| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from lk2fireone:
EXCELLENT REVIEW.
BUT I'M ALSO IMPRESSED BY YOUR WILLINGNESS TO GIVE THE SITE A 100 SCORE.
I GAVE METART A SCORE OF 99 ONCE, AND EARLIER GAVE IT A SCORE OF 95.
BUT I NEVER HAD THE COURAGE TO GIVE IT A SCORE OF 100.
EVEN WHEN I STATED THAT I SAID IT WAS THE BEST SOFTCORE PHOTO SITE ON THE INTERNET.
BRAVO FOR YOUR CONVICTION.
|
04-20-17 03:54pm
|
Reply
302
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from jook:
Excellent review and thanks.
Personally, I appreciate that you stuck to your convictions and had the wherewithal to give it a controversial rating.
I don't overly disagree except for a little nitpicking. You mentioned several cons. The one I would take them to task with is the first one you mentioned, organization. I would have taken off 5 points for that. But like I said, that's getting nitpicky.
I'll also mention that I was a member about a year ago. It's not my cup of tea but, as I mentioned elsewhere, personal bias should not be reflected in a review. For that reason, I don't have a big problem with giving it 100.
|
04-20-17 03:26pm
|
Reply
303
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from mbaya:
I just posted a review of sexuallybroken. I think you would like it.
|
05-26-13 03:31pm
|
Reply
304
|
Sex My Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from Khan:
as an aside ...
Mandytyler.com is now listed at PU. You may enter your remarks at:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/mandytyler/
|
09-08-12 07:47am
|
Reply
305
|
Sex My Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from Khan:
I don't know "the deal" with the site but felt compelled to mention that it's not at all unusal for a model to have more than one site. It actually happens quite often.
So, just because there are two sites featuring the same model, it don't mean they're clones (sites having virtually the exact same content).
|
09-08-12 06:39am
|
Reply
306
|
Shanda Fay
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from Homegirl:
Nice review, but her hair is not for me. I think pretty hair makes a girl attractive. I think she looks like a mess.
No insult intended as this is just my opinion, you can like whatever you appeals to you.
|
05-29-20 10:02am
|
Reply
307
|
Sharing My Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from xexbot:
For me, and I suspect others as well, there are two kinds of cuckolding sites now, "straight cuckolding" where the girl just fucks another guy in front of her cuck and/or tells him how worthless he is, and the more extreme "forced bi-sex cuckolding" sites where the cuck is usually forced to service the couple with little to no reward. The latter is more like what you find on Cumeating Cuckolds. Is this what you mean by "raunchy." Not trying to criticize, but all porn is raunchy. LOL.
So my question is do they have forced bi-sex at the site? This is not always easy to determine from stills taken from the videos. Good review btw.
|
07-29-12 10:43am
|
Reply
308
|
Sharing Paris
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from Khan:
FWIW ...
The site is now listed. You may enter your remarks at:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/pariskennedy/
|
08-02-12 07:18am
|
Reply
309
|
Sharing Paris
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Glad you're enjoying the place. We did notice your burst of activity. :-)
|
07-31-12 01:22pm
|
Reply
310
|
Sharing Paris
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(marcdc1's Reply)
To be clear ... A listing doesn't always mean a review.
Listings are fairly easy. Reviews take some coordination between our editors and the site owners.
Once a site is listed you can recommend it for a review from the TBP listing page (the brown pages).
Hope that helps
|
07-31-12 07:53am
|
Reply
311
|
Sharing Paris
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from Khan:
If I might note ...
A site being superceded by a newer site is not quite the same as being replaced by that site. In the later case, the first site would no longer exist (generally URL would be redirected).
So, while there may be a new site for this model, the listed site, Sharing Paris, does still exist.
As far as the newer site, I've asked the TBP editors to take a look to see if it qualifies for a listing. Barring any snags, they'll have it added w/in a few days.
|
07-31-12 07:31am
|
Reply
312
|
Sharing Paris
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from surfingman:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Thanks for the reply. All is crystal clear now! I'll probably join for a month, it will give me a chance to post a second review of the site.
|
03-15-07 02:06am
|
Reply
313
|
Sharing Paris
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from roseman:
Very good and helpful review, thanks.
|
03-14-07 01:28pm
|
Reply
314
|
Sharing Paris
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from surfingman:
Hi. On your review of "Sharing Paris" you state that you did not get membership of any other sites. However, on her site she states that you will have access to several bonus sites. Could you clarify this for me, since it seems a good site to join, but a bit expensive if there are no bonus sites.
Cheers.
|
03-14-07 10:30am
|
Reply
315
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(marcdc1's Reply)
In this instance consenting would kill the vibe they are trying to create but I agree that it's icky.
Mind you it's a moot point for me because I don't understand how this type of porn is even fun to watch when you little of the action and what you do see if badly shot because they are basically doing the kind of hidden camera type of porn that died about a decade ago.
|
07-27-19 09:17am
|
Reply
316
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from lk2fireone:
I'd be disappointed as heck if I got a sub to Shoplyfter and didn't have access to most of the rest of the Team Skeet network.
I believe that quality and quantity both count as major factors in the value of a site or network.
