Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : jd1961 (0)  

Feedback:   All (1121)  |   Reviews (65)  |   Comments (126)  |   Replies (930)

Other:   Replies Received (733)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 676-700 of 733 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
676
Visit Club Silvia Saint

Club Silvia Saint
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Tom Veller: (jd1961's Reply)

Hallo,

she isn't married - this is incorrect info. She only finished HC work.


08-26-07  12:08pm

Reply
677
Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

Agreed. And without Hungarian names like Zsuzsanna and such, my hard drive would have even longer lists of Susanna's, making it even harder to keep track of who's who -- just to give one example.

Pier999 does this mudane "Playmate of the Month" kind of naming somewhat, and it's really silly. Marina/Euphrat is "Patty Gower." Zuzana Zeleznovova is "Sharon Star." Lucie Horinkova is "Victorie Kay." Of course, these are all Czech models, who can't always escape the confining forces of Anglicization, either.


08-26-07  07:02am

Reply
678
Visit Pix and Video

Pix and Video
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Comment from jd1961:

BTW, I have to say that I think the photography is rather poor at this site. It seems to be a guy with a camera saying "spread your legs honey". Too many circus poses. 1ByDay is better.

08-25-07  09:48pm

Reply
679
Visit Pix and Video

Pix and Video
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Comment from Drooler:

They've had this problem for years, but not all the time. I've been a member off and on and sometimes it was quick, and sometimes it was just as you depicted it, paint-dryingly s-l-o-w.

Anyway, I don't understand why they haven't been able to get consistently good speed. It must be some tech issue -- beyond me. I did hear from them once that they get attacked by hackers and it caused a bunch of error messages for users at least once.


08-25-07  09:30pm

Reply
680
Visit Jenna Haze - JenX Studios

Jenna Haze - JenX Studios
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from roseman: (jd1961's Reply)

Yes, if you join you will get access to JulesJordan.com as well.

08-24-07  01:58am

Reply
681
N/A REPLY TO #21 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

Makes me realize how much it has changed since the '70s. The full length porn films back then more often had more human portrayals of people and were generally more sensual (a popular term then). These days, we've got fuck bunnies captured with technology that's a lot more efficient for rapid production of fuck-bunny formula flicks, but the viewer winds up having to relate to them as a fuck bunny, too.

There are subtleties of erotic experience that get lost when the basic idea is only, and always, to go at it like a crazed animal and do the weird shit that is just considered popular.

I must say that some of the girls really do their best to relate to viewer under the present circumstances.

And I agree about the annoyance of the "circus poses." I think, what is this? PT Barnum in the 21st century?

Another thing is taking the camera right down to the girl's finger-stretched asshole, then spitting in it. Ecccchhh. That's not sex; that's just decadence.


08-23-07  03:27am

Reply
682
Visit Club Red Light

Club Red Light
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from User: (jd1961's Reply)

While I agree that DRM sites are the bane of our porn perusal, I joined this one for a month because I admire their productions. I had read that the streaming was friendlier than most...and it is.

Now, I cancelled before my month was up because I am not going to show continued support to DRM sites. They need to catch up with the sites who once had DRM and are now removing them.


08-22-07  08:14am

Reply
683
N/A REPLY TO #14 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

Man, you said it. Reading your post, I was thinking, "That's just how I see it, too." It may sound harsh, but I think a lot of people who do the sites are idiots.

I add to your points of criticism galleries of softcore photos of the women looking away from the camera 40, 60, 70% of the time, as well as unexplainable cropping. The image is clear, the babe is hot, the pic is huge, her beautiful round ass is ... cut halfway at the cheeks! What is this bullshit?? (MetArt just had one like this of Marina/Euphrat; the other pic cut half of her head off. Fucking ridiculous!)

That's just one example of THOUSANDS.


08-22-07  12:45am

Reply
684
N/A REPLY TO #13 from pat362: (jd1961's Reply)

For all it's fault I still like my XP, and my IE. There might be some that are better, but that's often because they took the idea and built on it. That said, I have been burned a couple of times with the patches. Live and learn

08-20-07  07:36pm

Reply
685
Visit Girls Of Spice Lab

Girls Of Spice Lab
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

Their support page goes over potential problems users may experience with auto-resizing and auto-logins, but there's nothing about .rar files.

