| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1951
|
Anabolic.com
(0)
|
Reply of
kyote1's Comment
I hope you don't think I'm picking on you because I'm not but your post is the perfect place to warn others. I think that you represent a portion of people looking for porn who simply don't take all the warning signs seriously
One of the greatest advantages TBP/PU offer porn surfers like you and I is the ability to avoid scam sites. Why would you join a site like this when everything that has been written in the last 3 years as been bad? I was a huge fan of Diabolic and I'd be thrilled if they had a site that contained all of their original movies for download but I wouldn't pay a dollar for the crap this site claims to be offering.
I'd also like to add that it's impossible for Diabolic or it's sister site Anabolic to offer HD content because none of it was ever shot in HD in the first place. Their movies all precede the advent of HD technology.
|
10-14-13 08:06am
|
Reply
1952
|
Anabolic.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rawx's Comment
O don't think you will ever find any of their content in HD because it was never filmed in HD in the first place. That's not to say that you can't get some decent resolution but it won't really be true HD.
Mind you TBP gave this site a 68% in their review so why would anyone want to join it?
|
03-12-13 06:22pm
|
Reply
1953
|
Anabolic.com
(0)
|
Reply of
noche's Reply
I was a huge fan of Diabolic and Anabolic movies so I can understand why you decided to give them a try. My comments were mostly meant for anyone else who might decide to do what you did and not heed the multiple warnings given by TBP and other review sites.
I think the bulk of their content was never shot in HD so any site claiming to be able to offer it in HD is lying and trying to get the money of unsuspecting surfers.
|
05-01-12 08:42am
|
Reply
1954
|
Anabolic.com
(0)
|
Reply of
noche's Comment
This is a site that you could have easily avoided because there were plenty of warning signs telling you that it was not worth it. When TBP gives a score below 70% then that is a major red flag telling everyone to avoid the site or suffer the consequences. The review is 2 years old but then again the studio has been dead for 2 years so it's not like there was ever going to be any newer content to review anyway.
I'm sorry that it cost you a lot of money. You should take a look at Videobox because they have 29 of Anabolic's movies and they have over 150 of their sister studio Diabolic.
|
04-30-12 06:09pm
|
Reply
1955
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I love EA's material. I've been a fan from their early beginnings. That's part of why I'm so frustrated with the way the network is handled. Like I said in my review. This network appears more like a marketing tool to showcase movies from EA's various directors past & present. It mey be set-up this way because they have contracts with other sites? That might be a reason.
This network could be great if the owners make an effort to fix the navigation and surfing speed.
|
11-01-09 05:25pm
|
Reply
1956
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I know what you mean. I dislike having to wait 1-2 weeks to get my dvd's in the mail. My internet provider has now put a limit on how I can download per month before being overcharged. With many sites going the Hi-Def route, I'll soon be delegated to downloading only a few scenes per month.
|
06-11-08 06:23pm
|
Reply
1957
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Thanks You Very Much for the info. I'll have to take a much closer look at their content, since what they offer is scenes taken from their dvds. I've got a few of these, and I'd hate to spend the money for stuff that I currently have on a dvd in my house, but on the other hand I'm not against downloading the ones that I don't.
|
06-09-08 06:57pm
|
Reply
1958
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
Hi Jay G. Are you able to download all the material from the 21 Evil Angels sites? If yes, what are the movie formats available?
|
06-08-08 05:01am
|
Reply
1959
|
Anal Educator
(0)
|
Reply of
Freax Media Gro's Reply
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming that you didn't understand my previous post so here goes.
1-I don't have a problem with you uploading old content but I do have a serious problem when you put a recent date on it to make it appear as though it's new. You and I both know that the stuff tagged 2014 is way older than that.
2-Of course you'd say that because you want some poor unsuspecting person to buy a year long membership when you know it's possible that you will be out of business before the year is over and you won't have ad to refund that person. That's basically what you did twice in the last 3 years with your "No rest for the a.." sites.
3-Who's talking about conversion rates? I'm talking about your join price of 30$ which shouldn't be higher than 20$. In fact seeing as the bulk of your current content is a few years old than it should be even lower. It's not like you need the money to pay for those shoots since they were paid a while back.
