| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
926
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from GCode:
(messmer's Reply)
lol I totally re-read my reply and realized I totally messed up my question (I've had a few beam and cokes :)) I meant to say have you been a member of any of their sites and have maybe not reviewed them. Lol, I totally dropped the ball on writing that text, huh? :)
|
12-13-09 08:19pm
|
Reply
927
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from GCode:
(messmer's Reply)
haha yeah it definitely is subjective and that's why I asked your opinion as a fellow PU who enjoys older women. I fully agree on what you believe is a mature model for sure. Being a bit younger than you, I suppose I think a 'mature' model would be about 10 years older than me so that's about 37+. However, maybe mature sites think the same way and think that their target audience may be in the 18-21 range and a 10+ year old model would range around 28-35 or so. I never really thought about that until now and I think that may be why models on most 'mature' sites are getting late 20's and early 30's models and marketing them as 'mature'.
So many of these models on these mature sites could keep their original titties and natural features but be more demanding that the models keep in shape and this would result in really hot models. This is my opinion, but I hate the fact that a lot of 'mature' models tend to be early 30 somethings with huge fake tits and that means they are quality mature models. I like a natural sag as well (I think you like them a bit more and I respect that for sure) but I want my photos to feature them in the flesh as I would see them if I MET them in the flesh, ya know? For example, At Anilos, I love Chennin Blanc because of her natural look and her freckles but these are only present in the videos. If you look at her images, they are not there. A huge disapointment in my opinion :(
Now that you bring it up, I would not mind seeing a touch of gray in the hair of these models if they have it. It just adds to the natural look in older women that I love. Thanks for the insight and the reply!
|
12-13-09 08:14pm
|
Reply
928
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from GCode:
(messmer's Reply)
Ah yeah I meant a review or comment on PU. I was assuming that maybe you knew the watermarks of the photos may be based on a previous membership that maybe you never reviewed/commented on. As far as the remark about any of the sites, I think (and think it is) that this company had a site that primarily was mature video content, while this particular site is mainly photography. I see now that the reply could have been taken the wrong way and I apologize, but it was a reply that was whole heartedly in good fun when I thought that maybe you were a previous/current member that may have not reviewed the site yet. Thanks for the reply :)
|
12-13-09 08:04pm
|
Reply
929
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from GCode:
messmer have you been a member of any of their review sites ever? If so, let's see a review or gimme some feedback! Seems like they may have the model selection right?
|
12-13-09 07:02pm
|
Reply
930
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from GCode:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks for the vote of confidence in the review, buddy ol' pal :) This is definitely a site in the forefront for quality mature content and I basically joined based on your review and feedback. And....I was not disapointed! I'm glad you took my 'imperfections' remark the right way, I had a feeling I was going to get some negative feedback on that opinion but I'm happy to hear that I am not the only one who felt that way. These so called 'imperfections' that people tend to observe creates a downfall in some sites, IMHO. One of the largest qualities in mature women is the natural freckles many have (huge turn on for me) and I saw a lot of these attributes 'washed out' with image altering which pissed me off in the photos. You can see them in the videos which is great but they are air brushed in the photos (BOOOOOOOO!!!!). This is probably one of the largest quirks of this site that I found, that and the fact that model selection are a bit young to be featured on a mature site :( Don't get me wrong, they are quite attractive but I wanna see natural older women!
I think this is the most dissatisfying thing I find in sites that are considered to be in the 'mature' niche. While the argument is there for what is a true 'mature' model, I think this site is not entirely spot on in this aspect. However, the site is great and I do feel we think the same way on this issue. What do you think are some descriptions of what makes a true 'mature' model? I'd love to hear your feedback. Thanks again for the reply and take care.
|
12-13-09 06:27pm
|
Reply
931
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from mr smut:
I just checked some of the content I downloadaed while being a member there and besides of the fact that the pictures I grabbed are mostly nice I agree with Maggie and you.
A pic of my favourite model Andie shot in 2006 and 809x1200 pixel large has a watermark of 297x66 pixel with the padding to the top and left area added it takes up 306x74 pixel which is annoying. That's more than 1/3 of the horizontal image area.
