| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1401
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from badandy400:
When my non-recurring long term membership expired a few months back they did not say anything either. What mad me a bit mad is that I could not simply renew or even use the same username!
Now in their defense on your issue. Assuming you went through CCBill, VB would not actually have your credit card information. So, they would have no idea your information was going to change, and CCBill handles all that stuff for them. You can update your information on CCBill now to prevent these issues.
|
09-19-08 07:48pm
|
Reply
1402
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from jd1961:
SHILL ! :(
|
07-18-07 02:46am
|
Reply
1403
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks RA, good to see you still around.
My reviews should be a little more balanced score-wise than they used to be since I really don't have hardly any favorite models anymore.
I do believe the move to quality over quantity is important at this point in these sites lives. When you've got 10+ years of content piling up it's time to start focusing on quality since the quantity should already be there. I'll have a couple of more similar sites to compare over the next few weeks between DDF and 21 Sextury, as both of these once top European networks have both started using different update schedules, higher quality, less quantity practices.
I would think Videobox might still keep me coming back at least once a year to get the Vivid updates, but I ended up with nearly 200 GB more content from VideosZ than Videobox.
|
12-20-15 10:59pm
|
Reply
1404
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from james4096:
It seems that ExtraMoviez.com is some kind of premium addon to pornstar network. The content is nearly identical to videosz. They seem to be a day or two behind on releases. Videosz does have 3000 more DVDs so I guess you wouldn't be getting the full experience by joining Extramoviez. Not that I'm complaining.
So the PU affiliate link for Pornstar Network will give us free Moviez+ access? Good tip.
|
01-29-11 03:09pm
|
Reply
1405
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Cum Play John:
VIPissy has been really slow on the male-female updates of late.
It seems like they have a 4:1 ratio for lesbian pee vids to coed ones.
I've said for some time they ought to develop an independent site for male-female vids and they would garner a certain larger market for that taste.
They don't seem to want to branch out which given their business model working lol I suppose makes sense.
But the male-female POV shots are so gorgeous yet they completely ignore developing this idea more.
|
09-17-16 10:01am
|
Reply
1406
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Monahan:
You said, "Newer scenes also offer a few options that may be of interest to some members. They have ‘bonus clips’ of a trailer, a cut with close ups and a wide angle cut. This may not be of much value to all members but it certainly shows the site’s attention to detail that they’d make three full-length videos of the same scene available. (I sampled a few of these and can say that there isn’t really much of a difference between the primary scene and the wide angle cut.)"
This is a great idea that I would like to see replicated in other sites. More than once I've seen close-up material that excludes some body parts that I would have enjoyed seeing.
One example is how on a basic fuck scene the camera is fixed on the guys tool as he's porking some babe with unwelcome closeups of his hairy asshole. You get an occasional glimpse of the babe's pussy as it's getting the workout. What would be great is to see a long shot of that same scene where the babe's boobs were flopping vigorously and we can see her face and its reaction to the action.
|
01-09-15 10:59am
|
Reply
1407
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Cum Play John:
I just wish VIPissy offered more POV male-female compilations of their prior work.
It's not that this would be to everyone's liking, just that you cannot find such glamour models receiving pee streams anywhere else on the net.
They could also make compilations of the other genres as well.
But just the continual POV angle from the male perspective would be intense.
|
01-01-15 12:18pm
|
Reply
1408
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from LPee23:
Glad to see this site getting some notice. Great review!
I agree with you that this is an excellent site overall. In my book, they are the unquestioned leader in hardcore pissing. In the year 2014, with hardcore pissing in decline due to biller regulations, they take it to the limits. They keep their shoots high quality and classy too. My only critique would be that the site still needs time to grow and add more scenes, but that is usually the case with relatively new sites. I would definitely recommend anyone with even a passing interest or a bit of curiosity to check this site out.
|
10-19-14 05:12pm
|
Reply
1409
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from turboshaft:
Great review, rearadmiral!
Love how this site takes this fetish seriously, if that's the right word to use when discussing golden showers. Normally it's relegated to something only done at the end of scene so webmasters can just add another tag, and rather clumsily at that. Even better, it has long, hot, and enthusiastic girl-girl scenes which can be kind of rare within this genre. It's one thing to watch a pretty girl do a standard boy-girl or solo scene, but quite another to discover she's done work for this site.
