Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : tangub (0)  

Feedback:   All (1231)  |   Reviews (109)  |   Comments (65)  |   Replies (1057)

Other:   Replies Received (619)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 476-500 of 619 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
476
Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
(0)
Reply of tangub's Comment from Khan:

Correct, we do not allow reviews based on free access. Thanks for remembering.

10-12-12  12:21pm

Reply
477
Visit Sexy Babes

Sexy Babes
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from BadMrFrosty: (tangub's Reply)

Just what I wanted to know, thank you muchly :)

11-02-10  09:46am

Reply
478
Visit Sexy Babes

Sexy Babes
(0)
Reply of tangub's Review from BadMrFrosty:

Nice review :)

How much of the content would you say is hardcore?


11-02-10  06:48am

Reply
479
Visit Showy Beauty

Showy Beauty
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from lk2fireone: (tangub's Reply)

This is from the same company/partner/WhatEverYouCallIt behind Amour Angels. This new site is tiny compared to Amour Angels. And I'm guessing that both sites have a similar approach to photos and videos.

So if you like the style of Amour Angels, join that site, because it has a lot more content (models, photosets, videos) compared to Showy Beauty.


11-12-11  04:13pm

Reply
480
Visit Simon Scans

Simon Scans
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from lk2fireone: (tangub's Reply)

I can't disagree. If you have serious doubts about the biller, avoid using them.

I've never used Netbilling.

Hopefully, I will write a site review, when I have the time.


10-28-12  08:10am

Reply
481
Visit Simon Scans

Simon Scans
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from lk2fireone: (tangub's Reply)

There are lot of different models. Some cute, a lot not so cute. The photographic style is very different from glamor styles used at Met-Art or MPL Studios. I like it a lot less than the glamor style. You have attractive to lovely girls, and the photos make them seem a lot less attractive. That's my opinion, anyway.

I just joined today. So I don't know a lot about the site.

I don't know anything about Netbilling, never used them. I have used CCBILL a lot.

But I think it's worth using Netbilling, if they offer a cheaper price.

Get a new email address, there are plenty of providers that will give you a free email address.

Also, maybe use a special credit card, that you've never used before. I know some people use like a temporary credit card to pay for their porn site subscriptions. I never did. But if you can do that for free, that would make you safe two ways:

Your new/temporary email address is a safety measure, against spam.

Your temporary credit card would limit your liability against fraudulent charges.

But if there are any fraudulent charges on any credit card you use, I would assume that you are covered on any credit card. That's the way it works in the United States.

You are UK, but I would assume you are protected against any fraudulent charges on a credit card as well. But you can check that out, if you don't already know. If there are fraud charges, it would take a telephone call and one or two letters to the credit card company to straighten that out.

This site used to use a lot of British models. I haven't come across them yet, but they are supposed to be here. Most of the newer models are from Eastern Europe, supposedly because the models will work for less money.

But you might find the site of especial interest because they are supposed to have a large backlog of British models.


10-25-12  11:30am

Reply
482
Visit Skinny Super Girl

Skinny Super Girl
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Drooler: (tangub's Reply)

Discount! Hooray! But I missed it by about two weeks. Damn. Oh, well, I'll keep it mind for the next time I need some extra Russian Undressing in my porn salad.

09-27-11  01:52pm

Reply
483
Visit Skinny Super Girl

Skinny Super Girl
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from lk2fireone: (tangub's Reply)

slutty, on September 8, 2011 (earlier this month) mentioned that he has a current long-term membership to the Diesel Access network, and that he was surprised that he was not getting access to this new site of theirs (Skinny Super Girl). Drooler replied to that comment that he also was not getting access to Skinny Super Girl.

But in a reply to my comment of today, that I just joined and did get access to Skinny Super Girl, Drooler replied today that he is now getting access to Skinny Super Girl (without paying anything extra, I'm sure).

So I would guess that slutty is also getting access to Skinny Super Girl as part of his network access.