I'd really like to go back to this site but as they still use such intrusive watermarks :-(
|
12-13-09 12:01am
|
Reply
932
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from mr smut:
(messmer's Reply)
Hahaha o.k. that's a fine definition. If this is true then I'm a MILF and GILF lover :-)
|
12-11-09 09:24pm
|
Reply
933
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from mr smut:
(messmer's Reply)
But where's the border between MILF and GILF? I've choosen MILF because I like 40+ girls that still look pretty. So far I've seen a lot and even some girls in their 60ies look damn' pretty :-)
MILF absolutely and in all varities of course! Lesbian MILF, fetish MILF, softcore MILF, solo MILF, hardcore MILF etc.
|
12-10-09 11:34am
|
Reply
934
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(messmer's Reply)
Ditto that. I signed up for a full year that gave me an additional 6 free months. Not that sorry I did because the price per posted DVD is $.0367 (less than 4 US cents per video) which is pretty damned cheap. If I catch one video in 100 that is worth downloading my cost is $3.67, which is about the cost of a video rental these days.
But I am finding an average of 2 or 3 DVD's a week that have some good stuff so I've got no price complaints.
The only complaint is that I've got to weed through the crap to find the few good ones.
|
12-06-09 09:14pm
|
Reply
935
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Reg Berkeley:
Man, I don't know if that's a fair assessment. We've prided ourselves on having the most varied content. Some of the niches you mention (pregnant and hairy), we never have had much content to begin with because it's so hard to find good DVD material.
But MILF, squirt, bondage, fat, foot -- even our own category, Sick & Demented -- are regularly updated.
As far as Gonzo, that's also not really accurate either. Because we love feature films and put up quite a lot of those, too.
We have been light on the she-male stuff recently and have some unique stuff coming up soon.
|
12-06-09 11:53am
|
Reply
936
|
Silverstone DVD
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I was a member of the network about 4 months ago, and found a lot of very nice videos at some of the sites. There is a wide range of material, most of which I was not really interested in, but there are a good number of attractive models in a large number of videos that are nicely shot. One factor I appreciate is that the fake moaning and groaning in a lot of these videos is much less than the average porn clip. The network is certainly not perfect, but it's one of the better ones out there, as far as content and price.
|
12-04-09 12:53pm
|
Reply
937
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from malikstarks:
(messmer's Reply)
I agree some of them are borderline, I still may give a try some time in the future though. I like the camera angles they take pretty consistently
|
11-28-09 09:17pm
|
Reply
938
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(messmer's Reply)
I didn't know that thing about the price drop but that's of course a big deal. I'll stay for 3 months at least because I need to see cumming matures too :-)
|
11-23-09 11:12am
|
Reply
939
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from malikstarks:
(messmer's Reply)
Hey Messmer did you ever join this site? I've been thinking about it since they seem to have more North American models it seems than All Over 30. Plus I may like some of the camera work a little better.
If so tell me what you thought.
|
11-22-09 07:58pm
|
Reply
940
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Ray O:
(messmer's Reply)
Messmer:
I get ya and hear your pain (ok maybe not pain). I agree that many of the sets could spend a little more time on their dress and look. In fact, even though my favorite photographer is Sean R. and I really love his explicit shots, his biggest downfall is he rarely shoots full body shots, which I find to be quite the set up for the more graphic shots. He also is obviously not a breast man and rarely pays much attention to gals breasts, which sometimes is fine, but some of his models have absolutely wonderful breasts so it is a waste.
Dhara: OMG what a pig! She shows up every couple of years and I guess they like her since she has hair everywhere, even where she shouldn't (the mustache for one). I don't want to sound cruel, but she gets paid for this and is fair game for criticism. She is by far the ugliest woman I have seen on the site and probably one of the most unattractive women I have ever seen period. I mean really, I'd rather jerk off to a guy than her.
So I get and agree with your comments. I think they could do a better job with some of the sets. I also don't get why they have 60+ sets of some models. I'd rather have variety than one model over and over again (another reason I just let my 8 year membership lapse).
Ray
|
11-22-09 02:30pm
|
Reply
941
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Ray O:
(messmer's Reply)
Agreed. I have said before that I don't understand why one would want to limit the amount of materials provided that you are paying for. Yu can always download and edit.
Perhaps Capn doesn't have good high speed internet? I can download a zip of 250 pictures in about one minute.
