| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2926
|
Real Celeb Scandals
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Reply
All I know is that the names I gave you previously and which this site claims to have nude videos of is pure BS. Those celebrities have leaked naked pictures of them on the net and this site has taken those pictures and made as though they have videos.
It's possible that the site has nude videos of stars but why join a fraudulent site when you can get the samething from a known and reviewed site like Mrskin or celebrity movie archive.
|
09-09-10 07:34pm
|
Reply
2927
|
Real Celeb Scandals
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Comment
I recommend you stay away from this site because you will regret it about 30 seconds after you've paid for your membership. There is a limited trial for a 1.11$ which then recurs to 39.97$.
The main page claims to have videos of Rihanna,
Ashley Green, cassie, Vanessa Hudgens among many more. The big problem is that there aren't any videos. There are pictures of these people but they can easily be found elsewhere just by using Google.
|
09-08-10 06:52pm
|
Reply
2928
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
True but if you look at the "Important" box on the TBP review. You clearly see in bold letters that the trial is limited. I know that is a broad term but no one can come back after seeing that and say they didn't realise that the trial was very limiting.
|
06-01-15 02:54pm
|
Reply
2929
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Like I said. You can be forgiven for not looking too deeply seeing as this is a well established site. At least now you may rad the error reports prior to joining other established sites. I tend to always be very cautious when the words :free trial: are used.
|
10-04-14 06:25pm
|
Reply
2930
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Now you can be forgiven for not doing it but I assume you didn't check out TBP's review prior to joining because there is more than one error report this year and it's all about the trial not being a full one. In fact 3 out of the 4 reports this year were about the trial not being a full one. Not sure if you paid more than 1$ but hopefully you didn't.
|
10-04-14 09:21am
|
Reply
2931
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
blindtrust's Review
You are entitled to say what you want in your review but didn't you enjoy anything about RK? I can see using a large chunk of your con section complaining about hard to see cross-sales. Didn't you get a confirmation email stating that you had joined two sites instead of just one? I know that I do whenever I get a cross-sale?
|
09-16-13 03:37am
|
Reply
2932
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
jullie958's Comment
Wow! You are a demanding customer. I agree that it's great site but they already update with two new scenes per day, 7 days a week. I don't think they can updates more often. You are paying less than
20$ a month for 56 scenes. Many sites only update once a week and their membership cost is higher.
Now it would be different if you had said that you'd like them to update a particular series more often because it's one that you like.
|
05-25-13 09:15am
|
Reply
2933
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
My suggestion about not posting anything was only in regards to RK's forum. Of course there are other places where you can discuss this and since he has already posted comments about it here then he has done that. He could even start a thread in our forum about this very same subject as long as he avoids insulting the talent because it's just not nice to do that.
|
04-21-13 08:14am
|
Reply
2934
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
audrina69's Reply
It's not as bad but since they only hire from a small group of male performers than those being described still know who you are talking about. That's not to say that you aren't correct in your assessment of the quality of their work. Just that posting comments on it is not a very good idea. Much better that you let your money do the talking.
|
04-20-13 01:48pm
|
Reply
2935
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
audrina69's Comment
Here's my view on comments. If you are going to comment negatively on any of the performers then don't. In the first place. It's bad manners and in the second it's not nice. The people who shoot those scenes might read your comments and no one likes to be talked about in a negative way. They may not be your cup of tea but if they are still being hired then they must be somebody else because the site would be loosing customers left and right. A sites comment section is more a privilege than a right. Your money gets you access to the content so if the scenes are so bad then do what I do and don't join that site.
The problem with some of the male talents you named is that they are popular performers who shoot their own stuff and also work for other companies so hiring them is probably harder(no pun intended) and maybe more expensive. We get a regular supply of new girls but male talent is rare. Let me rephrase that. Getting good male talent is getting really hard.
