| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2101
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Sorry about that - didn't get around to that browser-mailbox yesterday.
And yes, the bonus-sites and in there now, thanks...
|
02-15-08 12:55am
|
Reply
2102
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Agree - still wonder why TBP hasn't stated the facts about the bonus-sites. It's a pretty good info for users...and a fine deal, if you consider joining Anette Dawn. Like you get Twisty and AD and the Blue Fantasies for a price lower than just joining AD.... as an exampel.
|
02-14-08 01:37pm
|
Reply
2103
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
Man, you work fast...
The pop-up with the $14.95-offer after leaving the join-page are gone....
Well, the $19.95 for Twistys and the two bonues-sites are still ok.
|
02-14-08 12:38pm
|
Reply
2104
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
Thanks, Shap
It still seems like a fine deal - Twistys and the two bonus-sites and a couple of days at Nubiles - for $ 19.95 - guess I'll join again - for the 6th, 7th or 8th time - I do not remember....
|
02-14-08 11:58am
|
Reply
2105
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
Well, thanks for reply.
When I mention $14.95 I regard it as a $5 off of the price stated at TBP which is $19.95.
At least I was offered the $14.95 when I closed down the page at CCBill(Twisty) - so I quite don't get your drift...
I mean - if you now offer the price of $14.95 it's a good bargain.
What about the bonus (anette dawn and blue fantasies) sites mentioned by Goldfish in his review - is that right or what?
cheers
Denner
|
02-14-08 11:41am
|
Reply
2106
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
Very interesting!
According to Goldfish's review Anette Dawns site is there for bonus - have recently signed up for Anettes site - that means that I could have had it all through Twistys instead for a lower price - well, good news anyway.
Still TBP has not stated that fact at the review - neither about Blue Fantasies.
It's interesting since those two - bonus sites - are more expensivce than Twistys.
NOT that I don't trust Goldfishs statement, but can TBP confirm the info about bonus-stes included....
BTW: There's even a low-price trial 2-days access to Nubiles. Is that correct, friends at TBP? And is it full-trial access?
|
02-14-08 09:00am
|
Reply
2107
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks, m'man...
I may try that (to reinstall). Main reason I'm partial to Netscape (instead of Explorer) is, that with Netscape you can watch videos during download (except when using download-manager, of course)...
Opera I've not had good experience with (my own fault, I guess).
|
09-22-07 02:13pm
|
Reply
2108
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Hey jd1961
You are quite right (of course, I'd say)
I'm certainly not an it-wizard - and I tried to do the google as you suggested. But here I only get the answers when this problem is at "start up"...
It's still strange this thing only happens when browsing Twistys...
But you're probably right - the problem is at my pc....
Cheers!
Denner
|
09-22-07 09:00am
|
Reply
2109
|
UK Amateur Vids
(0)
|
Reply of
m341ehw's Reply
Oh, yes - have in my stash some of my favorites - now almost vintage - British models, pix and vids, which is foremost:
1) Misty McCain
2) Linda (or Lynda) Leigh
3) Louise Hodges
(and a lot others, of course)
Take a look at: http://videoangels.tv/
Not a great preview, but it's sure to be recommended for lovers of Brit models...
|
07-12-11 09:20am
|
Reply
2110
|
UK Amateur Vids
(0)
|
Reply of
m341ehw's Review
A fan of British porn/models I keep looking.....
This does not seems like something for this user - both according to the preview and this review..........Thanks for the update/info....that's the review, I mean...
|
07-12-11 08:24am
|
Reply
2111
|
UK Upskirts
(0)
|
Reply of
dohboy24's Review
Wellcome, dohboy24 - main reason I reply here is first of all an interest in UP Upskirts - and btw - this is your first review, it seems.
But, sorry to say: If I seek more detailed help about this site, I'd go for TBP, here.
It'd be great with a little more details - the videos/the photosets - the quality/size, the formats ect.
You mention Pantymaniacs - fine site - but what kind of bonus material - all from Pantymaniacs and full download or what?
'Some nudity could make this site even better' are we at topless only? or?
Not saying 'short reviews are bad - and long ones are good' - but a little more details would help - It's an exiting site...
Cheers!
|
12-12-09 07:21am
|
Reply
2112
|
Ultimate Porn Zone
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
You hit it right on the spot, there - two only reasons I joined (trial) was the almost nothing trial-price - AND the fact that some of the previews looked quite decent - and thats whats easy to fall for at sites completely unknown to you - cheap or not.
But again this tells about some kind of sites and their socalled "previews" - and again, if we don't try it, we'll never know - so I'm kind of happy to have spend less than $3 and give the warning to fellow users here.
But of course your're right in the other matter: You get what you pay for..sometimes.
