| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
3226
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
I'm not too sure what you are talking about. I tested some of the previews and I didn't see any of the issues you brought up. I'd also like to point out that although you can find plenty of anal porn on the net. There is nothing similar to what Tushy is offering so if you like their brand of porn than sooner or later you'll have to join.
I should know since I'm a returning member. Of course I got a special offer so I got a much lower join price the second time but I would still have join if the price was 30$. I would just have waited a few weeks to do so.
|
11-04-15 05:39pm
|
Reply
3227
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I was aware of that info about wake up and fuck. I'm a past Woodman member. I tend to join once or twice a year as the mood moves me. I tend to like most of his stuff but sometimes the slapping gets on my nerves and what could have been a great scene is ruined.
It's porn so there is no way to be certain if the girls enjoy what he does but it's look like many of them do. At least he has a pretty average sized dick so that the girls aren't afraid to get their asses ripped when he does anal.
|
09-09-15 03:18pm
|
Reply
3228
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I think in your case it's a win, win situation because you get some amazing Woodman porn and Tushy will still be there when you want to join. I'm thinking about joining Woodman in the near future. I'm just not sure when it will be but definitely before the end of this year.
|
09-08-15 05:45pm
|
Reply
3229
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Since they update once a week than you already how long before they reach your magic number. My decision was simpler because I wanted to get the first anal scenes of certain performers.
|
09-06-15 06:02pm
|
Reply
3230
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I appreciate where you are coming from and I don't expect to change your mind but the site is worth the 30$ even if it only has 20 videos at the moment. Where I don't know if it's worth it is in staying with it long term. I have already allowed my original membership to remain active beyond the first month but I didn't allow it to go beyond the two month range because I didn't get an incentive to stick with it by getting some kind of discount. Since the price remains the same whether you have a membership or you don't than why bother staying long term? I can always join again for the same 30$ price
|
09-06-15 06:00pm
|
Reply
3231
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Comment
Here are two pieces of information to explain what's likely to happen to most Manwin properties in the months to come.
http://www.mikesouth.com/manwin/manwin-m...am-in-montreal-9324/
http://www.mikesouth.com/manwin/twistys-...-complete-scam-9311/
|
03-14-14 08:21am
|
Reply
3232
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I would suspect that she does anal in more than one scene. I think that Amber is an amazing performer and not affraid to do extreme stuff. I would still like a few different faces or asses to be featured doing anal.
|
06-17-09 05:16pm
|
Reply
3233
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Thanks mbaya. This is one of the sites that I keep track of but I've never joined. The wrestling aspect seems interesting but it's more the girl on girl action that would be the selling point. I notice that you mention an increase in anal between the girls nad that would be right down my alley. Is it always the same perforemr or is there a good mixture?
|
06-16-09 06:21pm
|
Reply
3234
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I did visit suicide girls a couple of times, but I've never been a big fan of extreme pierceings and tatoos. Unlees I'm mistaken that his most if not all their models. Actually there are 4 things that make me lose interest in a girl. Fake breasts (because most usually exagerate to a size that alters their entire body shape), Tattoos because most distract from the girls natural beauty, extreme body
piercings, and finally cosmetic surgery that alters the shape of the face.
|
04-09-08 05:29pm
|
Reply
3235
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I can't claim that I don't enjoy what they offer since I've been a member of some of their sites and might join more often if it weren't for the high price. I just find that some scenes are too intense to turn me on. At least the intensity is not for shock value like I've seen on some other sites.
|
04-08-08 06:19pm
|
Reply
3236
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Come on who doesn't look good in a "General Lee" T-shirt? My issue odly enough isn't so much with the content as much as the fact that girls get off on being, for lack of a better word, tortured. I'm sure it's consentual, but on some scenes I still have a hard time with it. You are correct that the newer stuff is one step higher, than most of the prior material.
|
04-07-08 06:18pm
|
Reply
3237
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Thanks for the info. I'll have too keep this one in mind. I've enjoyed some of their other sites like Whipped Ass, and Sex and Submission. I like a little S & M, but sometimes they seem to go beyond my comfort zone. Like most modern porn. The interaction between actors in some of their scenes is lacking any kind of chemistry. I joined earlier this Year Chanta's Bitches, and I find that she has good chemistry with most of the girls that go on her site.
