| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
751
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(Capn's Reply)
Ah, o.k. well I like the site even more with every new treat I find and there are some gems hidden.
The disabled forum access for ex members is something I don't like but I do understand the possible reason(s) behind
Cheers,
Smut
|
06-20-11 12:59am
|
Reply
752
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Almost two months later: I still keep looking in and still see no changes. Still a bunch of cute teenies in every day outfits .. but as I wrote earlier that appears to be what most subscribers want, so I won't hold my breath, or blame the site, as I wait for something that would appeal to a more mature taste.
|
04-17-11 01:26pm
|
Reply
753
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Basil:
Hello guys,
Thanks for your feedback! Can't disagree with you about pleasing everybody, running a paysite is a very delicate game ;)
As for toys, out of 60 sets released in this February only 12 were tagged under toys category, less than 1/5 of all content (we've decreased amount of toy sets per each shoot after your comments about half year ago) - I would not say that they are large, same sort of deal with gyno stuff.
Again, there are custom zips and category filters to exclude things you don't like and an open tour so you can decide if the updates are worth joining or not, so you won't be disappointed for your money. Maybe you guys need to wait for a couple of more months - there are some major changes coming that will please both of you ;)
Thanks for your feedback, much appreciated as always!
WeAreHairy Basil
|
02-20-11 07:18pm
|
Reply
754
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from messmer:
The emphasis has definitely shifted during the past few months, Cap'n. But webmasters see what works and what doesn't and I'm afraid the majority rules. Can't blame Basil for catering to what most people want. It's just not what WE like and want any longer.
I suppose it would be quite easy to tell from his end which updates are downloaded the most and then request something along the same lines from his photographers in order to keep business humming.
Maybe, down the road, the pendulum will swing back and our taste will once again be in vogue, I seriously doubt it though because each new generation comes with its own unique fetishes and tastes.
|
02-20-11 03:20pm
|
Reply
755
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from MichelleF:
You can check out more hairy girls at abbywinters.com
Actually if you enter coupon code 'Michelle' for one week only you receive 2 weeks completely free!
|
12-30-10 07:16am
|
Reply
756
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Ah, thanks! I thought you were talking about changes regarding lingerie! Less rather than more, I mean. Phew!
As to the models themselves I don't see anything wrong in meeting one in this site whom I saw in ATK Hairy before, as long as her set is more erotic than the stuff ATK have been putting out over the past month.
|
11-23-10 01:32pm
|
Reply
757
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
How do you think things are improving, Cap'n? Less lingerie and more nudity? That would be a real shame in my eyes. I'm this close to subscribing again and really would like to know what you mean by your comment. Thanks!
|
11-23-10 12:16pm
|
Reply
758
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Yes, I can say the same thing, Cap'n. When it comes to underarm hair it certainly isn't a fetish of mine, I just don't mind it!
|
11-03-10 10:30am
|
Reply
759
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Agreed, Capn! I tend to be quite negative in connection with many sites, so it's a pleasure to be able to say something good for a change! :-)
|
11-02-10 02:32pm
|
Reply
760
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Basil:
(Capn's Reply)
Who said that it'd be done by decreasing the amount of photosets? ;)
It's so hard to please you all but I will ;)
Basil
|
03-27-10 11:11pm
|
Reply
761
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
I hope in a positive way, Capn, because I really wish this site and its webmaster well!
