Thanks for the information, Drooler. I didn't know you were still a current member.
There are a few models at Rigin that I really like. But I will pass on the site, because I just don't have the patience to manually copy each photo from a set. I did manual copying years ago at some sites with no zips, but no more.
You have to be careful when signing up for some sites that have pre-checked boxes that will sign you up to a trial membership to a different site, as well as the site you want to join.
TBP normally points out the sites that have this pre-checked membership issue on their review page.
Once they bill you for the trial membership, it's hard as heck to cancel the trial membership without paying for the trial.
However, you can cancel the trial membership before the trial expires. If you don't, you will pay an inflated price for the new membership to the site you didn't want, because the trial converts to a "full" one month recurring membership. At a higher price than you would normally pay.
I don't know how you can get your money back.
If you signed up with a credit card, you can call the credit card comp;any and say that you were charged in error for a service you did not want. That might get you back the money for the 1st month of the over-priced membership of the site you didn't want to join.
The Rocco Siffredi site is not a rip-off site, but the pre-checked box is a problem.
I got dinged one time when I signed up to this site. So I had to pay the trial membership fee. I don't remember if it was $2 or $3. But I cancelled the trial membership early, and was not charged for the renewal into a 1-month membership.
My guess would be that the girls can come and go very fast in these shoots. While the guys might be more of a regular thing. There are far less guys used than girls. So the girls are more disposable, in that sense. So it's easier to keep track of the guys, since there are less of them. I mean, the main guy is Rocco himself, who's used time and time again. Then you get a few other guys who Rocco chooses.
So it's just easier to find the guys' names than the girls. Trying to track the girls you might like from one clip to the next, if you don't know what the girl is named, is annoying.
I don't know who would want to track the appearance of a guy. Except there must be fans of Rocco himself, who look for clips featuring Rocco.
I look for the girls. And I agree (with your implied statement) that when you don't know what the girl is named, it can be frustrating looking for her video appearances.
There's supposed to be software to block spam. But if we could come up with better software that really works to block at least some of this spam, we should make a fortune.
I also get a lot of random spam emails for sex, medications, whatever. Most of that goes into my spam box, but some of it gets into my regular email box. The amount of spam I've been getting recently has increased significantly.
And I'm too lazy to get a new email address, because then I would have to change my email for all the accounts that I really want to get mail and notices from.
Edit01: I did open two email addresses, that I was hoping would get the bulk of my spam. But my regular email address has been put on the list for spammers. And they also use my email address as a "fake" email address of origin when they send out spam, because I sometimes get notices that some messages (that are spam) were not able to be delivered, or that I have gone over the limit of the amount of email I can send. And I did not, obviously, send those spam messages, and I send out very few emails in any one day.
Thanks for the positive vote, TheSquirrel. But my reviews are really far below the outstanding reviews of someone like Toadsith. That guy has the technical knowledge, clear thinking, organization and way with words to write reviews that are informative and a pleasure to read.
There is definitely a hard-pro tone to most of the videos here. A few of the girls appear new to porn, but that is the exception. And even the new girls, if you see them in a second or third video clip, are fast turning into pros.
Personal taste varies widely. I don't know what you like. There were a few videos I found a year ago that I thought were very interesting and colorful, but I can't find them this time. Which is disappointing.
For $10 you get a 1-month membership to 22 different sites. (I don't know what the rate is for Europe). That is a very low price for around 5 sites that are solid hard-core video sites, with the other sites being niche sites (tranny, Indian [the country], etc.).
But it all depends on what turns you on.
There are sites out there that are worth the money. You just have to keep searching, and keep up the strength. Life, and porn, is what you make of it. :)
If you are a serious collector and you want all of the Rocco DVDs, you won't find them here. The guy has been in the business a huge number of years, and his output is tremendous. What you do get is a large number of scenes from his older work, and an even larger number of scenes from his more recent work (recent going back 10 years or more). You also get scenes/vid clips where he does not appear, but he is in a large number of the clips. As I said, he is the star of the site, and he takes a lot of pride in his porn star status.
I do agree with you that the price is very reasonable, because you get access to a large number of sites in the network. There are maybe 5 sites that are the main value, and a bunch of niche sites that might have some content that you might like, or find interesting, or a waste of time. Personal preferences vary widely. :)
For $10 for a 1-month membership, I definitely think the site/network is worth checking out.
