I think you are just stating reality, that most video porn has been reduced to rutting and kink. I don't know whether most people appreciate porn that way, but to find anything else is not that easy. That's one major reason why I prefer photos to videos, because you can find erotic photos much more easily than erotic videos.
Highly agree with the repetitive thing with this site. I think the major flaw that resulted in the lack innovativeness is the fact that they found a nice 'formula' for their scenes within the different fantasies. Then, they decided to just switch the stars and do limited improv that fits in to the scene resulting in the same thing over n' over again. I think instead of doing this formula for every scene, they could easily have written in more elaborate fantasies and implement them in to the scenes to create more successful difference in scenes. However, I really think this will ever change for this site or most sites in general. Once a site kind of finds a formula for a scene, they roll with it. Plus, with us being a bit more knowledgable and experienced in the porn world, we see the same things over and over as a bad thing while I believe a lot like these formulas because they just don't know better or care. PU'ers in general want difference and our expectations are a bit higher, I remember this was the first site I joined (I joined this site before I even had any idea the world of internet porn and was renting dvd's at that time) and this site was like a gold mine. I had no clue about really anything in the ways of porn and this site did the so called 'reality fantasies' and it was so different and somewhat realistic, I loved the site. As time went on and I got more in to porn from a technical side and so on, the less I found this site as the gold mine I thought of before.
The site does offer quite a bit and I think they do a great job there, but the formula's been going on for years now, the scenes are just getting stale. Plus, the 'fakeness' factor is high as you said with the silicone and surgery models. They are the classic American stars with the mindset that more is better.
You are right Messmer, the fact of the eroticism is almost nonexistant. They are so caught up in other things, they lost the focus of the fantasy in general and it become what Denner said, "Wham, bam, thank you, ma'am" scenes. Good review for this site and the honesty within it.
Oh yeah, well the MILFS...what do you expect. lol.
You have two types of MILF actresses:
Type 1) untainted (e.g. never married/given birth) girls in their 30's who look like MILFS...e.g. Mason Storm. These girls have gotten breast enlargements to stay afloat in the industry past their prime.
Type 2) Actual "tainted" MILFS in their 30-40's. These girls kinda need the enlargement to hold off the inevitable sag-effect.
So expecting a MILF site to be devoid of enlarged girls is a tall order.
Well a long time ago I was downloading from here and managed to get every file from Asian 1 on 1 and when trying to then tackle Housewife 1 on 1 I had ran into a wall, I don't remember what happened or what it said, but I had to wait 24 hours before downloading anything else, but that was a long long time ago.
I was using a download manager so I dunno if that triggered it or not.
To be honest with you, I havent experienced any download limits, which is why I am confused. Awhile back, I used to run into those download limits after 2GBs, but since they changed to their new format, I havent run into any limits. Maybe Im special, I dont know. ;)
- as of 10/26 the last update was August 2012 so it look like they are still updating.
- There are approximately 180 shoots in Neighbor Affair alone.
- They start adversing "DVD quality" in early 2007 so about 150 shoots are at that quality or higher (DVD quality seems to be 720X540 3mbps.
- and yes nearly every shoot has a girls with fake tits and ends in a facial.
With the deals they run, I say go ahead an join there enough her for you to find something to get your money's worth (if you've been a member in the past not much has changed, so if you were unsatisfied before, you will be again).
I have been trying out tangotime for a little bit.
So far its been alright.
1.) Things you post need to get approved first before they become viewable - so someone is actually looking at your material before it gets posted. As an exmaple, I posted a picture and I accidentally put it in the wrong category. The reviewer fixed that before making it public and left a note. As well I posted a duplicate, which the reviewer caught and rejected the post, again with another reason why. So its good that here things are actually moderated.
2.) Even if you are not a paying member, you have access to your own posted content, including the ability to remove it.
3.) Not as many fakers as other sites. I will say though, one
person there was a webcam girl trying to solicit me to get me on yahoo and probably pay for a show or something. But you can report these people and support there will actually do something about it.
4.) Voting system. I don't really care about voting systems in general, but they track people that spam 1 votes on accounts and they give you the ability to reset votes on pictures. This is probably done because they have ALOT of contests that award prizes.
5.) Lots of categories from nude to none nude to better filter what you are looking for.
