| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
801
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from tangub:
(messmer's Reply)
Yes TBP appear to have delisted it but if you enter moreystudio.com directly into your browser you should still be able to get to it.
|
01-23-13 12:46pm
|
Reply
802
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from tangub:
(messmer's Reply)
Yes I noticed it had been removed but I've just checked and Morey Studio is back online again.....they must have been down for maintenance of had some tech problems or something.
|
01-23-13 12:40pm
|
Reply
803
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Capn:
Link from this site doesn't work or typing in.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-22-13 11:35pm
|
Reply
804
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from tangub:
It's working ok my end, the site is still there.
|
01-22-13 10:41pm
|
Reply
805
|
Naked News
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
I suppose it may be an age thing.
More geared to the world we were brought up in than our chronological age though, I think.
It is still a woefully undersupported niche.
|
09-06-09 09:41am
|
Reply
806
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Capn:
When I was a member a couple of years back I kicked off about the lack of proper stripping. It was largely ignored.
I have resubscribed, there does seem to be more stripping now & a couple of the new anchors are hot. Still not enough stripping IMO
Cap'n. :0)
|
09-06-09 07:49am
|
Reply
807
|
Naked News
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from dracken:
(messmer's Reply)
Ha ha, good description that cleared all my confusion about this site. I had heard about it a while back and then I thought it disappeared or something. This cleared things up. Thanks for sharing.
|
08-11-09 02:51am
|
Reply
808
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from dracken:
I've been considering this site fo0r a while now, but hearing that the models don't really strip a lot but rather get naked pretty fast makes it drop lower on my list of places to visit. Are the news at least well presented?
|
08-10-09 03:47am
|
Reply
809
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Toadsith:
I agree wholeheartedly that if you join this site for the nudity, you'll get bored and bored fast. It is the same models standing around naked day after day. However, I do like the site for its news content and the personalities of the models presenting it. I personally don't have access to normal TV news - though when I do I find that is uniquely terrible - and NPR just depresses me. The programming on Naked News is too short - I'd prefer 1 hour shows - but I find they are rather balanced and cover a lot of European news that you just don't get to hear about in normal American TV news (and yes, they are Canadian, but they obviously cater to the American market heavily). It is a niche genre, but they do it quite well so I don't mind supporting them.
|
07-27-08 01:24pm
|
Reply
810
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(messmer's Reply)
Hey messmer, there was some other site that did this, but I can't seem to recall which it was, TeenDreams or something? If you look at the file location it has some really long list of characters with your IP address in it, and this list of characters seems to change after a while. Perhaps there is some workaround for this issue, but I haven't come across one.
|
01-21-13 01:33pm
|
Reply
811
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(messmer's Reply)
Your reply sounds like either an apology or a justification and neither is needed. Sites change and our tastes change. I can only imagine what nasty things I'd have written about Burning Angel had I joined a year ago rather than after my 'conversion' to some limited interest in tattoos.
I don't think you took my comments this way, but to be clear, I wasn't accusing you of being too subjective. Subjectivity plays a role in any review, even the ones done by the staff at TBP, but a good reviewer looks past their likes and dislike and gives an objective review. You did just that in both your reviews and scored the site differently. No big deal. In both cases the reviews were written by an objective person who was writing about his experiences with the site at that time.
Both reviews were great and I'd rely on both in making a decision to join the site if I had no personal history with it.
|
12-27-12 08:33pm
|
Reply
812
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from rearadmiral:
Excellent review! Like you, I was surprised at how much I like this network knowing that it really does promote 'enhanced' models. I was also interested to note that you've increased your score a full 10 points since you last reviewed the network which is another indication how they've improved over the past years.
|
12-27-12 11:31am
|
Reply
813
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
Regional Pricing is normlly not as subtle as that, so I think it is more likely a confusion of offer prices.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-26-12 03:38am
|
Reply
814
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from hodayathink:
It might have something to do with when you signed up, because over the past month they've had a $5.00 special (right now, but just started), a $7.95 special(over the US Thanksgiving holiday weekend), and a $9.99 special(last week). So it could be that the PU discount wasn't working and they gave you their special price instead (as opposed to purely regional pricing).