Thanks, Lionheart. There are people like Drooler and Toadsith who write excellent reviews. I've got a long way to improve before I get to be anywhere close to them as writers.
Thanks. I don't have a lot of experience in porn videos. This was the first time I saw Rocco Siffredi, that I know of. Some of his videos are really interesting and good quality. Of course, you watch a lot of them, especially some of his series, they do get a little repetitive. But there are some videos at his site that I thought were extremely good, better than anything I've seen elsewhere.
If you ever join this network, which has 19 different sites, this site is definitely worth looking over. It's just a question of how much time you want to spend going thru the different videos to find what you think is worthwhile.
But there are several sites in the network that I thought had some really worthwhile videos: peternorth.com
devilsfilm
silverstoneDVD
roccosiffredi
PU/TBP has a special price of $14.95/month for the network. But if you're lucky, you might find an even cheaper offer somewhere.
Thanks, Denner, rearadmiral, my review was honest, but maybe some PU members will enjoy the videos at this site. My tastes are far softer than many PU members, even though I do find some hardcore that I enjoy. I like many Pierre Woodman videos, even though I think he is sometimes abusive to the girls. And I still don't understand how he is able to get them to do what they do, and even apparently enjoy his rough treatment.
But this site was a waste for me.
In spite of that, if you get a membership to this network, and this site happens to be included, you should check it out for yourselves. Because there are some models here who are actually porn stars. So you might easily enjoy the videos more than I do. Or want to view them out of curiosity because of the model in the video.
slutty, the reason I gave the site an extra-low score was because I could not see a lot of the material. I need to download the video file before I can view it. And after downloading a couple of video files, I was not able to download any complete files because the download would stop after downloading about 1 GB (the file would be incomplete). And you can't play a partial file, you need the entire file to unzip it to get a playable file. So my experience with this site was very frustrating.
Obviously, if you did not encounter the problems I did (made worse by my slow DSL download speed of 150 KB/s), then you would score the site higher than I did.
But like I mentioned elsewhere, a site score can depend a lot on the personal experience you (or I) have with that site.
I would be interested in reading your review of this site, or any of the other sites in this network. That would also give PU members further information on the sites, that could be helpful.
There are definitely some good-looking models at this network.
Thanks for the support, Denner. I wanted to download a few videos from the site to see what they were like. But as I said in this review, I can't currently download a complete video file. And a partial file is not playable. That is why I gave the site an extra-low score.
There are other sites in the network that are much better.
The file name for Tricky Masseur is a generic number: 217.setMP4HD.
The file name for the Rub A Teen video is rubateen_gabi_full_hi_1080hd.
So you need to rename the Tricky Masseur file name.
But the Rub A Teen file name is acceptable. Or you can add the posting date to the file.
Bottom line: If you haven't seen the Tricky Masseur videos, the Rub A Teen Videos are definitely worth watching and keeping.
But if you've been a member of Teen Mega World, you will need to search through the Rub A Teen videos to find the ones you haven't seen before.
Either way, it's worth viewing the videos at Rub A Teen, especially the streaming versions.
And since you also get access to the Team Skeet network, that is a major bonus.
I'm giving Rub A Teen a score of 88. Because of the site contents, and because you get access to the rest of the Team
Skeet network. If they increased the update rate of Rub A Teen, that would increase the site value.
TBB states: On download limits, owners verify no limits, even though TOS stats daily 500MB limit. Caution on using download managers.
So it appears that TBP is stating there are no download limits.
If you encounter a download limit, I'd suggest asking for a refund.
But if only 14 videos, seems like a high price to pay, especially if you don't have a really good idea that the videos are going to be really special. If only 1 or 2 appeal to you, is that worth $18?
TBP doesn't clearly spell out what bonus sites are included with a membership. Are there any? Do they look good to you?
My best guess is that they are trying to make those pornhogs with fast Internet connections pay for slurping their site. Lol.
But don't forget that you get a bunch of bonus sites with membership to this site. So unless you have a massively fast connection, it's probably better to go for the 1 month membership.
I haven't been a member myself, so I have no idea whether you would think a 1 month membership is worth the money.