As far as I'm aware this site is totally exclusive, if also appearing to be the hardcore side of Wet and Pissy, though the companies are different. A model seems to do W&P and/or Wet and Puffy, and then move on to this. Those sites' solo scenes are well done, but again, add a second girl and it becomes even better, IMHO.
Also, there has been at least one American performer on here, Tiffany Fox, who's also done solo scenes for both Wet & Pissy and Wet & Puffy. Still wish they did have more American performers though.
|
10-18-14 08:08pm
|
Reply
1410
|
Virtual Real Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Onyx:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Oh and about the headsets. Current ones use both an HDMI and USB cable. HDMI for video and USB for transmitting details about the rotation of your head.
But based on your apprehension you may be best served sticking with a smart phone for VR.
|
12-12-17 04:28pm
|
Reply
1411
|
Virtual Real Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from skippy:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Archiving! The only VCR I still have is a VCR to DVD converter. Pretty soon, though, DVDs will probably be obsolete.
I just went to update the navigation maps on one of my cars, a 2012 BMW, and the update instructions call for 4 8GB thumb drives(32GB total, to hold all the business and point of interest stuff, I guess). All I had was 3 year old 4GB thumb drives, so I ran out to Office Depot. The guy there says "We don't sell them that small anymore. Smallest we have is 16GB." They were stupid cheap, too. That's advancing technology at its finest.
|
12-12-17 03:57pm
|
Reply
1412
|
Virtual Real Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Onyx:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yes, the "player" is just software. Think Windows Media Player, PotPlayer, VLC, etc. but for 180/360 degree videos. There a bunch of good free ones available.
I do not share Skippy's opinion of things being difficult. I also do not agree that there is some sort of war between technologies. This is simply untrue.
If you are uncomfortable with a PC you can use a smart phone. Lots of people use their phone to access and view VR content. That's about as plug and play as you can possibly get. In fact some phones are better than the best headsets for PC right now.
|
12-12-17 03:55pm
|
Reply
1413
|
Virtual Real Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from skippy:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
RA, You are not alone. I was in Information Technology for 20 years and am still an early adopter for many kinds of technology. It can be a real pain in the ass. VR is no exception. I had to build a dedicated computer that is essentially an expensive high-end gaming machine. And the HTC Vive platform is still embryonic. The problem is that there aren't any standards and no clear technology consortium has emerged yet. We are in the betamax vs. VHS mode for this stuff and Augmented Reality (projecting things through glasses so they appear in actual physical space) is the DVD coming down the pipe.
Here's a chuckle. I'm watching porn in VR, and Ultra-HD, but Comcast still gets to charge me extra for HD channels. SD over-the-air broadcasting ended 10 years ago, but somehow 75% of the channels I get at home on cable are still SD. If you watch ANY porn in Ultra HD, you are far ahead of the cable companies. (I just read that DirectTV will cease broadcasting in SD in 2019, so maybe Cable will wake up and do the same in order to compete.)
As usual, the porn is driving technology just like it drove VHS. :-)
|
12-12-17 03:34pm
|
Reply
1414
|
Virtual Real Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Onyx:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
It's not complex. The Oculus Rift is simple to setup and use. The video codecs being used in VR are the same as in 2D video. In fact they are just 2D videos, the player is doing all the work to get the correct portion to each eye. Provided you have a modern video card you should have no trouble that couldn't be straightened out via a simple post.
IMO, VR videos are so much better than 2D (even in their relatively low resolution state) that I have very little interest in anything non VR anymore.