This is an old story for me but my view in regards to content and updates is that it was never a question of whether or not it was going to happen but when it was going to happen. I always knew that sooner or later all those Tube and Torrent Sites were going to affect the porn industry to the point where the few of us that still pay for it can't counter-balance all those that steal it. When you couple that with an unstable economy, 3 std scares in one year, a foolish fight on condoms in the industry and you just compound the problems.
P.S: My suggestion is that if you think that 18$ a month is too much for the content you like then just join every few months or never again. Posting comments is not the way to go about changing site policies because they are just words. Your money on the other hand is quite another thing. That is tangible and hurts them where it counts.
|
04-20-13 10:46am
|
Reply
2936
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I still prefer natural to implants so I'd take the droopping ones if the women chose to stay natural but I can understand the reasoning for why they do it and accept that these older women often have huge mellons on their chest. At least they have the the wear and tear of time but a 20 years old with implants is mind boggling...Not really but that's for another discussion.
|
10-29-12 04:15pm
|
Reply
2937
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm less inclined to think that they were told to do that then that they chose on their own. As women age so does their body and breats seem to be of particular interest to women. Actually they are of interest to men as well.
I'm far more bafflked when a 19 years old gets huge implants because she definetely can't use age as the reason.
|
10-28-12 06:30pm
|
Reply
2938
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I don't know if they took people like you into consideration when they filmed the scenes but many of milf in the scene seem to always keep their tops on or they shoot in such a way that it's hard to be certain whether they have implants or not. I'm pretty sure that at least 4 to maybe 6 of them have natural breast as I'm also sure that at least 9 have implants. The last 4 or so are uncertain but I tend to lean in the direction of implants.
|
10-28-12 05:57pm
|
Reply
2939
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
It's a very good network of sites to join and the price is excellent.
Here is some info for you.
Moms Bang Teens is a nice addition since they have only been online since January. The downside is that they don't update on a regular basis so you have some months where there are 2-4 new scenes and then you have months where there are only 1. At least you have 31 scenes at the moment.
Milf Next Door suffers from low updating. They only have 6 scenes this year and 7 for last year. Basically it all went to hell in 2009 because that's when you saw a significant reduction in their upates.
|
10-28-12 09:00am
|
Reply
2940
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I was surprise about the name thing. I think you are right and they are just too lazy to fix it. Although it's true that the older stuff is not very good. I can't give them a score below 90 plus because they have so much content that you do get your money's worth.
It would be nice if they trie to remaster their older stuff like Bangbros and Dogfart do but we have already established that they are lazy so doing that would really be too much work.
|
10-26-12 01:52pm
|
Reply
2941
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
No question that porn is a huge Worldwide industry but it's still a small profit industry for most studios and porn companies.
I post regularly on ADT and PU. I sometimes post twice as much on ADT because they are a lot more threads going and far more participating members. PU is still years ahead in regards to the quality of it's posters.
|
12-29-11 08:21am
|
Reply
2942
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The original Captain Stabbin got so many newbies first on screen anal that it's hard to know where to start the name game. That's the main reason why I always came back to his site.
It's true that the porn industry is multi-billion industry but you never read that this is gross profit for the entire planet's porn industry. The other thing that is pure bullshit is when they compare it to the mainstream industry. No offense but there is no comparaison and anyone that says there is has an agenda against porn. Here's some simple examples. Avatar made 2 billions dollars in gross profit from worldwide box office takes. The last 2 Harry Potter movies which were really part 1 and part 2 of the same movie made a combined 2.2 billions gross profit in worldwide box office takes. That's not counting the profit they've made on dvd, Blu-ray and other streaming methods.
P.S: I really like ADT. Not everyone is as polite and nice as hear but the moderator are quick to deativate those that push the line. The bulk of the discussion are on performers and movies so it's good to particiapete here because we mostly talk about sites.
|
12-28-11 07:51am
|
Reply
2943
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It's possible that RK would have loved to make new Captain Stabbin scenes but the people involved with that series stopped doing them a few years ago. RK has done a couple of recent ones but these were with different performers. RK and Bangbros are primarily shot in Florida and I think that can be a good thing but the recent problems with performers being tagged as HIV+ were both in Florida and there have also been some police related issues at a couple of other times and shooting in Florida may no longer be such a geat thing.