They have all of six updates for the month of June. The July list in their previous updates stops at the middle of the month. Seems like a slow site in more than one way (the other being server response).


08-20-07  03:48am

Reply
686
Visit Girls Of Spice Lab

Girls Of Spice Lab
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

Thanks for the tip. One never knows when another site that uses .rar files might pop up. I think there's some kind of advantage about them that I read about -- better compression?

But until SpiceLab is a sure thing with larger scale pics and a decent server ...


08-19-07  04:49am

Reply
687
Visit Girls Of Spice Lab

Girls Of Spice Lab
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from apoctom: (jd1961's Reply)

I would recommend 7zip over WinRAR. It opens just about any compressed file format.

08-18-07  09:10pm

Reply
688
Visit Babelicious

Babelicious
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

They must be pretty damn good at conversation then!

08-18-07  01:25am

Reply
689
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Denner: (jd1961's Reply)

Yeah, something like that. I think you get my drift, jd1961 - and maybe agree
- about the discount-thing.......


08-16-07  08:13am

Reply
690
Visit Glossy Angels

Glossy Angels
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Drooler: (jd1961's Reply)

Yes, indeed.

I've been a W4B member a few times and have scoured the entire site. Everything I see in the preview/visitor's pages of the site looks just like what I've seen at W4B.


08-16-07  03:20am

Reply
691
N/A REPLY TO #19 from Pinche Kankun: (jd1961's Reply)

I use VHS tapes... HE HE HE!!!

:)


08-14-07  12:58pm

Reply
692
Visit Live Cam Network

Live Cam Network
(0)
REPLY TO #7 from LarryL: (jd1961's Reply)

yeah.....you do that........Lemme know when ya find one

08-12-07  08:31pm

Reply
693
N/A REPLY TO #20 from Pinche Kankun: (jd1961's Reply)

Hey jd1961, don't feel bad!! If someone has to be anonymous about their Trust Rating, they are probably still locked in the closet!!

08-12-07  06:18pm

Reply
694
Visit Live Cam Network

Live Cam Network
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from LarryL: (jd1961's Reply)

I dont care what you think of me. And if I recall right, I wasn't asking your opinon to begin with. Go find something to do

08-12-07  05:19pm

Reply
695
Visit Live Cam Network

Live Cam Network
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Comment from LarryL:

JD1961,

If you didnt have your head so far up your ass, you would go to livecamnetwork.com and see that we are actually members there. Go to "community" once your there, which is the bulletin service of the site. So you, and anybody else, that thinks we are spammers, or shills, or whatever the fuck you call them.......Go pound sand up your ass. You are an idiot, pure plain and simple..........


08-12-07  04:24pm

Reply
696
Visit Anabolic VIP

Anabolic VIP
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Comment from apoctom:

It seems like a lot of studio sites are the ones holding on to DRM. I think that they are just suckering in the people who don't read reviews like TBP or PU before joining. (Not to mention the price.) What a shame!

08-11-07  10:56am

Reply
697
Visit Live Cam Network

Live Cam Network
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from LarryL: (jd1961's Reply)

You aren't very smart are you? I am a member of that site, not a spammer. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer.....eh?

08-11-07  02:05am

Reply
698
Visit Live Cam Network

Live Cam Network
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Comment from Rick:

It's definitely an issue lately!

We have ideas and plans to take the effect of possible shills. Stay tuned. :)


08-09-07  05:49pm

Reply
699
N/A REPLY TO #8 from RagingBuddhist: (jd1961's Reply)

jd - There is one small known issue with AVG free - I went to install AVG and got a warning about a potential conflict with Roxio 7. But I definitely agree - Norton AV (along with just about every other Symantec product I've tried) oughta be made illegal.

08-08-07  11:38pm

Reply
700
Visit Live Cam Network

Live Cam Network
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from LarryL: (jd1961's Reply)

Nobody was asking you

08-08-07  07:25pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 676-700 of 733 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.87 seconds.