| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1976
|
Asian Sex Diary
(0)
|
Reply of
blackheart's Review
Be advised that it hard for most of us to believe that any site that is unwilling to allow downloads is worth a score above 90 but you are entitled to your score. For me the equation is simple. The preview section of this site is so horrendous that it makes it impossible for me to even consider joining. I don't ask that everything be revealed but when nothing is then it's an automatic pass for me.
P.S: You might want to add more info to your review seeing as yours is the most recent one and the score you gave it is significantly higher than what rabbit gave it in August.
|
11-02-15 03:40pm
|
Reply
1977
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
I think we can both agree that whichever option someone picks. That person will have had at least one dollar stolen from his pocket and if he or she is not carefull than that amount could go up pretty quickly.
|
03-29-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
1978
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
I don't agree with their method and it's bad business practices in my book but is it really any different then all those 1$ trials that so many sites like to employ?
Both lure you in using a small amount as bait and both hope to cath a sucker in the process. I assume that enough people fall for it and that's why you still see sites do that. If a site thinks it's content is only worth a dollar then why would anyone think it's worth more than a buck?
|
03-29-13 10:30am
|
Reply
1979
|
Ass Teen Mouth
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
All technical. The updates on the sites that are still active have been few and far between. I know that many fans have complained that some video links don't work, videos are incomplete or download speeds are very bad.
|
03-02-11 06:25pm
|
Reply
1980
|
Ass Teen Mouth
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
From what I've readon another forum then they have had some serious issues in the last few months and I don't think they are all related to security.
|
03-01-11 06:33pm
|
Reply
1981
|
Ass Teen Mouth
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I'm an old hand at Teen core club so here goes. The only sites that are still updating are young throat, try teens, double teamed teens, ass teen mouth and white teens black cock. Now most of these use the same performers so you get similar scenes from one site to the next. A large part of ass teen mouth is shoots from their other sites that they have remastered. My suggestion is that you avoid getting a memebership to teen core club unless this is your first visit. Most of the sites on the network are no longer updating and some of the content is leased but there is still a lot to satisfy a newbie. For any returning member then pick which site offers the best choice for the least expensive price.
Be advised that I read on another forum that recent downloading speeds were pretty bad. That may have been fixed by now.
|
02-27-11 09:04am
|
Reply
1982
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
You are correct. That is exactly what happened. I believe he's directing for Evil Angel. The money must have been too good to pass up.
|
05-17-10 06:44pm
|
Reply
1983
|
Assassinate That Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
pornfalls's Comment
Maybe that was a blessing in disguise because I would recommend you avoid this site. This is clearly a site with leased material and all of it is rather old. Many of the models on the site retired over a year ago and some even longer. I would recommend you look at a site like videobox because I think all of the performers on this site have more than one video at videobox.
|
10-13-11 06:25am
|
Reply
1984
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Explorer's Review
Thanks for the review. I've always liked the performers that appear on the site but their brand of porn is not one that I tend to enjoy so I'm unlikely to ever want to join. I think the site may be dead because 3 months without a single update is not a good sign so hopefully one of two things happen. Either they start to update or they remove the three month membership offer.
|
10-08-23 11:13am
|
Reply
1985
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I grant you that face fucking is probably in a class all of it's own and should not be used when describing other sites but some of the stuff assylum does sort of reminds me of the stuff I saw on FF. It doesn't look like they are out to degrade the talent like FF but it is very hard to walk the line when you are shooting some very extreme stuff.
Both sites are located in the North East so far away from California and therefore that may appeal to performers that live in that part of the US and commute to CA when they want to do porn. I think that is one of the reasons why FF is still able to get performers because if they were in the valley than most girls would avoid them like the plague.
As to why some girls shoot more than one scene. I personally think that they accept to shoot for FF more than once because they are in desperate need of cash and foolishly choose to shoot for them a second time. Normal porn is already hard on the performers so I don't want to imagine what an FF shoot must be like.
|
10-12-14 10:27am
|
Reply
1986
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
I just read on another forum comments made by the owner of the site and in case anyone had a doubt that the caning is real than I can confirm that it is because he said that a performers who agree to it will show marks of it on their body. It's not my cup of tea but it's still basically what the stuff Kink was shooting a little less than a decade ago so nothing new. They shoot out of NY so I don't hold a lot of hope that they can survive long term. Flying a California based performer to NY can't be cheap and this kind of porn must also be a little more expensive to shoot because you have to pay the performers more money.
|
09-27-14 05:46pm
|
Reply
1987
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Let me first say thanks for the review. I'm glad you found a site that you enjoy. This is the kind of site that could get a high score from multiple people and it would still get a low score from me because I simply can't enjoy their brand of porn. Here is a partial list of why it would get a low score.
1-There are way too many visible pain marks on the body of the women for me to overlook them or get sexually stimulated.
2-The main character always wears a mask and I can't tell you how much that that annoys me.
3-Too much of their porn is circus acts that I thought was on the way out. I guess there must still be a market for someone to attempt bringing it back.
4-Too much of the porn is designed to demean the women and by default it makes it impossible for me to believe that they enjoy what's being done to them.
