| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Cybertoad:
(ace of aces's Reply)
I agree aces, thats not cool.
Ok ya give a review, but no site suck at
everything.
I think in MHO, they should give him a free membership and then let him say it sucks.
Its a good site, its a great model.
It has a good network. And ok navigational look.
Not perfect, but not a bag of turd soaking camel balls either.
And there is allot of good in that site.
And with many reviews he's still at zero, wonder why.
Negative don't help all alone, you need balance.
|
07-02-08 11:46pm
|
Reply
427
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from lurifax:
(ace of aces's Reply)
A "review" should be as objective as possible.
Else it is not a 'review' but an opinion.
Having got your point of view clarified, I shall not bother any further to read any of your "reviews" as I can se no value in them.
|
07-02-08 04:10pm
|
Reply
428
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Cybertoad:
(ace of aces's Reply)
Yea, funny how they just don't make em like this anymore .
|
07-02-08 09:21am
|
Reply
429
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
from lurifax:
What a load of rubbish! (If the '99' is out of 100.)
I have previously complained about the trend among all (professional) website reviewers.
'Ace of aces' have obviously fallen into the same trap.
A typical example is 'VideoBox', which is given 98/100 by TBP.
Shortcomings @ 'VideoBox';
1. Not all videos are of DVD quality.
2. Many 'updates' are 'recycled' old videos.
3. ...and last, but not least: No HD quality to be seen anywhere!
In conclusion I ask; would an adjustment (improvement) with regard to the 'shortcomings' only be worth 2% - or less?
Obviously not.
|
07-01-08 05:00pm
|
Reply
430
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from badandy400:
(ace of aces's Reply)
I will be doing this one shortly...dont worry. Actually I have a good number of reviews to write!
|
06-12-08 02:18pm
|
Reply
431
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from badandy400:
(ace of aces's Reply)
I am not logging in after every video, but it is rather frequent. It is less than three hours for me. I will try to see how long it takes before logging me out.
|
05-06-08 08:42am
|
Reply
432
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
from badandy400:
AHHH!!! I joined! But, I did not realize that the photosets did not have zips for them! Also, I am noticing that I have to keep relogging in download the next video. So my download manager is not doing me a whole lot of good.
From before we talked about the bit rates. The new stuff is 2.59 MBit/s I believe, but Windows shows them as like 5.5 MBit/s....kinda weird. They are actually 2.5 and do not look bad at all.
No zips and lots of logins....I wont be giving it a 99 because of this, but the content is not bad. Brazzers does a login deal like this too and lost a few good points. Video box makes me login Saturday early afternoon, so once a week, and so far BangBros has never made me login except for the first time.
|
05-05-08 04:14pm
|
Reply
433
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from badandy400:
(ace of aces's Reply)
Well. That depends on a lot of things. But here even the lower end should look good still. A decently compressed and filtered 4000 Kbit/s video should look wonderful. Usually when videos get over 2000 they start looking pretty good. Of course there are exceptions, some still suck! Of course the higher the better, but there is a point where is make little difference to increase the bit rate and just makes it harder for a persons computer to play it. Try taking and average computer that is 4 years old and skip around an 8 MBit video....it does not work so well.
Thanks for the info, I just might have to join this site and check everything out myself. That is one beautiful woman! :)
|
05-04-08 02:49pm
|
Reply
434
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(ace of aces's Reply)
One way is to go the folder that you saved the videos and set the view to details, then have it display the bit rate. An other way is to open the video and look under properties, sometimes it will tell you. The last easy option I can think of off hand is simply to calculate the bit rate. Just pick a few videos and tell me their size in MB and there duration.