This is a vast improvement over when ATK split downloads of each set into 10-15 separate zips that one had to download, rename and combine. That was only a year or so ago.
|
11-22-09 07:59am
|
Reply
942
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Ray O:
I like but don't completely get your comment. I think the overall quality of the models is quite high and prefer their natural models - even if they are not Maxim quality. I hate the majority of solo female sites as they are all either (1) real porn stars, (2) wanna-be porn stars; (3) jaded strippers prostitutes and dancers; (4) Hollywood, bleach blond, shaved models or (5) drug addict skanks. So on a comparative basis, I'd say their models are still first rate. It could be a case of different strokes for different folks. Can you name some sites or types of models you like vs the one's you don't?
As to skills of photographers and repetitious posing. What can they do? They are working with a model for half a day and have to get 10 or more sets of them posed from dressed to naked. To a certain extent, there is only so much you can do. As a photographer that personally sometimes shoots nude models, I can say that the goal is to capture the gals faces, figures and sexual goodies in a way that is both tantalizing and at times graphic. You also want to make sure that the model looks fun and not bored. When you as a consumer look at 10 sets of one model in one sitting, you will of course see some repetition and if we a re doing our job right and you like the model, each set will be different enough and the model erotic enough to be entertaining. I have to wonder if your boredom is due to overexposure to the material. That being said, there are a lot of photographers, that in my opinion, are not so good at getting the most out of the models and have poor lighting and close-ups. So again, it would be instructive for you to list a site that does it more the way you want.
|
11-22-09 07:54am
|
Reply
943
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(messmer's Reply)
Doing the calculations from what files I have, the mp4's run an average of 275MB. The wmv's are harder to average because they've upped the file sizes a couple of times over time, but I would say the newer ones run around around 80mb, the older ones around 50.
|
11-21-09 10:02pm
|
Reply
944
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(messmer's Reply)
I chose bad management because that is the cause of all the others.
|
11-19-09 08:41am
|
Reply
945
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(messmer's Reply)
Maybe you should wait a moment until I've written my review. I will write one that's for sure but I can't say if this will happen today or on the weekend latest.
Cheers,
Smut
|
11-17-09 10:17am
|
Reply
946
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Advent:
(messmer's Reply)
I just wanted to let you guys know that we are working on a forum for our members/non-members to be able to post on. We know we will get negative comments on it, as we can not please everyone all of the time but we also feel it is a very important tool for us to use to stay in touch with our members. I know IT is working on it non-stop so we should be bringing it out soon. This is one of the things that is ahead of the custom zip feature.
|
11-09-09 10:16am
|
Reply
947
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from malikstarks:
(messmer's Reply)
I'm only lukewarm in regards to all over 30, they do everything about right it's just that for me I prefer North American Models and they seem to have too many European's for my taste, I don't know just a preference. I don't mind Euro models for other niche's (although I still prefer North American or English speaking), but I don't much care for them when it comes to the mature niche. Aunt Judys seems to have mostly English speaking models, and I'm not sure about Anilos since I have not been a member. I was considering Anilos but at the time they didn't have enough of a back catalog.
Other than that we have similar very wide ranging tastes. Most of the guys on this site only like younger models which is ok too, but it is good to find someone else that is more excepting of women in different forms. It is very hard to find good reviews on many of the BBW and mature sites because of this.
|
11-04-09 03:47pm
|
Reply
948
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
I would rather do that editing prior to downloading, with custom zips. :0)
|
11-04-09 03:43pm
|
Reply
949
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from malikstarks:
(messmer's Reply)
I don't see that being much different at 50 plus milfs, their watermark is about the same size and in the same top left hand corner as 40 something mags (albeit not bright yellow).
I remember you now messmer, your the guy that hates the big watermarks. Well most of the mature sites don't have big ones such as all over 30, and aunt judy's, so I hope your doing ok with those. That site Anilos I think looks good too.
|
11-04-09 03:05pm
|
Reply
950
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from malikstarks:
(messmer's Reply)
In regards to this site, I have been a member once and while it is pretty good I think that for now the better option is to just go with 40 something mag (same company) since they update more often and have a better mixture of hard and soft core stuff. Agree that the video quality needs to be picked up. That is another issue that Score needs to work on in general. They seem to segregate most of their HD content to the Score HD site which I think is a bit unfair, but oh well.
|
11-03-09 02:22pm
|
