| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
I almost joined this site once and kept it on my "future subscribes" list. Is there any way for PU staff to give some sort of mention of the types of things that make you make this decision? Obviously not every detailed problem, but maybe something that influenced your decision that may help us out?
|
12-17-09 11:35am
|
Reply
152
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Ah thanks. This is one site I was always interested in but don't know about it due to all the negative reviews. I'll stick with VideoBox and BrainPass
|
02-10-10 12:41pm
|
Reply
153
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
How did cancellation go? And was it easy to cancel or do they make it difficult?
|
02-10-10 12:34pm
|
Reply
154
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Me too, I actually never look at the photos on any site unless I want to quick browse the screencaps to find out which part of a scene I should download. Don't remember why I happened to come across the RK photos the other day.
|
02-15-10 12:13pm
|
Reply
155
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Thanks for the info about the extra sites. Real thorough review, as always expected from the TrashMan
|
02-13-09 10:36am
|
Reply
156
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
juanchopancho's Comment
Oddly I didn't have that problem two weeks ago with a trial membership. Maybe it's something that just started in the past 14 days. It would be a shame because I liked it so much I stayed on. Tons of content and I never do full memberships before a fl trial because that's how I know if I like the whole get-up.
|
10-23-08 12:26pm
|
Reply
157
|
Rip Her Up
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I'm interested too. The fifth rotating picture at the top with the girl with getting it doggy with her hand in her mouth...looks like it will be an amazing scene. Hopefully someone knows something about the site.
|
01-29-09 07:20pm
|
Reply
158
|
Skin Video
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Many thanks but my period would have ended yesterday so I don't think there's anything else that can happen. It was a shame because I actually liked the site, but what happened makes no sense and spoiled their site for me.
|
07-11-10 02:19pm
|
Reply
159
|
Soft Puffy Nipples
(0)
|
Reply of
giggitygiggity's Review
My general rule of thumb - never sign up for a site with no tour. Means they have something to hide (that being no content).
|
04-09-09 08:21am
|
Reply
160
|
Solo Interviews
(0)
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Review
I haven't checked solo interviews yet, but their network sites OyeLoca and InnocentHigh do indeed have high quality pics. Or rather, just to be safe, i'll say they are smaller in size (700x1050) but high quality regarding how they look. They don't look anything like vidcaps or amateur-ish. They look like any other sites High-Res pics but smaller in size. Video quality wasn't DVD quality like some great sites but wasn't worse than any other regular site and I never questioned it until reading the review.
I agree that this site is not as good as the other sites in the network, but does it really deserve a 51? Is that based just on the pics (it is mainly a video site)? I'd think, based on the things you pointed out that they did wrong, that the site would be in the 70's, described as: Average, some things done right, some things done wrong or 60's: does more wrong than right, low recommendation.
51 just seems low for a site costing 17.84 a month with 4 other sites included (over 100 vids all together), has a score of 78 by TBP and five 80's out of seven other sites reviews, no DRM or download limit (not anymore). Even a site with vidcaps only would be at least Average with all those added at that price, but this site DOES have actual higher quality pics, just not as high (pixels) as others which you wouldn't notice unless you used a program that showed pixels like photoshop or irfanview.
|
03-13-07 10:35pm
|
Reply
161
|
Spring Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Murr's Comment
Hasn't updated in years
|
06-16-09 10:27am
|
Reply
162
|
Street Meat Asia
(0)
|
Reply of
sherrrifff's Comment
I've had my eye on this site for a good five years+ but never joined...was afraid to bite the bullet with so limited reviews. I love the preview content I've always seen of it. Thanks for the warning, looks like I'll continue to stay away.
|
03-20-09 07:56am
|
Reply
163
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
I haven't been a member of Suicide Girls in a few years, but from when I was a member, there is very little reason to join from a video standpoint. Obviously that may have changed the past few years, but in all honesty Suicide Girls is more of a social network of people that enjoy the alt lifestyle. The actual "Suicide Girls" (the ones with photosets) are members of the social network but also amateur/professional models. Most photosets are done by professional photogs.