4-Just so you know that I'm quite knowledgeable. I checked the EBI link for your so called calendar and the updates stop on May 8 so anyone joining can expect to get updates only until then. Since we are already April 18 than that is less than one month of updates.
I appreciate that you need to make a living but I don't think it all right that you steal it out of our pockets. Good Luck with your so called new sites but it's just plain old stuff to me.
|
04-19-14 02:02pm
|
Reply
1960
|
Anal Educator
(0)
|
Reply of
Freax Media Gro's Reply
Sorry for not having replied sooner. I never got your PM but I think I can offer tell you what I think is wrong with your site(s).
1-Changing the dates on content to make it appear as though it's new and not a couple of years old is a big problem because it makes you look dishonest right from the start. If you can't offer brand new content then simply say so.
2-Offering any membership longer than one month is not a good thing for someone who has already cheated his customers twice in the past few years.
3-Charging more than 20$ for what is essentially old content is just not a nice thing to do.
4-A banner which links to your join page claims 30 updates per month which is a blatant lie since gags girl has only 2 videos, pupil teens won't be online until April 23 (if then) and dildo and fisting links back to anal educator so you aren't really getting seven bonus sites.
My theory is that you suspected that almost no one was going to pay money to join no rest for the ass because you screwed too many past members so you came up with a new site which contains all of your old scenes with maybe some new ones and this was another quick cash and grab scam where you won't be updating with actual new content and charge customers a premium price.
If you think that anything I wrote is incorrect then please tell me where and offer proof to validate your claim.
4-
|
04-18-14 09:35am
|
Reply
1961
|
Anal Educator
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I hope not because if you join through no rest for the ass then you also get this one. I'm pretty sure you will get the entire network and I hope you don't regret it.
I know I'm not joining because Girgio's past business practices pissed me off so now I refuse to give him my money.
|
04-10-14 01:56pm
|
Reply
1962
|
Anal Educator
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
I think Duke and probably anybody else associated with TBP and PU can be forgiven for any lack of current news on this site and any other associated with the No Rest For... network. Here is what I can tell you. Giorgio Grandi is the man responsible for all the content on the network and he posted on the EBI forum on April 5 that he would again start to update the network with new stuff and this site is now part of the network.
On the surface this sounds like great news and maybe it will but let say a few words about Giorgio for one minute. This is the man who in 2011 stopped updating his sites but never told anyone that he was doing that and certainly never stopped offering year long memberships to his customers. He sort of came back in 2012 with some new stuff and some sweet words that he was back but that was BS since the sites stopped updating only a couple of months after the announcement. Now he's saying that he's back and will update the network with some new content (were did I read that story before?) and if you are a newbie and visit his sites then you would believe that it's true because there is some content dated 2014. The first problem is that the dated is a complete lie since the content is a lot older and worse is stuff he already had released in years past but probably removed for just this kind of occasion.
It's your money and you can do what you like with it but don't come crying to me if you feel cheated and please do not buy a membership longer than one month because you will definitely regret it for at least 365 days.
|
04-09-14 06:29pm
|
Reply
1963
|
Anal Lick Fest
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Amen Brother. PU and TBP have managed to save me a lot of money over the last few years with all the reviews of sites that I was seriously thinking of joining. There are some sites that seem to be good from the outside but are so awful once you pay your membership that many people get taken in. It's up to guys like you, me and all the other PU/TBP reviewers to warn others.
|
07-02-11 06:14am
|
Reply
1964
|
Anal Lick Fest
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Just look at Pink Visual. If there was ever a porn company that has mastered the ability to screw customer it's this one. I'm quite sure there are many others that do the same thing but somehow few are as big as PV. As far as I can tell they haven't really filmed new content in a long time. Most of their updates are either leased material of much oldeer scnes that have been remastered. Add the fact that many of these can be found elsewhere like Videobox.
|
07-01-11 07:06pm
|
Reply
1965
|
Anal Lick Fest
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
The only theory I can come up with is that since they don't really update with new content then they must be losing members and not gaining too many more to replace them so those willing to join must pay more for they to still make the same kind of money as before.
