| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2801
|
Naughty At Home
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I think she is really hot but I didn't particularly enjoy her site.
The all POV/tripod stuff is not my thing. It's too bad that she never thought of getting a third person to shoot her having sex because I think she'd get a lot more traffic to her site. That's also why her little scenarios never worked for me because she was really only with her huasband in the videos.
|
07-28-12 05:28pm
|
Reply
2802
|
Naughty At Home
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
You have my review of last year which was a few months after she gad comeback and you also have TBP's which was done in February of this year.
|
07-28-12 05:13pm
|
Reply
2803
|
Naughty Julie
(0)
|
Reply of
charlesincharge's Reply
Maybe the info in the past was very different but based on looking at the most recent reviews done by other review sites and the comments on this site then my guess is that it has been more or less dead for many years.
The site had 134 videos in 2009 which was the last time TBP updated their info but the porn inspector reviewed the site in 2012 and they showed 157 videos and rabbits review says that last year she was back down to 144 videos. Basically that tells me that the site was not worth joining 3 years ago and why would it be different now
|
02-13-15 05:23pm
|
Reply
2804
|
Naughty Julie
(0)
|
Reply of
charlesincharge's Review
I'm kind of curious as to why you wanted to join a site like this one?
Was it because you had 30$ burning a hole in your pocket? I mean the one thing that TBP/PU is good for is make sure that we avoid joining sites that are obviously going to be a waste of time and a loss of important money that could be better used on decent sites. I noticed you posted a common on Rabbit's review so at least other people won't get fooled but I wonder if there was all that many people who were prior to you actually reviewing the site. I certainly don't remember hearing about this site.
|
02-12-15 05:48pm
|
Reply
2805
|
Naughty Webcams
(0)
|
Reply of
NoHagsHere's Reply
In this case I will say any relationship that is face to face and not through some kind of digital media.
|
12-16-13 04:21pm
|
Reply
2806
|
Naughty Webcams
(0)
|
Reply of
NoHagsHere's Reply
I'm aware that it's not for the sex because I do not believe that most guys would repeatedly get turned on by a porn girl playing with herself. If it wasn't for the implied personal relationship these girls develop with their customers then most guys would go elsewhere for their masturbation needs. I can see the appeal of having an attractive girl talking to you, calling you by name all the while she is playing with herself. If that makes someone happy then there is nothing really wrong with it. It's just that the relationship is not real and that's why it doesn't work for me.
|
12-15-13 05:58pm
|
Reply
2807
|
Naughty Webcams
(0)
|
Reply of
NoHagsHere's Reply
Maybe it's just me but I don't believe you can ever get your money's worth if you pay 50$ for a 10 minute cam show but you are getting robbed if you pay 130$ for that 10 minute cam show. I'd rather fly to Vegas book a pornstar escort and fuck her for 1000$ then pay 130$ so that I can jerk in front of my computer. Of course that's me and I've already said that I don't like cam shows.
|
12-10-13 06:02pm
|
Reply
2808
|
Naughty Webcams
(0)
|
Reply of
NoHagsHere's Reply
I don't think there's anything wrong with paying someone to talk to. My problem is with the amount they charge. I've heard that some well known stars charge at least 13$ a minute or more for their cam shows.
|
12-09-13 07:38am
|
Reply
2809
|
Naughty Webcams
(0)
|
Reply of
NoHagsHere's Reply
I avoid cam content like the plague because it does nothing sexual for me. I can see the appeal some people have with cam girls because the viewer gets a sort of personal connection with the girl/woman and that can be quite attractive to some people but not me.
Even if I was a fan then the sheer prices they charge makes this an impossible purchase for me. I'm not spending 2$ and likely more a minute to see a girl masturbate live for me. I don't care who it is and I also don't care what kind of show she puts out.
|
12-07-13 07:40am
|
Reply
2810
|
Naughty Webcams
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Thanks. The cam stuff is rather foreign to me so any insight is always appreciated. I can see the appeal that some people have with the chat part and strangely that is the one thing I'm not comfortable with so even if cam stuff was superior to what it is. then I would still stay away.
|
09-30-13 05:34pm
|
Reply
2811
|
Naughty Webcams
(0)
|
Reply of
NoHagsHere's Review
Can you answer a few questions for me and anyone else who will read your replies. I'm not a fan of cam sites as a rule but I think they are a great tool for any girl looking to do some extra cash so I'm not opposed to them in general.
1-How do the rates compare to other cam sites? If you haven't tried any others then simply give an average cost based on your experience.
2-Did you recognize some of the women on the site as being either ex-porn performers or girls that also cam on other similar sites?
3-Is there a lot of variety in the models? ie: Are they mostly all young white women in their late teens to early twenties?
4-Are the girls out to suck as much cash out of the customers by taking forever to get to the action?
5-What kind of things do most girls do on their cam shows?
|
09-28-13 05:21am
|
Reply
2812
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
nastytodd's Review
Could you give us more info on what's inside the site because the preview pages aren't worth anything. I'd love to know the average video length. What kind of action there is on the videos. What kind of resolution are offered for the videos.
