| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
551
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks for the info messmer. I suspected that the changes were done after TBP's review. There is no way they wouldn't have noticed that the videos are now streaming only. I hope TBP makes a change to their review because a lot of people will get burned like me. I know that I would never have joined any of their sites if I'd know about the streaming only option.
Score is correct that it will stop piracy but the problem is that it will also stop paying members who only wanted to download to their computer the pics and videos from joining.
|
04-18-11 05:53am
|
Reply
552
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from otoh:
I'm keen to join this site sometime too - seems a little racier than Abby Winters - but their preview area is a bit lacking, it would be good if non-members could see lists of sets/videos/updates, which would more than answer your query. (Which I apologise for not doing!)
|
04-18-11 12:25am
|
Reply
553
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
Pretty much seems to be what is ongoing there.
A shame & a missed opportunity IMO
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-17-11 01:47pm
|
Reply
554
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from The Bishop:
(messmer's Reply)
Hi messmer,
Thanks for the detailed response.
I actually agree with you though you may think that's odd. One of my old complaints regarding sets is if the jump to the goods straight away - no I'm in 100% agreement with you here - I love sets where it’s slowed down.
That's why I like the longer Sean R sets it can be a while before you see all which is so much better; love sets with lots of clothes too including long dresses with the classic suspenders and stockings but like you I find this has deteriorated of late.
Yes I think you’re right, some people want to see pussy from the outset, and think you’re odd if you like the models clothed for long, and don’t get me started on people that think there is something wrong if you like to see women in their natural state. Everyday porn is so boring to me, and I hate hardcore boy/girl stuff.
Anyway I think it’s improving but I can see your point, the models that used to come through from R Williams were always pretty good but his content has trailed off a lot.
|
04-07-11 03:22pm
|
Reply
555
|
Asian Boy Feet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from otoh:
(messmer's Reply)
Well, obviously you're the very worst kind of deviant, messmer. Women in erotic lingerie? Not sure we need your kind around here :)
|
04-06-11 12:43pm
|
Reply
556
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from The Bishop:
(messmer's Reply)
Hi messmer,
Yes they are still in volumes, guess that is something they ought to update too!
I've given 90 based on the upgrade and vastly improved interaction on the boards since the start of the year, they now provide information on upcoming models for example.
I'll openly admit though it's possibly a little high, see my response to Cap'n - I have yet to find another site that gives me the same raunch factor as N&H along with big sets, seems very hard to get this elsewhere.
Yes not all the contributors provide crystal clear images (something that baffles me) but photographing a live subject isn't as easy as we'd think no doubt, however I don't think that excuses blatantly poor quality.
However things are improving albeit a little too slowly.
Bishop
|
04-06-11 10:59am
|
Reply
557
|
American Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from exotics4me:
On the join page it does say this about downloads, "We also provide MPEG clips (divided into smaller, easily downloadable portions)".
|
04-05-11 06:45pm
|
Reply
558
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Maines Own:
(messmer's Reply)
I second that. I always had the choice which VB I want to use
|
04-05-11 04:02am
|
Reply
559
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from exotics4me:
(messmer's Reply)
You've always been the odd man out Messmer! There is a big difference, I do collect certain models. I think with my OCDC, if I just picked scenes here and there without any structure, it would drive me crazy, then I'd be the crazy man out! Agree about Aletta Ocean's implants. While I'm not against implants, especially in the case of models like Sandra Shine, Zafira, where they were realistic with their implants. I think Sandra was a 34C before implants but was sagging in her early 20s, she got implants that she says made her a 36C, what she calls "full" and said some bras are 36D. With Zafira, it was a case of her noticing from all the nude modeling she has done, one of her breasts was larger than the other. So she took the size of the bigger one and had both balanced out. I can understand those situations, but not in Aletta's case. Also, another that went way overboard is Black Angelica. I thought she had near perfect boobs before her implants, very similar to Eve Angel's, then Angelica goes and gets DD.
And there's that difference in us in the mature section of models. I should mention that I saw some really attractive Asian mature models on the Idols 69 network, but a lot had the mosaic on them. A few of those were in their 50s and I found them attractive. Once I near 60s, that's my mom's age and that's too far for me. And I like glam, similar to my next highest scoring site being Twistys and I remember you didn't like it that well.
Did you ever look at FTV? They have the glam thing too, but they do have a lot of amateur models. I had mentioned in the forum that I've been on an exhibitionism kick lately, they do that a lot, which is probably as far from glam as one can get since there is no studio, often spontaneous, though it can get boring at times since you sometimes watch a 10 minute video to see a handful of nudity flashes. It does have the girl next door feel though.
|
04-01-11 11:10pm
|
Reply
560
|
Exploited Moms
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Capn:
That copyright being stuck at 2006 is ominous.
