| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1251
|
Gaping Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Fine review, as usual. Lots of nice details and overall summary. Impressive.
|
04-14-11 11:35am
|
Reply
1252
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I never wanted to deal with the expense or time to get a disposable credit card.
I also never wanted to join German Goo Girls.
That site would require massive fascination and quality for me to join, after I've read so many horror stories about the cancel process.
Some sites are better off avoided.
For shady billing practices, poor quality content (or content that does not appeal to me), site structural problems (connection speeds, navigation issues that make the site difficult to use).
But some people go where others fear to tread (in the star trek tradition of heroes and adventurers).
I hereby nominate Rear-Admiral as leader of the PU Fleet.
Are you willing to accept this honor and responsibility?
|
03-24-18 09:55am
|
Reply
1253
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
What review are you talking about? Please be more specific. Lol.
I found the review of German Goo Girls by RipRap to be very original in its use of the Cons section. Wish I had the brains and artistry some of these PU posters have.
I vote "No" on DRM, as well.
I think RipRap was emotionally scarred by his DRM experience, which I can understand.
|
11-29-08 07:31pm
|
Reply
1254
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
"some incredibly beautiful amateurs"
AGREE COMPLETELY.
THE MODELS DON'T LOOK LIKE PORN STARS, BUT MORE LIKE THE BEST-LOOKING GIRLS YOU MIGHT FIND AT YOUR LOCAL SHOPPING MALL.
|
11-01-17 02:55pm
|
Reply
1255
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Attractive models, but the videos sound like a waste of time. And with site navigation problems, plus whatever, makes this a site that I would only join after I had explored much better sites.
|
03-06-12 01:27pm
|
Reply
1256
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the update. The info about a 30 day delay before downloading HD videos is posted at TBP, and was also mentioned in a previous PU review. I'm looking forward to your review. If there are any bonus sites included in a membership, would you please mention their names as well in your review?
|
07-21-11 11:34am
|
Reply
1257
|
Girls In Nature.org
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
The navigation for the preview section (and probably the member area of the site) seems extremely cumbersome. The site really needs a programmer to make the site easier to use, to show what models are available, and their photosets and videos. A simple site design like Met-art or MPL Studios would be a big improvement.
But the $14.95 monthly membership (recurring) seems attractive. I've been seeing more monthly memberships in the $15-20 range lately, maybe as a result of the recession.
The $14.95 monthly membership (recurring) is what is listed at PU/TBP. When I go to the site itself, using the PU/TBP link, the monthly price (recurring) I see listed is $16.95.
|
11-11-09 05:38pm
|
Reply
1258
|
Girls Rimming
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Excellent review, with lots of fine details.
I'm glad to see you back.
Unless my brain is mistaken, I saw your name disabled or suspended or whatever.
Hate to lose old-timers who contribute so much to the site.
So welcome back. And whether I am mistaken or not, wishing you a healthy and happy new year.
|
01-22-19 08:19am
|
Reply
1259
|
Girly Cast
(0)
|
Reply of
magiri's Comment
So contact CCBill, explain the situation, and CCBill should give you a refund. CCBill is a reputable billing agent.
|
05-18-11 04:22pm
|
Reply
1260
|
Give Me Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks for checking on Barbariska, slutty. There are so many models out there, and a few of them look so similar, that it's sometimes hard to tell them apart. But she is a really cute girl, who has appeared in hardcore in many sites, and she sure looked familiar. But like I say, some models can look very similar to other models, and the look on some models can change over time in just a few years.
|
04-21-13 02:45am
|
Reply
1261
|
Give Me Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks for the kind words, graymane. I'm glad you are well enough to participate at PU again. Like many PU members, we really wish you well.
|
04-21-13 02:40am
|
Reply
1262
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Reply
Some photosets at Erotic Beauty do have the metadata "date taken", other photosets do not.
The Avril photoset does not have the "date taken" metadata.
The same thing for Metart. Some photosets have the metadata "date taken", others do not.
It would be nice if more of these photos had that information.
|
02-12-13 07:28am
|
Reply
1263
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for your prompt and informative reply. I think a 1-month subscription would be worthwhile, if only to get the photosets that I had previously from Glam-deluxe that I seem to have misplaced.
The bonus sites would be a nice bonus, even if they are not updating.
And I wouldn't expect to Glam-deluxe to update very frequently anyway. Even when I was a member about 5 years ago, the update schedule seemed very irregular, from what I recall.
Ema/Avril A is lovely. And there are a number of other models who I particularly like at Glam-deluxe.
|
02-12-13 07:10am
|
Reply
1264
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
There is a new photo set of her at Erotic Beauty dated 2013-02-10.
