Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : PinkPanther (0)  

Feedback:   All (1637)  |   Reviews (48)  |   Comments (196)  |   Replies (1393)

Other:   Replies Received (941)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 976-1000 of 1393 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
976
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(0)
Reply of arangon's Review

For me it is all about the babe quality with Nubiles.net. They seemed to have put some attention to the "engagement" level of the models, because the first time I joined, I found a fair amount of material where the models looked bored or pained - models that other sites got great material from. I haven't found that to be the case since. I rejoined when Jessie's stuff was being posted a few weeks ago - I'm a big fan of Jessie at facedownassupuniversity.com and I really liked her material at Nubiles.net - there was one schoolgirl vid that was awesome. I like their stuff pretty well. It's not the highest quality on the net. They get their stuff from a variety of sources. But they always have new girls coming. They give multiple updates every day. It's a well-done site with good navigation and search functions and so long as the babes are hot, it's quite a nice site to see girls that you're not going to see absolutely everywhere, though if you see girls everywhere else, it's fun to see that they've got early material here, frequently.

12-10-08  07:30pm

Reply
977
Visit SF Bay Models

SF Bay Models
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Comment

Damn! This sounds worse and more migraine-producing than some of the old-skool vid sites that Exotic has reviewed. Even though I'm in the Bay Area and would like to support the home team, I'll be avoiding this turkey of a site like the plague.

12-10-08  07:20pm

Reply
978
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I voted "Other"

Polls like this annoy me, frankly. Here's the way I look at it - If there are people who have the need to see toys from the beginning, they can always skip ahead to the toy part if the toy part doesn't start right away. If there are people that don't like toys, well stay away from the vast majority of sites out there that have lots of toy material.

Personally, I like hot material - I'm not going to tell porn producers to have a certain amount of fully-clothed tease followed by a certain amount of stripping followed by a certain amount of such-and-such, etc, because then I'm be asking for more formulaic crap - and there's a lot of formulaic crap out there. Some of it's hot despite being formulaic, like most of the material on InFocusGirls, for example, some of it's so weighted down by how formulaic it is that the heat is virtually killed, like most of the stuff on Twisty's.

Give me hot erotic stuff - with toys, without toys, I don't give a fuck - give me hot babes shot well and presented in good quality formats with good navigation and I'll be happy.

All the paint-by-numbers instructions should be tossed off a fucking cliff.


12-10-08  07:14pm

Reply
979
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)
Reply of Tree Rodent's Reply

Customer Service at Reality Kings? There is not Customer Service at Reality Kings. There's a canned e-mail that repeats over and over again regardless of how much you try to get someone to address an actual issue.

If you join and have no problems, well good for you. If you join and have any problems, you're up shit creek cause they have no Customer Service.


12-08-08  09:34pm

Reply
980
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I can't say that I really care what a girl wants to use to get off - I think the hottest scenes that I've seen probably involve fingers more often than any store-bought toys.

Lil Lexy - who used to be Kimmy at Little Summer.com a few years ago - is doing lots of cam shows these days and she's a crazy little hyper nympho girl that likes to use all kind of odd objects. One of the hottest images I remember is her squatting over a tennis racket and fucking herself with it.


12-05-08  06:57pm

Reply
981
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Like others here, Met Art has had me renewing at the year-long level for multiple years. I just joined for a year recently for the 3rd time, I believe. I've been a consistent member of ALS Scan for multiple years now, as well. And with Sarah Peachez as one of their upcoming new models, they definitely keep giving me that "I can't miss an update" feeling.

11-27-08  09:38pm

Reply
982
Visit Pix and Video

Pix and Video
(0)
Reply of morgentau's Comment

Yes, that's totally true - of course, then you don't get the new material being updated daily as you do at Pix and Video - and in 6 months, or 60 months, you will not have access to Club Sandy's every other day updates. That's the choice - more and better bonus sites sooner or the newest stuff now and lesser bonus sites for now.

The actual count on bonus sites that you get with Pix and Video, since I just joined to take advantage of the "get Club Sandy for free in 6 months" offer is 29 - so you get Pix and Video plus 29 bonus sites for a total of 30 sites to start off with.


11-25-08  06:58pm

Reply
983
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)
Reply of morecumplay's Review

My problem with the site was keeping logged in. If I were just going to the home page and downloading the newest content, I was fine. If I wanted to go to one of the individual sites and look around and download any of the material that wasn't the newest, my membership wasn't recognized and it was "start all over again" - uchhh!

I get lots of offers to join at great prices, but for me this site was just too much work.


11-22-08  05:20pm

Reply
984
Visit Jana Rocks

Jana Rocks
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

As I said originally, this is an active site - the pic sets aren't in the thousands of pics, but they are average size pic sets for an internet model site. This is a professionally done site. I was a member for a month, had no complaints. If you can check out her cam shows, those are really fun. She'll talk about anything you want to talk about, leads rather a crazy life - gets kicked out of hotels at adult conventions for being too rowdy, etc. And her bod looks awesome on web cam.

