| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Reg Berkeley:
Man, I don't know if that's a fair assessment. We've prided ourselves on having the most varied content. Some of the niches you mention (pregnant and hairy), we never have had much content to begin with because it's so hard to find good DVD material.
But MILF, squirt, bondage, fat, foot -- even our own category, Sick & Demented -- are regularly updated.
As far as Gonzo, that's also not really accurate either. Because we love feature films and put up quite a lot of those, too.
We have been light on the she-male stuff recently and have some unique stuff coming up soon.
|
12-06-09 11:53am
|
Reply
402
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from runefist:
(messmer's Reply)
Im using explorer
|
05-11-09 02:57am
|
Reply
403
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Yeah! I like it too. At last people are starting to take note of this site. Very accurate review IMO. I agree about the webmaster. One of the most underrated things is customer service. Yes people moan about bad customer service, but do they support sites with great customer service? This is the sort of site customers should be signing up for.
|
02-24-09 03:33pm
|
Reply
404
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from The Captain:
(messmer's Reply)
Sounds good!
|
08-12-11 08:34pm
|
Reply
405
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from The Captain:
(messmer's Reply)
I understand. I am not that old but younger people keep looking younger and younger to me.
I am curious to see though if it really is the small thumbnails or just how you perceive them.
|
08-12-11 12:45pm
|
Reply
406
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from The Captain:
(messmer's Reply)
Here are their real birthdays from my db (I just subtracted 2011 from their bday without looking at the date of production, so I could be off 1 year)
Tacori Blu - 38
Jena Jackson - 40
Alexander Silk - 48
Tara Holiday - 44
Ariana Carmine - 36
Josie - 41
Mindy - 33
Cascade - 51
Average age for 8 models is 41 years.
We dont make the models look older or younger, we don't use makeup artists because they try to make them look like pornstars, we ask the women to do their makeup like they are going to a formal night out.
I took a real hard look at August updates. Tacori Blu in her one thumb she looks low 30s so I can see that but to be honest I am just not seeing what you saying. I think the small size of the thumbnails do not show off what the full size looks like because of the crop. I would really like to hear if you have the same opinion after seeing the full size images of these sets.
Jena Jackson looks spot on to me. Look at her face!
Cascade, there is no way she looks under 45, she looks closer to 55 then 50.
I don't know, maybe I am not a good judge of age.
|
08-11-11 10:25pm
|
Reply
407
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from The Captain:
Can you tell me a few girls as examples so I can see what you are talking about?
|
08-10-11 08:12pm
|
Reply
408
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from mr smut:
Hi Sir,
if only they would use watermarks that are a little smaller. I do agree that there are a lot of nice mature ladies available at anilos.com but IMHO they should go for more updates than one per day.
Still I would really recommend to give this site a try. Worthwile and with lots of sexy mature ladies *yummy*
Cheers,
Smut
|
05-19-11 01:17pm
|
Reply
409
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from The Captain:
(messmer's Reply)
Ok thanks for the feedback.
We have a search for lingerie. With an exclusion feature you would be able to turn off toys while searching for lingerie. :)
|
11-03-10 11:59am
|
Reply
410
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from The Captain:
I got to thinking more about this. On Nubiles for the search you can exclude all sets with toys. We are going to add that exclusion search to Anilos, also for both sites the output of the search is alphabetical per girl but if we can change it to be last set updated then you can use that as your updates list to grab the content.
|
11-03-10 11:10am
|
Reply
411
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
TBH I am just surmising from the layout & wording of their homepage.
Not much suggests softcore there.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-01-10 05:00pm
|
Reply
412
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from The Captain:
Messmer,
Our shooting specifications are for 4 solo sets of which half must be toy free. If a girl does HC hardcore then we often shoot extra set. One of the problems I think is that the updates are not alternated per toy free and toys, just whatever goes.
Here are the girls who were updated during the time you mentioned.
Sofia Matthews - has two toy free sets and two toy sets.
Samantha Rae - we failed, she has only 1 toy free set out 4.
Kelly Leigh - has two toy free sets and two toy sets.
Andi Roxxx - has two toy free sets and two toy sets.
Lailani - only one toy set from what i see
josefine james - has two toy free sets and two toy sets.
Kate kasle - has two toy free sets and two toy sets.
Robbye bently - we failed, she has only 1 toy free set out 4.
I thought we were doing better, but I still see a few girls in there that have a bad ratio. So I see there are still problems :( My only excuse is our production manager had his mind on other things, and he is no longer working here. But some of his work we are still updating, these shoots were all shot back in July. Takes us a long time to get them on the site.
So we still aren't quite there, sorry about that. Will make sure the new production manager understands this.
|
11-01-10 04:25pm
|
Reply
413
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
I don't know about that.
They are obviously pushing the HC content.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-01-10 12:01pm
|
Reply
414
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Capn:
I think there is a couple of clues on the header page.
A reference to Hardcore Matures in the title & the only button for reviewing models is Hardcore Models.
A shame really. It was always hovering on my 'possibles' list.
No longer.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-01-10 10:59am
|
Reply
415
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#23
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
Fair comment.
I didn't honestly expect any change.