|
02-10-10 03:01pm
|
Reply
762
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks for the tip, re. custom zips, Cap'n. I'll edit the review accordingly. Last night I tried to do as you suggested by just creating the custom zip on the last page but ended up with an html file instead of my zip. God knows what I did wrong?? :-)
|
02-06-10 12:48pm
|
Reply
763
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
from messmer:
Thanks for the review, Capn. I have to check out a few more things before I put in my review but the nice thing is that our two reviews will complement each other because I'm a video fan (I like pictures as well though, if they contain lingerie rather than an endless series of bare rumps) so between the two of us PUers should get a fairly accurate picture. :-)
|
02-05-10 07:22pm
|
Reply
764
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
I do! :-)
|
02-05-10 09:58am
|
Reply
765
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from messmer:
Don't forget to mention in your review if most/all models start out fully dressed and then slowly proceed to undress, hopefully even removing a stocking or two in the process! :-)
|
02-05-10 09:46am
|
Reply
766
|
We Do Blow Jobs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Capn's Reply)
I din't check out the photos. Since my membership is over, I cannot help with any information. Since the videos greatly varied in quality, the photos undoubtedly are also.
|
01-21-10 06:51am
|
Reply
767
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(Capn's Reply)
It's Wicked Pictures just like classic Hollywood studios were known as MGM Pictures, etc.
But they have literally tons of photo galleries - good quality, too.
Not available as zips, though.
|
12-26-10 04:11pm
|
Reply
768
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(Capn's Reply)
It's because from the time they started, they deliberately wanted to put themselves out as a "Hollywood"-style studio, like Universal Pictures, which is why they seized on the ability to have Jenna Jameson as a contract star to put both Jenna and Wicked on the map.
|
07-13-10 05:35pm
|
Reply
769
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from exotics4me:
What you're running into here is the name of the actual studio is called Wicked Pictures. Similar to Vivid, Evil Angel, etc...
|
07-12-10 04:42pm
|
Reply
770
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(Capn's Reply)
My hope is that since this is a 'reputable' studio then the site might be okay. How's that for rationalization??? I usually find studio sites disappointing, with rare exceptions like Evil Angel and Elegant Angel.
|
05-26-13 10:18am
|
Reply
771
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from zeomni:
(Capn's Reply)
Hi everyone,
There is now an offer at 29.90€, but this is still expensive.
Hope it helps someone.
ZeO
|
05-21-13 09:01am
|
Reply
772
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from slutty:
(Capn's Reply)
Capn,
I agree it is somewhat of a heartcore site, but I think the best example of that genre would be X-Art, at least in my opinion. This site still has some typical euro porn elements, but I would still clasify it as heartcore, just not the prototypical heartcore site.
Either way, I don't think it is a site you would enjoy, being well aware of what you are looking for in a site.
|
09-03-12 12:03am
|
Reply
773
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Monahan:
Looks like they heard you. The tag is now "hardcore sex."
|
06-14-10 10:20pm
|
Reply
774
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(Capn's Reply)
I think it's a nice feature you can choose to stream or download these bonus "advertising" sets.
For example, the video with Kasey Chase from Nubiles titled Smack My Butt has a runtime of 22 minutes 12 seconds, and can be downloaded in 4 choices:
HD 720p (WMV file, 578 MB)
HD 720p (h.264 file, 533 MB)
SD 480p (255 MB)
LD 360p (175 MB)
I normally choose the highest definition, largest file size, because I figure that's going to give the best, clearest picture to watch.
But I should really test the other file sizes, to see if there's a real difference in picture quality, that I can see.
It would save a lot of hard drive space if I downloaded these files choosing a smaller size.
I look at the videos and photos on a computer monitor, not a large TV screen.
And I've noticed that, for myself, at least, I can't really tell any difference in most small-sized, lower quality photos than a huge-sized, high quality photo. That's assuming we're talking about a recent photo set from MetArt or one of the other high-quality photo sites.
And I just bought a new 3 TB hard drive two days ago, because I keep running out of disk space.
The prices on new, larger hard drives keeps dropping, which is wonderful, but how many hard drives do I really need? It's like an addiction.
|
09-29-11 09:34am
|
Reply
775
|
YouStrip
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(Capn's Reply)
I almost guarantee they are flash. They are just a bit difficult to detect. The membership is for a year so it is not that huge of a deal to download them, I just like having everything local so that I am not using my small bandwidth downloading the same thing more than once.
|
09-15-09 01:20pm
|