|
04-06-08 06:57pm
|
Reply
3238
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
Hi Toadsmith. I've been curious about this site. I know that the winner of the wrestling match gets to abuse the other girl, but is there a lot of strap on anal sex between the performers.
|
04-06-08 10:32am
|
Reply
3239
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
Thanks for the additional info. I've only ever joined the premium channel in the very beginning of my membership so wasn't aware that you got a reduced rate if you waited until your main membership was about to expire. Do you know approximately when the lower cost comes into effect. It's not something that I personally care for but maybe some of the other people reading your comments will want to know.
|
11-18-16 05:37pm
|
Reply
3240
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Dirt D's Reply
Let's see if I can add some stuff to your excellent points.
1-I didn't want to imply that dropping WMV was an improvement so if that is what you got then sorry. I just think that that offering the videos in the superior MP4 is an improvement because it is a better video format that WMV. I can appreciate it if you were a huge fan of WMV and if that is the case than seeing it disappear would be an annoyance but that is the nature of the beast when it comes to technology. The better one normally eclipses the other ones.
2-Bit rate and so call HD formats don't always mean a lot if the finish product is indistinguishable from one version to the next. I honestly didn't see any difference with the stuff VB is offering now to the stuff they were offering a few years ago
3-I appreciate where you are coming from but it's been my experience that VB was never all that good when it came to offering the same quality as the source material. In fact I always thought that they added a loud musical soundtrack to videos that I'm pretty sure never had them on the VHS or DVD. I think VB does a moderately decent job at digitizing the original material so that it is as close as they can get it to the source material without costing huge sums of money.
3-And yet studios like Evil Angel and Jules Jordan are still using VB as a means to make some money even though they themselves have their own streaming and downloading sites. I must really suck to have to do that to make sure that some people at least pay for a part of the production of porn instead of going the tube way.
4-Actually if streaming what you want than Hot Movies or AEBN is the way to go. They have a better selection and the quality tends to be a little better but the cost is just too high for most people to use it on a regular basis. I'm old school so the kind of porn I like tends to be of lower resolution than most other people seem to like so video quality isn't as important to me. One of my favorite ite is classic porn and let me tell you it's not remotely close to HD. What pisses me the most about VB is that so little of the older stuff they should have is missing from their library while so much of what can be found elsewhere is in over abundance.
*I'm really considering joining VideosZ in the next little while so maybe I will post a review or add a comment.
|
03-29-15 05:13pm
|
Reply
3241
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Dirt D's Reply
Let me see if I can reply to some of the stuff you wrote.
1-Although WMV was a very good a stable format. What came after it is for the most part superior in large part because they improved on what WMV had done. MP4 is so much better format than WMV and it takes up less drive space.
2-The vast majority of the content on VB is not HD and never was to begin with. In fact it was never filmed in HD in the first place so how could it somehow become HD now that it has been digitized. Now of course many of the premium channels will have more HD but it's probably because their content is a lot newer and was filmed in HD.
Of course good luck with an Evil angel or Elegant Angel content that is more than five years old because it won't be in HD.
3-I applaud your reasoning for joining VB. If more people did like you did then maybe we wouldn't be in the situation that we are in but you have to realise that the VB business model was never a profitable endeavour for most porn producing studios. Those still producing porn right now make a lot more money when you join their site than the pittance VB must pay them for their movies. Add the fact that the bulk of the VB content is of dead studios and you realise that the only people profiting from a site like VB are the owners of VB.
4-I think that people should join both sites at least once but more would be better. each of them has stuff the other doesn't have so it's a good idea to join both to cover your bases.
|
03-26-15 06:24pm
|
Reply
3242
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Dirt D's Review
I'm glad you did this review because I also joined last month and I didn't want to do a review. I think the site sucks but it may be more because of what I was hoping to see and less because of what is available.
I totally agree with you about the premium channels and I would add that the last time I was a member. I'm pretty sure Elegant Angel was not part of the premium channels. I would be a lot happier with VB if instead of looking to add newer stuff that is too often subpar to older stuff. They simply tried to add content to the studios they already have. Where are all the older Elegant angel, Evil Angel, JM production, Zane Studios, Diabolic, Anabolic and I could go on movies that exist but can't be found anywhere. VB already has many of those studios movies so why can't they add content for those studios?
