The site models seem real amateurs, and the low current price seems attractive. I certainly don't recognize any of the models I saw in the preview pages. :)
Great review, that really gives the essential details and flavor of the site, as usual. I'm a fan of your reviews.
The only thing I wonder about is your comment that "the sex is nothing much". I'm not a member of brainpass.com network or this site, so I haven't seen the specific videos here in their entirety.
But I've seen short clips of a bunch of Pierre Woodman videos.
Personally, I don't like his style of sex in Casting X: it's brutal on the women, and I don't know how or why they seem to respond so favorably to the apparent pain.
Woodman seems to ream them out: mouth, vagina, ass.
My question is: why do you feel the sex is nothing much?
Are we (myself included) getting so blase to sex?
I guess a second question would be: how the hell does he get to pound so many gorgeous girls? I mean, sweet Lord, why is life so frickin' unfair?
The same sort of thing happened to me a few days ago.
I joined the Devils Film network, and was signed up for a separate trial membership to Porn Access. The Porn Acess membership was only $1.95 for 3 days, but it would renew at around $30 after 3 days unless cancelled. I looked for, but did not see, any pre-checked agreement for a trial membership.
But I was lucky that I was only charged $1.95 for the trial membership I did not want. I called customer service immediately, told them I did not want the trial membership, did not see the pre-checked agreement. Customer service would not cancel my charge of $1.95 for the trial, but they did cancel my trial membership.
I never used the trial membership.
But it was only $1.95.
I got a message from my credit card company to contact the credit card company. They wanted to know if the charge for $1.95 was valid, or if there was fraud (evidently, they have a program flagging charges by the billing company Porn Access uses). I told them the charge was valid, because I didn't want to get a new credit card number and whatever else I would have to explain about the charge.
You would think that we would be experts about these pre-checked agreements. But I sometimes wonder that sometimes the agreement might not even be shown on the sign-up page, because I was looking for the pre-checked line, and did not see it.
Live and learn. But what can we learn if we honestly don't see the pre-checked agreement?
Years ago, soon after I joined PU, Anonymous gave me a negative trust vote.
Said my reviews were too much like other members' reviews, and that an English prof would think I copied material from other reviews.
Still bothers me.
Guess I have a thin skin.
Time to move on from negative comments, unless we really feel there's merit in the criticism.
Sorry you wasted $30 on a poor site, because of some comment from Anonymous.
I always felt that Anonymous was a coward's use of negative comments, that the person would not own up to the comment.
For me, the link at TBP (and PU) to the site leads directly to the actual site, with no PDF file. The preview site itself has lots of hot links to different areas, as well as a small, short sample video that plays continuously. I don't see how they would put that into a PDF file without a lot of effort.
So my guess (and I'm no computer expert) is that this is a problem with your machine. I know that my own PC (and software) can give me problems viewing different sites, where sometimes I can't get the thumbnail pictures at different sites to load.
REVIEW(CONTINUES):
Analyzing the Chloe Cherry-James Deen video: James Deen gives his usual performance of treating the model rough: he forces her to gag on his cock deep in her throat, smear her dripping saliva over her face, shove his fingers into her mouth to dominate and show her who's the boss, choking her, grabbing her hair and pulling, etc.
Chloe is a cute girl, and she seems to go along willingly with her abuse.
So the video features Deen's style of dominance and sadism, while the model submits to his rough treatment.
I would categorize Deen as a slightly softer version of Pierre Woodman, who seems to enjoy forcing women beyond their normal limits to submit to his rough treatment.
In some videos, I've seen Woodman forcing the model to drink his piss, which, along with his slaps, forcible anal intercourse which often seems like rape, and other rough treatment, just adds to Woodman's enjoyment. But models put up with it, and even smile and kiss Woodman at the end of most of his videos.
So I have some trouble watching James Deen or Pierre Woodman perform in a video.
There are too many stories about James Deen abusing porn performers.
