| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
551
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not worth the effort. I almost always go for the 1-month membership. Haven't found any sites I am interested in that are offering me a $1 trial. Also, the $1 trials I've seen have a very expensive renewal rate, far more expensive than the regular 1-month fee.
|
08-21-10 02:16am
|
Reply
552
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm still waiting for turboshaft and drooler and the rest of the PU members to post their tanline photos before I make my final decision. So I can't say if they really look better with or without. :)
But for female models, I don't think tan lines usually make a big difference one way or the other.
|
08-20-10 08:06pm
|
Reply
553
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Many thanks for the blog examples, nadiencendia. I think you have to be a real fan of these models if you are going to follow/read these blogs. I think the models are pretty, but the blogs simply don't appeal to me. I understand the idea is to help their fans feel a connection to the models, and to increase the fan interest and loyalty, but the blogs just don't connect to me.
On the other hand, I bought a DVD of Rabid, a movie that Marilyn Chambers was in back in the 1970s, from Marilyn Chambers at a convention, and was happy to get it, because I had seen the movie when it played originally in the theaters when it was first released in 1977. Marilyn Chambers was a famous porn star back in the 1970s, when porn movies were first gaining acceptance and starting to make big money. Rabid was a non-porn zombie movie by David Cronenberg back when he was still doing small movies, and he since went on to become a big-time director. I was happy to get the DVD. But I haven't even opened the case or played the DVD (partly because she signed the outer plastic cover with a cute message). But I still remember pretty much what the movie was about, even after all this time. It was just a low-budget zombie movie, but I thought it was well done and enjoyed the movie at the time, so the DVD still brings back memories. :)
And Marilyn Chambers seemed like a really nice and friendly person when I met her. Very down to earth.
|
08-13-10 08:51am
|
Reply
554
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mistresskent's Poll
Where do you find these blogs? I assume you're not talking about model bios, but an actual blog that is done by the model. The sites I join might have a short model bio, which can often contain inaccurate data (country of origin, age, even getting the physical description of the model wrong at times). But I don't often come across a model's blog.
|
08-13-10 05:09am
|
Reply
555
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No.
|
08-12-10 03:49pm
|
Reply
556
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just the ones I use. :)
|
08-09-10 12:03am
|
Reply
557
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No.
|
08-07-10 12:17am
|
Reply
558
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My first thought is that some Japanese porn is censored with the mosaic effect. And if you're into Japanese porn, that's something you have to accept. I skip sites from the US or Europe that use censored photos or vids in the preview.
|
08-05-10 06:37am
|
Reply
559
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The model should definitely be showing some kind of emotion or enjoyment or arousal. I don't want a lot of fake moans and groans, but I don't want the female to be a slab of meat who is just lying there getting pounded on.
|
08-03-10 09:44pm
|
Reply
560
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like to see the entire female model, with all her body parts. And in videos, I even want to hear her voice, as long as it's not really stupid words coming out of her mouth, or really fake moans and groans. I don't really appreciate photos that cut off the model's head to focus on some other specific part of her body, or because the photographer/video cameraman is an incompetent.
|
08-01-10 12:34am
|
Reply
561
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The agony and the ecstasy. What a great title for someone bitten by the porn bug. Instead of watching movies about vampires and werewolves, why can't we see movies that explore real human activity, such as people watching porn? There have been academy award winning movies about drunks and drug addicts and other perverts. So why not about porn watchers? Don't we deserve a little respect?
|
07-30-10 07:33am
|
Reply
562
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I will sometimes use email to report a problem to technical support. But I don't think I've written to a site webmaster to praise or complain. The response to emails from technical support can be hit or miss. Maybe you get an answer, maybe it's helpful.
Almost all my porn emails/posts are done here at PU. But even after all this time, I'm not sure if PU has a webmaster. Does it? And is he visible to the PU members?
I assume that Rick is the site owner, and Khan is the head honcho for PU submissions/posts, but who is the webmaster? The guy that "runs" the site?
One definition of webmaster: a technician who designs or maintains a website.