6.) There is a chat/video interface you get access to if you become a paying member. I tried this a few times and what I dont like is at the bottom of the chat interface were advertisements which would make my antivirus pop up that it may be spam. Take that out and its fine.
7.) If you are the chatty type, I didn't find anything about a user forum there.
Well Mess, the reason for the watermark is to keep people from posting our pics as their own, or trading them as their own. We have thousands upon thousands of pics and a program that allows us to stamp them. We just stamp them before we post them. Did you mean the watermarks are blurred? If so, they just say suchsluts@mewbienudes.com . Anyway, glad you liked them. We try to keep the watermarks from getting in the way. We are in the process of creating our own site minus the watermarks ;)
You summed it up perfectly when you said it's a community and should be free. The operators should just carry advertising to pay the bills. You are also spot on when you say it should not be listed on TBP- technically it is NOT a porn site.
As for the other individuals post you responded to, (#8) it clearly falls under "shameless promotions" in the posting rules. That person's post is clearly spam and why it hasn't been deleted I don't know.
I have to agree with messmer's initial take on NewbieNudes. I would only recommend a paying membership to someone who is desperate to post pictures of themselves on the net, can't get paid to do it and isn't satisfied with just three pics a day.
I was a paying member (similar situation- a friend talked me into it. The friend later apologized) and over the course of a few weeks found it to be a complete waste of money. There are several issues I had.
First, they do not have 1.6 whatever million members. They've had that many people sign up during their existence, but my estimates are only 20,000 active users. Of those, less than half are posters. When a person deletes their account, (this happens A LOT) they do not lower thier "member" count. A small deception, but a deception.
Second is lack of quality material. Fifty percent of the content is blurry cock close-ups. There are also too many cell phone pics and just plain poorly taken pictures. Paying members can access "high resolution" versions, but I found the standard views far less grainy.
Third is the videos. Several people have told me this is what hooked them- only premium members can view them. I found 1 in 50 or 75 was watchable. The quality of these is usually so bad I can't fully describe it. Poorly edited, (if at all) absurdly short and terribly filmed. Quite a few are webcam/ cell phone captures resulting in unwatchable grainy images.
My fourth issue is more a personal pet peeve. A lot of people would go premium and then saturate the site with terrible pictures. I guess they wanted their money's worth, but I don't want to see 40 pictures every day of a woman I find totally unattractive doing almost the exact same pose in each picture. Slagging through all of the terrible content to find a couple of good pics was hard enough. This made it harder.
I'll make a sub-point to that last one. I found very few posters I liked, but when I did they were short lived. The best ones seemed to be standard members who would post for a week or a month and then delete their account. This was frustrating since quality pictures are so hard to come by on the site.
However, my biggest beef was people posting stolen pics. Being a paying member of a few real porn sites, I routinely recognized pictures that NN members were passing off as themselves. I got so frustrated with seeing material I had paid a lot of money to have access to being shown for free that I complained to NN. They completely blew me off and said that didn't happen on their site. They make it easy to report objectionable material, but not copyrighted images lifed from other sites.
In the end, I can only recommend this site to people desperate to be naked on the net. Even then, just do like 90% of NN posters do: start a standard membership, post 3 pics a day for a month or so and then delete it after you've had your thrill (or when the creepy private messages you'll get become too much).
A major attraction of NewbieNudes for me is the Fourm. Although NewbieNudes has over a million members, those who contribute to the Forum are a more limited number, and one can get to know the leading contributors. The Forum feels like a community of co-workers, neighbors, or the residents of a small town where everyone knows everyone else. I like many of the posters who contribute to the Forum. Some I like a great deal. Most I accept. Some I do not like. Nevertheless, everyone has a distinct personality, and contributes to the unique, and uniquely wonderful collective personality of the Forum.
For the most part I think we agree, but there are a few points I have to comment on.
There are good videos to be found, and no shortage of them. The quality may differ from studio porn, but the content isn't lacking. Just because this is an amateur site doesn't mean quality suffers tremendously; typical point and shoot cameras have 6 megapixels nowadays and video cameras are recording DVD quality movies. Some of the finer details may get lost in the transfer to the computer and eventually to the site, but I think most fans of "amateur" porn are fond of the less than crisp detail in the movies; sort of like some people prefering old black and white photo processing with its inherent grainy softness to modern day digital photo perfection. The lesser quality gives the admirer of amateur porn reasurance that he is, in fact, watching something unique and homemade. For those that prefer that style of video, which can be very hard to find in "mainstream" porn, this site is something near an answered prayer.
