| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1526
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
Been back to MetArt year after year - and still: my collection consists of very few MetArt-materials - mostly some photosets (forget the videos).
And again: I read this bottom line by hugow several times - and even if I like SOME MetArt photosets - I'm getting "partial" (like Virgil Tibbs said in the movie "In The Heat of The Night") to the bottom line by hugow.....can't help it...is this "inflation" of porn?
Is this just a going on and on in the same deal - for ever?
|
05-01-10 07:04am
|
Reply
1527
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Well, Capn - a rough estimate is that 50-60% of the photoshoots are done outdoors - BUT, Lately - I SEEMS like they are getting more and more indoor/bedroom/living room shoots... which as times go by that procentage seems to change.
And about indoor striptease: Oh, yes - I've found - out the the many shoots - some great indoor striptease photosets...
And bottom line: I think for photos this site is really worth a join, especilly if you have not been here before - you'll find tons of fine shoots - from way back, too - - and not all are just art. And the deal by TBP is ok/fine. You can spend hours in search for those special models to your liking....I have, six or seven times, at least - over the years - but again: I may seem repetitive after that first month, so..
|
04-18-10 07:49am
|
Reply
1528
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
Different and refreshing review - and I agree....
Like Monahan, I go for the videos - AND they are not worth a membership.
And all those outdoor scenes are getting too much at MetArt.
But, I like skinny girls - just wish MetArt could make better and sexier shoots (indoor) and BETTER videos...
|
01-04-10 06:13am
|
Reply
1529
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Comment
Well, well, well: 'A shitload of naked girls' a bit heavy there...
MetArt MAY be a bit overrated in score at TBP in some ways - but it's still a site who comes up with great amounts of entirely exclusive photosets of great - mostly great - euro/easteuro girls - you cannot take that away from them - og what are we here for - but 'naked girls'....ect.
Always had the main complaint: boring videos - but that's almost a historic fact - so skip those as a reason to join.
|
12-09-09 08:28am
|
Reply
1530
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Thanks! Tried to locate her in Femjoys preview - but no luck.
|
12-20-08 12:28pm
|
Reply
1531
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks, bro - guess you were my best bet here....and yes, it was..
|
12-20-08 06:55am
|
Reply
1532
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Thanks for this hint from jd....I've not been back lately, though..
But BTW: I think its funny how these well known sites seem to live up to their standards in quality and content - compared to a lot of - alas - new crap that keeps poping up.
That is probably the reason this user still go back to the "good ol' sites"!
|
12-17-08 08:46am
|
Reply
1533
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Yup, agree - but, man, we've seen so many other new PUs doing 99 or 100 without any serious arguments - just la,la,la...
I think hondaman done some fine things here after all - you remember how difficuelt it was in the start - I do anyway and got scorned a few times.
If a new PU shows some serious signs, he/she should get every chance.
In this case I do not "feel" any kind of faul play.
But, bro - we'll see in the future - guess there's never any 100%..
Cheers!
Denner
|
11-14-08 12:20pm
|
Reply
1534
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
The Panther kind of speak my meaning here: As a fan a fine solo-videos Met Art does NOT do it for me - they are simply too, yes well spoken PP:
BORING.
Been a member many times, but never saved any videos - only photosets.
Solo-videos: Go for Nubiles, Teendreams, 1byday and quite a few others.
|
11-14-08 12:13pm
|
Reply
1535
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Well, bro - you cannot take it from him (the new user, hondaman) that he THINKS it's "the best erotic art site on the net" - just because hondaman is new HERE - he - like so many others - could have been browsing for years - and then just joined PU.
And this user once also rated Met Art to 96 - because of the great models/quality in photosets - that I've since downgraded it had to do with the less exiting videos.
Anyway, I still think our new fellow PU has done a pretty good review here....
|
11-14-08 12:03pm
|
Reply
1536
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
hondaman's Review
Fine review - and also from this user: welcome to a new - what seems to be a serious PU.
A bit high score, but ok - if the score only goes for photosets, it's ok - because the videos are - alas - still too boring....Would it not be great if this particular site could do better in the way of sexier (solo) videos?
I gave it almost the same score long time ago, I know - but if I should make a new review it'll go a bit lower (90-92) - the downgrade is only because of the videos.
|
11-14-08 10:25am
|
Reply
1537
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yup, Drooler - you got to try to bargain, all the way. And as long as it works - it's time well used. And especially if you're/were a little pissed off by that currency-policy.........
|
09-27-08 03:53am
|
Reply
1538
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
By golly....it works.
Thanks, Mr Fountain
|
06-15-08 11:53pm
|
Reply
1539
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Been a member three times - have not seen that offer. But ok, it may have slipped among all that spammail, I still get.
|
06-15-08 12:51pm
|
Reply
1540
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Thanks, Jay G.....I won't waste more time keep looking...
|
06-15-08 09:23am
|
Reply
1541
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Where did you find the $19.95 price - I couldn't - my fault, probably. But guess I'd like to join again at that offer.
Fine review, BTW. And agree with your point about the missing variety in the vids - but it's a heck of a site for photosets.
|
06-15-08 08:09am
|
Reply
1542
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Fine review, there...
Just my problem with this in many ways great site - the vids are far from the quality/erotica-feeling of the photosets.
And as a video-freak, it's too bad - because the photos are no less than GREAT.
BTW: Gave you a new trust....
|
05-30-08 05:27am
|
Reply
1543
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Only a few of their videos have some touch, some erotica and some sexy ways.
Most are rather boring, I agree.
|
01-22-08 02:03am
|
Reply
1544
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Yeah, jd - I have exactly the same thing with the water vids.....but a lot of the newer soft-girl-sites seems to have an urge for that kinds of shoots...alas.
By the way, our old mate, Drooler had a great line for this site:
Candy Land
|
01-10-08 11:38am
|
Reply
1545
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
congestus's Reply
The newer ones are typical 200-250 mb (give or take) - a good size in my own opinion.
Older ones between aprox. 40 and 70 mb (again, give or take)
Enjoy if you join!
I did.....
|
01-10-08 11:35am
|
Reply
1546
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
That one really made me laugh....
Yeah, back in Candy Land, for certain!
|
01-10-08 08:56am
|
Reply
1547
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey old friend
What a great reply - it's a review in disguise...
I certainly agree about the vids, but man - I'm turning to photos again - and concerning the photos - no argue from this fellow PU. They are great and keep roling in - that's one of the fine things about this site - new stuff - all the time.
Thanks, again
|
01-10-08 08:14am
|
Reply
1548
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks PP
- for a very..........well, I just can't find the right english word for it - but something like: a constructive and helpfull reply......
Great to have folks like you as a fellow PU.
|
01-10-08 08:08am
|
Reply
1549
|
Metcn.cc
(0)
|
Reply of
Lovechina's Review
First: tangub has a point: What IS this site? Some kind of Chinese look-a-like to Met Art.
BUT still: The site is brand new and not reviewed by TBP or anybody else - and it looks somewhat interesting JUDGING FROM THE PREVIEW ONLY - and it WOULD have been great with a lot more infos in your review - a 96 is 'heavy' - but why can you recommend this site so much - more details, please!
|
12-01-10 08:13am
|
Reply
1550
|
Mia McKinley
(0)
|
Reply of
mypants70's Review
She is great looking, for sure...
But I miss some infos - both from the preview and the review.
So just these questions, for now:
It looks like something around 8 videos (in the preview) - is that right? - and what kind of quality and lenght are they?
There's not many photos in each set - but what's the quality?
|
10-12-08 05:41am
|