11-22-08  09:03am

Reply
985
Visit Jana Rocks

Jana Rocks
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

You don't see evidence that it's an active site? What about the detailed listing on the home page of photo set updates on 11/17, 11/14, 11/10, 11/03, 10/31, 10/27, 10/24, 10/20, 10/17, 10/16, etc? That isn't a clue? Then there's the cam show schedule, which is accurate.

I'm not currently a member, but there was at least 1 new vid a week, sometimes more.


11-21-08  11:51pm

Reply
986
Visit Club Sandy

Club Sandy
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

Denner, have you filled out their Customer Service feedback form? I got a response in 10 minutes when I had a question about the network bonuses a couple of weeks ago - that would give you a C/S person's e-mail so you could get direct assistance.

I was going to post the e-mail of the person that responded to me, but it's against PU rules - which makes sense.


11-20-08  06:00am

Reply
987
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm with Wittyguy - so long as the girls are hot and so is the action, it's good. There can be some hot fantasies built around inter-racial stuff, though a lot of that has been tamped down on since the 70's where there were all kind of un-PC scenes like plantation scenes and home invasion scenes.

These days with Max Hardcore being convicted and Rob Black being pursued and Stagliano under indictment there's less room for that stuff so what you get is more rote and repetitive.


11-19-08  05:47pm

Reply
988
Visit Jana Rocks

Jana Rocks
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Review

as with the comment I posted to the comment about this site, this is an old dead site - 2-3 years old, probably. After Jana left this webmaster, she had IDreamOfJana.com, then left that when she was gettin more frisky and Ninnworx built a site around her when she was a contract girl with them and now she has a new site that she's running with Sandy Summers and her webmaster called ClubJanaJordan.com with frequent updates, hot girl/girl and masturbation stuff, webcam shows, etc.

If you're a Jana fan, don't waste your time with the dead sites, check out her new active site.


11-18-08  11:04pm

Reply
989
Visit Jana Rocks

Jana Rocks
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment

Yeah, too bad you didn't post a comment first asking if anybody knew anything about this site. I could have told you that it was a dead site. This was actually 3 sites ago for Jana. She did this site, then she did IDreamOfJana.com, then Ninnworx built a site around her when she was a contract girl with them. Now she has a site that she's operating with Sandy Summers, formerly Naughty Girl Sandy, and her webmasters, called ClubJanaJordan.com. That site is updating multiple times a week and has more than Jana Rocks already, most likely, including hot girl/girl & masturbation vids.

Oh, well. If you're a Jana fan, that's the site that I would recommend.


11-18-08  10:59pm

Reply
990
N/A Reply of Duante Amorculo's Poll

For me, it's all about the sexiness of the girl. I've cum as much to non-HC stuff as I have to HC stuff. I've got a good imagination to fill in the gaps to what's on screen if the girl on the screen is inspiring me.

11-17-08  07:00am

Reply
991
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of asmith12's Reply

I don't think it's suspicious when someone starts their posting career at PU giving the highest ratings ever - probably because that's what I did. I started posting in order to let people here know about the sites that I thought were the best around - and I think all of my first reviews were in the 90's as a result.

I think it's the case that most people start posting here because they're passionate in one direction or another - they're either excited to let people know about the sites they think are fantastic or they've been burned by a site and they want to let people here know that was the case.

We need to give newbie posters a break - if they stick around a while, they'll probably settle down and be more moderate in their ratings.

Met Art deserves high praise - they're one of the most consistent, professional, generous sites around and if you like soft erotic photography, they are a truly great site.


11-14-08  07:23pm

Reply
992
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC
(0)
Reply of Karup's Reply

The thing about this forum, though, Jeff, is that there are enough members that, for the sites such as yours, that have a history of responsive Customer Service, there will be other members to speak up in the defense of good sites so that the complaints will have the lesser weight that they ought to. In the end, I think that's more valuable than the mods setting up a whole QC system, which I tend to think could create more friction than not.

I would certainly feel p.o'd if I had what I felt was a valid complaint about a site and I wasn't allowed to have my post seen by other forum members because a mod decided that it was not a valid complaint. On the other hand if I made my point and 10 other forum members responded, saying that they had always had great experiences with the site, I wouldn't have any reason to be pissed off at the mod or the other members and would probably chill out a bit and have more perspective about my complaint.


11-14-08  07:13pm

Reply
993
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of hondaman's Reply

Saying that Met Art's vids are boring is not saying that they are not hard-core. They are boring soft-core vids. I'm not saying that you could not have interesting soft-core vids. Hegre does them. I like Hegre's vids probably more than I do his pics. His vids are unique, they've got character, they've got personality, they've got humor, as well as looking and sounding great - they're interesting!

Met Art's vids are booooooooooooooooooooooring! Most are painfully boring. I've never seen one of their vids that I wanted to watch a second time, and it's not because they're soft-core and I was thinking "man, if only she were getting fucked!" It's because they were hideously, painfully boring and I was thinking "man, this vid absolutely sucks!"