When you couple that with the major down turn in the porn industry and I think Brazzer is the only studio with similar content who's actually making any money. I use an anal barometer to do this predicttion. When studios that used to shoot regular anal scenes and now only do them on rare occasion or remaster older ones then they are in financial trouble. Anal is more expensive than standard vags so if a studio shoots mostly that then they are looking to save on production cost.
Now in regards to Tanner. The simple answer is that there are very few studios that can afford to pay her price for an anal scene. Not too mention that very few stuios shoot on a regular basis. Having Tanner do anal in a video is sure to help sales but I read somewhere that dvd sales are very low. Most studio sell about 700-1200 units per most dvd's and the better ones about 1000-2000 units. If they make 10$ on each on these then their gross profit is anywhere from 7000$ to 20,000$. If the dvd has 4 standard b/g scenes with some established performer then the cost for each scene is going to be about 1000$ to 1500$. That means that just the performers are going to cost 4000$ to 6000$. You also have to pay a director, cameraman, editor and the cost of transfer to dvd. Imagine a performer asking for 4000$ for her anal scene. That's a small amount because I read that Breanne Benson wants 7000$ for her anal scene. If you have to pay 7000$ for only one scene then you have to be one of those lucky bastards that gets to sell at least 2000 or more units to even hope to make some profit.
|
12-27-11 07:07am
|
Reply
2944
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Thanks for the review. This is a network that I used to keep track of but I notice that in the past year they almost never have any updates that appeal to me and recently the site no longer makes it easy to see their newer scenes. Not too mention that looking for older content is a clkusterfuck. I really wish you had asked the question about the Tanner anal scene prior to joining. I would have given you the bad news and saved you from joining for her anal scene.
P.S: I have some good news on Tanner and anal stuff. She shot one or two movies for Evila Angel which should be released in January.
|
12-26-11 06:12pm
|
Reply
2945
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Either I'm getting picker or more and more sites which I used to enjoy are offering less interesting updates. Reality King, BangBros, Naughty America and even some of the updates at Brazzer seem less appealing. RK and Bangbros are by far the worse of the bunch. At least NA and Brazzer still have some good scenes.
|
03-19-11 05:28pm
|
Reply
2946
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Hodgepodge's Reply
That doesn't sound very good unless they were doing major changes to servers and such. Otherwise that could mean another porn company that's dying a slow death.
|
03-13-11 10:32am
|
Reply
2947
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
sigh's Review
Did you email their support group to see if they're having technical problems? I've been a member a couple of times and I've never encountered any of the things you describe.
|
02-23-11 06:43pm
|
Reply
2948
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
The only problem with their filter is that it doesn't list in order the anal scenes. You'd think that if you offer a filter option than at least it would start from the latest scene and move to the vey first one, but not on this site.
|
12-12-10 11:48am
|
Reply
2949
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
The site with the most anal is Brazzer then it's a fight between reality kings and bangbros. I would pick reality kings ahead of bangbros but that could be a question of tatse. Naughty America is going to be far behind all these guys. Anal used to be part of their regular updates but these days they have maybe one anal about every 2 weeks.
I notice that someone mentioned 21sextury and he is correct about the amount of anal content but I assume that since your list of sites is for American sites then you want to see American girls getting sodomized.
|
12-11-10 06:00pm
|
Reply
2950
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
lostdutchman's Comment
A very importsant reason why you should check out TBP's review page under the heading trial membership before joining any site's limited trial. It clearly states that the trial is only the first 10 min of the 2 latest updates.
The only trials that interest me are those that offer full access but with a time limit.
|
10-02-10 07:18pm
|