It can also be the other way around - you pay the high price $34 or more and get dissapointed (Teenrotica, for one - at this moment). A high price is certainly not always a garantee...
|
12-17-08 09:32am
|
Reply
2113
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Review
Another great review by SnowDude.
And a review that helps a lot.
Thanks to him and TBP I still find more and more great sites in this jungle....
Denner
|
04-09-07 09:07am
|
Reply
2114
|
Video Angels.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
hecatomb's Reply
Oh yes, the review is a little old - but I still treasure some of the content in my 'vault'...
The quality is general so-so (nowhere near those crips 5000k/1920x1080), some just ok, some average and some not that good.
No, do not remember Adeles material, but you'll all models/content here:
http://videoangels.tv/index.cfm?page=preview3.cfm
|
12-10-10 05:56am
|
Reply
2115
|
Video Angels.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Monahan - yes, bro - first of all I guess it's a one month site ONLY - the updates seems really slow, so..
The quality of videos are VERY different throughout the site - I've not been through all yet - first I go for my favorites. But compared to some "top-sites" you got to be prepared for some videos in average/low quality, alas.
Still I rate it the 80 because of a handfull of more fine videos with those "old timers" - but again: compared to "better sites" the quality is very much unstable - I'd say half is fine/ok...
But finally from one Fiona Cooper-fan to another: You get the girls/models from that time - and man, some of those videos of the models mentioned in my review is a revival - not crisp in viewing quality, but you can live with it...for most of them.
And oh, btw - the photo-deal is very slim (14 sets) and not worth much...
|
02-22-09 12:11pm
|
Reply
2116
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Dirt D's Review
Lots of fine inputs here - but leave it up to others: My eyes are transfixed trying to read the bottom line.....sorry.
|
12-22-12 10:45am
|
Reply
2117
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
janoskiss6805's Review
Nice review......
|
09-13-12 02:48am
|
Reply
2118
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Maybe it's a question of the entire setup at this site - it may seem attractive to some - and it may be attractive when you join and get overwhelmed - by the amount. And then to some: A disapointment of quality in general.
Still it should come as no surprise with the very different scores - this site in particular has been debated over and over again - with all it's "plus and minus"
Will not go into details - the details have been around about Videobox as long as TBP/PU - but guess it still comes down to the gap between "the amount" and "the quality" - it does to this user, anyway.....
|
02-23-12 06:52am
|
Reply
2119
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Thumbs up for this review......thanks,RA
Have not been at this site/place/network for quite a while.
The reason - after SEVERAL times of membership is the lack of real HD in the vids.
Judging from the score it seems to have gotten better - still the mention in cons:
"- Not a lot of HD material" ...makes me reluctant.
But RA's Bottom Line in general makes me consider again.
|
12-13-11 06:59am
|
Reply
2120
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Some sites and/or their billing co. has STILL NOT come to terms with the billing question: US/Europe ect.
We've had MANY inputs about the problem at PU - and now quite a few sites has the same price - equals Dollars/Euros.
Sites that do NOT - but charge more from Euro citizens - we should stay away from - till they learn....
|
06-05-11 10:10am
|
Reply
2121
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Thanks for the review - great to get qualified views/news of this site.
|
05-05-11 07:21am
|
Reply
2122
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
messmer - can't remember if we have had this up earlier.
But: Did you take a look at JB Video?
Do not know much about the site, but have seen quite a few trailers of newer and vids of somewhat older JB Video-material - and a lot here is milf/negligee/stockings for you...and pretty good - in my opinion.
|
03-13-11 07:15am
|
Reply
2123
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom22's Comment
OH, agree......if the members area is as bad as the preview ditto....
Judging only from the preview it seems like something from the past......and after browsing some of the content, well that, too - I hate it when they present a movie - and none of the clips have the model at the cover - see - just as an example: Hockey Moms #11 - with russian teen Leona (and a lot of akas):
http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/leona.html
- but nothing of her in the files....
|
02-14-11 09:57am
|
Reply
2124
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Can't find that deal with Reality Kings anywhere at the preview - they still got Vivid and EA (not worth the extra money in my opinion, anyway).
But VideoBox still brags with the old TB:
"Definitely the best video site on the net."
- The Best Porn
That one is from summer 2009 and a lot of things have happened in porn since then...
Guess I'll not go back to VideoBox for primarily two reasons (and a lot others):
In spite of that vast amount the site is worse than ever: Average/bad tech/viewing quality of most vids. And that's definitely the main bummer here!
Bad search system and that extra deal that will cost you money: Vivid and Evil Angel...at least they could have the decency to make it a part of there entire deal..
|
12-11-10 07:54am
|
Reply
2125
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Fine review - and as slutty mentions: a lot/everyone at PU has been here.
Still, it's nice to get an update on this site know and then.
|
08-27-10 06:29am
|