This is the perfect example of a site I would never join because you can't tell what's inside until you have joined.
|
07-30-11 09:08am
|
Reply
2813
|
New X Positive
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I might be more inclined to recommend if the site was a little less expensive but it is 30$ and I didn't like the fact that Niki is on the first page of updates.
|
04-09-12 01:45pm
|
Reply
2814
|
New X Positive
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I actually don't care if the content is exclusif or not as long as the price is right. That's why I love teen mega world because they offer content available elsewhere but they offer it at 20$ and they do have some exclusif contetn as well.
The biggest problem with this site is that the content doesn't look very good and thre isn't much either.
|
04-09-12 06:02am
|
Reply
2815
|
New X Positive
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
If you want my opinion then I'd recommend you stay away from this site. Their claim of exclusif content makes me a little nervous and I recognize a couple of performers that are probably no longer doing porn so the content could be dated. It certainly looked dated in a couple of the preview pics.
Here is a partial list of the performers based on EBI.
http://www.eurobabeindex.com/modules/sea...tive.com%20%28web%29
|
04-05-12 10:08am
|
Reply
2816
|
Nicole Peters
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
She is an attractive woman so I can see why you might get distracted.
I don't think the difference in score makes too much of a difference since sites in the 60's are normally the ones to be avoided at all cost. The ones in the 50's are the same but the person feels even more cheated and/or is royally pissed.
You gave sufficient data that anyone curious will know whether it's worth trying or avoiding.
|
05-07-13 03:34am
|
Reply
2817
|
Nicole Peters
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
You are a generous man because I don't know if I could have given this site a score in the 60's. The preview section is pathetic so anyone thinking that the good content is inside would have to pay to discover that it isn't.
|
05-06-13 05:32pm
|
Reply
2818
|
Nitro Celebs
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Comment
They have a single preview page and it doesn't tell
you anything important about the content so that does not sound good. Add the fact that they offer a 1$ membership and I suspect that you will feel cheated out of that dollar if you join.
|
06-27-10 11:01am
|
Reply
2819
|
No Rest For The Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
I didn't see the scene but it wouldn't have appealed to me. I like anal sex but I don't really consider that sex as much as a circus act. There is no way that anyone involve in that scene enjoyed themselves. Just looking at it makes me feel uncomfortable. I prefer anal sex where the girl seems to be into it and there is no one that could act as though they enjoyed getting tripled penetrated.
I was shocked when I saw Verunka/Irenka/Sandra getting anal fisted.
I'd just discovered her and I'd only seen her do lez stuff before that scene.
http://www.norestfortheass.com/index.php...ofile.php&id=160
http://www.europornstar.com/Verunka/Verunka.html
|
02-02-10 06:50pm
|
Reply
2820
|
No Rest For The Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
The only ones out of the 9 site that are really not worth it are Interracial Eurobabes and Gags Girls. The first because there are only 7 videos videos and the other because that does not appeal to me at all. I will be reviewing a couple of the sites later today or tomorrow. The key point with these sites is that the sex is more extreme than in some others. A couple of the scenes in some of the sites involves face slapping and that's not my cup of tea. Regardless that the girl might enjoy that. I do not.
|
07-01-09 08:30am
|
Reply
2821
|
No Rest Network
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
I concur with your assement of the network and I also suggest to everyone that they wait at least 2 months before joining. The network stopped adding new content on Januray 2011 and kept the join price the same for over a year before coming back with some new stuff a month or 2 ago. That doesn't inspire me to put my hard earn money on them. I'd also like to add that they have already messed with some of the updates because they were suppose to upload some a couple of weeks ago but these were pushed back.
I'm pretty sure that the guy responsible for the bulk of their content is the same guy that shoots stuff for huge strapon lesbians, brutal fisting and brutal dildos. His shooting style and choice of meterail is all over that stuff.
|
07-02-12 05:46am
|
Reply
2822
|
No Rest Network
(0)
|
Reply of
owen's Comment
The director(maybe owner) responsible for the content on those sites is about to start releasing new content sometime in mid to late May on a site that will probably be called doublenalaction.com. I don't have any more info than this so I can't tell you if this will be a brand new stand alone site or if it will be added to the network.
|
04-28-12 07:22am
|
Reply
2823
|
Nubile Girls HD
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I know of at least 3 sites that lease/buy content from adult labs. Smackmybitch, lovelyteensmovies and hardcore youth. Of these I think smackmybitch has bought the most. The problem is that I think they have stopped doing it because I haven't seen a new update in months.
|
08-08-10 06:33pm
|
Reply
2824
|
Nubile Girls HD
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Another very good review. I wish they hadn't changed the names of many of the models but that's common for many of these sites. From what I can tell many of these videos can be found elsewhere. The quality may very be better here than on the other sites. If you like these models then take a look at the link. This is the studio that's responsible for a part of their content.
http://adultlabs.com/new_faces.php
|
08-08-10 02:45pm
|
Reply
2825
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks PinkPanther. I've visited nubile many times but I've never joined. I do enjoy watching anal and since they have such a high quality look to their vids then that would have been a plus. You are correct about the anal being fairly common, but sadly most sites that offer it just down't have the quality to go with it.
|
03-22-09 06:16pm
|