And Pierre Woodman built his reputation forcing women to have rough sex. Sometimes against their will, which might or might not be scripted.
But both performers seem to get off treating the women they work with as pieces of meat to be degraded and/or treated roughly, in a domineering fashion.
Their attitude seems to be: I'm big, tough, and will fuck these women harshly, and the women will enjoy it and worship me.
I remember one video where the woman tells Woodman she doesn't want to be filmed, so he tells her he is stopping the video, and he shuts off a light, but continues to film her anyway.
So, Woodman can tell you one thing, and do the opposite. Which is common in real life.
But it drains my enjoyment of any scene with James Deen or Pierre Woodman because I believe they enjoy degrading women: on the other hand, I do enjoy sites like Pure Taboo, where there is a twisted pleasure in abusing women, but that seems more scripted, and I believe the sex is more consensual, so that's just me, where I don't believe the models are being treated harshly in real life.
Fantasy BSDM is fine, but when it moves into real life, the boundaries blur, and I have a problem watching or enjoying it.
The New Sensations network does not have a lot of BDSM videos, but I guess they add a few to give some variety to the storylines.
My preference is more in the heartcore line, where the performers are trying to please each other, hopefully with some affection or tenderness and lots of kissing.
At the same time, the Pure Taboo site at Adult Time is one of my favorite sites in the network, because of the element of tension in some of the videos, as well as the offbeat, twisted stories and the cinematic-style of the videos which is first class.
Giving the site a score or 85. Good site, but network access raises the score.
THE FRESH OUTTA HIGH SCHOOL SITE IS NICE-SIZED, WITH OVER 290+ VIDEOS TO WATCH.
IN ADDITION, YOU HAVE ACCESS TO THE BASIC NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK, WHICH HAS--
22 SITES CATERING TO DIFFERENT NICHES;
6500+ EXCLUSIVE VIDEOS;
2500+ PORN STARS;
UNLIMITED ACCESS;
MULTIPLE WEEKLY UPDATES;
HD QUALITY VIDEOS.
SO YOU CERTAINLY GET ACCESS TO A HUGE AMOUNT OF HARDCORE VIDEOS.
AND SOME OF THE VIDEOS ARE OF VERY HIGH QUALITY.
THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE IS A GLAMCORE SITE WITH LOVELY MODELS, HIGH PROFESSIONAL CAMERAWORK AND SETTINGS, EXPENSIVE COSTUMES, THAT CAN COMPETE FAVORABLY WITH ANY GLAMCORE SITE ON THE INTERNET.
SO OVERALL, THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK IS A WORTHWHILE JOIN.
AND THE FRESH OUTTA HIGH SCHOOL SITE, WHILE NOT THE BEST SITE IN THE NETWORK, HAS SOME WORTHWHILE VIDEOS TO BE ENJOYED.
GIVING THE SITE A SCORE 0F 85, BECAUSE OF THE NETWORK ACCESS.
IF THE SITE WAS A STAND-ALONE SITE, THE SCORE WOULD BE MUCH LOWER.
I SHOULD ADD THAT YOU CAN DOWNLOAD ALL THE VIDEOS IN MULTIPLE FILE TYPES AND MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS.
THE SITE (AND NETWORK) IS NOT ONE OF THE NEW STREAMING ONLY SITES.
I'm on a very tight budget myself, or I would be if I had more financial self-discipline.
I'm aware that because of the internet, the prices for wonderful porn are far cheaper than what the prices were 20 or 30 or 40 years ago.
But still, having a limited amount of cash to pay for porn, as is true for most people, the cost for each site has to be considered. Along with, the quality of the site: site content, site ease of use, and other factors you consider when deciding whether to join a site or not.
Basically, it comes down to: is the site membership worth the cost?
So I think that it makes sense to write that $30/month for FTV is expensive, compared to other sites that are $20/month, that offer a large amount of professional photo sets of lovely young models.