As for the isolated body parts, I have to say again; look around some more and you'll have no trouble finding incredibly hot women that hide nothing. In fact, pictures (such as those of my wife) of women wearing masks or pictures that have been censored to hide faces usually don't hold the highest rankings, as the site members prefer posters to not hide thier face. Having been a member there for more than six months, I can honestly say people that hide their faces (through whatever means) aren't the majority.
As far as what the site can offer the average porn viewer, I've been jerking off to porn for more than 20 years. It takes (what I personally feel to be) good porn to get me excited enough to enjoy myself when doing so. It stands to reason I wouldn't be able to get my rocks off every day that I don't have sex with my wife if this site wasn't able to provide me with good porn. It also seems that I would go to other porn sites if this particular one didn't give me enough to supply my masturbatory habit, but I don't. I stay right there at the same one. It has to have something going for it...
You present an accurate take on the site in your last paragraph. The site is made up mostly of individuals wanting to be exhibitionists, or those who appreciate people that enjoy being exhibitionists.
As you stated in the last sentence of your observation, for the typical non-contributing member, the site perhaps offers less than what you can find elsewhere on the internet. For those who submit content or those that appreciate this type of content, it is quite possibly the best venue for them.
Also, it takes time to fully discover all this site has to offer. 15 minutes is NOT enough to form a full opinion; especially if using the free membership to do so. I'm sure you're familiar with the phrase "You get what you pay for"... I have a sneaking suspicion that you looked at the first page or two of photos that you were presented with and didn't find much to admire. It takes some time to figure out that you won't see much at all by viewing content that way; you need to search individual categories and search by ratings or popularity. When you do that, you start getting into the good stuff and can be surprised at the quality of the content. It isn't long before you've bookmarked several very hot posters in anticipation of their next contribution.
IF the site is one you would like to be a paying member of, you can get a three year membership for less than 4 dollars a month. True, you have to lay out 120 dollars on the front end, but if the site appeals to you, that 4 dollars a month is money very well spent.
Once you are a paying member, the videos are where its at on this site. Again, the quality and production values aren't what you can find on other typical, mainstream porn sites, but people go to NewbieNudes looking for amateur content, so they are actually getting exactly what they want. To compare the content quality to mainstream porn is an apples to oranges comparison and doesn't really apply.
In regards to the hiding of faces and such; again, the people here are real. They are not earning their living fucking in front of a camera. If they were discovered, serious consequences could be faced, yet they are sensual people who want to expand their sexual activity by sharing themselves with those who wish to watch. I, for one, admire people that hide their identity, and besides, I'm not so much interested in faces anyway. I'm more of a tits and ass man myself. If hidden faces bother you, just keep looking around. The truth is there are hundreds of super hot people with no qualms about getting recognized posting pictures AND videos of themselves.
As you said; this site is for a certain type of person with certain tastes. For the mainstream porn watcher it might not offer much at all on the surface. A closer, more intimate exploration of the site will yeild interesting results. Of that I'm sure.
Most of the photos posted on NewbieNudes do not appeal to me. I find some of them distastefull. Nevertheless, with NewbieNudes there is always the thrill of discovery. Every now and then I see a photograph so beautiful that it takes my breath away. Because so many photographs are posted every day "every now and then" happens frequently.
Also, one can communicate with the pretty ladies in the photos. You don't get that with most web sites.
And just to clarify something that flew right over your head, when writing a review you must remain objective IN YOUR MIND! Of course the review has to be subjective or else it doesn't work.
Don't like hardcore on sites, DON'T JOIN THEM! Don't come in here and knock it down 'cause it doesn't meet YOUR standards. The world of porn doesn't revolve around people like you.
All I'm saying is you don't have to down a site just because there's content on it you don't like. With the exception of this site, every other site I ever joined had content on it that wasn't for me. So you know what I do? I don't look at, and I sure as hell don't come onto sites like this and whine about it.
When writing a review your supposed to remain objective and don't let personal views get in the way of your score. I based my score on quality of content and for the site niche, which is masturbation with some hardcore here and there, which they deliver in spades. And again, this is NOT exclusively a solo girl only site.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
