| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
nunya's Reply
What I think Wittyguy was getting at was that the review you gave made it difficult to understand the 70 rating. You're right, the purpose of the reviews is to show your opinions on sites and what they do. What he was getting at is that your review only mentioned personal distastes of the actual content of the DVDs they offer...next time try to do a little well-rounded review about other aspects of the site as well to both give info to other people that are interested in the site and also justify the score a little. I say that because most of us here really do take into account the scores these sites average when deciding what sites to join, so some people hope to see a little more explanation for extremely high/low scores or scores that aren't the norm for a site.
The only other thing is that Videobox is a special kind of site: they don't make their own content. They simply offer DVDs of varying niches for people to download. For most when reviewing porn sites, dislike of content isn't the same as bad content. I don't like lesbian porn but I'm not going to give a DVD site a negative score because they give mostly lesbian DVDs if the site as a whole is run well, has lots of daily updates, is a bargain of a price and easy downloads. I'll give them their due score for running a great site but mention that I prefer more variety (and possibly deduct only a few points if it's supposed to have well-rounded stuff, but not 10, 20 or 30 points. That's excessive by PU's standards).
|
05-29-09 10:10pm
|
Reply
177
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Hbe22bbm's Review
One thing to note about that I noticed a lot of people do for various sites: you shouldn't include a con for something that should not be expected at that site. Example: Videobox - as the name suggests - is a site for videos. They don't advertise pictures or want pictures..it's strictly a site for videos. Therefore, the absence of pictures shouldn't be a con.
That's like going to Blacks on Blondes and for cons writing "there are no white guys". That would be like going to Exploited Moms and for cons writing" all the women are MILFs, no young teens in the scenes".
Other than that, i agree that VB is a site to keep subscribing to
|
05-21-09 09:48pm
|
Reply
178
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Comment
Make sure you're looking at the right price. The special price is for the DVD quality video option (14.95 instead of 17.95). The regular quality option at $9.95 is the same whether you use PU or go straight to VB
|
05-05-09 10:41am
|
Reply
179
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Never had that problem...I can say that today (Sunday) the downloads were slow. First time I've encountered that really and been a member for months.
|
11-23-08 05:07pm
|
Reply
180
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
johnymac's Comment
I haven't had a problem and been a member for months. No idea why a few people have had that problem then, but just throwing it out that it's been fine for me.
|
12-11-07 06:01pm
|
Reply
181
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
tech101's Comment
Obviously everyone's experience is different, but I haven't had a problem with any downloads from Videosz or xmovies. I only download WMV files and haven't been a member for two months not, but my vids are still working perfectly. Not sure what the difference is between both of us. Has anyone else had problems? Just wondering if I got lucky and all my videos worked fine or if maybe something weird happened for you.
|
04-26-07 05:07pm
|
Reply
182
|
Wild On Cam
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
"It's really a shame but indicative of many sites that go away from what made them stand out and provide an essential value."
Ever think of the possibility that they transitioned to what they are now because that's what's getting them more subscriptions?
|
05-28-17 07:56pm
|
Reply
183
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Regarding the language, do they use subtitles?
|
05-22-14 01:25pm
|