If the video is say 300 MB. Multiply that by 8, then divide that number by how many seconds are in the video. This would give the bit rate in MBit/s, of course if you want you can divide that by 1000 to get it is KBit/s. So if the video is exactly 20 minutes long, and 300 MB in size, the bit rate would be 2000 KBit/s, now this bit rate would include the audio too but audio is usually very small when compared to video.
|
05-04-08 09:48am
|
Reply
435
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from badandy400:
(ace of aces's Reply)
I was actually referring to the bit rate of the videos. download speed is useful too though.
|
05-04-08 09:36am
|
Reply
436
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
from badandy400:
Grrr...you cant give a 99 either! Just kidding! Could you tell me what the bit rate and durations of the videos is? I looked at the tour page after seeing your review and I am tempted to join. Thanks for any info.
|
05-03-08 06:58pm
|
Reply
437
|
Real Cleavage
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from Jimmi:
we think it is besides you get access to 13 more sites as wll so you are bound to find something
|
07-07-09 11:33am
|
Reply
438
|
Reality Gang
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from Robbi81:
Is the discount still in affect?? Ive gone to the site and deleted my cookies and the discount still does not show up.
|
03-03-10 07:49pm
|
Reply
439
|
Reality Gang
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from bruce987:
Yes... they still have the discounted price of $14 and something. I was on this site three times in 2009. Wasn't bad. Girls are great and action good. Hi-res movies but slow downloads. Worth the waiting time.
|
02-05-10 05:58pm
|
Reply
440
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from chiefton:
The DL limit sucks! its just something they are doing to make you stay a member. Been a member ever since 2001 and well I am caught up with all the downloads that I want so I dont ever have to worry about that crap!
|
03-22-08 09:56pm
|
Reply
441
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from King:
(ace of aces's Reply)
FPS = Frames Per Second
Everything lower than 24 looks awfull
|
02-17-08 04:45pm
|
Reply
442
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from nygiants03:
what do you mean by 24th? I downloaded so much content on this site every month , I never once ran into the download limit.
|
01-27-08 09:12am
|
Reply
443
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from roseman:
(ace of aces's Reply)
LOL, who knows :-)
|
01-23-08 07:10am
|
Reply
444
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from roseman:
I hate download limits as well.
|
01-23-08 07:08am
|
Reply
445
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(ace of aces's Reply)
I can't. I never got in the site!
|
12-03-09 12:26pm
|
Reply
446
|
Roni's Paradise
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from kimo:
(ace of aces's Reply)
too many to count 100's
cam videos go all the way back to 1/05
there is always a video every week most times.
then there is the home made videos that go back quite abit.
then there are video feeds you get access to as well.
they are wmv's 320x240 512 bitrate 4:3 aspect ratio
that's about all I can tell ya
|
07-07-08 07:08pm
|
Reply
447
|
Russian Teen Obsession
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from Denner:
Not a member - but if you go along with the preview and on to the bonus-sites, you'll find, that this one site have only 6 videos at the moment - the six you can watch trailers for in the preview.
Talk about need for more material for $25.....take og leave the bonus sites.
BTW: Where are all those former fine east- or russian sites we saw earlier?
Global crisis, maybe.
|
03-05-09 11:40am
|
Reply
448
|
Sara Stone
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from atrapat:
Site just launched. Haven't had time to watch much of it. Some quick facts after looking at the previews.
15 photo sets: one hardcore bgg, 6 softcore gg ranging from mere tit rubbing to almost pussy licking, 8 solo galleries ranging from just posing to mild toy insertion.
28 videos: I'd say 40% are solo, 40% are bg (or bgg or bbg) and the remaining gg and a couple BTS. My guess is almost all the hardcore video content but one (the one tied to the bgg photo set) is recycled from DVDs. Photo content seems much more recent and likely exclusive.
Part of Premium Pass. No scheduled future updates. No entries in the free official blog; but a couple entries in the members only video blog. No webcam show scheduled.
Sara Stone is gorgeous. Hope she puts her site in shape soon as some of the other stars at Premium Pass have done.
|
05-31-10 11:55am
|
Reply
449
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from Denner:
I kind of agree with ace - but only kind of...
You get access to all the stuff in trial - but the content is not VERY good - been there 3 times within a year or so - and only found a couple of good videos....
But anyway - have you never been there it's still worth a visit - a trial visit.
|
02-06-08 11:46am
|
Reply
450
|
Secretary Sin
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
from Jay G:
As usual thanks for the warning. That's the reason I always read your reviews.
I remember the carnival when I was a kid where what was on the outside was almost never (except by an extreme extension of the imagination) lived up to by what was on the inside.
|
05-11-08 11:48am
|