Anyway it is pretty cool so unless cost was an issue I'd not be scared away by diving in. In any case no one lives forever, so don't wait too long.
|
12-12-17 01:40pm
|
Reply
1415
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Loki:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks for your suggestion, and I tried it, but it still did not bring up the 1/2 off offer. I am disappointed about not getting the offer, but more disappointed that no one bothered to respond to my email to customer service. It was polite and asked for them to help me get the 1/2 offer. If my email had been rude or vulgar, I could understand them not helping, but it was not. This was just bad customer service. I am very disappointed, especially as I have been a member several times and love their content.
|
08-14-12 11:46pm
|
Reply
1416
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from tangub:
Great review rearadmiral. I agree with you that this site appeals most to those who have a liking for soft erotic lesbian porn and there's probably not many better sites in that niche however it wasn't really my thing either. The thing that surprises me is that TBP don't even list lesbian as a secondary niche for this site so maybe they should consider recategorising as lesbian porn has certainly become rhe dominant feature here. Anybody searching for a good lesbian site on TBP could easily miss this one.
|
11-18-11 08:11am
|
Reply
1417
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Nick Spillum:
Just another quick point. We started our HD tests in WMV and then quickly converted to MP4 as the compression ratios were much better. All newly shot scenes are available in MP4 HD.
|
11-18-11 07:19am
|
Reply
1418
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Nick Spillum:
Thanks for the review rearadmiral. I have taken your points on the navigation to heart as they provided some good constructive criticism there. Thanks for that!
Just a quick point on the models - we don't actually remove content from the site as all. I'm not sure what happened with Desire Moore (maybe you mean Jessica Moore?) and Arianna Jollie http://www.vivthomas.com/models.php/1982 but I am checking that out for you.
|
11-18-11 07:18am
|
Reply
1419
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Oh,oh...does that mean, that the amount of vids in HD or 1280x720 is considerably higher in MP4??
|
11-18-11 05:20am
|
Reply
1420
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Denner:
Have to second Cybertoad....GREAT and very helpful review.
Have always been a little disappointed with the quality of those vids you also can watch as bonus material at many sites - and for quite a few years now.
Then found some new trailers in top quality - so it's a bit sad to learn this:
"... but remember that WMV HD is rare here."
But hope that will turn to the better in the future....
Thanks, rearadmiral!
|
11-18-11 02:55am
|
Reply
1421
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Cybertoad:
Awesome review there Rearadmiral !
|
11-17-11 04:50pm
|
Reply
1422
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tangub:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks for the feedback rearadmiral and glad to hear you're enjoying the site. I just hope my review didn't sound too negative because it truely is a great site but for me personally after spending a month at Young Legal Porn discovering some hot new talent like Gloria and Stasha and then coming back here it just felt a little dated and stale with the bulk of the content being of a group of models who seem to have been around forever. Take the current babe of the month Suzie Carina for example, there was a time when i was excited to find new content of a hot fresh young teen named Suzie Carina but i'm sure that must have been like 9 or 10 years ago. But anyway that's just my personal take on the site which is what PU is all about and i'm sure there are plenty of people who can't get enough of those top Euro models who would score the site in the 90s.
|
11-14-11 12:18am
|
Reply
1423
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from tangub:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Oh it's not a problem as i signed up last weekend during the rugby offer but i had the same sort of hassle as you trying to get the offer price to display. I was just trying to figure out if it was a cookie problem which seems to be the case. I'm surprised you get priced in euros from Canada though. For me the offer price was in British pounds, £9.95 (around $16 USD) instead of the usual £19.95, as you say slightly more than the dollar price displayed on TBP/PU but still an offer.
|
10-31-11 09:30am
|
Reply
1424
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tangub:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
There's certainly something weird going on here. I visited the site from my saved bookmark earlier and got the half price join offer up no problem, now since i visited the site using the PU link all i get up is the TBP/PU price. I tried clearing my cache and cookies and then typed vivthomas directly into the browser but still i'm getting the TBP/PU price come up even without linking from here. I had the same problem with the world cup offer, i was trying for ages to find the special offer price on my laptop without success then later on i visited the site from an old bookmark on my pc and got the offer price up straight away.
|
10-31-11 05:00am
|
Reply
1425
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Nick Spillum:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Hi guys,
This offer was a 48 hour time limited offer and started early Saturday morning European time and ended Sunday night European time. Maybe you weren't seeing the banner because of the time difference when you looked, but the offer was open to the entire world.
Just a little secret, especially for you guys, we'll be doing something similar for Halloween. I'll make the banner and the whole special offer much clearer, as I see you seemed to have a problem finding it.
-Nick
|
10-24-11 12:45am
|
