiral:
Has Let's Fuck Outside added anything new in the past three or four years? That is an amazing public sex site but it doesn't seem to be updating now.
Thanks!
|
10-29-19 02:41pm
|
Reply
37
|
Sexy Hub
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from mbaya:
You are correct it says unlimited downloads. This kind of thing makes porn sites look dishonest.
Probiller is located on Cyprus. Both Cyprus and Gibraltar are home to some shady characters.
|
09-30-19 11:30pm
|
Reply
38
|
Slime Wave
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from mbaya:
For a niche like this 170 scenes is not a con,it is a lot.
|
09-03-19 04:21am
|
Reply
39
|
Fully Clothed Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from mbaya:
Based on what you have described this appears to be a site that is recycling content.
I don't think that they are deleting low quality scenes. Lower video counts suggest they are remastering or maybe even just giving themselves a way to put up "new" updates.
I am glad that you like the site. i was a member a very long time ago, but never put up a review.
|
08-20-19 04:34am
|
Reply
40
|
21 Naturals
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from LKLK:
Excellent review.
Certainly one of the best this week.
Covers overview of the site, plus a lot of fine details.
You seem to think clearly, and that comes through in the review.
So the review is not only informative, but enjoyable to read.
Interesting divide between romance and lust: the difference seems to blur in some of the early X-Art videos, which seemed to show more passion or heat.
|
07-30-19 07:04am
|
Reply
41
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from exotics4me:
If not for the pictures I would not like Sex Art as much as I do. You would probably like the network, Finishes the Job.
|
07-17-19 04:50am
|
Reply
42
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from Kody:
"
The women are believably into the guy masturbating for them. More direction in the scenes would help. Some of the guys stand in one spot and go to-fro-to-fro-to-fro while the woman is in the background watching and teasing him. I want to believe if a guy was brave enough to pull it out from limp to hard, he would be brave enough to at least face the sexy, teasing woman. Is it just my own fetish to say the scenes would be better if the guy inexplicably tried to get cum on the woman? I would think that would strengthen this site for straight men. I believe most men would like seeing a guy land a facial -- 3 feet away -- on a snobby, teasing woman."
Agree with this. It would be very satisfying for me to watch a scene in which she is first teasing the guy "who I imagine to be me" for a long time, and then cumming on her in the end.
I also agree about the belittling part.
My girlfriend is a lot into watching guys masturbate. I've done it on many occasions for her and to me it always feels best when facing her directly, looking in her eyes. This would also turn me on when watching porn like this. There's an interesting tension when you are clearly looking at each other and feeling a connection, but at a same time have that "distance" where the woman is clothed and looks a bit unreachable.
The belittling that often happens not only makes it unrealistic like you mention, but it takes away that tension between connection and distance. You're only left with the distance and a bit of submission.
|
07-05-19 04:09am
|
Reply
43
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from mbaya:
This was an interesting review of a genre that I like. We have discussed the topic of CFNM here on PU and if you are interested I can revive the old forum thread.
The abusive CFNM sites that you don't like are targeted at gay men.
How I see it is that the other non abusive CFNM sites have a lot more of a role reversal as regards men being objectified as objects of desire. Women are empowered to see men performing for them. I can see why you would find these sites appealing.
My advice is to accept that porn does fantasy rather poorly. There are very few CFNM sites still around.
|
07-01-19 01:54pm
|
Reply
44
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from mbaya:
This was a nice review that I enjoyed reading. I am into CFNM and we have discussed it here on PU. If you want I can revive an old thread on it.
What I see is CFNM for straight men and CFNM for gay men. The abusive sites appeal more to gay men and they are plentiful on the internet.
For straight men I think the appeal is that the non abusive CFNM sites portray women as assertively aggressive sexually and I don't mean in a demeaning way.
In much of straight porn women are objectified as objects of desire.
I think that for anyone who likes CFNM there is pure fantasy that is incredibly unlikely, something rare in porn. In CFNM men are objectified and that does have its appeal. It is as if the roles are reversed compared to straight male porn.
|
07-01-19 01:48pm
|
Reply
45
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from rearadmiral:
This is a well-written and informative review of a relatively unique site. Thanks for taking the time to write and upload it.
|
07-01-19 07:16am
|
Reply
46
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from tangub:
A very well written review and particularly interesting to read the female perspective on a porn site. Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us.
|
07-01-19 05:21am
|
Reply
47
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from LKLK:
In real life, versus porn fantasy, men masturbating before women is normally frowned upon.
The woman has to consent to the guy masturbating.
The best examples of men masturbating in front of women, in the news, would be Harvey Weinstein and that comedian, Louis C.K.
I guess that porn niches could include men masturbating in front of women.
A lot of hardcore sex scenes end with the guy jerking off into the woman's face, ass, or other body parts.
But for the entire video to focus on a man masturbating in front of a women might have some limited appeal, whether for straight or gay porn I wouldn't know.
|
07-01-19 02:15am
|
Reply
48
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from FreddieAdmin:
(KayTBuffs's Reply)
hehehehhehehhehehe
|
06-11-19 08:01am
|
Reply
49
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from mbaya:
(KayTBuffs's Reply)
I take that as a compliment thank you.
|
06-10-19 01:50pm
|
Reply
50
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
from mbaya:
Congratulations on your first win. Keep up the good work.
|
06-06-19 03:38pm
|