I'm not saying that FTV is a waste of money.
FTV is an excellent site.
I am saying that I would rather spend less money for access to other excellent sites: photo sites like Metart, MPL studios, Femjoy.
Or video/photo sites like X-art. Or Teen Mega World (not a photo site, but massive amount of hardcore teen videos with a huge amount of attractive models).
One problem with joining FTV.
The PU discount for FTV has disappeared.
Monthly price is now $29.95.
There are a lot of photo sites (I realize FTV also has videos) that are $20/month.
But the extra $9 makes FTV expensive.
PU score is 65, but TBP score is 94.
As you know, FTV only has 2 active reviews.
One review score was 50.
That's why the PU score is so low.
It just goes to show you can't depend on PU scores alone, to help you pick your sites.
You also have to read the reviews, and see what sites might be attractive for you, in spite of their scores.
By the way, I agree that FTV is an excellent site.
If you run out of attractive Caucasian women, you might look at Oriental, especially Japanese or Chinese. Those are some of the most gorgeous women in the world. But the Oriental porn style is often different and takes a little getting used to. I don't like the mosaic, and I don't like the funny noises the Oriental girls make when having sex: they sound like they are being abused, even if they are supposedly enjoying the experience. Or maybe I don't really understand the mind-set, and the idea is that they are being abused, and that they don't enjoy the sex. You don't see much smiling from the girls during sex, or even from the stunt cocks. Maybe Oriental sex (especially porn) is a serious business that requires too much concentration to smile or laugh?
What I really enjoy are the photosets, where the girls can smile and look lovely.
Thanks for the reply, and taking the time to edit and check the update facts at the different sites.
My impression (which could easily be wrong) was that at the time I joined TeenMegaWorld, the fuckstudies videos were not part of the TeenMegaWorld content. I definitely know that the fuckstudies site was not one of the bonus sites at the time I joined.
At the time I joined TeenMegaWorld, when you joined any one site in the network, you got, as a bonus, access to most but not all the sites in the network. The specific sites you got was arbitrary: It changed depending on which site you joined through, and the date you joined that site. Also, when I last joined (July 2010), if you joined through the PU/TBP link, you got a discounted price, but you were penalized by getting access to a smaller number of bonus sites.
I posted a comment about the smaller number of bonus sites when joining through PU/TBP link, and Khan or someone else at PU contacted the network to get the higher number of bonus sites for the PU/TBP link.
So Khan and the PU/TBP team are looking out for us. Sort of like a big brother, or maybe like the mafia? Lol.
I joined teenmegaworld back in July, hoping that fuckstudies would be one of my bonus sites. But I didn't get it as part of my membership. So I am giving fuckstudies a fucking low grade of 30 because I never got inside the members area.
Regarding anal versus vaginal, there doesn't seem to be all that much of a difference, except when the guy sometimes pulls out and shows how enlarged the anus is. Which doesn't turn me on very much.
So maybe I should drop my score for the site another 10 or 15 points. What do you think?
I did see a few videos from the site, and they seemed to be very sharp in focus and clarity and color with good action with good looking models. Which is why I wanted to get into the site to see what else they had.
So which site did you join that gave you fuckstudies as part of the package?
Fuck Studies is part of the Royal Limited network. I've been a member of that network in the past. It's a real network, not a scam.
I don't know what is causing your login problem. I don't remember sending any emails to the Royal Limited tech support, so I don't know how responsive they are. But you should send them an email explaining your problem. Also, use a toll free number to explain your problem to Epoch.
Since you were charged through your bank account, if all else fails and you don't get a satisfactory solution (a refund or login privileges to your paysite + login privileges to the bonus paysites that are supposed to be part of your membership), you can contact your bank and explain that you were charged for a service you did not receive. And the bank should refund your money.
I've never had to deal with a bank about reversing a charge to my checking account from a paysite. It's much easier dealing with a credit card company about such a matter.
