| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2901
|
Porngantic
(0)
|
Reply of
MrMac's Reply
I'm sorry to hear about the DRM but I'm not very surpised. I was a member of StraponLesbian more than once in the last 5 years and they had quite a few attractive young women that didn't do anal on screen except on that site. They were all all with strap-ons but I didn't mind that. Most of the movies on Porngantic are from that site and a few others owned by the same people. StraponLesbian must have had over 200 scenes by the time they stopped updating so that could easily fill a fake new site.
|
01-30-10 07:26am
|
Reply
2902
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Implants were still quite new and not yet as popular as they became.
It is sometimes too bad for guys like us who remember a time when the girls who had large breasts did so because of Mother Nature and not a surgeon's knife.
I also found the statement ancient to be quite funy when talking about porn made in the last deacde or so. It's even strabger when you consider the age of the poster. I like ancient porn because I much prefer the movies made in the 70's and 80's.
|
02-03-13 11:06am
|
Reply
2903
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Roberto281's Comment
I think one of the main reasons why this site is more popular or at least higher rated than RK or Evil Angel is that you are getting access to older porn that may not be available elsewhere or only available on streaming only sites. One of my annoyance with EA is the fact that you only get a portion of their older library. There is still some great porn being made today but I much prefer the stuff that was made 10 or more years ago.
I don't think that you are not the right type of customer for PN and that is fine because you still have some great sites that you can join.
|
02-03-13 11:03am
|
Reply
2904
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
This is purely abuse and not really BSDM. There is a little but it's incedental to the normal action.
|
05-21-10 07:05pm
|
Reply
2905
|
Private Society
(0)
|
Reply of
UMBA8's Reply
Count me in as one of the people who has a general idea of what the content is because I have seen some of their videos on tube sites but I don't know if these are new or old videos or if they are complete scenes since I try to avoid Tube sites as much as possible. It would be nice if they used tube sites to their advantage but only if they also improve their site because the first thing people see is the site itself and no matter how great the content might be. I will never join a site that as such a poor design.
P.S: Sadly the people who pay for porn are getting rare but luckily there are still a few like us who understand that if you don't pay for it then they will stop making it.
|
04-09-20 04:15pm
|
Reply
2906
|
Private Society
(0)
|
Reply of
UMBA8's Reply
I'm sorry if you thought I was implying that you are trying to pull the wool over our eyes because that's not what I think. I think that your review lacked the important info to justify the score and seeing as the site design isn't just bad but it is horrible then how can we judge the value of the site if it isn't from an actual member.
Pointing their potential members to tube sites like they actually do on their twitter feed is a terrible business decision because if the people can get it for free then will they also want to pay for it. Especially when they don't know if what they are seeing is all there is.
P.S: The info in your reply would be great things to add to your review as this is what we want to see to know if the site has any worth.
|
04-09-20 09:48am
|
Reply
2907
|
Private Society
(0)
|
Reply of
UMBA8's Review
You are entitled to your score but a site that has only one preview page and 8 tiny trailers should probably not get a score above 80 regardless that the content might be good because all potential customer should not have to fork over 25$ to discover if it is or it isn't and that is exactly what you have to do with this site.
You couple that with the fact that one of the available trailer is for an Heidi Cummins video that has been on her MV account for a year and that adds to the problem. Granted there is no date associated with the trailer but one would assume that if it's there then it's a recent one.
We're in 2020 and that site looks like the kind of stuff I used to see in the late 90's and early 2000's.
We all have our favorite and you can be forgiven for looking at the site with rose colored glasses but giving the site a score in the 90's tends to make your review less believable than if it had been scored closer to previous ones.
Things not necessarily a must in a review but really help to flesh out what potential customers will get are things like.
-How many videos are there?
-Are they dated?
-What are the available resolutions?
-How many Models?
-Can you search for content?
|
04-09-20 08:07am
|
Reply
2908
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I was a member about 3 weeks ago and they only had a small selection of all their available magazines . I believe they have another site dedicated to only printed material.
