| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Parody Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(marcdc1's Reply)
When I first wrote reviews, I spent a lot of time trying to figure what score a site deserved.
But over time, I realized that a score is very subjective: even though some people think that a score should be a precise reflection of the value of a site, I think that is fantasy.
So I don't put a lot of faith or weight on the precise score a site receives. I'm much more interested in the overview and details of a review, and whether the reviewer appreciated the site, and the reasons why, for and against.
I looked at your review, and I'm glad I didn't read it before I wrote mine, because I mainly said the same things you did.
But my review was original, in spite of the resemblance to yours.
LOL.
|
03-17-19 02:59pm
|
Reply
277
|
Parody Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from Kody:
Haha, that's awesome!
|
08-14-18 05:34am
|
Reply
278
|
Pascal's Subsluts
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from mbaya:
This looks interesting to me. Does it come with any other sites?
|
02-16-20 06:30am
|
Reply
279
|
Pascal's Subsluts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Thanks for the advice. I'm glad I missed the deal...
|
12-02-17 09:07am
|
Reply
280
|
Pascal's Subsluts
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from rearadmiral:
This is a site that has been on my list to join for a long time. Last weekend there was a discount offered for a short time and I missed it. I had planned to join using the discount since it would be a low-risk way to join the site. After reading your review I'm kind of glad that I missed the discount and missed joining the site. I probably would have been disappointed.
|
12-02-17 06:21am
|
Reply
281
|
Pascal's Subsluts
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from pat362:
To begin with Thank You for the review. I like Pascal as a performer and many of the women who appear on his site are good looking. Sadly that's about the only positive I can say about his site.
1-The content is too extreme for my taste and that's why I will never join.
2-Many of the models are British performers but one of the problem with a lot of British performers is that they tend to sport a lot of ink and by default many of the models on the site have a significant amount of tattoos.
3-They don't try to make the models look as good as they could but I don't know if it's by choice or lack of interest.
|
12-01-17 06:54pm
|
Reply
282
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(marcdc1's Reply)
A full access trial membership is rare so even if you don't find as many great videos as I did then you are still getting plenty for your money.
|
05-16-13 06:37pm
|
Reply
283
|
Pornstars Like It Big
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from Monahan:
Great review. I say that because I'm virtually in agreement with everything marcdc1 says especially in his bottom line.
His signoff recommendation to check for favorites before getting a membership is spot on. There are so many of my favorites in their data base that have just one or two videos and are never updated.
Reliably excellent photography in most cases but I agree that there are too many slam bam thank you m'am scenes with no imagination.
|
01-20-18 07:33pm
|
Reply
284
|
Puma Swede
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from lokilokes:
Why would you say it doesn't allow zip downloads? Just click the winzip button at the top of each photoset and the zip file starts downloading automatically. It's right under the description of the photogallery and just to the left of the "vote on this gallery". It's quite large and obvious, I don't know how you could miss it?
|
01-07-13 07:54pm
|
Reply
285
|
Puma Swede XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from tangub:
First word first line of pros "Sophie"
If you're going to cut and paste the majority of your Sophie Dee review at least remember to change the name from Sophie to Puma so that it's not blatantly obvious you're submitting lazy cut and paste reviews.
|
08-01-20 05:21am
|
Reply
286
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from gaypornolover:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Hey there - there are several sites but the only one which seems true to the CFNM theme, and which I've joined, is CFNM.net
I've reviewed it and you can check out my review - most of the stories now have video and it's definitely worth joining for a month, though it's pricey and do check out my review for the flaws.
Remember I enjoyed it from a gay male perspective, focused on the guys, and I'm into humiliation of the men - this site has mostly humiliation content though a lot of it is pretty mild and a few scenes aren't so much about that.
No actual sex in any of the scenes though.
|
09-29-12 07:47am
|
Reply
287
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from Kody:
Totally agree with your bottom line! This site is awesome.
The balance in plot vs. action, variation in themes and enough ethnic diversity while still keeping the hotness of the models consistent is just perfect! Those are all areas where a lot of other sites fall short IMO
|
05-22-18 04:05am
|
Reply
288
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Fair enough, marcdc1! I wasn't sure how far you got in the tour of the site. My personal preference is always women (no matter what the niche) who look as close to people you would meet on the street.
