| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1451
|
Legally Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
fritzryan's Reply
Another reply from a PU - or rather a third - try getting an answer about the navigation problem - again from a users/cumstomers point of view:
As I mentioned in my review, I like the site enough to rate it 89 because of the great content - but what about the navigation-problem in the future?
Does this mean I go from Legally Teen to Fritz Ryan from now?
|
09-15-07 01:17pm
|
Reply
1452
|
Legally Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
I'm referring to my "comment" in this review.
Disregard that, since PU-webmaster has deleted that one because of the review!
|
08-28-07 10:24am
|
Reply
1453
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Not an anal fan - but a fine review...
And it looks like Pat362 is going to take over the 4th place at PU - since I've been a bit lazy doing reviews lately. But man, do I dig that laziness as a retired person....Still I'll be back, I hope.
And Pat362 deserves it.....Congrats!!!!, though somewhat premature.
|
12-14-11 08:01am
|
Reply
1454
|
Lightspeed World
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
I agree for sure...
Also with elephant: Make this ONE big site ...AND lower the price.
I'd never go futher than the usual top-sites $29.95 on this one.
|
08-28-07 10:18am
|
Reply
1455
|
Lingerie BBW
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Looking for the right word - but it comes down to: Sad
Sad for messmer in his 'struggle' to find a good mature site - I'm with you, bro...
I may repeat myself - but what about Lady Sonia?
And another British site:
https://www.thebestporn.com/review/videoangelstv/
Here I found my favorite mature ladies - including a lot of lingerie:
Linda Leigh
Misty McCain
Louise Hodges.....ect - those vids of these ladies from this site is still among my favorite stash.
|
07-26-11 11:39am
|
Reply
1456
|
Little Liana
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Another fine review from dracken....
And above all: Thanks for the warning!
|
10-25-09 09:00am
|
Reply
1457
|
Little Lupe
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Yes, agree - that's entirely a new style...
If you come across that new Private-production.
I did not recognize her at first - but not bad, not bad at all. A great tit-fuck - among other things - which she had more problems with before the fakes....
And a nice gg/b-scene with Jennifer Love.
|
10-13-09 09:20am
|
Reply
1458
|
Little Lupe
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
She has fakes now - and it looks like she stopped producing new material for her old site a year ago or so...there no material with her new boobs at her site.
Apart from the Private-production, she apparently has some sets (and/or video) with her new tits at Dannis - still looking elsewhere for more of the new Lupe....
http://girls-of-world.blogspot.com/2009/02/zuleidy.html
http://pt.interviewx.com/Zuleidy
|
10-13-09 05:36am
|
Reply
1459
|
Little Lupe
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for this update/info.
And yes, guess there's got to be very different opinions about her change (boobs). But watching that Private-production, I think she's mostly a knockout - and a scene with titfuck is just great...
But again - she's lost her (legal) petite cuteness.
|
10-12-09 06:29am
|
Reply
1460
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Reply
The strange thing is, that there are a lot of socalled free sites - I don't know their exact term - they have several shortcuts to previews you don't get when you just browse the specific site.
Like:
http://www.russianangels.info/
http://www.teenmovies.info/
http://www.lighthousemovies.com/
And yes, Lupe - don't think she updated for a year...
|
04-27-08 02:36pm
|
Reply
1461
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
powerman's Review
We all have different taste.
But this site I'd consinder worthless in many ways.
I gave it 72 a while ago and returned - just for the heck of it.
Still this site offers very little in new material.
After rejoining I have the same feeling - never again!
|
04-24-08 08:10am
|
Reply
1462
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
No problemas, m'man..
Your point with getting tired of glam I certainly can relate to.
Some of the models at Nubiles are not very glam either.
Don't know really, but most of the girls at Mutt just do not turn me on and most of the videos are maybe more fun/sweet/cosy than sexy.
And it's my own fault - they got a good preveiw from which I could have learned...