I found some really great videos but my biggest issue with the site is that you are still only getting a small portion of all the Private movies and that really sucks. I don't know what their update schedule is supposed to be but I know that they did not update one single new movie while my membership was active. They added individual scenes but no actual full movies.
|
12-01-13 09:23am
|
Reply
2909
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I can't speak about the site because I haven't been a member in many years but I haven't see a true new movie from Private in a long time. As far as I know all their releases are comp taken from their large library of movies.
|
04-03-11 10:05am
|
Reply
2910
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thnaks for the info. I'll keep my eyes open for that review. There are a couple of Private videos that I'd like to download.
|
02-09-10 06:16pm
|
Reply
2911
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
I hope you change your mind and write a review. I was a past member and I'd love to know more about the state of this site. I know that they do not realease has many movies because I almostr never see new stuff except compilation.
|
02-08-10 06:28pm
|
Reply
2912
|
Priya Anjali Rai
(0)
|
Reply of
ipg386's Comment
Whoever handles her site must have thought that it's better to get 3 dollars from unsuspecting visitors then 20$ from regular members.
I read a past comment that there used to be a 3 day trial which gave you full access.
I got burned with membership to sites when I first started surfing for porn and almost all of these were for pornstar sites. My rule of thumb is that unless I can see the entire content on the previews pages then I'd rather miss an opportunity then feel cheated.
|
01-01-11 06:56am
|
Reply
2913
|
Prolapse Party
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
The number of girls willing and/or able to do prolapse porn is tiny so don't worry about it. It's not my thing but I keep track of it because it's a curisosity of mine. I like to accumulate useless data in case I ever need it. That's why I can assure you that the content on that site is partially older and will not get updated very often if at all. Fisting is a little different because there are way more girls willing and able to do it. The difference between them is usally in which opening they can take a fist.
The most common extreme girls right now are probably Alyssa Gap, Roxy raye and Kinzy Jo. Alyssa takes the cake for most extreme with double anal fisting but I think she's more human freak than anything else.
Now I think you are confusing more violent with more technologically violent. A huge problem that occured in the last few years is the major advances in CGI technology. These days most TV shows and movies employ CGI effects when it comes to blood and guts. It's super great because they are only limited by their imagination and budget but they have removed the humanity to the effect. Seeing a guy gets his head cut off CGI style is more like watching a video game than a real scene. Of course it's bloodier but once you have seen one or two movies with that type of effect then you can't help but disbelieve any other effect using this technology. The most recent Rambo was a perfect example. There was so much blood and guts flying in that movie that you stop caring about the action and that takes you completely out of the movie.
|
12-15-11 12:24pm
|
Reply
2914
|
Prolapse Party
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
For me it's not what people are willing to do but why they are asked to do it that makes me think that we're screwed. The fact that some performers can do a rosebud is nothing new but they are now paid to do it so that means there was a demand. I know there is because Jay Sinn's thread at ADT includes people that love this stuff.
|
12-15-11 11:28am
|
Reply
2915
|
Prolapse Party
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
This is nothing because Mila used to do that in the 90's but she was one of the few since most other performers avoided doing this. What I think is even more importantly. There were very few people that wanted to see that in a movie so it was either never shot or got edited out but there are some pretty fucked up people watching porn these days because there are threads on another forum where guys love rosebuds and what every possible girl that does anal to do that.
I got an email to tell me about this site because it's owned by the same people that own brutal dildo, huge strapon lesbians and a slew of other similar sites and I'm one of their past member. I love watching anal but I certainly don't want to see a girl push out her anal cavity. On the plus side. I don't expect to see many videos on this site because there are still only a few girls willing or able to do something as stupid as this.
|
12-15-11 08:20am
|
Reply
2916
|
Prolapsequeen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
Although it requires possible customers to read that downloads aren't allowed. In their defense they at least have written in the section prior to the join page. That doesn't mean that some eager beaver isn't going to be sorely disappointed once he or she has paid her 30$ and discovers that their money is only going to be good for one month.
|
04-18-16 03:27pm
|
Reply
2917
|
Prostitute Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
Herman's Review
I am glad that you enjoyed it but the TBP review makes it clear that this is not a very good site. In fact it's borderline awful and it is a complete sham. You can believe that these are real prostitutes having sex with their customers but 2257 regulations means that you cannot release a video if you do not have the proper identification of each performers in those videos. The nature of prostitution is such that real names are usually to be avoided for fear of legal and marital repercussions.
|
09-21-14 05:13am
|
Reply
2918
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I believe that the P T producers would love to be able to do that but sadly the economics that govern the way they shoot porn are such that they are not given a budget large enough and probably never will.