I wouldn't have been as harsh with my score because there is simply too much porn for what you pay for but my last visit may truly be the last time I actually bother joining VB. Unless I see them adding movies to past studio than I don't see myself giving much of a shit about what they consider to be good updates right now.
|
03-21-15 12:12pm
|
Reply
3243
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'm from the old school where no one had any clue what HD meant so I don't care that the resolution is subpar when compared to almost anything done today. As long as I can see the performers and the action than that is more than acceptable. I found some movies that I thought I never would on the classic porn and it makes staying a member well worth it for me.
|
12-18-14 06:00pm
|
Reply
3244
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
These days I get more pleasure out of the movies the classic porn site uploads than anything else other sites have to offer and we are talking about some mediocre looking movies. it's just that they are the movies I've been looking for and I can live with a good movie that looks bad. I can no longer stand bad movies that look good.
|
12-16-14 05:47pm
|
Reply
3245
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I agree with everything you said but let's be honest. It's old farts like us that still pay for porn so sites might as well cater to our needs because the young ones are getting their porn on tube sites so trying to attract them as new customers or retain them is a waste of time.
|
12-15-14 05:43pm
|
Reply
3246
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I completely agree with you but we all knew that this was going to happen to them at some point. It's not like they can upload actual new content. There is simply not enough out there and most of it is now limited to the studios own site and they don't want to get the pittance VB would offer them for that content.
VB would be far better served in looking to upload older content that must still exist somewhere and which many fans would love to see than to add the same compilation crap over and over.
|
12-14-14 09:11am
|
Reply
3247
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Schirm's Reply
The bulk of the content on VB and VideosZ is many years old and it's not getting any younger. The quality of the print the sites used was not necessarily the best and they never bothered to remaster them so the final product is often of passable video quality. Their problem is compounded by the fact that so many studios have died in the last 5 years that it's getting harder and harder for them to find new material to update on a daily basis. In fact the bulk of the new stuff is actually content taken from porn sites as opposed to actual porn studios. The rest is a mixture or older titles and content from the few remaining active studios but that last one now means that it's not exclusive to VB and/or VideosZ.
That doesn't mean that both sites aren't worth joining because they are if for no other reason than they have such a huge library of content that it's well worth a month long membership. Likely longer if you want o truly find everything that you want.
The bulk of the content on both sites is best appreciated if the video resolution is 640x480. I wish I could say the newer stuff can be downloaded and viewed in 720p or 1080p but stated above that both sites still update with older content so no way of telling you which new movie is actually recent and which one isn't without seeing their library.
|
03-23-14 07:41am
|
Reply
3248
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
The new site design is your basic "How to screw up a site up 101". How can they hope to get new customers when anyone who's not familiar with the site is unable to see anything and worse is lied to on the only page you can see
|
07-14-13 04:26pm
|
Reply
3249
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Comment
That seems to be a fairly new thing because that was not the pages that I used to see when I visited the site and it's definitely not the ones that I still see when I use my Firefox link. I still see the original pages which do allow you to see the current info.
That page is actually a giant mess because it's full of lies and half truths. The perfect is example is if you scroll down to the section where it says "Just Added". They have two movies starring Jayden James. That part is true but these were added at least two years ago since there are comments about those movies that are that old.
I know it's VB and there are tons of reviews so anyone curious about what he or she is getting need only read those but this new marketing idea is a really bad one. If I use my Firefox link then I have to pay 15$ instead of 12$ but I will at least know exactly what I'm getting for that amount and frankly 15$ is a joke because there is just too much content for that amount.
|
07-14-13 07:32am
|
Reply
3250
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
I'm sure VB is well aware that studio output of new movies has been dropping for the last 3-4 years and therefore other sources had to be found but I don't think that this is the main reason why they are adding older titles to their library. I think that although you may not like those older titles. Many members probably do and they have been asking VB to add them. I know that new stuff is nice to look at but a lot of older stuff is better(at least to me).
|
03-20-13 05:24pm
|
