| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
601
|
Asian Deep Throat
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jack40:
(jd1961's Reply)
For an amateur site it looks very good and easy to navigate in member area differently to other amateur sites that I know. And the girl offers REAL DEEPTHROAT and also LIVE VIDEO CHAT in member area. Annd they are always trying to stay in contact with the members through their guestbook and take the requests of the members. And for a site which is only online for 5 weeks they have done a very good job.
But don't forget that it is an amateur site I gave it 100 for amateur and not professional.
|
10-06-07 10:52am
|
Reply
602
|
Asian Deep Throat
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from williamj:
(jd1961's Reply)
100! just by the preview clip I wouldn't rate it a 50.
|
10-06-07 04:11am
|
Reply
603
|
Naughty Athletics
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from SnowDude:
(jd1961's Reply)
Many good points in there and you are right that I should know better. I'm an optimist by nature, so that keeps my hopes up whether I like it or not. And you couldn't be more right about how stupid male porn actors are and often seem to be more interested in their own tools then the girl. When the hell did that happen?
Thanks for the reply!
|
10-05-07 07:38pm
|
Reply
604
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Great deal for Sweet-Models members. Sweet-Models was my first introduction to DDF, so it served it's purpose. The new site blows away anything that they had in the past - it's nice to see a long-established site do that.
|
10-03-07 07:17pm
|
Reply
605
|
FM Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Jeeeezz, where did you find that?
At their "Term and Condition" - Never read that stuff
Well, whatever.
What I download, I keep untill the day I might what to clean up. I guess we all do it that way, no matter what.. and that's the way it should be. No DRM, as I see it.
But anyway, jd1961 - the content here (video-wise) sure looks swell!!!What exclusive russian/easteuropean dolls here.... (have not had time to dig into the photo-sections yet).
|
10-03-07 08:44am
|
Reply
606
|
FM Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hej jd1961
Like 12 videos and the same amount of photo-sets. And state ment, that aproxx 6 videos would be updated - but never got them.
Well - I just joined the new site - be back with a review.....
|
10-03-07 07:29am
|
Reply
607
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
It's just that I hate when server "filth" gets in the way of enjoying the content "filth."
|
10-02-07 02:36pm
|
Reply
608
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Drooler:
Actually, I'm glad that they've come to their senses and stopped this business of having gobs of sites, probably just to rake in cash. The only one that I ever liked at all was 1byDay; the others were too kinky for me, with slow updates and lousy, filthy lousy server response. (1byDay went through several months of terrible servers, too.)
The new 1byDay/1byNight is a huge improvement over that earlier, and obviously ill-fated, business plan. It's fast, it's vast, and it's hot.
|
10-02-07 02:11am
|
Reply
609
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from nygiants03:
Hmm. I dont agree but everyone has an opinion, i cant really think of many better sites then ftv girls. Every site gets boring eventually which is why we join new ones. FTV girls is not hardcore, but i everything but. There are many erotic scenes i think, good quality, hot girls, natural environment, cant get to much better for me. Also it gives me the real orgasms many sites fail to deliver.
|
10-01-07 01:32pm
|
Reply
610
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Robare:
You know, I just don't get people dinging a site for being what the site advertises itself to be. A site that advertises itself as presenting certain content, then fails to present that type, quantity, or quality of content, should get dinged. But, on the first tour page of FTVGirls is a collection of 161 update cover pages. In none of them is a male featured. In fact, nowhere on the site is heterosexual activity advertised. In none of the reviews of that site on this site is there a statement affirming heterosexual activity being presented on that site. It seems to me any reviewer dinging a site, for not being what it never said it would be, is being just as stupid as a person who goes out and buys a carton of milk and then complains that the milk isn't orange juice. It seems that one claiming to be jaded might have accrued adequate experience to distinguish the nature of the content of a website prior to purchasing. That would seem to be particularly so when the website has done a very comprehensive job of representing it's content on it's tour pages. And, it seems that one, having availed themselves of such information, would be well positioned to avoid disappointing themselves. But, then again, perhaps all is not what it seems...
|
10-01-07 12:20pm
|
Reply
611
|
Apex Glamour
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
No kidding! Makin' a plain peanut butter sandwich is actually slightly more challenging than making a zip file.