That is a new photo set I haven't seen before. I am currently a member of Erotic Beauty, and the photo set was actually shot years ago. I am basing that on how she looks. Her physical appearance changed very little over the years she was active, but you can still tell that she was getting older as the years went by.
The photographer, Thierry Murrell, has used her a model since she first started out. He is the main photographer at Glam Deluxe. And he also contributed a lot of her sets to Metart.
This is her first appearance at Erotic Beauty. But like I said, this is a photoset that was shot years ago.
|
02-11-13 08:27am
|
Reply
1265
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Edit: Avril A (the model's name at metart) is the model at ema's place. Her last set at metart was November 2010, so that was less than a year ago.
Her name at glam deluxe is Emanuelle.
She also has different names at other sites.
|
08-04-11 07:05am
|
Reply
1266
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I think the model at emas place is very cute. She has a number of sets at glam deluxe from years ago. She also has a number of sets at metart. She's also had a few photosets at other sites (just teen site, etc.).
But I haven't seen anything new from her in over a year, I think.
|
08-04-11 06:49am
|
Reply
1267
|
Glamour.cz
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Cap'n, you are a better detective or treasure hunter than I am. I missed those samples. But I will not be adding them to my collection yet. :)
|
05-16-10 05:18pm
|
Reply
1268
|
Glamour.cz
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
justme, I think it's a nice feature when a site gives an extensive preview of its contents, so a person can get a clear idea of what he would get if he paid to join the site. Many sites provide sample photos and nice-sized thumbnails of their models, and possibly some short video clips. The more information the better, I think. The preview section is part of the advertising for a site.
That's my opinion. But if people want to join a site based on a very limited preview of the site, that's their decision. I certainly don't control what other PU members do or join.
I don't understand what you mean when you say that my comments are what we are all able to easily view for no cost.
If you mean that my comment here, and my other comments, have no value, OK, that's your opinion.
If you mean that I am not charging you to read my comments... PU is a free site that you can join or lurk at, without paying any membership fees, and the member reviews and comments and posts are free for all to read.
|
05-16-10 05:11pm
|
Reply
1269
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Reply
I'm not a person who understands the finer points of photography.
I look at photos and videos on a low-priced laptop.
Even if I had high-end monitors and expensivwe computers, I don't know if my eyes would notice a measurable difference from what I'm seeing today--because of advancing age, etc.
I respect the people who can appreciate the higher qualities of photos or videos, but it's not my thing. I'm not trying to be rude or disrespectful. I'm just stating that experience (to be able to view and enjoy artwork at a higher level) is beyond me.
Does that make sense?
|
05-13-16 08:43am
|
Reply
1270
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the fast response.
I posted a comment on All Gravure a couple of years ago. I wasn't a member, but from looking at the preview pages, and knowing something about some of their featured models, a lot of the pictures would be non-nude, because those models are non-nude models. They are idols, which in Japan means they have a fan base.
And a lot of the photos are non-exclusive. Apparently, this site collected photos from photo-books of Japanese models, and posted the photos at this site.
|
08-09-12 09:35am
|
Reply
1271
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
What Japanese site or sites do you think are the best value?
I think Japanese models are some of the most beautiful in the world.
And their photography is first class.
But I don't really appreciate the mosaic blurring in their videos.
|
08-09-12 08:00am
|
Reply
1272
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
You're right.
I was being very approximate.
Several years ago I used to buy photo-books from Amazon.co.jp.
At that time, the rate was very close to 100 Japanese yen per US dollar.
|
08-09-12 07:54am
|
Reply
1273
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
op9527's Review
Interesting review. Your wife seems to sum up the site quite well: "Too little for too much time and money"
|
08-09-12 07:25am
|
Reply
1274
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
Solid review of a disappointing site. I doubt many PU members are willing to pay for a year's membership before they can access the entire site.
|
08-16-10 01:02pm
|
Reply
1275
|
HD Love
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Babes Network is a much better choice, because it has so much more material.
Some porn companies start or run different sites, even though there might be little difference in the style of the content, as a way of generating more sales, more money.
There is no difference in the style of 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn, which are run by the Diesel network. In fact, the photoset of a video shoot might appear at one site, and the accompanying video might appear at the other site. And in the past, but not currently, material that appeared at one site sometimes migrated to the other site.
Wow Girls, even though it's marketed separately from the Diesel network, has the same style of content, even the same models, as 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn. Any of the content at one of those 3 sites could have been posted at any of the other 2 sites.
It's purely a marketing decision, splitting the content between the 3 sites, as a way to make more money.
|
12-27-12 05:27pm
|