If you are limited to access to Shoplyfter only, which only updates once a week with a new video, and has a limited backlog of videos (about 130+), all following the same repetitive formula, I wouldn't even rate the site as high as 70.
But the limited access you get to the Team Skeet network makes this site a poor value.
I seem to remember (my memory is poor) that I've watched a number of the Shoplyter videos. None of them impressed me very much. Certainly not enough to join this as a separate membership, without also getting access to most of the rest of the Team Skeet network.
But your review is excellent: you give the overall rating for the site, and the detailed cons.
Good review, of a poor site.
|
03-17-19 06:20pm
|
Reply
317
|
Sophie Dee Live
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Tom D Admin:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I just want to confirm that Wraith0711 is correct about the weekly updates on Vixen.com - I signed in and checked just now - but I need to clarify another detail he mentioned.
The special, which currently is $19.95, not $24.95 (will have to check later whether it's temporary or we need to change the review), doesn't give you any bonus sites.
They are available if you sign up for a more expensive all-access plan. But what he says about the download limit being per individual site rather than for all the sites combined - makes total sense.
Hope that helps!
|
07-27-20 02:46pm
|
Reply
318
|
Sophie Dee Live
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Wraith0711:
(marcdc1's Reply)
you are very welcome Sir
|
07-25-20 11:17am
|
Reply
319
|
Sophie Dee Live
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Wraith0711:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I don't want any confusion here Sir or have something turn into "well he said" type of deal, but what are you talking about "aggressive update schedule"? I don't mean to be rude, I just don't want to unintentionally mislead anyone or have any bad blood with anyone. I don't think I said anything about updates. As far as I remember they were updating each site about once a week.
If your talking about the 25 scenes a week then that is the download limit and not the update schedule Sir. The 25 scenes a week is their weekly limit to download. If you start downloading today and download all 25 today then your count will not reset until the following sunday, seven full days. 25 scenes in seven consecutive days. HOWEVER if you hit the 25 scene limit on one site it does NOT carry over too the others. If you hit it on vixen then move on over to tushy lol
|
07-25-20 10:12am
|
Reply
320
|
Sophie Dee Live
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Wraith0711:
(marcdc1's Reply)
They're not new, they've been in business for years. They have a new deal for If I remember correctly, $59 for all their sites for one month. I joined tushy and did the upgrade and was immediately refunded for the tushy membership I had just paid for and it was just the $59 for all 6 sites, so it was like getting four free memberships. They do have a download limit but I can't remember what it was or how it worked. I think it was 25 scenes in a seven day period. I always download the pics zip along with the 720, 1080, and 2160 (if available) and all of this counts as one on the same scene. enjoy!
|
07-25-20 09:13am
|
Reply
321
|
Sophie Dee Live
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Wraith0711:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I'm sorry to report this to you. She was a personal favorite to me as well. Will have to check this site as it looks like it was before her enhancements. here is a link to the scene in question at vixen:
https://www.vixen.com/search?q=sophie%20dee
Hover the curser over the scene and it will play as a preview
Yeah since whats-his-nuts left it has become very cookie cutter.
|
07-25-20 08:56am
|
Reply
322
|
Sophie Dee Live
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from Wraith0711:
She had a scene on Vixen.com the end of May/Beginning of June 2019 and I was shocked at how freaking big she was. I don't know if it was natural weight (I doubt it) or just poor choice of implants (ASS & TITS) or what. She was always a big beautiful wonderfully curvy woman (and the accent drove me wild as well!) but she just looks like a living cartoon cliche' milf now. I hate when gorgeous women mutilate their bodies to try and please their agents and fans. There wasn't a thing wrong with her body before.
|
07-25-20 07:39am
|
Reply
323
|
Spizoo
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from exotics4me:
Spizoo used to be better known as the Jessica Jaymes XXX network. It featured several solo sites back then that are no longer around. Spizoo, I assume, bought the Jessica Jaymes network and merged it into their content. The last time I was a member, 2014 or 2015, under the name Spizoo, it was a good but very straightforward network of gonzo porn and Jessica's solo site was a nice bonus.
In 2011, I reviewed Jessica Jaymes XXX a 91 and the review is still on here.
If I had reviewed Spizoo in 2014-2015, I would have scored it similar to the current TBP review. It has excellent quality (technical, including 4K) but I wouldn't have pushed it into the 90s as the content itself was very much like the average gonzo porn site, bordering on cookie-cutter.
|
05-15-19 04:05pm
|
Reply
324
|
Spring Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I think the ability to download is what separates true porn collectors from mere users. And I also suspect that this difference will grow as people can access porn from anywhere on any device. But for a collector, being able to watch a scene from the mid-90s or mid-00s is important. I'll always be willing to pay for downloads.
|
01-22-19 03:58pm
|
Reply
325
|
Spring Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from rearadmiral:
This was one of my favourite sites on the Dogfart Network. I really liked Spring's look and her playful attitude. I'm was sad to see it stop updating though I still watch scenes from the site. As crappy as they are by modern standards, I'll hang onto these in perpetuity.
|
01-21-19 02:57pm
|