|
12-22-12 12:11pm
|
Reply
815
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(messmer's Reply)
Banks would never do that....Yes, they would. You could be right on that one because Epoch is by far the best one when it comes to doing Regional Pricing. Mind you it could also be NA that asked Epoch to charge more for foreign customers.
|
12-22-12 10:25am
|
Reply
816
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(messmer's Reply)
I agree because although the amount is quite small. We are still talking about a 50 or so percent increase in the price for Non-US citizens. I don't know who their CC procesor is.
|
12-22-12 10:06am
|
Reply
817
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from pat362:
It's a kind of regional pricing but not as serious as some others. Of course not being as bad doesn't mean that it doesn't suck.
|
12-22-12 09:50am
|
Reply
818
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from hodayathink:
(messmer's Reply)
I apologize for going a little overboard. It's just a pet peeve of mine when people say things that can be proven incorrect with a little bit of research (and not just here, anywhere). When I first read your post, because you included Faye Reagan, I assumed that the post was talking about all women, and not just the older ones. Because the older ones skew fake, and the younger ones skew natural, if you look at the whole site, it does end up being about 50/50. And that's not an assumption, you can see it using their tagging system (click the porn finder link at the top of the page, and on the right hand side is a list of all the tags they use and the numbers across all the sites).
|
12-20-12 09:33pm
|
Reply
819
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from marcdc1:
(messmer's Reply)
No, it's right on the main site before you log in. Although I imagine they're also promoting it through their twitter account.
|
12-20-12 07:15pm
|
Reply
820
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from hodayathink:
I said this to someone else, and I'll say it again: Half. They're basically half-natural and half-fake as a whole.
I realize that may not be enough for your tastes, but to act like natural breasts are a rare occurrence just isn't correct.
Edit: unless you're talking about ONLY mature models, and even then it's rare but not impossible to find.
|
12-20-12 01:04pm
|
Reply
821
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from hodayathink:
(messmer's Reply)
I completely understand preferring girls without implants. I disagree, but my opinion is no more or less valid than yours, so I don't have any issue with your preference. It was just the phrasing of "I hope they are in trouble", like you wanted them to go under because you don't like their content, as opposed to being ambivalent about it because it's a site that you normally wouldn't join, that got me a little upset. Especially since I know some of the people that work there from having been a member so long, and you would have been effectively wishing they were out of a job.
|
10-16-12 03:46pm
|
Reply
822
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from hodayathink:
(messmer's Reply)
You hope they're in trouble? Really? You hope a web site goes out of business because of your personal preference? That just seems cruel.
Edit: And there are thousands of scenes on the site of girls with natural breasts (at least 1700 by the easiest way to find them), and couple hundred scenes on the site of MILFs with natural breasts. I can't see how it wouldn't be worth $5 just to check out those couple hundred scenes.
|
10-15-12 10:54pm
|
Reply
823
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(messmer's Reply)
I believe you are correct and maybe I'm wrong but I think that they hire the more popular mature models and sadly the enhanced versions outnumber the natural ones. I am more forgiving of older women who get implants because time isn't kind to us and sagging breast does affect morale. Of course you would assume that more mature would equal better decision making abilities and therefore these older women would not get giant implants and that's where you would be wrong.
I know you taste in women so it would be great if this site finally had something for you but I don't know if it really has.
|
10-15-12 05:53pm
|
Reply
824
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks Messmer. Yeah I've not grown to like them, far from it but I just figured I like some of the faces of the American girls and like them actually speaking in english in the movies so I would have to accept the fake boobs and live with them.
|
09-18-12 02:30pm
|
Reply
825
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from marcdc1:
(messmer's Reply)
LOL. You are too right.
|
07-30-12 11:20am
|