From a purely porn standpoint, this isn't really that type of site. It's more geared towards interaction with all the other users as well as the girls. Think myspace for adults that love tattoos, piercings and other erotica (though not like those fake adult dating sites that claim that tag).
|
08-06-09 08:23am
|
Reply
164
|
Tiny Tabby
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
I hope they didn't get a copy of her birth certificate and see she was underaged at the time!! But seriously, I like her and at one point thought about joining. If hardcore is gone, that makes my mind up easily.
|
01-12-09 08:38am
|
Reply
165
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks, yeah I finally figured out how to view all the scenes by models on their tour site. They changed it a little as far as being able to view all scenes by a person.
|
09-26-08 09:12am
|
Reply
166
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Do you know if Syd is still filming scenes? She was a beast as far as the wrestling goes. I noticed (in TGP galleries) that there is one time that she lost and that's a video I'd really like to see. Since every other scene has her using a strap-on as the winner, I want to see what it looks like when she's the one getting humiliated.
I do agree, back when I was a member a couple of years ago the scenes got boring after a while. They should join all their sites on a network - more incentive for some people to probably stay a member. I'm interested in all the other sites too but never joined.
|
09-25-08 08:13am
|
Reply
167
|
Upperclass Video
(0)
|
Reply of
DaboGirls4eva's Review
Thanks I've been interested in this site for a while. However, to me from just their home page it didn't seem like they updated so I was hesitant. Although the HD quality is a welcome addition, I don't know about having 1GB file sizes...I may join a ways down the line if they continue updating and I buy a terabite hardrive
|
12-29-07 03:02pm
|
Reply
168
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Comment
I still use the old version ... haven't gone over to VB3
|
03-30-11 09:57am
|
Reply
169
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I agree, download speed has slowed CONSIDERABLY the past year and the updates are getting a little boring to the point I don't even check every day or every few days anymore. But as far as video quality, I think it's important to note differences in what viewers want. Reading the comment, it would sound like old-school bang bus videos or something that are extremely grainy. I believe you're looking for High Def, which is what you mean by low quality. Is it high def, I don't know, I always download the "High" instead of the "DVD" options. But for just a casual viewer, even the "high" looks great -- no grain, audio/visual in line, etc. I never noticed that my take on quality must have been a lot lower than high-def regulars until using this site the past couple of years with people digging on the quality of a lot of sites I'm a member of that the quality looks fine to me. If you join Easy Dater and say bad quality, I agree. If you join Bang Bus/Videobox/Reality Kings, etc and say bad quality, I'm like "your standards are WAAAAYY high" (as in you like high-def only).
|
03-24-10 01:01pm
|
Reply
170
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
Am glad to say it looks like today they brought Quick Preview back. Finally. All the other new features they created are great (like the new custom clips and ability to share your custom clips with the network), but at the end of the day Quick Preview was an important feature that I'm guessing the research they did previously gave them a wrong impression on how much it was used/liked.
|
03-17-10 11:52am
|
Reply
171
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Haha, I didn't download that video. It was just an example of something weird and out there, types of things we'll never see at VB
|
12-27-09 06:56pm
|
Reply
172
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I haven't been an American Vice fan forever because I hate their site. Because of that, I have no idea how they update now. All I know is when I was a member they had numerous unique DVDs on file (including a series with midgets and some deformed guy). That's what I was talking about.
|
12-25-09 09:05pm
|
Reply
173
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yeah and it makes no sense to me. I'm personally not an anal fan, does nothing for me, so I'm tired of seeing all these anal updates. I'd like to see some weird niche's like American Vice has. If Videobox gave uncommond dvds like American Vice, for me it would be perfect.
|
12-23-09 05:39pm
|
Reply
174
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Yeah they added a new deal with Evil and Vivid about 6 months ago or more. Once you're a member, you rarely (*never it seems to me*) so Vivid or Evil Angel updates. You can click the tab to see those updates and preview the scenes though. But on just the regular VideoBox page, I haven't come across those updates at all in my regular browsing of the website - and I visit multiple times a day to see every update.
|
12-10-09 10:01am
|
Reply
175
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I've noticed the past week or two that downloads have gotten extremely slower. Not just an isolated deal - the downloads have gotten slower. I get the jerky streaming sometimes, but if I pause for a minute and then start watching, no problem. Looks like it just buffers slower when you initially pull it up.
|
09-21-09 11:47am
|
