I assume the question refers to "regular" movies, not porn movies.
If that's true, then it doesn't matter much to me whether the movie I watch is "wide-screen" or not. Some people seem to think there's a big difference in whether a movie is wide-screen or not, but I'm not one of them.
I watch movies, and porn, on my laptop. Maybe if I watched movies on a big-screen high definition TV, then it would make more of a difference.
graymane1777, I'm not saying this situation can't happen in real life. But I think it's far less common than it's portrayed in porn: The younger girl going after the older man.
I knew a guy whose wife left him for another man.
The first guy and his ex-wife had a daughter. After living with the woman, the second man dumps the woman, and married the daughter.
True story.
Actually, I don't think the young girl, or the ex-wife, were chasing after the second man: I think he was the one doing the chasing.
But RustyJ and I are not saying your life is a porno film: If your life really was a porno film, you wouldn't have the time or energy to spend on porno subscriptions. :)
Score should be an indication of the value of a site. If a site has very little content, even if the content is extremely high quality, then, unless the price is very low, the score should be adjusted to reflect the small amount of content.
The score of a site should reflect:
1. the quality of the site content
2. the amount of the site content
3. the ease/difficulty of accessing the site content
4. the price of the site
5. If the site gives access to other sites, then that should be reflected in the score as well.
6. So I don't believe the score for a site is a precise number set in stone, but a judgment on the part of the reviewer
7. And different people can come up with very different scores for a single site, depending on how they value the site contents, and ease of site access
8. And there can be other factors affecting the score of a site, such as pre-checked cross sells in the signup form, or regional pricing for people living outside the U.S. Which could be considered part of the membership price, or as separate items that can affect the membership price.
I don't see hairy legs or armpits on females very often, but I don't understand what all the fuss is about. The first few times I saw male porn guys with shaved pubic hair, I thought it was strange, and then I started reading that female porn girls were supposed to be disgusted when they had to do a scene with a guy who didn't shave his pubic hair.
I prefer seeing a female model with some pubic hair. That's what I grew up with, and I think it's more erotic for a female to have some pubic hair. The bald look is ok, but some hair down there shows the girl has reached the stage where she has started to grow some fuzz of her own.
Fashions change, and I can't wait until it becomes fashion mandatory for guys to shave their armpits, chest, legs, groin and ass, and take it all off the top.
Then the girls can start to grow their hair long all over their body, to show that women are taking their rightful place as rulers of this planet. Will they be able to do a better job of running this planet than the men? Probably not. But they probably wouldn't do much worse.
Power to the women!
(I'm thinking of getting a sex change operation when the women take over, because it always pays to stay on the right side of power.)
Thank you, graymane1777. You are now being considered for the position of my number 1 acolyte, for recognizing what I revealed to the PU community: lk2fireone is Truth.
Based on the way the poll question is worded, some of the possible answers seem invalid.
If you are forced to get rid of your porn stash, you can't hide it. Hiding it would still be keeping it.
The same for asking a friend to keep it for you. You are still keeping it, or keeping control of it.
The logic is slippery, the answers are slippery.
Just like President Clinton was speaking "truthfully" when he said he didn't have sex with Monica Lewinksy. His definition of sex didn't include a bj. Spoken like a true lawyer. Or a true liar. What's the difference between a lawyer and a liar? I'm not sure if there is a difference. Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
But if I had to get rid of my porn, I would just delete it from my hard drives. To be 100% certain, I would have to trash the hard drives, or throw them into the trash.
On the other hand (isn't there usually another hand out there somewhere?), if you are faced with a difficult decision, it's only human nature to change reality to come up with something that better fits our desires.
So instead of trashing my hard drives, I could swallow hard and say, "That's not porn. That's erotic art." And poof. My porn stash has disappeared. I now have a collection of erotic art.
And there is a lot of truth in that. Because what has been considered porn or smut has often changed to become art or erotica, and could now be valued in the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars.
I picked "other". I like long reviews, that are full of site details and personal opinions. But there are reviews that can be fun or interesting to read because of the writer's talent: Toadsith writes the most professional reviews, he even wrote a couple of guidelines on how to write a review and what points to include, that are well worth reading. There are others who can inject some welcome humor or really interesting point of view. And there are many more writers who can give you a clear idea of whether a particular site might be a worthwhile join for you.
The reviews and comments (and some of the threads) can provide really useful information about these sites: both the positive and negative values.