That sounds as suspicious as another site I ran across recently which had samples of recent updates.
The watermark on the phots were dated 2005!
To answer you question, I don't know for sure, but I would put the chances around 95% that it is dead in the water.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-31-11 04:08am
|
Reply
561
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
You are spot on with that.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-11 03:40am
|
Reply
562
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Capn:
If it has had a turn around, that is interesting.
Knowing my preferences, do you think current content would appeal to me?
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-26-11 02:52pm
|
Reply
563
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from malikstarks:
Glad to see your pleased. Thanks for the insight
|
03-24-11 12:06pm
|
Reply
564
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from turboshaft:
(messmer's Reply)
I hate those! I have never been able to block them either, so they just keep popping up.
|
03-17-11 11:34am
|
Reply
565
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Denner:
messmer - can't remember if we have had this up earlier.
But: Did you take a look at JB Video?
Do not know much about the site, but have seen quite a few trailers of newer and vids of somewhat older JB Video-material - and a lot here is milf/negligee/stockings for you...and pretty good - in my opinion.
|
03-13-11 07:15am
|
Reply
566
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Best of all, the drought seems to have ended. From December into January, the updates at Videobox were the worst I've seen since I've been a member - just dismal. They've really picked up lately, for my tastes.
|
03-12-11 04:05pm
|
Reply
567
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(messmer's Reply)
Well, I was almost out of sites that I haven't already reviewed on this network (or these two networks and a bonus package) ;)
|
03-03-11 08:53pm
|
Reply
568
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from lk2fireone:
(messmer's Reply)
My guess would be that most webmasters would not pay much attention to these polls unless the number of responding members was at least 1,000 or more. You would need a really large number to command the attention of most webmasters.
To be more effective regarding a positive response from webmasters, you would need some program that targets specific webmasters with polls that address issues relating to their websites (general or specific, e.g., streaming only content, download limits, etc.).
|
03-02-11 09:33pm
|
Reply
569
|
A Measure of Curiosity
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
Yes, I didn't think it would be quite right for you, M.
That is why I didn't suggest it to you earlier.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-02-11 12:33pm
|
Reply
570
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from malikstarks:
These sites are from the Score Group. I made a thread about their new direction a few months back entitled: "No adult industry in two years" in which their lead editor predicted that piracy would bring an end to the industry ("in two years").
At the time all they were doing was eliminating downloads for their newest "it" model Valery Irene. (Score always has an "it" or "Flagship" model, before her it was Christy Marks, and before that Lindsey Dawn McKenzie) Now it seems they have expanded this approach to some of their websites, although clearly not all of them as I am currently on the last day of a subscription to ScoreHD and they have not yet limited downloads there.
I was actually planning to return to 50plus milfs sometime next month, as I had not really downloaded as much as I wanted to last time. Obviously with this news that is out of the question. They basically just lost a customer. I will consider returning to Exploited Moms instead. Not to mention I know of a free blog where I can obtain most of their back catalog right now. But I was willing to pay.
They are making a big mistake with this as they are destroying any chance at repeat business they might get. I don't think they understand their consumer base. While I understand their concern over piracy, they are clearly not the only ones being hurt by this, none of the other sites have turned on their own customer's in this way.
While they offer unique content overall, and particularly with this site. It is not so unique as justify this, even from a purely business standpoint.
|
03-02-11 11:50am
|
Reply
571
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from nostromo:
(messmer's Reply)
Yes, i entered the site today. I joined yesterday teenmodels and my card wasn't declined -a virtual credit card-.
|
03-01-11 11:27am
|
Reply
572
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from elonlybuster:
I hate bringging up old comments/threads, but can you tell us exactly how much of a difference there was between enhancements on RK and BB? Was it an over-whelming difference, or a relatively close "competition"?
|
02-28-11 07:50am
|
Reply
573
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from otoh:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks messmer - I have a couple more impending reviews coming up, so I'm sure I shall continue to baffle and confound you :)
|
02-24-11 11:05pm
|
Reply
574
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from tangub:
(messmer's Reply)
Watching with interest as this site has been on my radar since reading otoh's fine review.
|
02-24-11 03:16am
|
Reply
575
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
Smaller sites will have a smaller multi-function staff.
They should really focus on keeping their customers happy though.
A disappointing performance on that score here.
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-23-11 03:17pm
|