And "bottom line" taste in girls are different and that's just great.
|
09-10-07 03:07am
|
Reply
1463
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Been waiting for and expecting this fine and thorough review
And with the good TBP bargain I too am going for it...
Thanks to exotics4me
|
08-24-07 03:52am
|
Reply
1464
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
GREAT!!!!
Look forward to the review - thanks, man
|
08-23-07 08:15am
|
Reply
1465
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Been looking at this site a few times - and it seems ok
Can't afford to join them all, so one question for exotics4me:
Are the videos ok?
- it looks like they have a lot - same amount as photoshoots, which COULD mean every model has video?
|
08-22-07 03:10pm
|
Reply
1466
|
Lizzie Secret
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
There's one thing (including a lot of others) you can say about the Drooler...he sure can find those new sites.
And guess the same Drooler is responsible for the best reviews around - they just got it all.
And this one, too. Wauw - those (only) five vids in the preview are just so much of an appetizer - and wish they'd give away a couple of full size pics to get a feeling of those sets - but ok, Drooler is THE help there - and the previews of sets kind of underline the quality.
Thanks for this review - appreciated by another PU always on the hunt for new sites/material.
|
04-23-11 08:26am
|
Reply
1467
|
Lollypop Blowjobs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Weird - that seems like one special fetish...
|
04-19-09 02:48am
|
Reply
1468
|
Louis De Mirabert
(0)
|
Reply of
turismo's Reply
Hey turismo
Think I Know what you mean. When I hit a new site, I'm quite a bit relieved when CCbill are in. With others: I always take a good look to see how to cancel and make sure there is an easy way to cancel - but never quite at ease with my money like when it's CCbill.
Maybe in some places CCbill has a lack in reputation - but I have never been cheated by those guys.
|
09-03-07 07:24am
|
Reply
1469
|
Louis De Mirabert
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Hey jd1961
The Drooler just made a comment for this site too - see that m'man.
But agree.
Maybe strangely enough I never had any serious problems with CCBill - always accurate at billing, always accurate at cancel - never got billed extra for anything - which in fact seems quite unique - or what.
I have my concern with most other billing-co. - especially Verotel.
So maybe....I'll repeat a question for TBP/PU about getting some kind of a special post for the users (PU) experience about billing-companies.
|
09-01-07 09:02am
|
Reply
1470
|
Louis De Mirabert
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Jeeeez.....Drooler. I almost forgot about this site.
But apart from your point here - in which I quite agree - I have not considered getting back.
I had my trouble with the owner about billing - and even got thrown out for my critisme. I understand from jd1961 that they changed their billing-systemt to CCBill - well, that might be an improvement...
|
09-01-07 08:44am
|
Reply
1471
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
Thanks, bro.
And you're absolutly right about the site - and BTW: the content is certainly NOT that good - so this is probably the last time this user sign up with them...and that my experience is usefull to other users.
|
09-23-08 10:35am
|
Reply
1472
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
This VIP, or Premium og whatever is bad politics for websites with webmasters who are a little too smart: You get some extras if you just pay a couple of bucks more...
Pier 999 had it (when they were active - are these buys on the deroute?) and now LSG.
It's just a way to get more money out of members/customers.
I really dislike it.
|
02-11-08 11:30am
|
Reply
1473
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
to jd1961 and Drooler:
You guys make this place more fun.......
|
09-03-07 06:59am
|
Reply
1474
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yeah, maybe this is a start of new undermining of this good PU.
As I stated concerning this LSG- "hoax-offer": IF i'd get such a free access, I would stand down (is that the right frase?) from making any review/comments on the site in question.
But it does not seem to be necessary, because I think most of these sites are doing scams - even with us PU's.
It's good to warn about this and I certainly agree on the the question of credibility here at PU.
And maybe we all should publish if we get an offer like that - and take it.
|
09-02-07 08:57am
|
Reply
1475
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Not from me, anyway...
Like I said in the comment - if these guys give me a free access - nada about LSG on PU from this user.
|
08-30-07 12:30am
|
