| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1526
|
Disgraced 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Gazette Risque:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I'm glad it was of use to you.
It's always good to be well informed when you subscribe to such sites ;)
|
05-10-10 03:56pm
|
Reply
1527
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Goldfish:
I've seen this site around for a while but never joined because I've never been a solo/softcore guy myself but now I'm intrigued. I think I'm going to place it in the queue.
You sold me!
|
05-05-10 02:48pm
|
Reply
1528
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from PinkPanther:
I don't know if you read Alex's Director's Blog today, but the first updates from the Caribbean trip - including lots of public nude beach action - will be released on June 2nd. From everything that I've been hearing from Alex and the participating models - one good use of Twitter - this trip was really fantastic. And Alex makes the point that members are needed to finance trips like this - the economy strikes back.
|
05-04-10 05:41pm
|
Reply
1529
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from messmer:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yes, that's what I really like about this site, that, despite its BDSM theme the obvious willingness of the models to test their limits (or to give in to their natural inclinations) puts them in control, even though they may play (or be) submissives. Kink is far removed from Max Hardcore in that respect.
|
04-23-10 01:43pm
|
Reply
1530
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from messmer:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
All's well, rearadmiral. I got in very quickly just a few minutes ago, and moving around within the site was a breeze, and I can tell you already from having watched one full episode last night that this site indeed deserved your praise. Technically and otherwise the scenes are very well done.
I only have one small personal complaint: I wish they would do away with the initial interview with the model before the action starts, I feel this takes away from the fantasy. The interview upon conclusion is fine because it gives you the assurance that everything shown was consensual.
|
04-23-10 08:53am
|
Reply
1531
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Just a quick inquiry. Do you have any difficulties today getting into and navigate within the site itself? The individual pages seem to take eons to load. Downloads are quite fast and so far I am happy with the quality of the material I've downloaded but logging in and moving within the site are horrible for me while the other sites I subscribe to are moving along at their usual fast speed.
|
04-22-10 06:29pm
|
Reply
1532
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
You've come to the right person, rearadmiral, I can't help but let everyone know what I think! Give me a few days to look things over. :-)
|
04-22-10 02:29pm
|
Reply
1533
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from turboshaft:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Sorry I didn't respond earlier, rearadmiral.
I'm not a fan of public nudity--I feel it's too Jackassesque to be erotic--but it is there, even if not as the main attraction, which is shaved ladies in privates places showing off their private places. ;-) Anyway, they generally seem to relegate the public nudity to bonus scenes, with a half hour or more (sometimes up to an hour) of video, with at least a hundred photos, again usually more, which I guess if you like public nudity are pretty good bonuses. I think the majority of the these full public nudity scenes are from Eastern Europe since doing it in the U.S. would be a crime against humanity or something, but they do occasional flashing in their American outdoor shoots, but not full-on public nudity for the entire scene.
They also have their annual Caribbean trip where they devote a day to going to the beach and shooting the girls pretty freely, that is on a nude public beach, with a lot of photos and video. I like these a little more than the traditional public nudity because they can be more exciting and open.
Hope this helps, maybe some other members will respond if they're currently subscribing.
|
04-22-10 01:08am
|
Reply
1534
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thank you, rearadmiral! I'm about to join a Kink.com site for the first time! :-)
|
04-21-10 06:08pm
|
Reply
1535
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from messmer:
Just took the tour because of your review and because the site looks really promising but noticed that all updates have seven, or six videos listed above the update. Could you please confirm that all videos are downloadable as one complete video rather than in segments? Thanks.
|
04-20-10 06:29pm
|
Reply
1536
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from yadayada321:
Interesting, I will have to check this one out sometime; hopefully though they get some more content as it is a little expensive for just 77 scenes.
|
04-11-10 12:22pm
|
Reply
1537
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from mbaya:
I was a member a while back when they had a lot less content. I have never rated a site as a 99, but for this one I can see why you would. I agree that is a fair rating for a truly great site.
|
04-06-10 08:48pm
|
Reply
1538
|
Society SM
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I have been a member of 3 kink sites. Whipped ass twice and once to fucking machines and once to everything butt. I don't consider fucking machines a true bsdm site since it's basically a girl and her toy(s). I also think that everything butt is more extreme lesbian or BG sex than bsdm. Whipped ass is the only one of these 3 that I consider actual bsdm.
I don't know if it's still active but I believe you can join any of their sites for 19.95$ but that could be an offer reserved to previous members.
|
04-01-10 07:12pm
|
Reply
1539
|
Society SM
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks for the info. I actually noticed that you did some mini reviews in the comments section but by then I had already sent you the email. I think that I may join them now because you get all the other sites. I don't think I'd ever join them as stand alone.