If I were only into hard-core, I wouldn't be as complimentary about this site as I am. I really like the pics, really dis-like the vids.


11-14-08  06:45am

Reply
994
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of hondaman's Review

Nice review of a great pic site - I still can't recommend this site to anybody that is more into vids than pics. The vids on this site are just miserably boring. They're HQ, very pretty, and very, very boring.

11-13-08  10:14pm

Reply
995
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
Reply of Karup's Reply

Good job, Jeff. I have never been a member of this particular Karups site, but I have been a member of KarupsPC 3 different times and have never had access problems or problems cancelling membership and have always found Karups to be quite responsive and professional way, so I have to say that the "Stay Away" from any Karups site should be taken a grain or two of salt.

11-13-08  10:10pm

Reply
996
Visit Sexy Babes

Sexy Babes
(0)
Reply of xbigvmanx's Reply

And I question your addition

Babelicious = 75 (according to you) plus SexyBabes.tv, which you say is a decent site plus other sites in the network = 69?

It's a strange method of scoring a site IMHO


11-11-08  09:18pm

Reply
997
Visit Sexy Babes

Sexy Babes
(0)
Reply of xbigvmanx's Reply

Every member of this forum is, of course, entitled to their own method of scoring a site, but it's hard for me to understand how this network of sites gets a 69 from this user when Babelicious as a stand-alone site would earn a 75, and the user says that SexyBabes.tv is also a worthwhile site - and you get the whole of both sites, not a teaser of one or the other - so I would think that you would then have a base of 75 plus whatever should be given for the addition of SexyBabes.tv - and then you've got some bonus sites as well. It's hard to see that not getting you to 80 at least.

I agree with Exotics that, while you can find stuff in this network that has been posted elsewhere, sometimes in the same week, the higher quality posting of the set is in this network of sites as compared to, say, Twisty's.

The worst thing about this network of sites in my opinion - the navigation between the various sites - the whole thing would be SO much better if they connected it up in a more cohesive way, which they have mentioned as a possibility.


11-11-08  08:52pm

Reply
998
Visit Suicide Girls

Suicide Girls
(0)
Reply of WeeWillyWinky's Reply

Make that a trio of fans of this site - I'm the newest, I guess. I had been interested in checking it out and took the leap when they had a special in October. There are some negatives - there are more models that I am not attracted to than at other sites that I enjoy. The pic size is unimpressive. The vids are non-existant.

I's a tweener site - somewhere between a lifestyle site and a pic site. The navigation on the groups/forum thing is not particularly user friendly for someone like me that doesn't want to spend much time figuring it all out.

So what's good about it?

The photography is good and it's unique and it's fresh. You don't see the same poses in the same places repeated in every photo set as you do at many sites. You see different looking models in different looking places with different angles and just generally a lot more variety to the site.

There are a LOT of updates to this site. Besides the 2-3 sets posted daily of official Suicide Girls, there are many sets posted by "hopefuls". And the sets posted by hopefuls are not of noticeably lesser quality than the sets of official Suicide Girls.

Of course, if you don't care for tats and piercings, there's probably no reason for you to join this site, because tats and piercings are de rigeur, but there's a lot of cute tatted up honeys and there are very few models here that you will have seen at other sites, another "fresh" quality of this site.

I find the level of eroticism to be comparable to Met Art. You're not gonna find much intense girl/girl action or intense toy action, you're gonna find girls posing and stripping in good quality photography, except instead of Eastern European waifish honeys, the main thing at Met Art, it's global tatted up babes - some that aren't that tremendously attractive to me, but many that are - and there are enough updates that it has never taken me more than a few seconds to find a set of a girl that I want to spend some time looking at. So there ya go.


11-11-08  08:40pm

Reply
999
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(0)
Reply of Sarah's Reply

Agreed, Sarah - this is absolutely my fave site - and I'm not a huge fan of the gape and crazy insertion shots - they have PLENTY of shots of gorgeous young models, clothed, semi-clothed and nude, besides the crazy insertion shots - and they have EASILY the hottest girl/girl vids I've seen anywhere - fantastic stuff that makes Sapphic Erotica look like paint drying in comparison.

11-07-08  11:48pm

Reply
1000
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

The most annoying things in porn to me are:

1) The guys who fuck women with as little physical contact as possible, just the cock in the pussy while they lean back like they're studying themselves in a mirror - are they gay? WTF?

2) The only-genitalia shots where you have no idea what woman you're looking at because all you're seeing for an extended period of time is a disembodied pussy or ass being fucked.

3) The no-lips "blow-job" where the woman just shoves her head back & forth over the cock and makes gross gagging sounds

4) The eyes-sealed-shut blowjob where the woman scrunches her eyes up tight before she ever has the cock in her mouth - like it's the most disgusting activity she can imagine engaging in, but she really needs the money.


11-05-08  10:21pm


Shown : 976-1000 of 1393 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.39 seconds.