This site reminds me of the misogynistic stuff Facial Abuse is known for but here it's may alienate many performer who might otherwise have worked for them thinking it's like Kink. It's not by a long shot.
|
09-21-14 06:22pm
|
Reply
1988
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Here is a little bit of news about ATK that may explain some of your complaints.
http://www.mikesouth.com/reader-mail/thi...ng-ugly-at-atk-9313/
|
03-13-14 09:14am
|
Reply
1989
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Nothing wrong with two people saying the same thing. This way the lazy people who prefer to read comments from the bottyom up will get your reply first.
|
07-18-12 06:27pm
|
Reply
1990
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Don't forget that it's top rated only because the default is minimum 2 reviews in the last 90 days. If you change the parameter to 3 or more reviews than the site disapears completely from the list.
I'm glad that a site which seems to have such great content gets a high score but 2 reviews will not necessarily mean that it's better than a site with 10 reviews with a lower average score. There are some sites that cater to a more selective type of customer so that those that join and review it are less likely to be disapointed and therefore are more likely to give a high score.
|
07-15-12 10:14am
|
Reply
1991
|
Aussie Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
Of course if you had than you wouldn't have taken one for the team and maybe other people would have joined what looks to be a rather very disappointing site.
I've done it more than once and I always take comfort in the fact that my loss is also the site's loss because my review turns people away.
|
10-12-14 05:28pm
|
Reply
1992
|
Aussie Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Review
Thanks for the review because you took a bullet for the some other people that might have wanted to join but will hold off now that they know what they are getting for their money. It took me less than 10 seconds to know that the site wasn't worth it because the second scene is one starring Lexi belle who has been retired for about a year now. Then I looked at their blog and the last post is about 4 months old.
|
10-12-14 10:34am
|
Reply
1993
|
Babysitter Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
TheBlueDot's Comment
I wish you would have posted a comment prior to joining because I could have told you that the site isn't worth a dollar. This is all leased material and a lot of it is a few years old or more.
|
10-19-11 12:37pm
|
Reply
1994
|
Backdoor Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
PornoPro's Review
Don't you think your score of 79 is very high for what appears to be at best a mediocre site? Is your score because you only paid 8$ for the trial access? Is it possible that Ferro has altered the trial access where you can't download the videos? I know TBP says it's a full access trial but I'm a video guy so not being able to download videos or play them would be a deal killer.
I was a member of Ferro's network last year I was unable to find more than a couple of videos that were worth downloading and I didn't save any of them because they were boring with very little passion or heat. not too mention that navigation is hellish and there is not info on any of the models.
|
09-13-11 07:58am
|
Reply
1995
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Can't speak for broke amateurs because their preview section is so poor that I would never join based only on that. True that the girls are really cute for the other two sites and sad that most never do more than these sites. I know the guy isn't located in California and that's why most of the girls don't make the jump to the industry.
P.S: I forgot to mention but the special offer is 19.99$ for the 3 sites mentioned yesterday.
|
12-31-13 09:13am
|
Reply
1996
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
See the fact that he goes out of his way to avoid showing his face is a problem for me because that means he'll avoid shooting from certain angles for fear that too many shots will have his face in them and he will have to use that stupid circle or he'll have to edit too much content to remove his face.
Mind you this guy is a genius when compared to the idiots at girls do porn. They also avoid showing the performers face and they use an actual camera operator but the shots are 100 times worse at GDP than here.
The sad part for me is that both sites manage to hire some really cute unknowns with great potential but completely mess the shoots so that these one and gone girls can never make it onto my wish list for more stuff.
|
12-30-13 01:48pm
|
Reply
1997
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
How does the shooting style of the newer stuff compare to the older content? My biggest issue with this site was that it was so badly shot that it was nearly unwatchable. The fact that he takes his face out of the video is also a problem for me because I need a connection to happen between both performers and that's ruined when one of them has a circle hiding his face whenever his face should be in the shot.
The static cameras are a problem for me but if he could actually use and handheld camera properly then that might be okay. I keep getting a special offer to join but since I have only saved a tiny portion of the past videos that I suspect the newer stuff will also not work for me.
|
12-30-13 01:34pm
|
Reply
1998
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
I've always found that Epoch's conversion rates are far better than CCBill and that's why I'm always happy when Epoch is the CC processor
of the site I'm looking to join.
|
12-27-13 07:55am
|
Reply
1999
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
bestimmt's Reply
Probably very few and only because I believe he shoots girls from the mideast or midwest. These girls probably never planned to go to the East Cost or West Coast anyway. The site is designed to make it look like he's a kind of dick but the shoots themselves aren't very hard for the girls. I mean it's a one-on-one sex scene with no one else in the room and the guy isn't carrying a deadly weapon in his pants.
If you want to see a site that has managed to destroy possible porn careers then check out facial abuse. Many a girls made the mistake of thinking that these guys are on the up and up and the claim of abuse is just for show. They are in many ways what Max Hardcore was in the last few years before he went to jail.
|
10-30-12 03:59pm
|
Reply
2000
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
bestimmt's Reply
This site has two things going for it. It features girls that would normally never get seen if it wasn't for this site and a tiny amount of them will shoot a few more scenes for other sites/companies.
|
10-28-12 08:30am
|