Cap'n. ;0)
|
07-19-10 03:32pm
|
Reply
416
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#21
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
Has this issue been addressed now, or is it still midcore / hardcore orientated?
|
07-18-10 03:21pm
|
Reply
417
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#20
from The Captain:
(messmer's Reply)
Your memory serves you right. This one slipped through the cracks and its something we need to do a better job of. Hopefully its not all the way for our future upcoming updates as we do shoot ahead a few months, but nonetheless we will get back on track eventually.
|
05-19-10 08:29pm
|
Reply
418
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from The Captain:
We have had the policy that for every girl at least half of her content is without toys and dildos, but fingers and masturbation are ok. But it seems you are right. We have not been doing a good job of enforcing this with our producers. I will get on their asses. Thanks for pointing this out.
As for the hardcore, thats just an extra set. We don't shoot any less solo sets if they have hardcore.
|
05-19-10 03:10pm
|
Reply
419
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from GCode:
(messmer's Reply)
Weird you mention interviews because that was one of the favorite things I liked about the site. The fact that most were interviewed by a woman which made a better atmosphere in my opinion and the teasing the models would do. As far as the 'more is better' thing, I dunno if I'm right. I'm just throwing it out there :) I think it makes sense but I think it might be a combo of that and the fact that almost every site does it as well. It's probably a huge factor that most sites do it that the directors/producers feel the need to do it to so they are not the odd ones out. I have to agree that I'm sure that the masses must enjoy dildos or that there are just not enough of the majority complaining about it that they must think that this is what the masses want.
|
05-13-10 08:33pm
|
Reply
420
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from lk2fireone:
(messmer's Reply)
Edit: Another common complaint about Met-art is that the tease factor is missing. There is very little tease or strip-tease.
|
05-13-10 08:25pm
|
Reply
421
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from lk2fireone:
(messmer's Reply)
Met-art is strictly softcore. No hardcore, no midcore, no masturbation.
If you want more action than 1 or 2 pretty teens standing, sitting, lying down, etc., then you need to look elsewhere.
You should be able to get a basic idea of the site from reading the numerous reviews posted at PU.
There are probably thousands of photosets posted at Met-art. It is a huge mega-site.
There are a huge number of videos, mainly 10 minutes runtime or less. The videos are almost all boring and a waste of time. The models in the videos can be lovely, beautiful, or merely attractive, but the videos are a waste of time to watch, after you've seen a few to get an idea of what they are like. I don't understand the psychology of why Met-art will post photosets of lovely girls that I find erotic, and yet videos of the same models are just a bore. Almost all of the PU reviewers that mention the videos state that the videos are a waste of time.
If the PU reviews don't give you enough information on whether Met-art would be appealing to you, you should be able to find 1000s of free mini-photosets of the Met-art photosets. I mean, there are 1000s of reduced-number of picture photosets on the internet. Many were posted by Met-art itself, as a form of advertising for the site. So if you look at a number of those photosets, you should get a good idea of whether the site is worth your while.
A 1-month subscription is only $20 (rounded off). So it's not expensive.
I've had several 1-year memberships to Met-art, because it's my favorite porn site.
I posted a PU review of Met-art over a year ago. And there are plenty of other PU reviews of Met-art that are worthwhile reading. Some people love the site, some like it, other people think it's over-rated and not worth joining.
|
05-13-10 07:57pm
|
Reply
422
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from lk2fireone:
(messmer's Reply)
I think I found the perfect site for you to hate.
"Toy Desire is full of young sluts who have never had the pleasure of a fat dick in their tight cunts, after weeks of trying to get them to take fat cocks, we failed, but we did manage to get them to shove just about anything else in their tight little twats, and yes, we got it ALL on video. These girls use cucumbers, strap-ons, vibrators, dildos anything that will give them the orgasm they so desperately need!"
I haven't had a chance to examine this site yet, but it appears to be one that you should avoid at all costs, until you get over your aversion to dildos.
Trying to find sites that you would really like seems to be a much harder thing to do.
I guess I'm lucky, because I really enjoy sites like Met-art. The only problem is that my budget is limited, so I can only join one or two a month.
But if I had an unlimited budget, my mind would blow a fuse, and I'd lose my appreciation for porn. Lol.
|
05-13-10 06:54pm
|
Reply
423
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
The big guns won't, but the smaller niche guys might.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-13-10 11:50am
|
Reply
424
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
'......that must be what the public wants or they wouldn't keep doing it.'
Well, everybody doesn't want it.
As we know it really comes down to what is available.
Not being porn manufacturers, we have to put up with:
a: What we are given.
b: What the majority are perceived to want.
c: What we dislike least.
Unless by continually banging on about it, we finally get given ( sold ;0) ) what we want.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-13-10 10:06am
|
Reply
425
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from GCode:
Ah yes, the dildo routine. I liked this site because of the stray away from mostly all that. I remember even seeing some machine use. I have to say you are probably right when it comes to dildos. I think that just most producers/directors probably just think a models use of only fingers does not give enough 'umpff' to the content. Therefore, the result is bringing in toys. However, I've always thought that the simple use of fingers shows much more erotism amongst models because they are using their own technique in such a simple way to get themselves off. But, back to what I said, I think a lot of makers of porn tend to see more as better and toys are the solution in the eyes of them :( Stinks but it is what it is I guess.
|
05-12-10 08:22pm
|
