| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Emily 18
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from tangub:
Thanks for the review and warnings about this site graymane, you've probably saved me 30 bucks somewhere down the line. I love Emily and have had this site bookmarked for some time. Ironically I was looking through the previews at the pictureview newsgroup service a few weeks ago and saw what looked like must have been pretty much a site rip of Emily 18 there and was tempted to sign up for that, I wish I had now if signing up to her actual site means you can't get at the content.
|
05-13-12 01:25am
|
Reply
202
|
Erotic 4 U
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from gaypornolover:
Sounds like your review will serve as an excellent warning to others.
I've never heard of a site which locks you out as soon as you cancel your membership - as you say you're supposed to keep access until the time that you've already paid for runs out.
Sounds like the site isn't remotely how it's described so I suppose that's why they resort to dirty tricks like that.
Have you filed a complaint with their billing agent?
|
07-01-12 05:50pm
|
Reply
203
|
Erotica X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for your comments graymane. I hope someone finds this information useful!
|
12-16-13 02:36pm
|
Reply
204
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from tangub:
(graymane's Reply)
Sorry to hear you were disappointed with this site. I was there 2 or 3 years ago and still rate it as one of my favorite sites.
|
10-22-10 03:31am
|
Reply
205
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from Capn:
Looking in the tour area, it does look to be good quality photography.
Do they ever break out of the cliched nude glamour shoot approach though?
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 09:51am
|
Reply
206
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(graymane's Reply)
That's what we all want, a site "to do something for me". But as we get older, that changes. When I was an early teen, looking at a copy of the Sears catalog (the women's swimwear or lingerie sections) would do it for me. But now I can look at a catalog of Victoria's Secret, which is far more colorful and explicit than what I ever saw in the Sears catalog, and
Victoria's Secret is just a catalog, even though it has beautiful women in lovely lingerie.
I used to be exclusively softcore. Then I joined PU, and I've been getting into hardcore. I'm still mainly softcore, but I'm looking for new material and new sites that I hope I will find entertaining. Most of what I find doesn't really appeal to me. But I keep searching. Because there is a lot of good content out there, somewhere. :)
As far as your score for this site, that's an entirely personal opinion. I used to worry when I gave a site a score whether it was the "right" score. But then I finally realized that a site score is very subjective. Some people think a site's score is based on objective factors, and they even have a rigorous system to create a score based on specific factors. But I personally believe a score is both subjective and objective, as long as the basic factors of download speed, ease of navigation, basic quality of contents, basic amount of contents are at the site. And each person's standards of acceptable varies, as does the person's tastes and opinions.
|
10-18-10 10:44pm
|
Reply
207
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from lk2fireone:
Sorry you were disappointed, graymane. You did get a nice price at $29.95 for two major softcore sites. Unfortunately, Metart is famous for its non-erotic videos of lovely young models.
From what you write, it sounds like you should avoid softcore sites, and look for something harder. Most softcore sites, like Femjoy, MPL Studios, etc. would probably be too soft for you.
There are plenty of sites out there. The problem is finding the ones that appeal to your personal tastes, at a reasonable price.
There's also a ton of crap out there. Metart and Errotica Archives are quality sites, they just don't meet your tastes.
|
10-18-10 09:09pm
|
Reply
208
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
I'm glad I could be of help. Like you I appreciate reviews that steer me to good sites that I have an interest in and I also appreciate reviews that confirm a suspicion that even if a site is technically fine I probably wouldn't be into the material.
|
07-19-10 05:19pm
|
Reply
209
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for your kind words Sir. It's nice to know that some folks find my reviews useful.
|
05-04-14 09:03am
|
Reply
210
|
Fame Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
I don't know Graymane - I probably won't go looking. I've subscribed to Met-Art's newsletter in the past just to take and edit some of the photos to go on labels of my DVDs. I've shown some of them in other posts but that's about my extent of my still photo interest.... oh, except some ripped photos from videos of throating to the balls of some models that I play with just cause I can.
|
01-17-13 08:09pm
|
Reply
211
|
Fame Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from jberryl69:
After reviewing the site, I have to say, based on your current poll question, Sandra is the hottest in my book. Shame she has no updates and has "retired", whatever that means.
|
01-17-13 01:18pm
|
Reply
212
|
Fame Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from WeeWillyWinky:
Wonderful review, graymane! I agree with you about the attractiveness of these three young beauties. Legs! Legs up to their earlobes!
The non-nude approach is MORE stimulating than nude for me. Once you've seen The Prize in all its glory, it gets a bit old seeing it pulled and yanked and twisted and gaping every which way. I much prefer the subtle, barely concealed suggestion of The Prize, the bittersweet agony of the known unknown.
Great review. The models are drop-dead gorgeous and the preview pics alone make me feel like I just got an injection of testosterone.
WWW.
|
09-25-11 04:59pm
|
Reply
213
|
Fame Girls.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(graymane's Reply)
I wasn't aware we'd broken up.
;-)
Have a great holiday weekend.
|
08-30-13 03:19pm
|
Reply
214
|
Fame Girls.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(graymane's Reply)
c'mon now, let's not go overboard.