Even if I had been a member, I still wouldn't know, because individual tastes (and values) vary from person to person. :)
I've been a member of Met-Art several times, even had a few one-year memberships to them. Met-Art is probably my favorite site for porn on the internet. It was also the site of my first review at PU.
I've also been a member of MetModels (now called Erotic Beauty) and at least one of their other current sites.
But I never signed up for their promotional emails.
I'm currently a member of Erotic Beauty, so I do have access for that $8.00 offer to join Rylsky.
But at the moment, I'm already subscribed to too many other sites, that I don't really have time to visit them all. A waste of money.
But when I have the time, I will put Rylsky on my watchlist.
In the meantime, I followed your implied suggestion, and just now signed up for the Met-Art emails/special offers newsletter.
Great review. A well-known site, but you give a wonderfully clear and informative summary that is a pleasure to read. I also agree that Sophie M. is probably an easy to remember variation of Sophie Moone. Lol.
Review with nice details. But it sounds like you're getting a little bored with porn. It happens to all of us. Hopefully it passes, and we can appreciate all the beautiful girls out there again.
Interesting review of Sapphic Erotica. I've never been a member of the site, and that might be partly why I have trouble understanding your ideas. You appear to write in clear, precise English, at first glance, but trying to understand what you actually mean is difficult for me.
I'm not trying to make fun of your English. I've always had a poor ability to learn any foreign language. So you are accomplishing something which I would not be able to do: writing a review in a foreign language.
But I think it would be better for you to write your review first in your native language, and then translate that review into English.
I would guess that you wrote this review in English, not your native language (which is German, I assume).
One simple example of what I mean when I write that I do not understand the meaning of what you write.
You write:
"I have been a regular subscriber to the site for the last, say, 4 years. Since then I was a member for about 10-12 times at least."
If you have been a regular subscriber to the site for the last 4 years, that implies that for the last 4 years you have been a regular subscriber.
So how can you have been a member for 10-12 times since then? You are writing that you have been a member for the last 4 years, which means that you are a member now, and have been, for the last 4 years. So, to count that as 1 continuous membership, and then to count separately 10-12 memberships since then, does not make sense. There was no time for you to be a member 10-12 times since the current time.
And when the 10-12 memberships did take place, is also slightly confusing.
Possibly you meant to write that over the last 4 years you have been been a member 10-12 times.
Sorry if I appear to be picky. Feel free to ignore me. Your review is interesting, almost like poetry, where you sense meaning in the words, but the ideas are something you have to clarify and puzzle out.
I hope to see more reviews from you, and hope they have as many or even more of your ideas and opinions.
What about the fantasy art of Frank Frazetta, Boris Vallejo and Luis Royo? Frazetta started working in the 1940s, Vallejo in the 1960s, and Royo in the 1970s. They all have erotic elements in much of their artwork. Royo probably more explicit than Vallejo who is more explicit than Frazetta (a reflection of when they started working and what was allowed at that time). You don't have the formal stories supporting the illustrations of Frazetta, Vallejo, and Royo, that the Sardax site has. But Royo has come out with illustrated books with an implied storyline.
I grew up on Frazetta as a teenager (his Tarzan covers, paperback book covers), discovered Vallejo in the late 1960s) and liked what he did. Only found out about Royo in the 1990s, but like him very much.
Do you enjoy the artwork of Frazetta, Vallejo, or Royo? Or is it specifically the femdom aspect of Sardax that you enjoy, and much less looking at the female figure in artwork?
What I'm try to say is that with a short pictorial, 10 to 20 photos or less, but with accompanying personal story, the photos, and the model herself, gained meaning.
Today's photoshoots have far more photos per set, but the story is lacking, and the photos have less impact.
Other factors enter in as well. With 10 to 20 photos in a pictorial, the editing/choosing of the actual photos was more important. And I remember savoring each fine photograph like a fine dish.
Today, I go through a single photoshoot like I'm slurping down garbage, hoping that a few photos will stand out and give me pleasure.
The models today are just as physically lovely, if not more so, than the models of 50 years ago. And there are certainly more of them.
But I'm glad that some sites, like X-art and Diesel, are trying to put an erotic or sensual or quality element back into porn.
I started looking at nude magazines in the 1960s and 1970s, first with Playboy, then with Penthouse. Obviously the pictures were paramount. But the accompanying personal stories made the models more real and meaningful, even if the "facts" were sometimes doctored.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