I actually saw "I, a Woman" back around 1966, which was considered an extremely erotic movie. The Mr. Teas series was erotic comedy, I think, but I'm not an expert on these classificatons. Depends on your definition, I guess, because the novel "Ulysses" by James Joyce was banned as porn for many years after it was written, but I studied that novel in college in the 1960s because it was then considered a classic. But in the 1960s movies (unless they were real porn) did not show actual penetration or pussy shots. But just watching a guy stick his hand under a woman's skirt and feel her crotch (without actually seeing the hand or the crotch) was considered massively erotic. That's about all I remember (or think I remember) from "I, a Woman". There was also the idea that an unmarried woman was having sex, and with more than one man!
This was before VHS tapes (and DVDs), so I saw it in a theater, but I don't remember if it was a mainstream theater or what.
Even then, I did not consider "I, a Woman" as porn, but as an extremely erotic movie. Today's audience, especially the PU members, would not consider it porn. Today's younger PU audience would laugh at the idea that "Ulysses" was considered porn.
None of the above. First porn movie I saw was at a stag party, it was an 8mm film, that I thought was crap. I did not watch the whole thing.
Later, in the 1970s, when porn movies had really improved and were becoming more commercial, I saw my first porn movie in a regular theater. It was Emanuelle. That was a good porn film. I also saw The Story of O when that came out in the theaters. That was also a very good movie. Both those movies had an interesting plot, good looking girls. Both those movies would probably be considered softcore by today's standards. But I believe they were X rated at the time.
I have copies of Emanuelle and The Story of O on DVD that were commercial copies. But the video quality is not up the standard of the movies when they came out. They keep putting out new releases of those movies over the years, but why they can't make a high-quality version I don't know. Maybe because they can't find a good master to copy from?
I personally like Win XP better than Win 7. Win XP just seems easier to use. But the new computers all come with Win 7, and I'm not going to pay extra (a large amount of dollars) to add Win XP to my PC.
Microsoft charges a large amount of money if you are buying an OS separately from them. Nowadays, the cost of the Microsoft OS is what, maybe $200, and you can buy a low-priced PC for $500 with all the hardware and software that comes with it.
The price for buying items separately instead of bundled with a new PC has always been high, but it seems even higher nowadays. Unless you really know where to buy, and can do it yourself, instead of having a PC tech guy do it for you.
There's also supposed to be a Black Screen of Death and a Red Screen of Death out there, but I've never seen either one of those, that I can remember. The Blue Screen of Death pays me a visit every so often, and has ever since I started using a home computer.
If money didn't mean anything, I would join a lot more porn sites than I do.
But since my funds are limited, I try to join sites where I think I'm getting real value for my money.
There are plenty of sites out there I would like to join, or at least look over to see what they have, but my funds are limited.
The first few times I saw it, I thought: Ugh.
Then, after seeing it so many times, I think: Ugh.
Unless it's done by a girl who can really act like she is enjoying it, I would prefer they come up with some other action to show how hot they are.
I personally think a 100% is easily doable. In all modesty, if I were rating myself, I know that I deserve at least a GB%. And with the way I'm improving day by day, I will soon reach the next step of greatness, with the TB% rating.
For porn sites, the more modest 100% is a goal to be aimed for, rather than achieved, because 100% in theory would be a perfect porn site.
Denner, a beautiful story. As good as any porn novel I read back in my younger days (Nowadays, I watch porn on the Internet instead of reading it.).
I dimly recall my first bj. I didn't feel disbelief, but it was a blissful experience. Except my first intercourse was even better. Memories. I haven't thought about either of those experiences in many years now.
Once I got past high school, it was definitely porn that gave me the most education about sex. And then, many years later, the Internet showed me even more amazing things, many of which I would gladly have passed on. There is a ton of crap out there in pornoland. And the fetishes you can come across: Geez, no thanks!
Comments serve a variety of purposes. You can give useful information about a site, your personal opinion about a site, specific problems or, more rarely, valuable features of that site. Or you could ask general or specific questions about the site, hoping to get a helpful response from a PU member who's been a site member.
PU allows us wide freedom to post our thoughts in a comment, but they also reserve the right to censor our comments. Unless the comment is total spam, they usually let you comment (and post in the threads) however you like.
Which makes for the question: why is the PU site so member-friendly, where the people are courteous and helpful to one another. We aren't saints, but this is one of the nicest sites I've been a member of.
For many sites, where you have an open membership, you have a large number of people who enjoy being idiots and flaming other posters to show their superiority.
But any disagreements at PU are usually mild. The members seem to respect one another, even when they have differing opinions and tastes. And the tastes of the PU members go all over the place, in their search for "enjoyment". Lol.
So if you want to comment on the tour area of a site, go right ahead. I know that's what I've done a number of times in the past.
The tour area of a site is a major introduction to a site, and can be a valuable resource. Or it can also be a waste of time. More sites should put more effort into making the tour area an attractive source of information about the site, that gives you a good idea of what the site is like.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