I've been told the "reason" sometimes is that it's harder to collect all of the stuff, so it slows down intellectual property theft/distribution over the net. I was polite about it, but honestly, I thought, "That just don't wash." If you're turning people away because they have to click-save their wrists into physical therapy, how well is that IP doing in ROI?
|
09-30-07 04:51pm
|
Reply
612
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Now that is good. Our friends outside the USA might not be able to grasp it (lucky them!), but that's a phrase that will no doubt come in handy again. Probably soon, too.
Thanks. I had a great laugh. Still laughing!
|
09-30-07 04:42pm
|
Reply
613
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Denner:
Well, jd1961 - I think you're absolutly right about this site. A lot of photos and videos of young girls, but it never get's really exiting.
Been a member twice (last time in December 2006), but have not had the urge to go back again.
I was tempted with new previews, but saw some of these videos in full elsewhere (usernet) - and I still hang on to that same feeling: It's generally boring stuff - and the video-scenes are all in the same style...
Thanks for that update-review.....
|
09-30-07 07:43am
|
Reply
614
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Drooler:
I haven't been to FTV since June '06 myself for the same basic reason you gave: lack of excitement. It's also a strange mixture of very lightcore stuff and then sudden frenzies of phallus maxiumus.
I also hate the way they break shoots into different galleries. Which pics should go where? I don't join sites for the pleasure of solving such puzzles.
And anyway, I've seen too many galleries of women just looking around, looking away, looking "dead" ... Why join for that a lack of eroticism? I think some sites have some pretty half-baked ideas about what their own content is supposed to communicate. It's not always true of FTV, but it's still too often the case. I don't understand why some people like it so much, but at least they're happy with it.
|
09-30-07 04:58am
|
Reply
615
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
The answer to the question is probably "nothing." Eve's one of those girls that competes with herself. I used to think the same thing of Linda O'Neil and Jana Cova. They were all over the place.
|
09-30-07 04:43am
|
Reply
616
|
Jack's Playground
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
I see your point. Jack's streaming vids at least will display "full screen" and are replayable. Vivid's shit vids are in that tiny, tiny little window and offer no control to the user and are so long that any attempt at fowarding or replaying leads to total meltdown.
Vivid charges $10 for this pleasure; Jack's is $30 a month. I'd say Jack's is better than .. let me rephrase that: not as bad as Vivid, but still bad enough to leave the subscriber with that "got fucked over again" feeling.
|
09-29-07 02:52am
|
Reply
617
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(jd1961's Reply)
The first time I ever joined, I wasn't able to get access, got a refund from the billing company, then got an e-mail from the techs at 21st Sextury saying "Hey, we really could have solved your problem." Before you get a refund, definitely go for their support e-mails, give them a chance to try to help solve the problem.
Good luck.
|
09-28-07 05:44am
|
Reply
618
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Well, guess what. Today for the first time I saw a set on MetModels that had already appeared on MetArt, of the thin blond Olga, "Svelte," on MetModels.
I'd picked it up Nov. or Dec. last year from MetArt as Olga R, "Presenting." Same model, same pics.
So I've paid for it twice. How nice!
|
09-27-07 11:47am
|
Reply
619
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(jd1961's Reply)
LOL. Trouble is they don't take off their clothes when they are going past my window! Cheers.
|
09-26-07 01:41pm
|
Reply
620
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from PinkPanther:
(jd1961's Reply)
Good point - High praise is due to Shap at Twisty's and the Captain at Nubiles as well.
|
09-24-07 08:28pm
|
Reply
621
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(jd1961's Reply)
Plain to one can be beautiful to another. It's a matter of taste and my taste is the "natural" girl next door look. That's why ABBYWINTERS suits me fine.
|
09-24-07 10:35am
|
Reply
622
|
Kick Ass Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from dauthie:
(jd1961's Reply)
Ok, bro, I'll write a review for Devil's Films. And I'll give it 100 points, though it will take a lot of text to say why--that's why I've been putting it off. And as for KickAss, I think I downloaded anything good (especially video-quality-wise) in just a week, ie. much less than a month...
|
09-24-07 12:50am
|
Reply
623
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks for the support. PU is growing community. Can't expect things to work out with everyone.
|
09-23-07 04:20pm
|
Reply
624
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Jay G:
Maybe I dreamt it, but I remember reading that the nerve endings for the feet are somehow very close to the nerves of the sexual organs, so foot fetish is not that unusual a thing. Beautiful feet are a treat!
|
09-23-07 04:30am
|
Reply
625
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Drooler:
You have a nice way with words and a great sense of humor. Really liked the point about having the leg/foot fetish "creeping around in your psyche." Well put!
|
09-22-07 07:55pm
|