But since you say your bank account was charged, you definitely need to straighten this out. Because if your account was charged, whether the charge was legitimate or not (a possible scam), you have to be able to stop any future charges that you don't authorize.
I believe the update rate is one video + matching gallery per week for FuckedHard18.
But my subscription ran out yesterday, so I can't confirm that.
I had full access to the site through my PornMasterMind membership, which gave me random updates from a number of other sites that I did not have full access to--but were useful in showing me some of what those other sites offered.
I did have full access to MassageGirls18 site through my membership, but I did not enjoy those videos.
At that site, the girl is the one giving the massage. I thought the videos, although still professionally shot, were disappointing compared to the FuckedHard18 videos: the girls were attractive, but the setup was too artificial, the girls had to do more acting, and they are not good actresses, and the sex was not as hot.
Just my opinion. Other people might find the MassageGirl18 videos satisfying. But I thought the erotic massage theme was done well at FuckedHard18, and was poorly done at MassageGirls18. At MassageGirls18, it was more like the guy is not really there to get a massage, but to get a blow job and fuck. Because the massage is not believable, and the girl is there for sex, even though she is supposed to be a masseuse. So the sex is not as hot.
One recent photo set or gallery, for the model Elsa, has 263 photos.
The zip file size is 41.9 MB.
(You don't get to choose the photo definition, as you would at a high-end photo site).
Each individual photo is about 200-250 KB.
The dimensions of the photo are 1024x1536.
Width: 1024 pixels
Height 1536 pixels
Horizontal resolution 96 dpi
Vertical resolution 96 dpi
Bit depth 24
These photos are not the high-quality you find at high-grade sites like MetArt or MPL Studios or Femjoy.
There are more like high-quality screen-shots, because like I said in my review, I assume they were shot during the video shoot, or maybe there is a software program that creates high-quality screen shots from a video shoot.
When I had dial-up, which I had for many years, I was lucky to see download speeds of 3-4 KB/s, which showed in the Windows system tray when downloading a file.
I switched to DSL, and then got 150-160 KB/s download speeds (again, from what appeared in the Windows system tray area when downloading a file).
I recently switched to a faster DSL, and now get up to 630 KB/s download speeds, which is a huge improvement.
I knew there was a difference between bits and bytes (8 bits per byte), but it was still confusing when I looked at speed ratings because I didn't know which were being used or referred to.
But if everyone follows the simple rule that "b" stands for bits, and "B" stands for bytes, then I hope to remember that.
But I ignore the difference between "K" and 1,000 (K = 1,024), because my brain can only hold so much. :)
We were both teasing. But sometimes it doesn't come across as clearly as it should. :)
But I also mean it when I say there are new, attractive girls turning up in porn all the time. Back in the 1970s (which is ancient history) an attractive-looking girl in hardcore porn was rare. But now it's very common. You can find them easily.
Denner, did you notice that Hayden Winters has ink marks on her back (better known as tattoos), a belly button ring, and feet that are overly large? She even has a stud in her tongue. So I would not rate her as a top porn model. But I have seen the video "My Little Panties", and find it disturbing: A porn star should be wearing new underwear in her movies, and it appears she's been rubbing her panties over-much and needs a new pair (the old one has lint-balls or something over the crotch area). LOL
And that guy sniffing and chewing her panties? Does he have a fetish or what?
I really appreciate the responsiveness of the webmaster to reviews and comments on his site at our forum. That shows a concern for customer satisfaction that is rare.
Moaning in german sounds better than in english? You might scream and yell louder in german than in english, but this is the first time I've heard that german moans sound better. Is that because the germans do a lot of moaning and whining?
I'm not a member.
I tried loading the site page, could not get it to load.
That's why I am often careful about buying a long-term subscription to a site. You never know how long the site will be around.
If the site does not come back up, you can always try to get a partial refund.
Wishing you luck, either way.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