That said I can't help but notice that sometime they don't know what they are doing and it as nothing to do with budget and everything to do with lack of talent behind the camera. That's a little bit less obvious with some of P T videos but glaring with Girlsway videos
|
01-28-18 11:27am
|
Reply
2919
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Thanks for the review. I applaud the producers attempt to shoot porn with a scenario because that is something that is sorely lacking in modern porn and I even appreciate their use of lenses that make the scenes look grittier/darker because it makes their stuff look less fake.
Where they kind of lose me is in the execution because ultimately the producers ultimate goal is to shoot a sex scene that happens to have a simple story and what they should instead be doing is shooting a simple story that will at some point include a sex scene. That means that they should concentrate a lot more time to the story part of the scene to the point where they do dry runs, multiple shots and maybe even 2 day shoots to make sure that the story is as good as the sex scene.
If anyone is a fan of this site and also likes lesbian porn than you should check out Girlsway because most of the videos on Girlsway are also produced by these people.
|
01-27-18 07:26pm
|
Reply
2920
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I avoided describing what I saw because I don't think a lot of what they do is S&M so much as trying to push the pain threshold of the various performers. I don't have a vagina so maybe I'm way off but the kind of things the women allow to get done to them is probably not medically recommended.
|
06-04-17 05:42pm
|
Reply
2921
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
I watched two of the previews and these aren't their most intense and in many ways I wish I hadn't done so because the images were more than enough.
|
06-03-17 06:18pm
|
Reply
2922
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Review
I can honestly say that there is not one single scene that I could watch for more than a few minutes(if that) because it is not the type of material that stimulates me. I only looked at maybe 7-8 pages worth of content but most of what I looked at made uncomfortable. It is definitely not hardcore. It is more like ultra extreme torture porn in nature. I know it's not really but it sure feels like it when you see the kind of things is done to the performers and the argument that they are willing participants doesn't make me feel any better.
I know they have a certain fan base willing to pay for it because I think they may be the only site that is still updating with that kind of content. Fetish Networks used to produce similar stuff but I think they stopped doing it half a dozen years ago.
It may not be my cup of tea but I'm sure some people will enjoy your review. Especially since yours is the only recent one.
|
06-03-17 11:15am
|
Reply
2923
|
Rage Story
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks Khan. I hope the owner does the decent thing and changes the members page to reflect their decision or someone else is likely to get charged for access to their claimed bonus sites. Their decision is likely to hurt them in the long run.
P.S: I'd love to know what he defines as older members since they have only been in business for a little more than 3 months.
|
06-22-11 08:02pm
|
Reply
2924
|
Rage Story
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I just tried again and it takes me to this page(see below link). http://sboe5brji8p.ragestory.com/members/goto.php?site=meetmysweet.com
In case the link doesn't work then I copy and pasted the info found on that page.
AS A SPECIAL GIFT FOR YOU:
CLICK HERE TO FREE ACCESS MeetMySweet.Com !
After 1 day, your meetmysweet.com free trial will recur at $29.95 if not canceled.
Already MeetMySweet.Com member? Click here to login
Contact Customer Support
Copyright © 2010 , FW Corporation Ltd.
As you can see it gives you 2 possibilities but only one of them as no money attached to it. I already made the mistake of taking option #1 and that cost me 1$ for a trial membership. I also tried option #2 by using my standard user name and password but they don't work. I sent their support staff a message yesterday and and this is the answer they have posted today:tBonus sites aren't included to the membership free of charge, but proposed for a discount trial price (1 USD instead of 2.95 USD).
|
06-20-11 01:55pm
|
Reply
2925
|
Rage Story
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I notice that rage story is scheduled for review by TBP this week so they will be able to verify this for themselves. I understand why TBP might not change any info they have on their site until they have verified it themselves. I still think that TBP and PU are the 2 best porn review sites on the net. I've seen enough review sites to know the difference.
The good thing about my review is that others will not waste their money on this site.
|
06-20-11 05:53am
|