|
07-01-11 10:24am
|
Reply
1966
|
Anal Pantyhose
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The good news is that most if not all of the performers that appear on this site also appear on the other anal themed sites within the Ferro network. You are better off joining one of those sites. The way Ferro seems to work is that they film scenes with a certain fetish in mind and then release the scene in a particular site tagged with that fetish. They have multiple nylon sites but only one that also has anal and vice versa they have a few anal themed sites but only one where the women wear nylon during the scene.
|
07-02-13 06:43pm
|
Reply
1967
|
Anal Sex Zone
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Comment
Let me see if I can help you.
1-The site has a score that is barely above 70 so why are you even willing to waste your money on what is likely going to turn out to be a turd?
2-I don't know how much of the content is leased material but some of the more recent updates are many years old.
3-Seeing as the site has so little content then a 10GB limit is unlikely to be a problem.
It's your money so if you want to spend it on this site then please go ahead but I can guarantee you that you will be disappointed with the content.
|
12-17-17 05:51pm
|
Reply
1968
|
Anal Teen Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Robin68's Reply
It would also piss me off. I like that 19.95$ price so much that I may rejoin them simply because of it.
|
03-24-10 02:36pm
|
Reply
1969
|
Anal Teen Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Robin68's Reply
Hi Robin68.
I don't know if you joined analteenangels or one of the other within the network. It's true that many of their sites have lesbian content
but only about 3 are pure lesbian sites only most of the others will
have a mixture of lesbian and boy/girl content. I know that they've had some problems in the lst few months because they have completely
altered their network and download speeds have been good to bad. I
usually don't download the HD stuff so I didn't see a big problem with the speed but there were a couple of days of really bad speeds.
I know somem people don't like the reward program but there is the best one I've ever seen and with a new price of 19.95$ for the first month, then 14.95$ for the second and then 9.95$. You will get all the sites for an investment of less than 50$. The only issue is that you have to wait 3 months.
|
03-23-10 06:24pm
|
Reply
1970
|
Analized
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Thanks for another great review. Now I can cross this one off my list of possible. Another con to add is that two of the models on the site appear in an anal scene but don't actually perform it and there is no way to know that unless you visit James site.
|
04-17-17 05:48pm
|
Reply
1971
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
dgerity's Review
I hope you don't mind but I'm too curious to know your answer to the following question. Did you join her site after Marcus's review or before? If it was before then that's one thing but if it's after then why would you even bother? He gave the site a very poor score but all the info pretty much made it clear that the site was a scam.
At least in my mind it is.
|
04-13-13 06:24pm
|
Reply
1972
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
I find that her other site is even more of a scam because you can't download anything. I don't agree with sites that offer streaming only of their videos but I at least understand why they do this but I really don't understand why you would prevent paying members the ability to download the photosets. She appears to still be doing cam shows but I'm not sure if they are only for ehr site or if she freelances on other sites. She is quite active on Twitter.
|
03-10-13 07:50am
|
Reply
1973
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
The only reason I called it a scam is because there is so little HC on this site that almost everyone joining will feel cheated since this is suppose to be her HC site. This is compounded by the fact that she has a few other softcore sites so unless someone sees your review prior to joining then they will rightly assume that Ann is doing only HC stuff on this site.
That's not to say that a few months or a year from now that the site won't be full of HC porn but that won't help all the people who like you joined expecting some HC porn from a favorite girl.
|
03-10-13 05:37am
|
Reply
1974
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
Thanks for the review.
If I read your review correctly then her site is pretty much a scam since she hasn't actually done any hardcore sex yet. She may have done some midcore stuff but that is not the same thing at all.
|
03-09-13 06:48pm
|
Reply
1975
|
Asian Sex Diary
(0)
|
Reply of
Vito's Reply
The only exceptions used to be sites like AEBN and Hot Movies because they have movies that are simply no longer available anywhere else but I stopped using them in the last few years because the cost to satisfaction ratio is just too high.
|
02-01-16 05:44pm
|
