| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2176
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hello, friend messmer - well, "just came in from the storm" (vacation) and forgot about the past (and your former review). Still it's great to come back and get into porn again - and read a splendid review like yours....look forward to some fine talks.....
|
06-20-12 10:06am
|
Reply
2177
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Glad you finally took up this site (and made a review)...which I've suspected that could be your kind of deal for some time....I really like the site...and btw: great review, messmer....
|
06-20-12 08:44am
|
Reply
2178
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Another:
BTW, messmer - do not know if Michelle Thorne is your cup of tea or not (I think she's got that old-time-dirty about her) - BUT really like that vid: "Perfect Tease" and the/her audio/talk that goes with it. (the quality for this particular vid is not the best, still.......)
|
12-06-10 10:44am
|
Reply
2179
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
First, messmer - as I took the risk to recommend the site to you - sorry to hear about that very annoying download situations.
Maybe and maybe not it's got something to do with North America/Canada - do not know. But I never had that problem when a member.
Still I'm glad, that in spite you're somewhat content with the material - I got quite a collection of - what I think - fine vids from the site..
BTW: Oh, yes - we all seems to have that question about full nude in the last part of the vids - but here I think the deal is generally just fine - well, at least I really like my collection - HOPE you will too, amigo!!!!
|
12-06-10 09:22am
|
Reply
2180
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Agree - it's a fine and special site - made a review last week - see it if you like...
|
07-28-09 01:06am
|
Reply
2181
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hey messmer
I think it's only about 45-50 in the large format (formats - I realize that a couple are in 1280x720) - until now.
The 640x480 and even 720x576 are not BAD - and can be viewed (not crisp, though) fullscreen...but generally the formats seems a bit varied - and even in the same formats - so does the viewing quality..
|
07-24-09 12:27am
|
Reply
2182
|
Virtual Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
SHIT, buddy
That's the kind of nightmare we all fear if some kind of - yes, asshole - as you put it - mess with cookies.
Jeeeez, sorry to hear it hit you.
And man, should we all take this as a very serious warning!
I'll stay away from this mess, for sure....
|
02-16-08 10:17am
|
Reply
2183
|
Virtual Nymphos
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Excellent review (and warning).
Well, Cybertoad got around to it and the same goes for asmith: Those 3D/animated-sites.
I've been somewhat fascinated by that kind of "porn", but along the way it seems like the deal is not so attractive, after all - thanks to reviews from asmith and Cybertoad.
Maybe thing are a bit premature - and maybe it takes MORE time to develop stuff like this. Wish it did not, though...
|
10-13-08 09:20am
|
Reply
2184
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Spillum's Reply
Great to get your input on this one, NS.
I really do not care that much if the HD-vids material is WMV, AVI or MP4 or whatever - as long as it is in great viewing quality and like 1280x720 (or even better).
You say:
"All newly shot scenes are available in MP4 HD."
From what date are "newly shot scenes" - and HOW many can we see at the site?
Thanks!
|
11-18-11 08:47am
|
Reply
2185
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks a lot!!! tangub - for this fine info/update...it's almost like:
Now, your're talking!
This was what I was waiting for - concerning a join...
|
11-18-11 08:37am
|
Reply
2186
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Oh,oh...does that mean, that the amount of vids in HD or 1280x720 is considerably higher in MP4??
|
11-18-11 05:20am
|
Reply
2187
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Have to second Cybertoad....GREAT and very helpful review.
Have always been a little disappointed with the quality of those vids you also can watch as bonus material at many sites - and for quite a few years now.
Then found some new trailers in top quality - so it's a bit sad to learn this:
"... but remember that WMV HD is rare here."
But hope that will turn to the better in the future....
Thanks, rearadmiral!
|
11-18-11 02:55am
|
Reply
2188
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Spillum's Reply
Thanks - great to get a response so fast from a WM... and: unlike those sets/vids offered at sites like Teendreams - it's good to hear, that the main site itself has much better quality...
BUT: WHY? - at all offer that low down quality vids/sets in license that make users think: That Viv Thomas deal is not worth it???
|
09-21-11 08:39am
|
Reply
2189
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Hope you can clear this up....
There GOT to be a difference between the main Viv Thomas-site - and the one you gain access to via various sites, Teendreams as one.
The vids - via Teendreams - are almost horrible/blurred in quality and 3:4. But seen some trailers from Viv Thomas in 1280x720 (I think it was) - and in great quality...
Guess that's the "Very High Quality"?
And if so....great! And is that only for newer vids?
|
09-21-11 06:10am
|
Reply
2190
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
navycolt's Review
I really understand your disapointment...
Viv Thomas is not a site to join, if your going for videos - and certainly not at that price...
Stay put here at PU and read a lot of fine reviews for a lot better video-sites - for a couple of a lot better sites you should have gone to PixandVideo/ClubSandy - or again Teen Dreams (where you get access to Viv) ect...
My advice is to take a much closer look at the reviews both here and at TBP - I'm sure it'll give you better hints...
|
12-10-09 08:18am
|
Reply
2191
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
Damn fine review here, RB - in spite of the cons it really looks like worth a try....
|
01-04-10 06:16am
|
Reply
2192
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, I remember ibill - and not to be trusted.
Do not know exactly when they got out of bussiness, but this may be right:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBill
BTW: Have to agree entirely with Drooler about the use of creditcard - got a couple - but always use ONLY one for porn-sites - that way it's much easier to follow the transactions!
|
12-09-08 04:07pm
|
Reply
2193
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Pretty wild - remember once seening a beautifull brunette acting as a falconer - with a real bird and all...just do not remember where (typical)....
|
08-05-08 06:26am
|
Reply
2194
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
In spite of some serious cons: No zips - no videos, this site has really got the attention of this user.
Main reason: New exclusive stuff! (including a new way of soft latina material)
Tnanks to Drooler for this first/exclusive and fine review - and though the score does not reach for the skies - I'm going for it.
Check out the preview, BTW....
|
08-02-08 02:54pm
|
Reply
2195
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
By all means...what a relief - imagine how this 20 year old bank employee with the pimples may smile at you at the next visit....
|
05-30-11 12:11pm
|
Reply
2196
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Agree, lk2 - about the preview.
And the models, for sure - but bottom line: the style! That's the main, if not ONLY the problem here - indeed so for the vids (not much into the sets at this site, either).
And thanks for the good wishes/reply about my membership.
|
08-29-11 07:20am
|
Reply
2197
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
It's sometimes hard to be rational when you preview/join a site...
|
08-29-11 03:42am
|
Reply
2198
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ze Droolah - you use the word "clarity" about the way they shoot the material - well, is that not precisely what this is about..
See my answer to messmer - still guess it comes down to how good - or not - those photographers/video-guys are - and there certainly is a lot of difference.
And getting back to W4B this time, I was really disappointed - those vid-shoots are getting worse in general.
|
12-06-10 09:41am
|
Reply
2199
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Messmer - we got to admit it - times are changing - things are not what it used to be - and la,la,la...
Still I think you hit it right: The photographers/video ditto - I get a feeling some of the newer onces lack that touch of what is erotic and what is just plain simple....
|
12-06-10 09:36am
|
Reply
2200
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
2)
BTW - no offense, PP - a fine hint for US PUs this could be a sweet deal...........
|
11-12-10 09:04am
|
