| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from messmer:
Hey, graymane, I always enjoy your reviews. How did you like all the hairy legs?
Us old timers tend to wax sentimental over the good old days before the models shaved but we think mostly of the pubic bush, while this site has evolved into a true fetishists dream.
As you stated "hair, hair everywhere" - hair on the nipples, hair in the pits, hair on the legs, hair in the cracks. However, one thing in their favor I do believe that their statistics might very well be right on.
This site has been around for a long, long time, therefore between 8 - 10 picture updates a day, with most sets containing at least a hundred pictures, it is not beyond belief that they have as many sets and models as they say they have.
I recently quit with two months to go, not because they lied to me, but because I found most updates either too hairy for my taste (the legs) or too bland or for the "vaginal over exposure" as you put it so nicely. But you know me, looking at a set without the girl at least wearing some sort of erotic lingerie, is the epitome of boredom.
|
01-21-13 07:01pm
|
Reply
177
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Thanks for the entertaining review Gray one. You happened to pick out a couple of big irritants as far as I'm concerned. First of all the ever present genitalia closeups. Then there's the constant moving about. You get to the point where they finally show the whole girl in all her glory, then they have to change her position and it's back to the closeups.
The cameraman goes to sleep on the closeups, but the minute they finally focus on the whole body they have to move. You just cannot get to experience the glory of the whole body. It's like they do it deliberately just to piss off porn viewers. "Ner ner ner, you paid for this, but you're not going to see anything stimulating, oh no, we can do this all the time to the end of the video you know." And they do.
|
01-21-13 06:11pm
|
Reply
178
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the kind remarks, graymane! Actually I was a member of this site quite a few times previous to this. I re-subscribed because I couldn't resist testing the new layout and the increased picture size.
Before you take the plunge I must warn you, though: if heavy leg hair or underarm hair should be a problem for you, don't do it! As you can see by my review of the site, I'm not keen on leg hair, underarm hair I can tolerate, and this will really be the last time I subscribe.
The high rating is as objective as I can make it, it is meant as a guide for those who like extreme hair, but the body of the review also wants to inform the more moderate lovers of hair that this site has become more extreme. If you enjoy extreme, of course, go for it! No judgment here, live and let live! :-)
|
06-20-11 12:44pm
|
Reply
179
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(graymane's Reply)
It is a pretty good option.
WeAreHairy is worth a look too.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-21-10 03:03pm
|
Reply
180
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
I think you're being a little unfair to yourself, sir. As much as we all try to be objective when writing reviews the reality is that whether you like a site is usually a subjective decision - as long as the site isn't a fraud, of course. And in that light, the more reviews the better. Many will find your information more useful when they're trying to determine whether what Babes Network offers is to their liking. Any ay you look at it, people are far more likely to forgive a slow download speed or a messy site design if they like the porn rather than the other way around. A well-designed and run site that offers nothing you like is of no value to anyone.
Keep up the excellent work. Have a great Christmas too.
|
12-25-13 05:47am
|
Reply
181
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review graymane. I must have received the same email offer that you did because, like you, I joined this site not realizing that it is a clone of Babes Network. I emailed Khan and he pointed me to a forum post where he explained that for unknown reasons Manwin doesn't want Babes.com listed.
I liked the site a lot and will likely score it higher than you did when I post a review. I also didn't have the same username/password issue that you mentioned. I got to pick my own.
|
12-24-13 09:09am
|
Reply
182
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from otoh:
(graymane's Reply)
Many thanks, GM! Am blushing to receive such commendation from such an esteemed member of the community :)
|
04-30-13 10:37pm
|
Reply
183
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
I'm blushing, Sir...
|
04-20-14 08:54am
|
Reply
184
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tom22:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the good comment. I've been trolling this site almost from its beginning and finally wrote the 5th review.
Yeah, there is too much talk all together and not enough action. I use a video cutter (Boilsoft makes a good one) and just clip out the good part. Normally I only keep about 30% of the video and many of the videos are just not salvageable because the camerawork is so bad.
The real shame is, that this could be an awesome site, but they just can't drum up the determination to break away from the old worn out style. Oh well, there are other sites that do it right.
|
03-07-11 07:13am
|
Reply
185
|
Cash For Sex Tape
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(graymane's Reply)
It is interesting content, it is just a bit frustrating to download a scene that is basically home videos for 50 minutes, and like 10 minutes of poorly shot, poorly lit sex or nudity. I like the concept as well, they just didn't execute.
|
12-01-10 09:21pm
|
Reply
186
|
Casting Couch X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thank you for the glowing assessment, Sir.
One obvious problem with comparing me, as a "Butt-lover" to Roger Ebert, is that when I give two thumbs up, just what (or who) are those thumbs up in?
|
10-25-13 03:41am
|
Reply
187
|
Celebrity Movie Archive
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from alexmedia:
(graymane's Reply)
Yes, I know this site, thank you. I think it's the best celebrity site. Also I tried Celebrity-worship.com - quite good site too.
|
06-23-10 10:24pm
|
Reply
188
|
Celebrity Movie Archive
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from alexmedia:
Thx for the review.