I see the new discount for network access through PU/TBP for $29.99/month.

There was some discussion in the past on whether it was worth joining either Young Legal Porn or 18 Only Girls by themselves, or paying extra to get the entire network. Some people said it's not worth the extra money to get the entire network, since most of the network sites are small and don't update, and also because there was some duplication between the Young Legal Porn and 18 Only Girls sites, which are the two major sites of this network.

But when I joined before, I got the network access. And I got network access again this time. And slutty and Drooler also got network access. So I think it's worth getting network access, at least for the first time you join this network.

That's just my opinion.

This is not a mega-network like Teen Mega World, or a mega site like Nubiles or MetArt. But if you like white Eastern European teens, there are a number of lovely young girls here. The sex is more softcore than Teen Mega World. And there is a lot of solo and girl-girl at this network. But I think, based on what I like (teen girls), that it's worth joining at least once.

And some of us have obviously joined the network more than once. Lol.


09-27-11  09:16am

Reply
484
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)
Reply of tangub's Review from sonofzog:

I'm very interested in the models on this site but doing a preview I've come up with a question: Does Skokoff ever take photos in landscape format. Everything I've seen is portrait but that might be a result of the previewing software.

07-10-21  05:08pm

Reply
485
Visit Sperm Mania

Sperm Mania
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from mbaya: (tangub's Reply)

I just double checked. I see the biller as Vendo at 34.95. i would join if I saw the price that you do.

06-28-18  09:31am

Reply
486
Visit Spunky Bee

Spunky Bee
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from lk2fireone: (tangub's Reply)

No zips for springtimebeauties is still the case.
I like photos, but the ones I like are the high quality that you find at metart, justteensite, mplstudios, etc. The photos here at springtimebeauties are much lower quality (with no zips). So even if the site had zips, in spite of the cute models, I would not save these photos. That's just me. Because the photos are low quality, in my opinion.

Edit01: I also like a small amount of photoshopping, because I think it makes the models look better. But there is no photoshopping in these photos. You see all the freckles and moles and whatever on these girls. I just like a little glossier appearance.

They do have some very yummy models, though. Thanks for mentioning the site. :)


10-15-10  03:25am

Reply
487
Visit St. Mackenzie's

St. Mackenzie's
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from Capn: (tangub's Reply)

I suspected as much.

Thanks for the confirmation.

Cap'n. :0)


10-05-12  06:12am

Reply
488
Visit St. Mackenzie's

St. Mackenzie's
(0)
Reply of tangub's Review from Capn:

So what percentage of material ends with full nudity, please?

Cap'n :0/


10-04-12  04:07pm

Reply
489
Visit St. Mackenzie's

St. Mackenzie's
(0)
Reply of tangub's Review from Cybertoad:

looks like a nice site , great review, maybe tad to soft-core but cool non the less.

10-04-12  07:48am

Reply
490
Visit St. Mackenzie's

St. Mackenzie's
(0)
Reply of tangub's Review from otoh:

Thanks for a great review, tangub - I had noticed this site a couple of times and wondered what it was like.

I think you are right in that it is the same photographer as Breath Takers - Michael White (who also features in Met Art and Body In Mind, among others). I actually really like the style; the colours are natural, there is a good mix of models and usually some context which really works for me.

In this case it's good to know that it's on a par with Only Tease as to explicitness; I'd find this frustrating, and the schoolgirl theme doesn't really work for me either. At least though the theme justifies a separate site; I'm still baffled as to why Breath Takers, Girlfolio and Take5 Girls (back again) all run with overlaps in content...


10-04-12  07:03am

Reply
491
Visit Stasy Q

Stasy Q
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from exotics4me: (tangub's Reply)

The system here won't let me edit my previous reply. The low resolution photo zips are downloading properly now. I don't know if they had a glitch going on and maybe seen the review and fixed it.

They are 960x640 photos.


