| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
701
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from pat362:
I've joined videobox a couple of times but I never stayed for very long. The first time was the best because I had access to all this amazing content which would have costed me hundreds and probably thousands or dollars if I had bought it in DVD's.
I can't say that I didn't get my moneys worth but once you downloaded what you liked then all you have left is what new content they add. This is where I find that a long term membership is not worth it. I've noticed that a great amount of the newer content is barely 5 to 10 yrs old. That might be the reason why you thinks it's blech! I know that I do. If Videobox brought older content from the 80's and early 90's then I would have a different opinion.
|
10-31-10 06:54pm
|
Reply
702
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks, messmer....there is quite a good number of sets/vids with lingerie and/or just cute underwear - and scenes where items are removed gradually. Can't put a percentage on, really - but the good thing is this:
Most models have several sets and 3-4 vids (some more) and generally the girls are wearing different things in each set - and among these there is fine lingerie/or sexy bra and thongs....(and not much stripped socks, thanks you)
|
10-31-10 02:29am
|
Reply
703
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Jay G:
Good review. appreciate your objectivity..... some of us appreciate an "over the hill" chick for variety.
|
10-30-10 10:10am
|
Reply
704
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from pat362:
(messmer's Reply)
In some ways I prefer her newer stuff than when she first started in porn. A really hot women that gives great scenes.
|
10-29-10 06:52pm
|
Reply
705
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from nadiencendia:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks a lot for that, Messmer. Aletta Ocean and Kathia Nobili are not particularly my type of model, so these new sites are not specially atractive for me. I've checked what they say are their "newest sites", and apart from those two, apparently they are "Nude Fight Club" y "Cheating Whore Wives". Meh.
In any case, I would say that 21st Sextury would do better to maintain in good shape the sites they already have, instead of trying to open new ones. But probably they want to attract new customers, as a commercial strategy...
|
10-24-10 06:43am
|
Reply
706
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from pat362:
Is gapeland one of the new sites added?
|
10-23-10 11:42am
|
Reply
707
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from nadiencendia:
And have you been able to identify the two new sites added to your membership? :)
|
10-23-10 11:31am
|
Reply
708
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from tangub:
Thanks for the review. good to read the photo sets come in one zip now, last time i was at any of the ATK sites it was 20 pics per zip and so time consuming to unpack them all and move to one folder.
|
10-22-10 03:34am
|
Reply
709
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from graymane:
As usual, a very comprehensive and informing review, messmer. I've been contemplating joining something, anything that'll bring back some hair. I'll give this one serious consideration when making a decision.
|
10-20-10 10:43pm
|
Reply
710
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from PinkPanther:
It's the same haphazard posting of vids that they have been doing for some time with no explanation or rhyme or reason. Every once in a while they post vids that can be downloaded in 1080p, but it's never been consistent.
|
10-20-10 06:54am
|
Reply
711
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from anyonebutme:
Little harsh?
The site just is not to your personal tastes.
"Severely ripped off"? They are still pushing out genuinely new exclusive updates each day that a great many people enjoy.
Don't like the current day's update? Then download the next day's update! This site does allow you to do that, you know.
|
10-19-10 11:39pm
|
Reply
712
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
For the modest price I would say it is well worth a look, I doubt you would stay long though.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-10 01:41pm
|
Reply
713
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
Although it is featured in a few sets, it is certainly not a forte of the site. Often where you would expect to see lingerie you do not.
Largely, if it is featured, it starts out from lingerie.
I would view it as a refreshing change from many mainstream artsy softcore sites.
There is a lot of warmth & intimacy in a lot of the sets & I think it is worth the current bargain asking price just for that alone.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-10 01:27pm
|
Reply
714
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
Yes, I am using similar software.
I would just rather not download 100MB & have to delete 80MB of it.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 11:43am
|
Reply
715
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Capn:
I know I have been banging on about this for years, but this site would be sooo much better if they consistently proceeded to full nudity in each set.
They have great outfits & models, and I appreciate that some won't do nude, but there are plenty that would & do.
A tease is no good without the pay off for me.
They have a very shaky definition of nude too, as some of the sets they claim to be nude aren't.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 10:06am
|
Reply
716
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Capn:
I rejoined recently myself because I got a good promo offer.
Whilst I am pleased I did, I still think user selected zips are required.
Some sets have as many as 250 pics in, telling a story that could easliy be told in 100pics or a bit less.
These sets feature a lot of duplication of poses so could be regarded as padding.
I have started pruning after download, but I find it a PITA!
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 09:58am
|
Reply
717
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Khan:
(messmer's Reply)
messmer, yes, it's mentioned on the raffle info page where we tell all the ways you can earn tickets ....
https://www.pornusers.com/raffle_info.html
Hope that helps.
|
10-18-10 06:34pm
|
Reply
718
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks for the quick reply and the helpful information. You told me everything I need. I will give this site a skip, as you suggested.
|
10-18-10 03:32pm
|
Reply
719
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from lk2fireone:
I've never joined this site.
What percentage complete nudity (including photos with lingerie that shows all the good bits) is there in the photoshoots? A wild guess is fine by me.
What is the name of your "real sexy model with tons of picture sets and videos"? Or is she part of your private stash?
Also, why would a recently posted video (August 2010) be of such low quality? Is this a file they dug up from their unused historical trash? Most sites that post updates use files that are their average quality or above average quality. Why would a site post a below average quality file, unless it had some historical or collector interest?
Wild guesses on my part, because I have no knowledge of this site, except for its name. :)
But unless there is a significant amount of nudity, I doubt I would be interested in joining. I like softcore, but I still want to see the "good" bits. (Bits is a British term, you understand. LOL.)
Edit01: I just looked up "bits". I want to see everything interesting, not just the cunny.
|
10-18-10 02:48pm
|
Reply
720
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Lionheart:
It's good to know that other websites are trying to compete ageist Videobox, as much as I love VB, a more competitive marketplace means a better quality, service and content for porn users like us!
|
10-12-10 12:48am
|
Reply
721
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Monahan:
I agree with the review and thanks for the tips.
A few months back I was having problems with the logon so the techs changed it. Happened again. Fixed again. Happened again. Fixed again.
Each time I lost access until tech support fixed the problem, but no extension of time was offered in any of the cases.
Minor point but each interruption lost me from 24 to 48 hours. (Gave me time to check out other sites.)
Logon has been stable now for at least 4 months.
|
10-10-10 11:18am
|
Reply
722
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from happyending:
Nice review. The RealityKings moderators have a low tolerance for comments. I usually use Internet Download Manager which is not free to download the streaming videos.
|
10-10-10 11:14am
|
Reply
723
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks for the review.
What are these grades B and C you (and others) refer to about DVD's? Just a subjective definition of quality or some PU scale?
Personally I think those old Private videos they have are great. I own many on DVD's from time when you could order them for five to six euros a piece with free shipping.
|
10-10-10 02:12am
|
Reply
724
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from malikstarks:
(messmer's Reply)
Understood. Never been a member at VideosZ.
|
10-07-10 08:37pm
|
Reply
725
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Goldfish:
(messmer's Reply)
My 2 cents on the "DVD quality videos". My guess is many of these videos are not going to be as good in quality as non-HD movies created by Hollywood producers. In defense of the porn videos, watching them from two feet away on an HD quality monitor will expose many more imperfections in the picture than watching it from across the room on your TV.
|
10-06-10 08:30pm
|