I saw this site but decided not to join. I like to download without limits and feel uncomfortable if I know there are some limits on download. Also I like to watch pictures.
|
06-20-10 05:48am
|
Reply
189
|
Christie's Room
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the input, G.
Appreciated.
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-05-11 11:29pm
|
Reply
190
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from TheMan:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the feedback. I will definitely add more content.
|
01-22-14 08:36pm
|
Reply
191
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from slutty:
(graymane's Reply)
Yeah, my earlier reviews are perhaps not quite so wordy, and perhaps a little less informative - been trying to improve. I will say based on the most recent review for this site, that it might be worth looking into whether or not they have made any reasonable improvements. I think the content was good, just difficult to get at.
|
08-04-10 11:27pm
|
Reply
192
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from Monahan:
Hi, GM,
I've finally had it with Twistys and started looking around for another site to cuddle up with.
When I saw a non-discounted price of $29.99, I just moved on without looking in. Today, however, I clicked on the PU link to discover that their multi-month deals were $39.99 for 3 months (that's $13.33 per month) and $94.99 for a full year ($7.92 per month). Both prices are too good to pass up.
I agree that too many sites seem to think we're interested in a continuing education program for gynecologists. While I like a good looking snatch in a gallery or video, the preoccupation with snatch limits the amount of time available to check out the mammaries, the gluteous maximus, and other sweet attributes of the models. But I can skip past the stuff I don't care about.
Just a few questions on your review.
- I assume there's no b/g hardcore at all (OK with me) but it wasn't clear if there was any lesbian content on this site.
- Does the site have a decent search function (like Twistys once had) where I can do a search on attributes such as cup size, hair color, natural vs. enhanced, etc.)?
- Was Epoch OK with how they handled your cancellation? I've had very good experiences with Epoch and am OK with calling in the infantry when a site makes cancellation tough.
|
11-22-15 03:25pm
|
Reply
193
|
DogFart
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(graymane's Reply)
Just join Blacks on Blondes and then you'll still get access to all of the other sites but you won't have to think about Dogfart. Mind you that title also doesn't make all that much sense since there are plenty of non-blondes on blacks on blondes. I overlook the name of the network because I really like their style of porn.
|
10-15-12 05:17am
|
Reply
194
|
DogFart
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for your kind words, graymane. I hope that some PU members might find this useful in making a decision to join or not.
|
08-13-12 05:19pm
|
Reply
195
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Graymane, I say this to you as a former Roman Catholic and one who studied to be a priest. The Catholic Church has the doctrine of Purgatory where an otherwise holy person gets sent to be purified before being allowed into Heaven. For the purposes of humor only, I'll deem that you may need a little while in Purgatory and I wonder if your punishment is having to watch anal sex for a few years before being allowed to enter the fullness of Heaven? If it is, please, please, please tell them that I too hated anal sex. And I hated Taylor Rain and Tanner Mayes especially. And the most fitting punishment for me would be a requirement to watch these women have anal sex.
Trust me, when we meet in Heaven, I'll buy you a drink!
|
05-16-14 02:12pm
|
Reply
196
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Great story sir!
It reminds me of a joke I only partially remember so I won't dwell on it, but the gist of it is that a man dies and goes into the great beyond where things are better beyond all imagining. It's like a harem of beautiful women who look after all his sexual needs and submit to every depraved wish. He finally asks someone what he had done to earn such a high place in heaven. The reply was 'Heaven? You're not in Heaven! This is hell for all these women who did bad things on earth!"
|
05-15-14 05:21pm
|
Reply
197
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Give it some time, young man! You'll come around! ;-)
|
05-14-14 01:59pm
|
Reply
198
|
Dylan Ryder
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(graymane's Reply)
GM,
Thank you, as always, for your kindness and dignity. Sorry to hear Dyaln didn't raise your spirits. I plan on reviewing the rest of the network, to give the community the best representation of what they would be getting. Is there anything in particular that interests you at the moment? I'll keep an eye out for it.
Warm Regards-
Marc
|
08-10-12 05:08am
|
Reply
199
|
Emily 18
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from rearadmiral:
Thanks for the warnings about this site. You likely saved me some money. This sort of site makes me wish that we could have more impact rather than just warning members and readers here. Maybe the best we can hope for is that sites like this will see a downturn in business thanks to warnings like yours.
|
05-13-12 09:34am
|
Reply
200
|
Emily 18
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from Marcus:
Wow, this is good to know, and definitely a site to cross off my hit-list too. I hate that feeling of joining up to a site, logging in for the first time and realising you've made a massive mistake.
|
05-13-12 03:37am
|