12-11-19  08:28am

Reply
492
Visit Stasy Q

Stasy Q
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from exotics4me: (tangub's Reply)

I checked the ultimate upgrade and it is $199, that's the only way to get video downloads and high resolution photo downloads. It does give lifetime membership but this is what really bothers me the most, TBP reviewed it in May 2019, and this is directly from the TBP review, "Only VIP members have access to downloadable videos and Zip files for the high-res pics. VIP subscribers can also check out the behind-the-scenes interviews and backstage videos."

So, it looks like they have changed the way their site works. The membership I joined is VIP and the only options I have for downloading are pay $4.99 per video or join ultimate. It really is a shame. The models are great looking and the videos I've streamed are very good at teasing.


12-11-19  07:57am

Reply
493
Visit Suburban Amateurs

Suburban Amateurs
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Capn: (tangub's Reply)

In actual fact, I am only saying that from past experience of a few years ago.

So far as I can see, there is no evidence that it has changed in that regard.

I agree, I do feel they are missing out in a potentially increased market.

Cap'n. :0/


01-19-13  04:15am

Reply
494
Visit Suburban Amateurs

Suburban Amateurs
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from messmer: (tangub's Reply)

There might be some fake tits but I haven't come across any yet, or if I did the job was so well done that I didn't notice, tangub.

05-26-11  12:06pm

Reply
495
Visit Suburban Amateurs

Suburban Amateurs
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from messmer: (tangub's Reply)

You're welcome, tangup. If the video format doesn't bother you you will find this a good site. I like it a lot.

05-25-11  12:45pm

Reply
496
Visit Sunny Leone

Sunny Leone
(0)
Reply of tangub's Review from mbaya:

She is one of my favorite models.I would consider this at the $5 price you mentioned, but I don't see it offered. Did you mean $14.95?

This was a very interesting and helpful review.


06-24-17  03:56pm

Reply
497
Visit Sunny Leone

Sunny Leone
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Khan: (tangub's Reply)

Must have had tech problems this morning. We couldn't get to it either.

But, the site seems to be back up now.


02-07-12  10:18am

Reply
498
Visit Tania Spice

Tania Spice
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from exotics4me: (tangub's Reply)

The way I was mainly looking at it is that I would recommend joining Pacino's Adventures + full access trial to Tania's solo site for a combined $34.95 over joining Tania's solo site as your main site. The one site you don't get with Tania's solo site is Pacino's Adventures. I kind of felt frustrated, not so much burned, back when I joined Pacino's Adventures last year then joined Gigi Spice's solo site only to find that 1/3 or so the content on it was on Pacino's Adventures. From what I can see, Gigi, Tania and Karla still have standalone sites. They each come with the same bonus sites as Pacino's Adventures. I don't think any of those 3 though are even close to Pacino's Adventures in terms of quantity or quality. The thing to notice, there have been other solo model sites through Pacino, like my favorite of his, Pamela Spice. It looks like once he runs of stashed sets, he adds their sites to the bonus sites.

Gigi is the best example right now as she has implants now and is going by her real name, I assume, Carolina Alvarez. Yet, her solo site is still releasing new updates that look like they're 3-4 years old.


11-15-10  12:49pm

Reply
499
Visit Team Skeet

Team Skeet
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Tree Rodent: (tangub's Reply)

Thanks tangub, not sure it was my comments that contributed to the change, but it would be nice to think pressure from some of us here at PU, helps to change things a little.

01-10-13  10:49am

Reply
500
Visit Teen Deja

Teen Deja
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from SteveO: (tangub's Reply)

I agree that the small amount of content would not justify the cost for most people. Solo girl sites in general are not the best deal in my opinion. I also have a 21Sextury membership and have been very busy with the vast amount of content on the site. I just felt like adding her to my collection so I said "what the hell." I see they are running a 3 day trial of Real Peachez for 8.95 so maybe I will check it out after Thanksgiving.

11-19-10  12:20pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 476-500 of 619 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.8 seconds.