| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
701
|
Torrid Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from otoh:
Looking at the previews, I can see why you like this - looks to be lots of full strips, which lately I find very appealing. And whereas I'm not averse to girl-girl content, it's good to see they are sticking to their niche. One to add quite high up my list; maybe before a revisit to Breath Takers.
|
06-20-11 02:57pm
|
Reply
702
|
Torrid Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks, Drooler for pointing out that feature to me. Great! And to you, Cap'n, thanks for getting my hopes up with your "full strip" comment! :-)
After the tour I find once again, to my disappointment, that girls nowadays simply don't wear enough under that dress or jeans, and that "strip" means showing a bra (sometimes) and thongs, and that's about it. I am glad for my youth when women still dressed alluringly under their everyday clothes. Times have passed me by, I'm afraid.
|
05-16-10 12:54pm
|
Reply
703
|
Torrid Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Capn's Reply)
I just thought I'd mention it since no one else had and it might help users in their decisions whether or not to join.
Then hopefully more will. Then the $$ flowing it to the site can increase. Then they can pay for models and such more often. And then they have have updates more often.
See, I did it for YOU, Cap'n. ;)
|
05-16-10 02:53am
|
Reply
704
|
Torrid Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Drooler:
Yeah, they ain't Speedy Gonzalez, but the archive has grown enough that they're certainly worth a join for a first-timer. And I'll be back sometime, too.
|
04-18-10 08:54am
|
Reply
705
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Orb Ltd:
(Capn's Reply)
I agree with you that we may lose some potential customers who think that the site isn't updated at all.
The reason we don't do this page of the current updates for the non-members (besides the fact that our content guy is too lazy for this ;-) is that we will move soon (I hope) to this new interface, so it's better to focus on this new thing.
|
10-30-11 10:01am
|
Reply
706
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Orb Ltd:
The most important thing is that the members area page is updated itself, isn't it? ;-)
Next week we will start to move to the new style of members and non-members area on one of our sites (it is not TU), when we'll finish with it on one site, we may add all other sites to this new interface, which will include many nice feature.
I can't give any ETA, because it will take time to test with all our sites, but I hope that we'll finish moving to the new script by the end of the year.
WBR, Andy
|
10-30-11 09:12am
|
Reply
707
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Orb Ltd:
(Capn's Reply)
Which of HR ladies?
The new one got some treatment...
WBR, Andy
|
10-05-11 12:43pm
|
Reply
708
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Orb Ltd:
Capn,
Yes, the site is updated.
Copy-paste from the members area index: "Next update: October, 6 2011 "
Most of the recent videos have the English subtitles.
We will modify the external page so it will reflect the recent updates.
WBR, Andy
|
10-04-11 02:36am
|
Reply
709
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Orb Ltd:
(Capn's Reply)
Correct, the external look of the sites should be changed, so we will feature newest updates on the top.
You may see this on many sites nowadays.
WBR, Andy
|
04-21-11 10:41am
|
Reply
710
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Orb Ltd:
Cap'n
As for photosets - we have images for all of the videos, as I understand you mean the images in higher resolution. There were only 6-7 videos with the stills from the videos, all other episodes have HQ pictures, so it should be a regular feature.
As for zips - we're working on the new members area script which will include the features like search, custom zipping etc. But it takes time.
Our content guy told me he plans to add the zips for the current sets at TU at the end of this week.
Thanks!
WBR, Andy
|
04-21-11 09:54am
|
Reply
711
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from asmith12:
(Capn's Reply)
Sorry, didn't check (stills are not really my cup of tea), but I doubt they're worth it even for fans of stills.
|
04-17-11 08:06am
|
Reply
712
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from asmith12:
(Capn's Reply)
There are photosets, but they're nothing special IMHO. You can't see much emotions from them, and quality is mediocre (500px larger side), though they IMHO do not look as a screencaps.
|
04-17-11 07:49am
|
Reply
713
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(Capn's Reply)
This is definetely a download only video site. They don't even offer the option of streaming the videos in a flash player.
|
07-02-12 05:36am
|
Reply
714
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from bebelover:
(Capn's Reply)
Some Hardcore, mostly recently more and more HC porn added.
|
05-12-15 03:43pm
|
Reply
715
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from bebelover:
(Capn's Reply)
All of the above. Some HC...Some SoftCore. zips.
|
11-17-11 11:00pm
|
Reply
716
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Nancy Moore:
(Capn's Reply)
Hello there,
We actually have all of them, Softcore, midcore and hardcore
In all video formats
|
11-17-11 09:08am
|
Reply
717
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(Capn's Reply)
The characterization of toys and finger play as "midcore" is associated with the pornography standards of magazines over the latter part of the 20th Century.
Playboy was the first mainstream porn mag to show muff back in the late 1960's, creating a mild firestorm. Penthouse grabbed the momentum by showing modest amounts of genitalia, usually somewhat hidden by bush and, by today's standards, very mild.
Content in mainstream porn mags with any form of insertion arrived in the late 1990's in Hustler who toyed with the process earlier with solo labia lip activity.
We old farts look at insertions as going more hardcore than the PG (pretty girl) genre we grew up with where all there was was babes showing their bodies with no overt sexuality.
That's a long way of saying I understand where Capn is coming from and agree completely.
|
07-31-10 11:26am
|
Reply
718
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nadiencendia:
(Capn's Reply)
Ok, it could be a useful distinction. For me, almost any solo action is softcore; most lesbian action (specially kinky stuff excluded) could be midcore; and any boy/girl action with penetration etc., hardcore; anyway, thanks for commenting :D
|
07-28-10 12:50pm
|
Reply
719
|
UK Amateur Vids
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from dougie:
(Capn's Reply)
I always do my research, I am very thorough
|
04-22-11 01:46pm
|
Reply
720
|
UK Amateur Vids
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from dougie:
(Capn's Reply)
Sorry I disagree! $50 for one month or $70 for 6 months bit of a no brainer really!
|
04-22-11 12:46pm
|
Reply
721
|
Uplay IStrip
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from ace of aces:
(Capn's Reply)
did you try the dvd they offered? seems to be cheaper then "membershipfee".
|
08-07-11 06:46am
|
Reply
722
|
Uplay IStrip
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ace of aces:
(Capn's Reply)
that got something to do with my tmonitor? checked it and got to alternatvies 16 and 32 bit colour quality.
|
08-04-11 10:56pm
|
Reply
723
|
URA-Channel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Lionheart:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks very much for the feedback.
|
10-14-10 02:30pm
|
Reply
724
|
Urban Teen Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BadMrFrosty:
(Capn's Reply)
Actually every video does come with a picture set, not particularly well photographed or high res, but a picture set none the less.
|
05-27-10 01:45am
|
Reply
725
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(Capn's Reply)
I just think it was good Customer Service. I don't know what they would have pangs of conscience about. The original deal was one that I agreed to, have never had reasons to regret. The fact that they changed their pricing model is not anything unique to this site - lots of others have done similarly.
The new deal makes me happy, so there we go.
|
07-28-10 05:33pm
|