A second definition of webmaster: a term used loosely to describe an individual assigned to administering a web site. Typical duties might include updating pages, correcting errors, fixing links or responding to technical inquiries.
|
07-28-10 07:30am
|
Reply
563
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I found it by looking up porn review sites. And at the time, I thought it was one of the better review sites, because the reviews were written by amateurs like myself, and many of the reviews were intelligent and informative, and sometimes amusing. Over time, I found that the reviews/comments were much more useful than the puff pieces found at many porn review sites. Also found that I enjoyed contributing/interacting with the PU community, which was friendly, polite, and mainly welcoming. The discounts offered thru PU were also helpful and appreciated. And the raffle is like a cherry on top (but not the virginal kind, I'm afraid).
|
07-22-10 01:10am
|
Reply
564
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Rearadmiral seems to sum it up nicely: If a site has enough good content, it's worth joining once. But without updates, as long as you are able to keep the downloaded material in your collection, there's no sense in joining a second time.
|
07-20-10 03:18pm
|
Reply
565
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I would rather have subtitles than dubbing, but I don't often see subtitles for porn.
|
07-18-10 12:24am
|
Reply
566
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Poll
Today video clips can take 1 GB for a 20 minute runtime. So buying more external hard drives seems like the only solution. On some photosets, I've seen single photos that are 4 MB or more. It takes more and more space to store these images and videos.
So how much space does my porn collection take? Too much.
|
07-17-10 06:42pm
|
Reply
567
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Some of those Teenfuns photosets and videos are classic. As good as anything that is being put out today, in spite of the "lower quality" of the photos and videos. They had some absolutely yummy models.
|
07-17-10 06:17pm
|
Reply
568
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Who even thinks about such details? I am happy if I can find some porn that is watchable (clips), or viewable (photos). I would like the porn to be cleanly lighted with attractive models. I am not an auteur who is viewing world class art or film, I'm just trying to find some good-looking, erotic porn. Lol.
|
07-16-10 01:16am
|
Reply
569
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Poll
I can't decide whether to be disgusted or interested. Maybe I should sleep on it. :)
|
07-16-10 01:07am
|
Reply
570
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Sevrin's Poll
PU is the only site I post on. But I do post here quite a bit.
|
07-04-10 02:57am
|
Reply
571
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I don't think movie reviews have much effect on what a movie does at the box office. I think that many years ago movie reviews had more impact. But because of the internet, where access to a wide range of different reviews is easily available, people can more easily see how different reviews of a movie can be from the different critics. Also, people depend on word of mouth more than on what they read from a single critic.
I read a movie review to find out about the plot of the movie, and try to get a general idea of what the movie is like. But I don't think most people, myself included, depend on the critics to decide whether to see a movie.
|
07-03-10 03:30am
|
Reply
572
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Poll
I definitely think about a site before I join it. What do the contents look like, what's the price, what do the reviews at PU say? There are so many sites out there, and if money was no object, then I would be joining a huge number of sites. But since money is limited, I often stick with established sites, many of which I've joined previously.
|
06-30-10 12:27am
|
Reply
573
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I have joined a number of sites, as many fellow PU members have. And maybe I've been lucky, but I was never rebilled at any time after cancelling my site membership.
So I think that CCBill and other payment processors are not only efficient, but ethical as well.
|
06-30-10 12:16am
|
Reply
574
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't have a precise method of scoring sites, it's more of a gut-feel process for me. But what I am basically aiming for is:
site score = value = (site contents + ease of access)/price.
So price is one of the major factors in the value or score of a site, as far as I am concerned. I believe that the site score should indicate the value of a site.
But I also realize that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And that the site contents can be very appealing to me, but almost worthless to other PU members. Personal taste varies wildly. So I believe that the score of a site has a very large subjective component.
Met-art, my favorite porn site, can be a waste of time and money for other PU members.
And some sites that other PU members can rate very high, based on "objective factors" such as content, can be a waste of time and money for me.
So to understand the value and meaning of a site score, depends on who is doing the rating, and how much I agree with their personal tastes.
I believe most PU members realize this, even if it's not prominently emphasized.
|
06-26-10 10:36am
|
Reply
575
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've seen a few sites where the ads are plastered all over the page, and they take up as much space as the site contents you are paying for. That is ridiculous.
|
06-24-10 08:54am
|