Yeah, constructive criticism is one thing but saying we're sleeping when we're not is something else entirely. My remark about past support was only to think that, based on past history, we might have deserved the benefit of the doubt until your query about your "missing" review was answered one way or the other.
But be that as it may ...
Your participation here is always welcome. I'm not sure how many more ways it can be said. Obviously, no penance is needed or sought.
|
08-30-13 02:52pm
|
Reply
215
|
Fame Girls.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Marcus:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the very kind words, much appreciated. I've been a fan of FG for a long, long time. Have always loved Sandra, Ella and Virginia, and although it's a shame Sandra and Virginia have both retired, I think Katie is a superb replacement and definitely does the 'Fame Girls spirit' justice.
It's quite pricey now, but I think that's just because of the fees CCBill charges versus other processors.
I'll definitely have a read of your review. Having been a member of both sites, this one compares very favourably apart from obviously not having such a huge archive. The videos are a brilliant addition, though.
Glad to see another PU member who understands that girls don't necessarily have to do HC content to be extremely sexy.
|
08-30-13 01:44pm
|
Reply
216
|
Fame Girls.net
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Comment
from Marcus:
My Fame Girls.net review explains this, but...
Fame Girls.net (which I've reviewed) is the new site with Ella and Katie
Fame Girls (that you reviewed) is the archive site with Ella and Virgina
|
08-30-13 12:54pm
|
Reply
217
|
Fame Girls.net
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Comment
from Khan:
Considering the level of support you've received here at PU, I am kinda confused by you implication that we're sleeping on the job.
But in reply to your accusation that we did away with your review or are somehow not doing our jobs ...
Your review is quite intact and you can see it at:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/famegirls/
You'll note that this site (the page you're on) is for Fame Girls.net whereas the site you did a review for was Fame Girls (the .com site)
In the future, if you "lose" a past submission you can find it by looking at your past activity. (see the 'User Stats' section on your profile page)
I hope that addresses your concern.
|
08-30-13 12:50pm
|
Reply
218
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Comment
from Capn:
Yes, Tony has an unique site here.
Long may it continue!
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-11 11:35pm
|
Reply
219
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review from graymane:
There's a new development between me and the webmaster of FigureBaby that warrants further attention.
Having reluctantly give in and subscribing to a 90 day option, because the price was too good to pass up, I later discovered I should've gone with my earlier judgement of monthly.
technical problems and non-existent promoted features dogged me from the very onset of joining FigureBaby.....about which I complained.
The good news is that the webmaster acknowledged each and every issue I had and appeared to make every effort to recify the problems. Although that which was working did so very well, and for a month into my use of the site, I think I did get my money's worth.
But those features I weren't getting, for all practical purposes, ultimately lead me to quit logging onto the site completely.
I appealed to Tony (Webmaster) to take that which he thought was a fair amount of my payment for usuage and refund me the difference.
Without any argument, and much to my surprise, Tony sent me an email stateing he would refund my complete payment ($24).
I can now add to my review that this site has proved to be among the most honorable and consumer-friendly that I've ever encountered.
This speaks volumes for the integrity of the webmaster and the superiority of his site. Remember this if you're contemplating joining.
|
09-17-11 10:10pm
|
Reply
220
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from Capn:
Yes, 'mainstream' it isn't & all the better for it IMO.
It is a quirky, personal slant, which on the whole I like.
That is why I bemoaned the recent shift of emphasis to more mainstream video content.
Cap'n. :0/
|
08-24-11 01:28pm
|
Reply
221
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from BradlyH:
(graymane's Reply)
Oh no! don't tell me you overlooked Save to stash ! :)
Save to stash is a (awesome) feature at the top of every set right under the star rating. When you click on it, it will save that particular set to your "Stash". It's pretty much a "favorites" or a book mark type thing for the sets. So when i sign in it allows me direct access to my saved sets instead of searching for the model...ect. Quite and brilliant idea if you ask me.
Don't feel bad you didn't know about this feature, after all there is beautiful naked women on the page... why look anywhere else !
|
08-24-11 12:05am
|
Reply
222
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from BradlyH:
LOL! i love your choice of words. Very well done !
I am currently subscribed to the site also and i don't seem to be having any video problems as of yet, maybe it is your computer ?
Also did you like the "Save to stash" feature ? i find myself using it a lot and find it rare among sites.
|
08-23-11 09:21pm
|
Reply
223
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from BradlyH:
(graymane's Reply)
I'm glad my review interested you in this site! I think FB should be more in the lime light. Any reason why you regret the choice of the 3 months compared to the one month ? 3 months saves you some cash and the models are updated 3 times a week, that's why i went with the 3 month option.
If Figure baby appeals to your taste you should look into a subscription To Petites-parisiennes.com
It is much like Figure baby but more atmospheric, sophisticated and a different Shooting style.
|
08-08-11 07:19pm
|
Reply
224
|
Finishes The Job
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks once again for the kind words, Sir!
|
04-18-15 05:12am
|
Reply
225
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from bjajlt362:
(graymane's Reply)
lol, I tend to be a porn hoarder. I already have a couple of terabytes full. I've seen the quality on the site, and the quantity, I'm fairly certain I'll probably need a lot of storage :)
|
07-21-10 12:33am
|