The one that I've looked at a few times is bondageorgams.com but I'm still undecided.
|
03-31-10 07:15pm
|
Reply
1540
|
Society SM
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from pat362:
Great review.
Which site do you get with your membership? Is there anal content or is it very rare?
|
03-30-10 07:38pm
|
Reply
1541
|
Nude in LA
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from mbaya:
Nice, very complete review. I would love to find a site involving public nudity that was worthwhile. So far , every one I have seen is sadly lacking. On the preview I saw several models with tattoos. In all of 2009 there were only 6 updates. Not good.
|
03-04-10 11:40am
|
Reply
1542
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Cybertoad:
This was a great review, I haven't been member in years
but was great.
|
03-04-10 10:33am
|
Reply
1543
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from slutty:
Hey man, good comment on Hustler's site. I totally agree with most of your sentiments - This site could be excellent if they put some effort into it. I would note that I didn't see any scenes that were downloadable in parts, perhaps they got rid of this recently...
|
02-18-10 08:57pm
|
Reply
1544
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Wittyguy:
One of the better PU reviews on this site that otherwise gets way too many reviews.
|
02-11-10 03:28pm
|
Reply
1545
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Denner:
Well founded review here - but the score?
Still: no matter - what matters is this accurate statement:
'Anal or not, one issue is that they really seem to focus on quantity over quality. Some of the videos are really bad.'
Cannot agree more - VideoBox seems to have this deal in my mind: Give the suckers a LOT - video-QUALITY - what's that?
|
02-11-10 07:05am
|
Reply
1546
|
Private.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I actually didn't mind Hustler's new setup without DRM that much. I think they do fill a niche (porn with stories, however half-assed) that sites like Videobox and AmericanVice don't seem to focus on. Although Hustler certainly needs to improve video quality.
If you didn't like Hustler's setup, you'll hate Private. It has significantly worse navigation than Hustler does, and the video quality is equal or perhaps slightly better than what Hustler offers.
peace,
slutty
|
02-10-10 08:44pm
|
Reply
1547
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Monahan:
Good review and I agree that VB is the baseline site for any horndog into web porn.
One issue I've raised before and that I consider to be a major failing is their accuracy in their search capabilities with many misspellings and worse, their genre tags. (Gianna Michaels - small tits?????) Gianna Michaels spelled 10 different ways rendering a search for her stuff to be much messier tha n necessary, etc.)
I consider that carelessness/sloppiness to be a real problem with a site with as much content as VB has.
|
02-10-10 03:49pm
|
Reply
1548
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Hey rearadmiral,
I've become even happier with the Vivid premium channel as the membership goes on. I'm finding models I had forgotten about like Melissa Hill. The way I'm looking at it is I might join it once a year, maybe twice if an update stands out to me. So far, I've downloaded 27 GB from the Vivid channel, only 7 GB from Videobox, so it has been a good value for me. A lot of those 90s clips are in better quality here than I've ever seen them with standard DVD 640-720 high end resolution and bitrates in the 5000 range. A few still look a little dated, poor lighting/color, but I don't guess they can fix that since it is that way in the originals. Overall though, I expect to have around 50 GB just from the Vivid channel. You also don't see as much of the current nonsense in the hardcore clips, not much slapping, no spitting and probably less than half of the hardcore scenes end with facials. I'm not a fan of facials, so that was a plus too.
|
02-01-10 11:09pm
|
Reply
1549
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from FTV Staff:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Truth be told RearAdmiral, that its becoming rather nasty nowadays, with every street corner, niche in a mall, park, resort, etc... being 'watched' with security cameras. Thank vandals & theives for the propagation of these devices. Though one specific resort actually installed security cameras around my favorite shoot locales because of me lol.
|
01-05-10 01:44pm
|
Reply
1550
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from FTV Staff:
Ah, I visit this page at least twice a week, but I finally got myself an account to post here.
Take note Rearadmiral that the public stuff is as risky as it gets, there are no arrangements with resort owners, and with security cameras being added to virtually every location, its getting more and more difficult to pull it off safely. I challenge you to find a US BASED site that comes close to the risk & volume of public nudity -- sure it cannot compete with EU sites where the girl walks naked to a cafe in Budapest, but try it in the US, and might as well have the site shut down.
I make it look easy; almost every shoot has some significant risk involved. I think the best way to put it -- I trained a few photographers to shoot public stuff here, and nearly half the time they ended up getting in trouble with the law. With the combination of instinct and luck I've been able to get away with what I have for so long.
I wish the pornusers would see the site not for individual niches, like public, feet, fisting etc... but as a comprehensive site that covers all interests, puts it all in one large 'adventure' update, instead of splitting it up into several small updates giving you the ILLUSION of having a lot of updates/week.
|
01-03-10 02:43pm
|