Nothing against a good looking porn star, though, I just like the extra realism especially when it comes to the "wives" category.
|
10-11-12 06:28pm
|
Reply
289
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from messmer:
I don't believe this site will give you what you are looking for. I just took the tour and clicked on "scenes" and it appears that every wife is a glamor model .. so much for realism.
|
10-11-12 12:09pm
|
Reply
290
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from hodayathink:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I joined this site a few months ago for a month (and even wrote a review on it).
As far as comparing the two sites, I think that Reality Kings has more variety (both ethnically with their Round and Brown site, and in the fact that they shoot in Europe, Florida, and California so they have a wider variety of women). But I generally preferred the navigation at Naughty America (I know some people have trouble with it, but if you know that many of the pages are controlled by JavaScript and that the back button will take you to the last page you loaded, and not the last page in the list you were thumbing through, then I find it really easy to get around), and I don't really like the pseudo-reality setups that many of RKs sites use. So I would say that I prefer Naughty America, but not by that much.
|
11-21-12 06:01pm
|
Reply
291
|
Rebecca's Office
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tom D Admin:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Clearly, this site is closed but I will give you a point as a courtesy.
And I have spoken to my colleague to have the listing removed on TBP and Rabbit's Reviews.
Unfortunately, the automatic link checker for our sites is only effective at catching completely broken links/dead sites. This URL is still functional.
Tom
|
05-25-21 03:49pm
|
Reply
292
|
Rebecca's Office
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from pat362:
I think your review is now moot because you can no longer join this site. Only existing members have access.
|
05-24-21 08:05pm
|
Reply
293
|
Sara Jay
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I think the same can be said for almost all of the sites within the network. I feel that they decided to make a network of performers that mostly do cam shows and the odd photo shoot. I could be wrong but there isn't all that mch new stuff that other than cam shows.
|
01-16-13 04:49pm
|
Reply
294
|
Sara Swirls
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from Khan:
Ok, at the risk of confusing things even more ...
One of the TBP Editors checked the site. What she found was files available for download but not streaming.
So, it appears the site has changed yet again. Given the number of changes in such a short period, I want to stress that what we found was accurate as of this morning (27-Oct-2012).
We'll get the listing changed asap and we've asked Maggie to update her review.
FWIW, we make every effort to keep our listing info accurate. However, as shown here, site owners change things w/out letting us know. So, if/when you notice something on a listing that doesn't match with what you're finding at a site, please submit an error report or otherwise let us know.
As always, thanks for your continued support of PornUsers.
|
10-27-12 11:57am
|
Reply
295
|
Sara Swirls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(marcdc1's Reply)
|
10-26-12 03:05pm
|
Reply
296
|
Sara Swirls
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from messmer:
Khan, right under Maggie's observations on this page, the last sentence states: videos are streaming only!
|
10-26-12 02:18pm
|
Reply
297
|
Sara Swirls
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from Khan:
What in the listing is making you think streaming only?
I can't say what the site has now but when the site facts were updateted last April, they showed streaming or downloading in three sizes of WMV
Am I missing something?
|
10-26-12 07:01am
|
Reply
298
|
Sara Swirls
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from cjd2004:
Trying to cut down piracy I'd assume.
|
10-26-12 05:41am
|
Reply
299
|
Seduced By A Cougar
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from messmer:
May I add that their great job of covering MILFs consists of about 90% enhanced breasts and 10% natural. As I wrote in my comment 29 cougar scenes (in one of the MILF sites) is quite a decent offering for a low priced monthly trial, I also gave them a good review, but I think this fact should be mentioned here since most users appear to be against enhanced breasts, at least here in TBP/PU.
|
12-29-12 01:15pm
|
Reply
300
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I think your review is excellent and quite detailed. I respect your reasons for giving the site the score you did but there is no way that any of the current Kink sites deserve a perfect score because by your own admission they aren't perfect. The fact that their search engine sucks, the fact that you are basically relegated to scrolling from page to page to find a specific scene, the fact that most of their scenarios are not well thought out or well executed mean that they are more a distraction than an advantage. That said you did your homework and bothered to explain why you gave the site 100. I may not agree with your score but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
|
04-20-17 05:50pm
|
